Declining Incidence of Major Lower-Extremity Amputations in the Northern Danish Region Between 2016 and 2021: The Impact of Diabetes and Preventive Vascular Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Preventing lower-extremity amputations (LEAs) is pivotal. In the present study, we aimed to examine the recent trends in nontraumatic LEAs seen in the Northern Danish Region. METHODS: Using data from the regional Business Intelligence unit, we identified all nontraumatic LEAs (n = 689) performed in people above 50 years of age in the Northern Danish Region between January 2016 and December 2021 (approximately 600,000 inhabitants). Persons with diabetes (n = 26,025) were identified based on International Classification of Diseases-10 codes and data from the National Health Insurance Service Registry, while preventive vascular procedures (n = 1,097) were identified using surgical codes. Major LEA was defined as any amputation above the ankle. Incidence rates were expressed as events per 1,000 person-years. Trends were described as differences between the periods 2016-2018 and 2019-2021. RESULTS: A total of 249 (36%) major LEAs were performed in people with diabetes. People with diabetes were younger (71 vs 77 years, P < 0.001) and more frequently male (70% versus 54%, P < 0.001). Between 2016-2018 and 2019-2021, the incidence of major LEA declined from 1.76 (95% CI: 1.75-1.76) to 1.39 (1.39-1.39) in people with diabetes and from 0.47 (0.47-0.47) to 0.20 (0.20-0.20) in people without diabetes (all P < 0.001). Simultaneously, the incidence of preventive vascular surgery increased from 2.26 (2.26-2.26) to 3.48 (3.48-3.48) in people with diabetes and declined slightly in people without 0.49 (0.49-0.49) to 0.47 (0.47-0.47) (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant declines in major LEA in both people with and without diabetes, most of the decline was driven by a large reduction in major LEAs in people without diabetes.

Prevalence of painful and painless diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the Northern Danish Region: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes, yet varying estimates of its prevalence exist. The present study aimed to estimate a questionnaire-centered prevalence of painful and painless DPN in the Northern Danish Region, examine its geographical distribution within the region, and investigate associations between DPN and potential risk factors. METHODS: A questionnaire-based survey was sent to all persons living with diabetes in the Northern Danish Region using electronic mail. Persons with diabetes were identified using The National Health Insurance Service Registry. The survey included information on demographics, socioeconomics, municipality, diabetes type, duration, and treatment, as well as the validated questionnaires Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument-questionnaire (MNSIq) and the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4)-interview. Possible DPN was defined as an MNSIq-score ≥ 4, while possible painful DPN was defined as pain in both feet and a DN4-interview score ≥ 3. RESULTS: A total of 23,206 eligible people were identified as having diabetes and approximately 33 % answered all questionnaires. The prevalence of possible DPN was 23.3 % (95 % CI: 22.4-24.3 %), while the prevalence of possible painful DPN was 18.0 % (17.1-18.8 %). The prevalence of possible DPN ranged from 22.1 % to 35.0 % between municipalities, while the prevalence of possible painful DPN ranged from 15.6 % to 20.0 %. High body-mass index, long diabetes duration, insulin use, glucagon-like-peptide-1-analogue use, and low income were associated with increased risk of DPN. CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of possible painless and painful DPN emphasizes the need for better prevention and careful screening even in high-income countries.

Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice.

PURPOSE: To examine the real-world performance of a support vector machine learning software (RetinaLyze) in order to identify the possible presence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetes via software implementation in clinical practice. METHODS: 1001 eyes from 1001 patients-one eye per patient-participating in the Danish National Screening Programme were included. Three independent ophthalmologists graded all eyes according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale with the exact level of disease being determined by majority decision. The software detected DR and no DR and was compared to the ophthalmologists' gradings. RESULTS: At a clinical chosen threshold, the software showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 84.9% (95% CI: 81.8-87.9), 89.9% (95% CI: 86.8-92.7), 92.1% (95% CI: 89.7-94.4), and 81.0% (95% CI: 77.2-84.7), respectively, when compared to human grading. The results from the routine screening were 87.0% (95% CI: 84.2-89.7), 85.3% (95% CI: 81.8-88.6), 89.2% (95% CI: 86.3-91.7), and 82.5% (95% CI: 78.5-86.0), respectively. AUC was 93.4%. The reference graders Conger's Exact Kappa was 0.827. CONCLUSION: The software performed similarly to routine grading with overlapping confidence intervals, indicating comparable performance between the two groups. The intergrader agreement was satisfactory. However, evaluating the updated software alongside updated clinical procedures is crucial. It is therefore recommended that further clinical testing before implementation of the software as a decision support tool is conducted.

Long-term glucose-lowering effect of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring for type 1 diabetes patients in poor glycaemic control from Region North Denmark: An observational real-world cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Lowering glucose levels is a complex task for patients with type 1 diabetes, and they often lack contact with health care professionals. Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) has the potential to aid them with blood glucose management at home. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effect of isCGM on HbA1c in type 1 diabetes patients with poor glycaemic control in a region-wide real-world setting. METHODS: All patients with type 1 diabetes receiving an isCGM due to poor glycaemic control (≥70 mmol/mol [≥8.6%]) in the period of 2020-21 in Region North Denmark ("T1D-CGM") were compared with all type 1 diabetes patients without isCGM ("T1D-NOCGM") in the same period. A multiple linear regression model adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration and use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion was constructed to estimate the difference in change from baseline HbA1c between the two groups and within subgroups of T1D-CGM. RESULTS: A total of 2,527 patients (T1D-CGM: 897; T1D-NOCGM: 1,630) were included in the study. The estimated adjusted difference in change from baseline HbA1c between T1D-CGM vs T1D-NOCGM was -5.68 mmol/mol (95% CI: (-6.69 to -4.67 mmol/mol; p<0.0001)). Older patients using isCGM dropped less in HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that patients with type 1 diabetes in poor glycaemic control from Region North Denmark in general benefit from using isCGM with a sustained 24-month improvement in HbA1c, but the effect on HbA1c may be less pronounced for older patients.