The Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of HER2-Low Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Between HER2-Low and HER2-Zero Subtypes.

BACKGROUND: HER2-low breast cancer (BC) is a newly defined subset of HER2-negative BC. However, it is still uncertain whether HER2-low BC can be categorized as a distinct biological/clinical subgroup with any prognostic significance. METHODS: Invasive BC cases (n = 10,215) with Stage I-III were retrospectively analyzed to determine the HER2 status. The HER2 status was then divided into 3 groups: HER2-0, HER2-low, and HER2-positive. RESULTS: The HER2 status was classified as HER2-0 in 1,227 cases (12.0%), HER2-low in 7,209 cases (70.6%), and HER2-positive in 1779 cases (17.4%). HER2-low cases had more positive nodes and were significantly associated with positive ER/PgR, lower nuclear grade, and lower Ki-67 index. HER2-0 had the lowest OS rate in the primary cases and after recurrence. HER2-0 in the node positive group had the lowest OS and was significantly different from HER2-low in the same group. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate for NAC was lowest in the HER2-low group. The DFS after NAC was significantly better in all the pCR cases, regardless of the HER2 status. However, the DFS was significantly lower in the HER2-low non-pCR cases. CONCLUSION: HER2-low accounted for 70% of the cases and correlated with favorable biological markers. The HER2-low group had a significantly better OS than the HER2-0 group. However, the response to NAC was low in the HER2-low group, and this group had the poorest prognosis among all the non-pCR cases. These findings indicate that HER2-low may have a different biology and prognosis and therefore should be classified as a new entity.

A prospective analysis of two studies that used the 5-mm interval slices and 5-mm margin-free method for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy is one of standard treatments for early breast cancer. However, it is regarded as an option to treat elderly patients with small hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery and hormone therapy without radiotherapy. We conducted two sequential prospective studies to examine the feasibility of breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy since 2002 and present the results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Primary female breast cancer patients who fulfilled the strict eligibility criteria were prospectively enrolled in two sequential studies named WORTH 1 and 2. The surgical materials were sliced in 5-mm intervals and all slices were examined microscopically. Postoperative radiotherapy was not allowed, but tamoxifen or anastrozole was administered for 5 years. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR)-free survival was the primary outcome. RESULTS: The data of the two studies were combined (N = 321). The median follow-up period for IBTR was 94 months (4-192 months). Only three patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5- and 10-year IBTR-free rates were 97.0% and 90.5%, respectively. The age at operation and PR status affected IBTR rates independently. When we calculated IBTR-free rates of patients who were 65 years of age or older at the time of surgery and had PR-positive tumors, the 5- and 10-year IBTR rates were both 98.4%. CONCLUSIONS:  Our "5-mm-thick slice and 5-mm free-margin" method may be effective to select patients who can be treated by breast-conserving surgery and hormone therapy without radiotherapy.

Health-related quality of life and estimation of the minimally important difference in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptom score in postmenopausal ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with low sensitivity to endocrine therapy.

BACKGROUND: The HORSE-BC study previously demonstrated that second-line endocrine therapy (ET) for patients with acquired endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC) still provided a clinically meaningful benefit. Herein, we investigated the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in the HORSE-BC study. METHODS: Patients with acquired endocrine-resistant MBC who were scheduled for second-line ET were recruited. The HRQOL was assessed at baseline, and 1 and 3 months after second-line ET initiation. To investigate the minimally important difference (MID) in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES), we evaluated the means and standard deviations for the distribution-based method, and differences in the change in HRQOL for the anchor-based method. We also investigated the association between FACT-ES total scores and clinical benefit. RESULTS: Overall, 56 patients were enrolled. Of these, 47 were analyzed. When defined as 1/3 standard deviation estimates based on the distribution method, the calculated MID was 5.9. The MIDs of the FACT-ES total scores based on the anchor method were 7.7 for decline and 4.1 for improvement. The MID decline proportions were 6.1% and 14.7% lower in patients who experienced clinical benefits than in those who did not at 1 and 3 months, respectively. The ratios of MID improvement in patients who experienced clinical benefits were 18.3% and 3.2% higher, respectively; the mean change in the FACT-ES total score from baseline improved in patients who experienced clinical benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining the HRQOL as determined by FACT-ES may be associated with clinical benefits in patients with acquired endocrine-resistant MBC treated with ET.

