Barriers to care and health-related quality of life among US adults with several common chronic inflammatory skin diseases: a cross-sectional analysis of the NIH All of Us Research Program.

Research investigating the impact of barriers to care on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among US adults with chronic inflammatory skin diseases (CISDs) is limited. In this study, we utilize multivariable-adjusted logistic regression to analyze the associations between cost barriers (e.g., delaying specialist and mental health care due to cost) and non-cost barriers (e.g., delaying care due to transportation issues and the lack of provider diversity) with HRQoL among US adults with several common CISDs in the National Institutes of Health's All of Us Research Program (AoURP). Among the 19,208 adults with CISDs included in our analysis, the prevalence of poorer HRQoL(i.e., "fair" or "poor" HRQoL) was significantly higher among adults with CISDs who experienced cost (aOR, 2.39;95% CI, 2.10-2.73) and non-cost barriers (aOR, 2.52; 95% CI, 2.20-2.88) than those with CISDs who did not experience those barriers. Since dermatologists are often the only physician caring for patients with CISDs, this study reinforces the critical role dermatologists have in addressing social determinants of health and advocating to reduce cost and non-cost barriers for their patients with CISDs.

Evaluation of Stigma Toward Individuals With Acne.

Importance: Little is known about the prevalence and magnitude of stigmatizing attitudes of the general public toward individuals with acne. Objective: To explore the degree of stigma toward individuals with acne and whether these attitudes vary based on characteristics of the individuals with acne or of the survey participants. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional internet survey study, 4 stock portraits of adults that varied in sex (male/female) and skin tone (light/dark) were digitally enhanced to have acne (mild/severe). One of these 12 images was randomly presented to survey participants, who subsequently answered questions regarding stigmatizing attitudes with respect to the pictured individual, such as desire for social distance and stereotype endorsement. The survey was administered to a convenience sample of adult respondents in the US who were volunteers on the ResearchMatch platform. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence and magnitude of stigma toward individuals with acne. Results: The survey was completed by 1357 respondents (65.7% completion rate) (mean [SD] age, 42.4 [14.3] years; 918 [67.7%] female, 439 [32.4%] male). Compared to those with no acne, for those with severe acne, participants reported less comfort being friends (adjusted coefficient [95% CI], -0.28 [-0.47 to -0.10]; P = .003), hiring (-0.33 [-0.51 to -0.15]; P < .001), having physical contact (-0.26 [-0.45 to -0.08]; P = .006), dating (-0.44 [-0.74 to -0.14]; P = .004), and posting a photograph together on social media (-0.50 [-0.70 to -0.30]; P < .001). Compared to those with no acne, participants were more likely to rate individuals with severe acne as having poor hygiene (adjusted coefficient [95% CI], -1.04 [-1.46 to -0.82]; P < .001) and being unattractive (-0.89 [-1.12 to -0.67]; P < .001), unintelligent (-0.42 [-0.63 to -0.22]; P < .001), unlikable (-0.36 [-0.56 to -0.15]; P < .001), immature (-0.52 [-0.74 to -0.30]; P < .001), and untrustworthy (-0.40 [-0.61 to -0.18]; P < .001). There was evidence that the effect size of the association of acne with desire to social distance was greater for individuals with dark skin. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study demonstrates that stigmatizing attitudes toward patients with acne existed across a variety of social and professional scenarios, with severe acne and acne in darker skin tone being associated with a greater degree of stigma. These findings highlight the need to identify approaches to reduce stigmatizing attitudes in the community and for adequate access to care, which might prevent negative downstream effects related to these stigmatizing attitudes.

