Myeloperoxidase to high-density lipoprotein ratio: Potential predictor of severity and outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: As a new marker of inflammation and lipid metabolism, the ratio of myeloperoxidase to high density lipoprotein (MPO/HDL) has been reported in the field of cardiovascular disease. However, the effect of MPO/HDL on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is not clear. The purpose of this study was to explore the prognostic value of MPO/HDL level in patients with AIS. METHODS: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 363 patients diagnosed with AIS. Stroke severity was assessed by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The short-term functional outcome was evaluated with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 90 days after admission. Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between MPO/HDL and NIHSS scores. The predictive value of MPO, HDL and MPO/HDL to AIS was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). RESULTS: The level of MPO/HDL in patients with NIHSS score ≥ 4 was significantly higher than that in patients with NIHSS score < 4 (P < 0.001). MPO and MPO/HDL were positively correlated with NIHSS score (P < 0.001), while HDL was negatively correlated with NIHSS score (P < 0.001). During 90-day follow-up, multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that increased MPO/HDL levels were associated with 90-day functional outcomes. ROC showed that compared with MPO and HDL, MPO/HDL had the highest predictive value for 90-day functional prognosis in patients with AIS (AUC = 0.9825). CONCLUSION: The level of serum MPO/HDL may be potential prognostic biomarker in AIS 90 days.

Risk factors for anxiety in patients with epilepsy: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a very common neurological disease, and it is important to focus on both controlling seizures and alleviating the psychological problems associated with this disease.Anxiety is an important risk factor for epilepsy and seriously affects the quality of life of patients with epilepsy (PWE). However, several risk factors for anxiety in PWE are relatively controversial and understudied. This meta-analysis was performed to identify potential risk factors for anxiety in PWE with the aim of reducing the incidence of anxiety and improving the quality of life among the individuals. METHOD: The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to July 2023 to find eligible original English studies. All the search results were reviewed based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria. We calculated the combined odds ratios (ORs), standard mean differences (SMDs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the effect of the included risk factors on anxiety in PWE. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies involving 5,403 PWE were ultimately included. The pooled results of our meta-analysis showed that female sex (OR = 1.67; 95 % CI: 1.30,2.15; p < 0.001), unmarried/divorced/widowed (OR = 0.83; 95 % CI: 0.72,0.96; p = 0.011), low socioeconomic status (OR = 0.47; 95 % CI: 0.33,0.67; p < 0.001), education levels below high school (OR = 1.74; 95 % CI: 1.36,2.23; p < 0.001), a history of trauma (OR = 2.53; 95 % CI: 1.69,3.78; p < 0.001), monotherapy (OR = 0.49; 95 % CI: 0.39,0.62; p < 0.001), AED-induced psychiatric side effects (OR = 2.45; 95 % CI: 1.20,4.98); p = 0.014), depression (OR = 5.45 95 % CI: 2.49,11.94; p < 0.001), a history of suicide (OR = 3.56; 95 % CI: 1.72,7.38; p = 0.001), and illness-related shame (OR = 2.76; 95 % CI: 2.17,3.52; p < 0.001) were risk factors for anxiety. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that female, unmarried, low socioeconomic status, education level below senior high school, a history of trauma, monotherapy, AED-induced psychiatric side effects, depression, a history of suicide, and shame were risk factors for anxiety in PWE. However, further research is needed to determine the effect of other potential risk factors on anxiety in PWE. In addition, most of the studies included in this meta-analysis were not uniform in scale, and the risk factors were not comprehensive; therefore, larger prospective studies in different countries are needed to further investigate these risk factors.