An evaluation of lymphovascular invasion in relation to biology and prognosis according to subtypes in invasive breast cancer.

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is associated with a poor outcome in breast cancer. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical significance of LVI in primary breast cancer and to investigate disease-free survival as a prognostic marker according to the breast cancer subtypes. This study examined 4,652 consecutive cases of invasive breast cancer excluding the patients with non-invasive cancer, stage IV and those who underwent neo-adjuvant therapy from February 2002 to February 2021. The clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of LVI-positive and -negative tumors were compared. LVI was evaluated in H&E staining specimens from surgically resected samples. The LVI expression rates were 29.2% (low, 19.7%; high, 9.5%) in all primary cases. The LVI-positive rate was significantly associated with specimens with the following characteristics: ER/PgR-negative, HER2-positive, p53 overexpression, higher Ki-67 index values, higher nuclear grade, positive nodes and larger tumors. Moreover, the subtypes were significantly associated with LVI positivity; 20% in Luminal A, 34.6% in Luminal B, 40.9% in Lumina/HER2, 38.1% in HER2-enriched and 29.8% in triple negative (TN). There were significant differences in disease-free survival between LVI status in Luminal A, Luminal B and TN subtypes, but there was no difference in the Luminal/HER2 and HER2-enriched subtypes. A multivariate analysis revealed that LVI was a significant factor in Luminal B and TN subtypes. Overall, LVI was significantly associated with the advanced and aggressive characteristics in breast cancer. Luminal A type had a lower LVI rate, and HER2 type had a higher LVI rate. Moreover, LVI was a significant prognostic factor in Luminal B and TN subtypes. These data suggested that the LVI status was useful in predicting the prognosis in HER2 negative breast cancer cases.

Triple Negative Breast Cancer: An Analysis of the Subtypes and the Effects of Menopausal Status on Invasive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer which lacks hormone receptor (HR) expression and HER2 gene amplification and is the most aggressive subtype, with a heterogeneous genetic profile. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical significance of menopausal status in breast cancer cases with TNBC. METHODS: Primary breast cancer patients who underwent curative surgery were enrolled in this retrospective study. A total of 5153 invasive breast cancer cases with Stage I-III were analyzed. The distribution of cases according to the menopausal status and subtypes was investigated and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were compared between pre- and postmenopausal TNBC patients. RESULTS: TNBC was frequently seen in postmenopausal patients and Luminal B and Luminal/HER2 subtypes were more common in premenopausal patients. There was no difference in DFS in the Luminal A/B and HER2 subtypes, but a significant difference was seen in the TNBC patients. Premenopausal patients with TNBC frequently had an overexpression of the p53 protein, a significantly higher Ki-67 index value, and a higher nuclear grade. A multivariate analysis revealed that menopausal status, nodal status, and tumor size were significant factors for DFS in TNBC cases. CONCLUSION: Menopausal status significantly correlates with breast cancer subtypes. TNBC was often seen in postmenopausal patients and these patients tend to have more favorable factors and a better DFS than premenopausal patients. These findings suggest that menopausal status is an important factor for evaluating biology and prognosis in TNBC cases.

Anthracycline-containing regimens or taxane versus S-1 as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated S-1 is non-inferior to taxane with respect to overall survival as first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. We aimed to confirm whether S-1 is also non-inferior to anthracycline-containing regimens in the same setting. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, non-inferiority, Phase 3 study. Individuals who had HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, had received no chemotherapy for advanced disease and had endocrine therapy resistance, were randomly assigned to the anthracycline-containing regimens or S-1. The primary endpoint was overall survival. A pre-planned combined analysis of our two Phase 3 studies was also carried out. RESULTS: We enrolled 230 patients (anthracycline, n = 115; S-1, n = 115). Median overall survival was 30.1 months (95% CI 24.9-35.8) with the S-1 group and 33.7 months (95% CI 25.5-36.9) with the anthracycline group. The HR for the anthracycline group was 1.09 (95% CI 0.80-1.48). The combined analysis constituted 814 patients (395 assigned to standard treatment (anthracycline or taxane); 419 assigned to S-1). Median overall survival was 36.3 months in the standard treatment group and 32.7 months in the S-1 group. S-1 was non-inferior to standard treatment in terms of overall survival (HR 1.06 (95% CI 0.90-1.25); P non-inferiority = 0.0062). CONCLUSIONS: S-1 could be considered a new treatment option for first-line chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The University Hospital Medical Information Network, Japan: UMIN000005449. This trial was registered on 15 April, 2011.

