Earnings and work loss after colon and rectal cancer: a Swedish nationwide matched cohort study.

Background: Colorectal cancer is common and prognosis is improving. The conditions of survivors of treatment, including financial consequences, are thus important. The aim of this study was to quantify loss of earnings and work loss in working-age patients with colon and rectal cancer relative to matched comparators. Methods: The study utilised data from the CRCBaSe database that is generated from the nationwide Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Register and includes data from several Swedish nationwide registers. The study period was 1995-2020 for rectal cancer patients and 2007-2020 for colon cancer patients. A retrospective population-based nationwide cohort study on earnings, disposable income, and work loss, in survivors of stage I-III colorectal cancer treatment was undertaken. Median regression was used to analyse earnings and disposable income, and logistic regression to analyse the probability of work loss. Findings: A cohort of 8863 colorectal cancer survivors diagnosed before 2017 and 52,514 comparators matched on birth year, legal sex, and county of residence, was analysed. There was a clear reduction in earnings between the calendar year prior to and the calendar year after diagnosis, from € 31,319 to € 23,924 for colon cancer patients and from € 32,636 to € 22,647 for rectal cancer patients, and earnings never fully recovered during the 5-year follow-up. Disposable income was practically unaltered. The probability of work loss increased in the calendar year of diagnosis, from 29.8% to 25.3% the previous year to 83.3% and 84.4% for colon and rectal cancer patients respectively, and never fully recovered. The probability of work loss was similar between colon and rectal cancer survivors, but was higher among patients with rectal cancer who had received neoadjuvant therapy. Interpretation: This study shows that despite an extensive welfare system providing maintained disposable income, there is a financial burden in the form of increased risk of work loss and a reduction in earnings among survivors of colorectal cancer. Funding: The study was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society, the Swedish Cancer and Allergy Foundation, and the Stockholm Cancer Society, and supported by grants provided by the Regional Agreement on Medical Training and Clinical Research (ALF) between the Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet.

Defunctioning stoma in rectal cancer surgery - A risk factor for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome?

BACKGROUND: In rectal cancer surgery the formation of a defunctioning stoma is common in order to reduce the consequences of an anastomotic leakage. The role of a defunctioning stoma and time to stoma reversal, in relation to major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) in the long-term perspective, is still unclear. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between a defunctioning stoma and long-term bowel function. METHOD: Patients who underwent curative rectal cancer surgery between 2007 and 2013 in Stockholm county, Sweden, who had no history of anastomotic leakage, without a remaining stoma, free of cancer and alive in April 2017 were eligible for the study. The exposures were (i) use of defunctioning stoma at cancer surgery and (ii) time to stoma reversal. Main outcome was major LARS with information retrieved from the LARS score questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) primary comparing major LARS to no LARS. RESULTS: A total of 430 patients were included in analysis. The mean follow-up time was 6.7 years after surgery (range 3.4-10.7 years). The use of a defunctioning stoma was associated to major LARS with an adjusted OR of 2.43 (95% CI 1.14-5.20) when compared to no stoma. There were no evident associations between time to stoma reversal and the risk of major LARS. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the presence of a defunctioning stoma is associated with impaired bowel function in the long-term perspective, while failing to show any clear association to time to stoma reversal.

Preoperative multidisciplinary team assessment is associated with improved survival in patients with locally advanced colon cancer; a nationwide cohort study in 3157 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary team (MDT) assessment is associated with improved survival in locally advanced rectal cancer, but the effect of an MDT assessment on survival in locally advanced colon cancer has not been reported. The aim of this national population-based cohort study was to establish if preoperative MDT assessment affects prognosis in patients with primary locally advanced colon cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients in Sweden with locally advanced colon cancer, without metastatic disease, who underwent an elective colon resection between 2010 and 2017 were identified through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR), and the cohort was linked to national registers. Data on patient characteristics, preoperative staging, surgical procedures, recurrence and survival were collected from SCRCR. The association between MDT assessment and colon cancer-specific survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models. The multivariable analysis was adjusted for sex, age, ASA grade, CCI, time period, pN, region and preoperative MDT. RESULTS: MDT assessment was performed in 2663 patients (84.4%) of 3157 eligible patients. The 3-year colon cancer-specific survival was higher following MDT, compared with no MDT assessment (80% versus 68%). MDT assessment was independently associated with reduced colon cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.70, 0.57-0.84 95% CI). CONCLUSION: Preoperative MDT assessment is associated with an improved long-term survival in patients with locally advanced colon cancer and should be mandatory in patients with suspected locally advanced colon cancer.

