Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 20(21): 4540-4546, 2016 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27874943

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of pathological bowel loops wall (pADC) with the ADC values of normal appearing ones (naADC) and to determine a discriminating threshold. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 60 patients were studied at our Institution through a MR-enterography that included free-breathing axial Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) with two b (0 and 800 s/mm2) after histological diagnosis of active Crohn's disease (CD). The one (when unique) or the best analyzable (when multiple) pathological bowel loop was identified in each patient, on the basis of the MRI features: wall thickness, presence of mural oedema and wall contrast enhancement after contrast medium administration. A normal appearing bowel loop was used for comparison. ADC values were measured in consensus by two radiologists, and they were compared with t-test. The ADC threshold value for the differentiation between pathological and normal appearing bowel loops was determined. RESULTS: The pADC values were significantly lower than the naADC values (1.48 ± 0.058 x 10-3 mm2/s versus 3.525 ± 0.07 x 10-3 mm2/s; p < 0.05). A threshold of 2.416 x 10-3 mm2/s showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the discrimination between normal and pathological bowel loops. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active CD the ADC values of the pathological bowel wall are significantly lower than those of normal appearing bowel loops. A threshold of ADC value of 2.416 10-3 mm2/s could discriminate normal from pathological bowel loops.


Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Intestines , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
J Oncol ; 2012: 481806, 2012.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22536238

Ovarian masses present a special diagnostic challenge when imaging findings cannot be categorized into benign or malignant pathology. Ultrasonography (US), Computed Tomography (CT), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are currently used to evaluate ovarian tumors. US is the first-line imaging investigation for suspected adnexal masses. Color Doppler US helps the diagnosis identifying vascularized components within the mass. CT is commonly performed in preoperative evaluation of a suspected ovarian malignancy, but it exposes patients to radiation. When US findings are nondiagnostic or equivocal, MRI can be a valuable problem solving tool, useful to give also surgical planning information. MRI is well known to provide accurate information about hemorrhage, fat, and collagen. It is able to identify different types of tissue contained in pelvic masses, distinguishing benign from malignant ovarian tumors. The knowledge of clinical syndromes and MRI features of these conditions is crucial in establishing an accurate diagnosis and determining appropriate treatment. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate MRI findings in neoplastic and non-neoplastic ovarian masses, which were assessed into three groups: cystic, solid, and solid/cystic lesions. MRI criteria for the correct diagnosis and characteristics for differentiating benign from malignant conditions are shown in this paper.

...