A Correlation Analysis Between Metabolism-related Genes and Treatment Response to S-1 as First-line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: The SELECT BC-EURECA Study.

INTRODUCTION: The previous randomized phase 3 trial (SELECT BC) showed that S-1 as a first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is non-inferior to taxane with respect to overall survival. This study aimed to identify the usefulness of metabolism-related genes as predictive biomarkers for the response to S-1 compared with taxane using tumor tissue samples from the previous trial.   PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this SELECT BC-EURECA study, 147 patients with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative MBC who received either S-1 or taxane were evaluated. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens were collected, and 14 genes involved in the pyrimidine metabolic pathway, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, Ki67, and beta-tubulin were measured using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in microdissected tumor specimens. The expression of each gene was categorized as low, intermediate, and high by tertile values.   RESULTS: Interaction tests to identify biomarkers for the response to S-1 compared with taxane, revealed the following as the top 3 biomarkers: RRM1 (P value = 0.24), GGH (P value = 0.25), and MTHFR (P value = 0.28). In the S-1 group, lower GGH and higher MTHFR expression were significantly correlated with better time to treatment failure. In the taxane group, there was no gene that was identified as a significant indicator of treatment failure. CONCLUSION: This biomarker analysis from SELECT BC did not identify any predictive biomarkers for the response to S-1 compared with taxane. Future studies with larger sample size and information on not only mRNA, but also protein and DNA for broad functional analyses are needed.

The impact of neoadjuvant systemic therapy on breast conservation rates in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer: Surgical results from a phase II randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) induces tumor shrinkage and boosts the chance of breast-conserving thearpy (BCT) in patients with breast cancer. However, only a few trials have evaluated the effect of NST in conversion from BCT ineligibility to BCT eligibility in HER2-positive breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted the surgical sub-study of a phase II randomized trial, which compared standard neoadjuvant treatment or an experimental treatment modified according to the interim Ki-67 evaluation in women with stage II or III HER2-positive breast cancer. The treating surgeons assessed eligibility for BCT before and after NST. We evaluated the change in BCT eligibility following NST. We also analyzed the type of surgery performed and the success rate of BCT. RESULTS: Two hundred six patients were included in this study. Of these, 44.0% were considered BCT candidates at baseline, while 69.8% were deemed eligible for BCT after NST (P < 0.001). Among non-BCT candidates at baseline, 46% successfully converted to BCT candidates. Of 139 patients deemed eligible for BCT following NST, 84.2% attempted BCT, and successful BCT, defined as tumor-free at all surgical margins, was achieved in 96.8% of patients. Different treatment arms did not affect the rate of post-NST BCT eligibility (70.0% vs 69.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that NST resulted in an absolute increase of 25.8% in the rate of BCT eligibility in HER2-positive breast cancer. About a half of non-BCT candidates converted to BCT candidates. BCT was successful in most patients who attempted BCT. There were still patients who chose mastectomy even though they were deemed eligible for BCT. Patients considered BCT-ineligible due to large tumor size most likely converted to BCT-eligible with NST. On the other hand, NST had less impact on the surgical indication of patients with multicentric disease or probable poor cosmetic outcome.

Palbociclib-letrozole as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer: Updated results from a Japanese phase 2 study.

Palbociclib is a highly selective, reversible, oral inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 that is approved to treat hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. An open-label, single-arm, Japanese phase 2 study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line treatment in 42 postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. The probability of progression-free survival originally reported at 1 year was 75.0% (90% confidence interval, 61.3-84.4), but median progression-free survival was not attained at the primary analysis. In this report, updated efficacy and safety results with a longer follow-up period are presented. The median duration of treatment in the updated analysis was 33.0 months (range, 1.8-49.2). The probability of progression-free survival at 1 year was 75.6% (90% confidence interval, 62.4-84.7). Median progression-free survival was 35.7 months (95% confidence interval, 21.7-46.7). Objective response rate and disease control rate were 47.6% (95% confidence interval, 32.0-63.6) and 85.7% (95% confidence interval, 71.5-94.6), respectively. Common treatment-related adverse events (all grades; grade 3/4) were neutropenia (100%; 93%), leukopenia (83%; 60%), and stomatitis (76%; 0%). Treatment-related febrile neutropenia was reported in one patient. In general, no clinically meaningful deterioration in health-related quality of life was observed. Palbociclib plus letrozole remained effective and tolerable in Japanese postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer in this updated analysis.

