Utility of a Passive Bending Colonoscope for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Surgically Altered Anatomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The utility of a passive bending colonoscope (PBCS) in ERCP for patients with surgically altered anatomy has not been established. This study compared the outcome of PBCS-ERCP and balloon-assisted enteroscope (BAE)-ERCP. METHODS: This multicenter observational study included 343 patients with surgically altered anatomy who underwent ERCP. Among these, 110 underwent PBCS-ERCP and 233 underwent BAE-ERCP. Propensity score matching was applied, and a final cohort of 210 (105 in each group) with well-balanced backgrounds was analyzed. The primary outcome was the success rate of reaching anastomosis or ampulla of Vater. Secondary endpoints included the cannulation success rate, completion rate, procedure time (to reach, cannulate, complete), and adverse events. RESULTS: The success rate for reaching the target was 91.4% (96/105) with PBCS and 90.5% (95/105) with BAE (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.12, [0.44-2.89], P = 0.809). The mean time required to reach the target was significantly shorter in PBCS: 10.04 min (SD, 9.62) with PBCS versus 18.77 min (SD, 13.21) with BAE (P < 0.001). There were no differences in the success of cannulation or procedure completion, although the required times for cannulation and procedure completion were significantly shorter in PBCS. The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in BAE (19.0%) than in PBCS (4.8%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with surgically altered anatomy, PBCS-ERCP showed promising results with shorter time to reach, cannulate, and a lower incidence of adverse events compared with BAE-ERCP. The success rate of reaching was favorable through PBCS compared with BAE. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000045546.

The risk of weekend biopsy: Impact of specimen source and fixation status on HER2 assessment in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (The HER_WEEKEND study).

Accurate evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) expression is crucial for determining chemotherapy regimens in gastric cancer. However, formalin fixation status has been identified as an important factor affecting HER2 assessment reliability. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the correlation between sample collection day (weekday vs. weekend) and source (biopsy vs. surgical specimens) in assessing HER2 expression in patients with unresectable advanced/recurrent gastric cancer. Data were collected from gastric cancer patients who received chemotherapy at a single public hospital in Japan from 2008 to 2021. The analysis included 177 patients (109 men, 68 women) with a median age of 68.0 (21-88) years, and the primary outcome was the HER2 positivity rate. The overall HER2 positivity rate was 18.1%, with higher rates on weekdays (20.0%) compared to weekends (12.8%). Biopsies had higher positivity rates on weekdays (23.9%) but lower rates on weekends (11.1%) than surgical specimens. Significant differences were observed in formalin fixation times between weekdays and weekends for both biopsies and surgical samples. The study findings suggest that longer formalin fixation times on weekends may lead to underestimating HER2 expression, particularly in biopsies. Therefore, it is crucial to be cautious of excessive formalin fixation when collecting samples, especially during weekend biopsies.