Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 4 de 4
2.
Br J Cancer ; 108(4): 951-8, 2013 Mar 05.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23403822

BACKGROUND: The molecular basis for the development of appendiceal mucinous tumours, which can be a cause of pseudomyxoma peritonei, remains largely unknown. METHODS: Thirty-five appendiceal mucinous neoplasms were analysed for GNAS and KRAS mutations. A functional analysis of mutant GNAS was performed using a colorectal cancer cell line. RESULTS: A mutational analysis identified activating GNAS mutations in 16 of 32 low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) but in none of three mucinous adenocarcinomas (MACs). KRAS mutations were found in 30 LAMNs and in all MACs. We additionally analysed a total of 186 extra-appendiceal mucinous tumours and found that GNAS mutations were highly prevalent in intraductal papillary mucinous tumours of the pancreas (88%) but were rare or absent in mucinous tumours of the colorectum, ovary, lung and breast (0-9%). The prevalence of KRAS mutations was quite variable among the tumours. The introduction of the mutant GNAS into a colorectal cancer cell line markedly induced MUC2 and MUC5AC expression, but did not promote cell growth either in vitro or in vivo. CONCLUSION: Activating GNAS mutations are a frequent and characteristic genetic abnormality of LAMN. Mutant GNAS might play a direct role in the prominent mucin production that is a hallmark of LAMN.


Appendiceal Neoplasms/genetics , GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gs/genetics , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Chromogranins , Female , Genes, ras , Humans , Male , Mice , Mice, Nude , Middle Aged , Mutation , Neoplasm Transplantation , Transplantation, Heterologous
3.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 5(1): 42-5, 2012 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22776343

INTRODUCTION: The pluck and stripping techniques are used for lower ureter management in renal pelvic cancer patients. Herein, we report our experience of extracorporeal ligation of the ureter and the ureteral catheter through the trocar port, which differs from conventional laparoscopic ligation in the retroperitoneal space. This technique was selected to reduce the time needed for ureter management using the stripping technique and to provide secure ligation. MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: We performed this stripping technique in patients with T1 and T2 stage renal pelvic cancer without imaging-evident lymph node metastasis. After transurethrally placing a ureteral catheter, we resected the circumference of the ureteral orifice. After laparoscopic nephrectomy via a retroperitoneal approach, the ureteral catheter and distal ureter were ligated extracorporeally. The catheter was pulled to invaginate the ureter so it could then be pulled through the external urethral orifice. DISCUSSION: This technique of extracorporeal ligation ensures more a secure ligation of the ureter and ureteral catheter. This modified stripping technique does not require lower ureter management with laparotomy, and it is also useful in shortening the operative time. This method is effective for relatively early stage renal pelvic cancer.


Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Kidney Pelvis/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Nephrectomy/methods , Ureter/surgery , Humans , Kidney Pelvis/pathology , Laparoscopy/instrumentation , Ligation , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrectomy/instrumentation , Retroperitoneal Space , Urinary Catheters
...