The efficacy of sequential second-line endocrine therapies (ETs) in postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients with lower sensitivity to initial ETs.

PURPOSE: Second-line endocrine therapy (ET) for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is offered based on the response to first-line ET. However, no clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of secondary ETs in patients with poor responses to initial ET. This study evaluated the efficacy of second-line ET in ER-positive and HER2-negative postmenopausal MBC patients with low or very low sensitivity to initial ET. METHODS: This multicenter prospective observational cohort study evaluated the response of 49 patients to second-line ETs in postmenopausal MBC patients with low or very low sensitivity to initial ET. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 49 patients assessed, 40 (82%) received fulvestrant in the second line, 5 (10%) received selective estrogen receptor modulators, 3 (6%) received aromatase inhibitors (AIs) alone, and 1 received everolimus with a steroidal AI. The overall CBR was 44.9% [90% confidence interval (CI): 34.6-57.6, p = 0.009]; CBR demonstrated similar significance across the progesterone receptor-positive (n = 39, 51.3%, 90% CI: 39.6-65.2, p = 0.002), very low sensitivity (n = 17, 58.8%, 90% CI: 42.0-78.8, p = 0.003), and non-visceral metastases (n = 25, 48.0%, 90% CI: 34.1-65.9, p = 0.018) groups. The median progression-free survival was 7.1 months (95% CI: 5.6-10.6). CONCLUSION: Second-line ET might be a viable treatment option for postmenopausal patients with MBC with low and very low sensitivity to initial ET. Future studies based on larger and independent cohorts are needed to validate these findings.

Ki-67 response-guided preoperative chemotherapy for HER2-positive breast cancer: results of a randomised Phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of a therapeutic strategy that switches chemotherapy, based on Ki-67 tumour expression after initial therapy, relative to that of standard chemotherapy, has not been evaluated. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to the control arm or the Ki-67 response-guided arm (Ki-67 arm). Primary tumour biopsies were obtained before treatment, and after three once-weekly doses of paclitaxel and trastuzumab to assess the interim Ki-67 index. In the control arm, paclitaxel and trastuzumab were continued for a total of 12 doses, regardless of the interim Ki-67 index. In the Ki-67 arm, subsequent treatment was based on the interim Ki-67 index. Ki-67 early responder is defined as the absolute Ki-67 value that was <10%, and the percentage of Ki-67-positive tumour cells was reduced by >30% compared with before treatment. Early Ki-67 responders continued to receive the same treatment, while early Ki-67 non-responders were switched to epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS: A total of 237 patients were randomised. There was almost linear correlation between the Ki-67 reduction rate at interim assessment and the pCR rate. The pCR rate in Ki-67 early non-responders in the Ki-67 arm was inferior to that in the control arm (44.1%; 31.4-56.7; P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The standard chemotherapy protocol remains as the recommended strategy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN-CTR as UMIN000007074.

Outcomes of trastuzumab therapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer patients: extended follow-up of JBCRG-cohort study 01.

BACKGROUND: Previous large trials of trastuzumab (TZM) demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. However, its effectiveness and safety in Japanese patients is not yet clear. Recently, new anti-HER2 agents were developed to improve treatment outcomes, but the patient selection criteria remain controversial. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of TZM therapy as perioperative therapy for HER2-positive operable breast cancer in daily clinical practice and to create a recurrence prediction model for therapeutic selection. METHODS: An observational study was conducted in Japan (UMIN000002737) to observe the prognosis of women (n = 2024) with HER2-positive invasive breast cancer who received TZM for stage I-III C disease between July 2009 and June 2011. Moreover, a recurrence-predicting model was designed to evaluate the risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS: The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 88.9 (95% CI 87.5-90.3%) and 82.4% (95% CI 79.2-85.6%), respectively. The 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96% (95% CI 95.1-96.9%) and 92.7% (95% CI 91.1-94.3%), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the risk factors for recurrence were an age of ≥ 70 years, T2 or larger tumors, clinically detected lymph node metastasis, histological tumor diameter of > 1 cm, histologically detected lymph node metastasis (≥ n2), and the implementation of preoperative treatment. The 5-year recurrence rate under the standard treatment was estimated to be > 10% in patients with a score of 3 or greater on the recurrence-predicting model. CONCLUSION: The recurrence-predicting model designed in this study may improve treatment selection of patients with stage I-III C disease. However, further studies are needed to validate the scores generated by this model.