Conversion therapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) impairs prognosis, yet long-term survival can be achieved by enabling liver resection. This study aims to describe factors associated with conversion therapy leading to liver surgery and treatment outcome. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all patients with CRLM discussed at multidisciplinary team conference at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, from 2013 to 2018. Factors associated with conversion therapy and outcome following conversion therapy were analysed with logistic regression and survival analyses. RESULTS: Out of 1023 patients with CRLM, 100 patients (10%) received conversion chemotherapy, out of whom 31 patients (31%) subsequently underwent liver resection. Patients in whom conversion chemotherapy resulted in liver resection were younger (median age 61 vs. 66 years, p = .024), less likely to have a KRAS/NRAS-mutated primary tumours (25% vs. 53%, p = .039) and more likely to have received anti-EGFR agents (32% vs. 4%, p = .001) than patients progressing during conversion chemotherapy. The median OS for patients treated with conversion chemotherapy leading to liver resection was 24 months, compared to 14 months for patients progressing during conversion chemotherapy, p < .001. The OS for patients progressing during conversion chemotherapy was similar to patients given palliative chemotherapy, approximately 13 months. CONCLUSION: Conversion therapy offers a survival benefit in selected patients. Despite treatment advances, the majority of patients undergoing conversion chemotherapy never become eligible for curative treatment.

Prevalence of low anterior resection syndrome and impact on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: population-based study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after rectal cancer surgery varies from 17·8 to 56·0 per cent, but data from high-quality studies are sparse. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of LARS and its association with quality of life (QoL) in a large, well defined, population-based cohort. METHODS: This was a population-based study that included all patients who had curative rectal cancer surgery with total or partial mesorectal excision in Stockholm County in Sweden between 2007 and 2013. Patients without a remaining stoma, free from cancer and alive in April 2017 were eligible for the study. The LARS score questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30 and Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence score were used as outcome measures. Adjusted mean scores (and differences) of EORTC QLQ-C30 for LARS groups were calculated using repeated measures ANCOVA regression models while adjusting for predefined confounders. RESULTS: In total, 481 patients (82·6 per cent response rate) were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up time was 6·7 (range 3·4-11·0) years after surgery. The prevalence of LARS was 77·4 per cent (370 of 478 patients), with 53·1 per cent (254 of 478) experiencing major LARS. Patients with major LARS reported worse on all EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales (except for financial difficulties) than patients without LARS. A higher mean LARS score was associated with a greater impact on bowel-related QoL. CONCLUSION: After anterior resection for rectal cancer, the majority of patients suffer from major LARS with a negative impact on QoL.

ANTECEDENTES: La prevalencia del síndrome de resección anterior baja (Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, LARS) mayor después de cirugía del cáncer de recto varía entre 17,8% y 56,0%, pero los datos procedentes de estudios de alta calidad son escasos. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la prevalencia de LARS y su asociación con la calidad de vida (quality of life, QoL) en una gran cohorte poblacional bien definida. MÉTODOS: Este fue un estudio de base poblacional con todos los pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía curativa de cáncer de recto con exéresis total o parcial del mesorrecto en el condado de Estocolmo en Suecia entre 2007-2013. Los pacientes sin estoma definitivo, sin recidiva y vivos en abril de 2017 fueron elegibles para el estudio. El cuestionario de puntuación LARS, el EORTC QLQ-C30 y el sistema de puntuación de incontinencia de la Cleveland Clinic Florida se usaron como medidas de resultado. Las puntuaciones medias ajustadas (y las diferencias) de EORTC QLQ-C30 para grupos LARS se calcularon utilizando modelos de regresión ANCOVA de medidas repetidas ajustando por factores de confusión predefinidos. RESULTADOS: En total, 481 pacientes (tasa de respuesta del 82,6%) se incluyeron en el análisis. El tiempo medio de seguimiento fue de 6,7 años después de la cirugía (rango 3,4-11,0 años). La prevalencia de LARS fue 77,4% (n = 370) y un 53,1% (n = 254) presentó un LARS mayor. Los pacientes con LARS mayor tuvieron peores resultados en todas las subescalas EORTC QLQ-C30 (excepto por dificultades financieras) que los pacientes sin LARS. Una puntuación LARS media más alta se asoció con un mayor impacto en la calidad de vida relacionada con el intestino. CONCLUSIÓN: Después de una resección anterior por cáncer de recto, la mayoría de los pacientes sufren un LARS mayor con un impacto negativo en la calidad de vida.