Acne accounts for an almost 2.5-fold higher proportion of dermatology visits among adult females compared to adult males in the United States: A study of the national ambulatory medical care survey from 2002-2016.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris affects a significant number of females into adulthood. Juvenile acne and adult acne have different presentations and potentially distinctive pathogeneses. However, patterns in treatments specifically related to the adult female population have previously not been studied. METHODS: Retrospective database analysis of healthcare utilization and medications prescribed for acne using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) data from 2002-2016 was performed. RESULTS: After age 20, acne accounted for an almost 2.5-fold higher proportion of dermatology visits among females compared to males (10.1% vs. 4.1%, P < 0.001). Tetracycline-class antibiotics were the most prescribed therapy within all age groups of females between 2002-2016. However, there was also a substantial rise in prescriptions of spironolactone beginning in 2012. CONCLUSION: A significantly greater proportion of dermatology visits by adult females are for acne in comparison to adult males. Tetracycline-class antibiotics remain the most prescribed therapy in adult age groups despite a potentially different pathogenesis of adult acne. Therefore, there is a need for further studies comparing the effectiveness of therapies specifically for adult female acne.

Barriers to Care Among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals With Chronic Inflammatory Skin Diseases in the US.

Importance: Research on the prevalence of barriers to care among sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases (CISDs) in the US is limited. Objective: To compare the prevalence of cost and noncost barriers to care among SGM and non-SGM patients with CISDs and to analyze the prevalence of barriers based on SGM status and race and ethnicity. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study of health care access and utilization survey data collected by the National Institutes of Health's All of Us Research Program between May 31, 2017, and July 1, 2022, was conducted. Participants were adults aged 18 years or older with CISDs who enrolled in All of Us directly online or through partner health care practitioner organizations located across the US. Exposures: Chronic inflammatory skin diseases, sexual orientation and gender identity, and race and ethnicity. Main Outcome and Measures: The main outcome was the experience of cost and noncost barriers to health care among SGM patients with CISDs. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association of SGM status with experiencing barriers to care. Results: This study included 19 743 patients with CISDs; 1877 were SGM patients (median age, 40.5 years [IQR, 28.7-57.9 years]; 1205 [64.2%] assigned female sex at birth) and 17 866 were non-SGM patients (median age, 57.1 years [IQR, 40.8-68.1 years]; 13 205 [73.9%] assigned female sex at birth). Compared with non-SGM patients, SGM patients with CISDs were significantly more likely to delay specialist care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.47), mental health care (AOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.37-1.91), and filling a prescription (AOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.11-1.52) because of cost. In addition, SGM patients with CISDs were significantly more likely than non-SGM patients to delay care because of transportation issues (AOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.22-1.80) and not having a health care practitioner who shares the same background with regard to race and ethnicity, religion, native language, sexual orientation, and gender identity (AOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.19-1.62). Sexual and gender minority patients with CISDs were also significantly more likely than non-SGM patients to report not always being treated with respect by their health care practitioners (AOR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.30-1.65). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study of survey data suggest that SGM patients with CISDs may be disproportionately affected by cost and noncost barriers to health care. Dermatologists and other health care practitioners caring for SGM patients with CISDs have an important role in helping to address these barriers and larger systemic issues for SGM patients at both the patient and system levels.

Racial and ethnic differences in barriers to care among US adults with chronic inflammatory skin diseases: A cross-sectional study of the All of Us Research Program.

BACKGROUND: Research on racial and ethnic differences in barriers to care among patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases (CISDs) is limited. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of a broad range of barriers to care among patients with CISDs across different racial and ethnic groups. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using survey data from participants with CISDs in the All of Us Research Program. Multivariable regression was used to analyze the relationship between race and ethnicity and experiencing barriers to care. RESULTS: Our study included 16,986 patients with CISDs. Compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients were significantly more likely to delay care because of cost and a broad range of additional structural barriers, including transportation, work, childcare, adult care, living in a rural area, and the lack of health care workforce diversity. However, associations between race and ethnicity and many barriers to care were substantially attenuated after controlling for insurance, income, and education. LIMITATIONS: The population studied was not a representative sample of US adults, and responses were not specific to dermatologic care. CONCLUSION: Racial and ethnic minority patients with CISDs, especially Black and Hispanic patients, are disproportionately affected by a broad range of barriers to care.