Microsatellite instability in Japanese female patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: It is important to identify biomarkers for triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). Recently, pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), was approved as a treatment strategy for unresectable or metastatic tumor with high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficiency, such as malignant melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell cancer and urothelial cancer. In addition, results from clinical trials suggested that ICI was a promising treatment for TNBCs with accumulated mutations. However, the frequency of MSI in Japanese TNBCs still remains unclear. We aimed to analyze the presence of MSI-H in TNBCs as a biomarker for ICI therapy. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the MSI of 228 TNBCs using an innovative method, MSI Analysis System Version 1.2 (Promega), consisting of 5 microsatellite markers: BAT-26, NR-21, BAT-25, MONO-27 and NR-24 without a normal tissue control. RESULTS: Among 228 tumors, 222 (97.4%) were microsatellite stable, 4 (1.7%) low-frequency MSI and 2 (0.9%) MSI-H, respectively. Two MSI-H tumors were potentially aggressive pathologically as indicated by nuclear grade 3 and high Ki-67 (> 30%), and were classified as basal-like and non-BRCA-like, but were not consistent regarding tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, CD8 and PD-L1 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Although we found that MSI-H was uncommon (0.9%) in TNBCs, potential targets for ICIs exist in TNBCs. Therefore, MSI-H breast cancer patients should be picked up using not only conventional methods but also platforms for comprehensive genomic profiling.

CYP2D6 Genotype-Guided Tamoxifen Dosing in Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (TARGET-1): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase II Study.

PURPOSE: In patients taking tamoxifen, the CYP2D6 genotype causes different exposure of active metabolite endoxifen. The objective of this randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II study was to prospectively evaluate whether CYP2D6 genotype-guided tamoxifen dosing in patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer could have an impact on the clinical outcome. METHODS: Patients who needed first-line tamoxifen therapy were enrolled. Based on individual CYP2D6 genotype, patients heterozygous (wild type [wt]/variant [V]) or homozygous (V/V) for variant alleles of decreased or no function were randomly assigned to receive tamoxifen at an increased dose (ID arm; 40 mg daily) or regular dose (RD arm; 20 mg daily), and patients homozygous for wild-type alleles (wt/wt) received tamoxifen at 20 mg daily. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. The secondary endpoints included PFS and correlation of Z-endoxifen concentration with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Between December 2012 and July 2016, 186 patients were enrolled in Japan. Of 184 evaluable patients, 136 carried wt/V or V/V (ID arm, 70; RD arm, 66), and 48 carried wt/wt. PFS rates at 6 months were not significantly different between the ID and RD arms (67.6% v 66.7%). The serum trough concentrations of Z-endoxifen in the ID arm were significantly higher than those in the RD arm (median, 89.2 nM v 51.1 nM; P < .0001) and were also higher compared with wt/wt patients (72.0 nM; P = .045). No significant difference in Z-endoxifen concentrations was observed between patients with disease progression and those who were progression free at 6 months (P = .43). CONCLUSION: In patients with CYP2D6-variant alleles, increasing tamoxifen dosing did not achieve a higher PFS rate at 6 months. The CYP2D6 genotype solely cannot explain individual variability in the efficacy of tamoxifen.