Study of the neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio as a biomarker for predicting recurrence of first-episode ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Neutrophils and albumin are associated with recurrence in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between the neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) and recurrence in patients with first-episode acute ischemic stroke to identify a more predictive biomarker for ischemic stroke recurrence. METHODS: In this study, the clinical data of patients with first-episode acute ischemic stroke admitted to the Department of Neurology of Shanxi Bethune Hospital from June 2021 to June 2022 were retrospectively collected, and a total of 829 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were followed up for 3 months. We evaluated the recurrence of patients within 3 months after acute ischemic stroke. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the relationship between the NPAR and recurrence within 3 months in patients with AIS. Finally, ROC curves were used to compare the predicted values of albumin, neutrophil percentage, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and the NPAR. RESULTS: A total of 829 first-episode acute ischemic stroke patients were included. The median NPAR was 1.60 (IQR 1.44-1.79). The percentage of patients with a 3-month recurrence was 6.0 % (50/829). The multivariate analysis showed that the NPAR was independently associated with the risk of recurrence within 3 months in acute ischemic stroke (OR 9.71, 95 % CI: 3.05-31.62, P < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value of the NPAR for predicting recurrence of acute ischemic stroke within 3 months was 1.78, with a sensitivity of 0.80 and a specificity of 0.75. Compared with the NLR, albumin and neutrophil percentage, the NPAR showed the greatest area under the curve (AUC) [0.78 (0.73, 0.83)]. The AUC test showed that the difference in the NPAR and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.019), NPAR and albumin (P = 0.013), and NPAR and neutrophil percentage (P = 0.007) were statistically significant, while the difference between the other two were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: 1. The recurrence rate within 3 months among patients with a first episode of acute ischemic stroke was 6.0 %.2. The NPAR was independently associated with recurrence within 3 months among patients with a first episode of acute ischemic stroke. Moreover, the NPAR may be a more effective biomarker for predicting recurrence in acute ischemic stroke patients than the albumin level, neutrophil percentage, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with epilepsy and epilepsy specialists.

OBJECTIVES: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the global population experienced changes in diagnosis and treatment patterns. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with epilepsy (PWE) and epilepsy specialists in China. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated newly diagnosed PWE from January 2018 to January 2022 at Shanxi Bethune Hospital. The clinical characteristics of PWE and the prescription habits of epilepsy specialists were analyzed. We also explored changes in seizure control among PWE as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and assessed the possible causes. RESULTS: After excluding 49 PWE who were lost to follow-up, 421 PWE were included in the study. They were divided into a prepandemic group and a pandemic group, with December 2019 as the boundary. By comparing the two groups, we found that the duration between first symptom detection and diagnosis was longer in the pandemic group than in the prepandemic group. Epilepsy specialists preferred prescribing the fast-acting antiepileptic drug levetiracetam (LEV) in the pandemic group. During the COVID-19 pandemic, 49.57% of PWE reported difficulties in accessing their epilepsy healthcare provider, and 26.96% reported that appointments with their providers occurred as usual. A lack of anti-seizure medication (ASM) availability was reported by 32.17% of subjects. An increase in seizure frequency was noted in 25.22% of the PWE during the pandemic. The factors increasing seizure frequency during the pandemic were fear of COVID-19, exacerbation of mental states, sleep deprivation, cancelation of regular medical visits, difficulties accessing epilepsy healthcare providers, and a lack of ASM availability. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed PWE to harmful consequences mainly due to medical shortages and worse life states. During the pandemic, there were delays in the diagnosis of PWE, and doctors' prescription habits changed. We must consider the lessons learned during this period of social restrictions and employ recent technological advances to improve treatment for PWE.

Comparison of the retention rate, safety, and efficacy of two different titration protocols for lamotrigine in newly diagnosed epilepsy patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the retention rate, safety, and efficacy of two different lamotrigine (LTG) titration protocols for newly diagnosed epilepsy patients. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated newly diagnosed epilepsy patients taking LTG from January 2012 to December 2021. In one titration protocol, LTG was taken once daily; in the other, LTG was taken twice daily. Clinical characteristics, seizure outcomes, adverse effects and patient retention rates were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 193 patients were included. There was no significant difference in seizure outcomes or adverse effects between patients treated with LTG once daily and twice daily. However, the retention rates were significantly higher in the once-daily group than in the twice-daily group (73.03% and 55.77%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The effectiveness and safety of LTG were not significantly different between the two different LTG titration protocols groups. However, the retention rate of the patients treated with LTG once daily was higher than that of the patients treated with LTG twice daily.