T-bet+ lymphocytes infiltration as an independent better prognostic indicator for triple-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: T-box transcription factor 21 (T-bet), which is the master regulator of effector T-cell activation, is derived by stimulation of T-cell receptors. In this study, we focused on T-bet and examined the function of activated T cells. METHODS: This study included 242 patients with primary triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who underwent resection without neoadjuvant chemotherapy between January 2004 and December 2014. The immunohistochemistry scoring for CD8 and T-bet expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was defined as ≥ 30 per 6.25 × 10-3 mm2. RESULTS: Of the 242 TNBC cases, CD8 was positively expressed in 127 (52.5%) tumors, and T-bet was positively expressed in 67 (27.7%) tumors. T-bet expression was significantly correlated with CD8 expression (p < 0.0001). Patients with T-bet+ tumors had longer overall survival (OS) compared with patients with T-bet- tumors (p = 0.047). The combination of CD8+ and T-bet+ was associated with a better recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS compared to CD8+/T-bet- tumors (p = 0.037 and p = 0.024, respectively). Adjuvant chemotherapy provided significantly greater benefit to patients with T-bet+ tumors (p = 0.031 for RFS, p = 0.0003 for OS). Multivariate analysis revealed that T-bet expression on TILs was an independent and positive prognostic indicator (HR = 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.94, p = 0.037 for RFS, HR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.07-0.95, p = 0.039 for OS). CONCLUSIONS: OS was significantly improved for patients with high T-bet-expressing TILs in TNBC. Thus, T-bet may be a predictive indicator for survival and various immunotherapy strategies in TNBC.

Participants in a randomized controlled trial had longer overall survival than non-participants: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: While some studies show improved outcomes in clinical trial participants as compared to non-participants, existence of such a trial effect has not been proved precisely. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study to compare the prognoses for participants in the randomized controlled trial (SELECT BC) and non-participants. SELECT BC compared S-1 and taxane as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. Non-participants were all patients who met the eligibility criteria of SELECT BC and who had been requested to participate in that trial by attending doctors and declined. The study aimed to compare the prognoses between participants and non-participants. The primary endpoint was median overall survival. RESULTS: The median OS in participants was significantly superior to that in non-participants with a statistically significant difference (36.8 months vs. 25.2 months. HR 1.48, p = 0.022). A similar result was obtained when only patients who received the same chemotherapy (S-1 or taxane) used in SELECT BC after declining participation were assumed as non-participants (36.8 months vs. 22.0 months. HR 2.03, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This study may suggest the existence of a trial effect, in which, for a given treatment, participation in a clinical trial is associated with a better outcome.

Ki-67 index value and progesterone receptor status can predict prognosis and suitable treatment in node-negative breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative tumors.

Gene profiling has identified at least 4 breast cancer subtypes, including Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-enriched and basal-like, and immunohistochemistry is used as a guide to determine these subtypes. In the present study, patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative and negative nodes were classified into 4 groups according to the PgR and the Ki-67 status and were retrospectively examined. The analysis was based on the clinicopathological findings, and includes the recurrence score (RS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. Patients with invasive breast cancer (n=1866) were classified as LA (high PgR/low Ki-67), LB-1 (high PgR/high Ki-67), LB-2 (low PgR/high Ki-67), and LB-3 (low PgR/low Ki-67). In addition, 41 of the cases underwent a 21-gene expression assay. The data revealed that T1 tumors were more prevalent in the LA group and rare in the LB-2 group. Furthermore, nuclear grade 3 and p53 overexpression was revealed to be significantly correlated with LB-2. In terms of prognosis, LA had a significantly more favorable DFS; however, no differences were observed in the LB-3 group. LB-2 had a significantly worse DFS in all cases, and in the cases administered with endocrine therapy alone. Chemotherapy in combination with endocrine therapy was administered to cases with a higher risk of recurrence. In the LB-2 group, there was no difference in the DFS rates between the cases with endocrine therapy and chemo-endocrine therapy. These findings suggest that chemotherapy could improve the DFS in the LB-2 group. In addition, the majority of cases with LA, LB-3 and LB-1 had a RS of ≤25 and the majority of the LB-2 cases had a RS of >25. The patients with LA and LB-3 had a favorable DFS even in the group that received endocrine therapy alone. LB-2 was significantly correlated with a higher degree of malignancy and benefited from chemotherapy. These data suggest that the PgR and the Ki-67 status are effective in predicting prognosis, and for deciding on the most effective treatment strategy in patients with breast cancer.

Palbociclib in combination with letrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: PALOMA-2 subgroup analysis of Japanese patients.

BACKGROUND: In PALOMA-2, palbociclib-letrozole significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo-letrozole in women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in the first-line setting. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of palbociclib in Japanese women in PALOMA-2. METHODS: In this phase 3 study, 666 postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- ABC were randomized 2:1 to palbociclib (125 mg/day [3 weeks on/1 week off]) plus letrozole (2.5 mg daily) or placebo plus letrozole. A prespecified, exploratory, subgroup analysis of Japanese patients (n = 46) was conducted to compare results with those of the overall population. RESULTS: At the February 26, 2016 cutoff, median PFS among the 46 Japanese patients was 22.2 months (95%CI, 13.6‒not estimable) with palbociclib-letrozole vs 13.8 months (5.6‒22.2) with placebo-letrozole (hazard ratio, 0.59 [95%CI, 0.26-1.34]). The most common adverse events (AEs) were hematologic and more frequent among Japanese patients than the overall population (neutropenia: 93.8% [87.5% grade 3/4] vs 79.5% [66.4%]; leukopenia: 62.5% [43.8%] vs 39.0% [24.8%]); no Japanese patients had febrile neutropenia. Palbociclib dose reductions due to toxicity (mainly neutropenia) were more common in Japanese patients (62.5% vs 36.0%); few permanently discontinued due to AEs. Although mean palbociclib trough concentration was higher in Japanese patients vs non-Asians (95.4 vs 61.7 ng/mL), the range of individual values of the Japanese patients was within that of non-Asians. CONCLUSIONS: These results from PALOMA-2 suggest that palbociclib-letrozole merits consideration as a first-line treatment option for postmenopausal Japanese patients with ER+/HER2‒ ABC. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01740427.

Palbociclib in combination with letrozole as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer: A Japanese phase II study.

This single-arm, open-label, phase II study in 42 Japanese postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer evaluated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of first-line palbociclib (125 mg once daily, 3 weeks on/1 week off) coadministered with letrozole (2.5 mg once daily). Primary endpoint of investigator-assessed 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) probability was 75.0% (90% CI, 61.3%-84.4%), far surpassing the 40% lower limit of the 90% CI supporting efficacy. Median duration of treatment was 438 days. Among secondary efficacy measures, median PFS was not reached (95% CI, 16.7: not estimable), 17/42 patients (40.5%) had an objective response, 36/42 (85.7%) maintained disease control, and 27/42 (64.3%) remained in follow-up. Median overall survival was not reached, and 1-year survival probability was 92.9% (95% CI, 79.5%-97.6%). Results of intensive pharmacokinetics in a subset of 6 patients showed palbociclib steady-state mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval [τ] and mean maximum plasma concentration were 1979 ng·h/mL and 124.7 ng/mL, respectively. For day 15 plasma samples from cycles 1 and 2, geometric mean of the within-patient mean trough concentration was 90.1 ng/mL. The most common treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (100%) and stomatitis (73.8%). There was 1 case of treatment-related febrile neutropenia. Toxicities were generally tolerated and manageable by dose modifications and/or medical care. Efficacy and safety of first-line palbociclib plus letrozole therapy is supported in Japanese postmenopausal patients with treatment-naive ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

Role of HER2-Related Biomarkers (HER2, p95HER2, HER3, PTEN, and PIK3CA) in the Efficacy of Lapatinib plus Capecitabine in HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Refractory to Trastuzumab.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-related biomarkers and the treatment outcomes using lapatinib plus capecitabine (LC) and to evaluate the influence of the estrogen receptor (ER) status in trastuzumab-refractory HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. METHOD: Eighty patients were enrolled in this study. Total HER2, p95HER2, and total HER3 expression were quantified using the VeraTag assays. PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) and p95 expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry and PIK3CA mutation using direct sequencing. RESULTS: The response rate to LC was 30%, clinical benefit rate was 51.3%, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 174.5 days. ER negativity significantly correlated with higher HER2 and p95HER2. The lower HER2 and PIK3CA mutations were often observed in the nonresponders. A high p95HER2 expression correlated with longer PFS especially in the high HER2- and ER-positive cases. Patients without the PIK3CA mutation showed longer PFS in the same subset. Overall survival after LC significantly correlated with the number of recurrence organs. CONCLUSION: LC therapy is effective in trastuzumab-refractory HER2-positive breast cancer. Moreover, the biomarker expression differed depending on ER status, and a high p95HER2 expression and wild-type PIK3CA gene correlated with longer PFS especially in the ER-positive cases.