Decrease in primary but not in secondary abdominal surgery for Crohn's disease: nationwide cohort study, 1990-2014.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with Crohn's disease has evolved in recent decades, with increasing use of immunomodulatory medication since 1990 and biologicals since 1998. In parallel, there has been increased use of active disease monitoring. To what extent these changes have influenced the incidence of primary and repeat surgical resection remains debated. METHODS: In this nationwide cohort study, incident patients of all ages with Crohn's disease, identified in Swedish National Patient Registry between 1990 and 2014, were divided into five calendar periods of diagnosis: 1990-1995 and 1996-2000 with use of inpatient registries, 2001, and 2002-2008 and 2009-2014 with use of inpatient and outpatient registries. The cumulative incidence of first and repeat abdominal surgery (except closure of stomas), by category of surgical procedure, was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Among 21 273 patients with Crohn's disease, the cumulative incidence of first abdominal surgery within 5 years of Crohn's disease diagnosis decreased continuously from 54·8 per cent in 1990-1995 to 40·4 per cent in 1996-2000 (P < 0·001), and again from 19·8 per cent in 2002-2008 to 17·3 per cent in 2009-2014 (P < 0·001). Repeat 5-year surgery rates decreased from 18·9 per cent in 1990-1995 to 16·0 per cent in 1996-2000 (P = 0·009). After 2000, no further significant decreases were observed. CONCLUSION: The 5-year rate of surgical intervention for Crohn's disease has decreased significantly, but the rate of repeat surgery has remained stable despite the introduction of biological therapy.

ANTECEDENTES: El tratamie nto de pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn ha evolucionado en las últimas décadas con un uso cada vez mayor de medicamentos inmunomoduladores desde 1990 y tratamientos biológicos desde 1998. Al mismo tiempo, ha aumentado la utilidad de la vigilancia activa de la enfermedad. Hasta qué punto estos cambios han influido en la incidencia de la resección quirúrgica primaria y repetida sigue siendo objeto de debate. MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohortes a nivel nacional de pacientes incidentes con enfermedad de Crohn de todas las edades identificados en el registro sueco nacional de pacientes entre 1990-2014, que se dividió en cinco períodos de diagnóstico: 1990-1995 y 1996-2000 con el uso de registros de pacientes hospitalizados, 2001, y 2002-2008 y 2009-2014 con uso de registros de pacientes ambulatorios y hospitalizados. Se estimó la incidencia acumulada de la primera cirugía abdominal y de las cirugías abdominales subsiguientes (excepto el cierre de estomas), por categoría de procedimiento quirúrgico, mediante el método de Kaplan-Meier. RESULTADOS: Entre 21.273 pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn, la incidencia acumulada de la primera cirugía abdominal durante los 5 años posteriores al diagnóstico de la enfermedad disminuyó continuamente del 54,8% en la cohorte 1990-1995 al 40,4% en la cohorte 1996-2000 (P < 0,001) y nuevamente del 19,8% en cohorte 2002-2008 al 17,3% en la cohorte 2009-2014 (P < 0,001). Las tasas cirugías iterativas a los 5 años disminuyeron de 18,9% en la cohorte 1990-1995 a 16,0% en la cohorte 1996-2000 (P = 0,017). Después del 2000, no se observaron más disminuciones significativas. CONCLUSIÓN: La tasa de intervención quirúrgica a los 5 años para la enfermedad de Crohn ha disminuido significativamente, pero la cirugía iterativa se ha mantenido estable a pesar de la introducción de la terapia biológica.

Perirenal fat surface area as a risk factor for perioperative difficulties and 30-day postoperative complications in elective colon cancer surgery.

AIM: Visceral obesity is associated with perioperative and postoperative complications in colorectal surgery. We aimed to investigate the association between the perirenal fat surface area (PRF) and postoperative complications. METHOD: Data on 610 patients undergoing curative, elective colon cancer resection between 2006 and 2016 at Stockholm South General Hospital were retrieved from a local quality register. We assessed perioperative and postoperative outcomes using a multinomial regression model adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and surgical approach (open/laparoscopy) in relation to PRF. RESULTS: PRF could be measured in 605 patients; the median area was 24 cm2 . Patients with PRF ≥ 40 cm2 had longer operation time (median 223 vs 184 min), more intra-operative bleeding (250 vs 125 ml), reoperations (11% vs 6%), surgical complications (27% vs 13%) and nonsurgical infectious complications (16% vs 9%) than patients with PRF < 40 cm2 , but there were no differences in the need for intensive care or duration of hospital stay. The multivariate analyses revealed an increased risk of any complication [OR 1.68 (95% CI 1.1-2.6)], which was even more pronounced for moderate complications [Clavien-Dindo II, OR 2.14 (CI 1.2-2.4]; Clavien-Dindo III, OR 2.35 (CI 1.0-5.5)] in patients with PRF ≥ 40 vs < 40 cm2 . The absolute risk of complications was similar in men and women with PRF ≥ 40 cm2 . CONCLUSION: PRF, an easily measured indirect marker of visceral obesity, was associated with overall and moderate complications in men and women and could serve as a useful tool in the assessment of preoperative risk.

Restorative surgery after colectomy for ulcerative colitis in England and Sweden: observations from a comparison of nationwide cohorts.

AIM: A longstanding disparity exists between the approaches to restorative surgery after colectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) in England and Sweden. This study aims to compare rates of colectomy and restorative surgery in comparable national cohorts. METHOD: The English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and Swedish National Patient Register (NPR) were interrogated between 2002 and April 2012. Patients with two diagnostic episodes for UC (age ≥ 15 years) were included. Patients were excluded if they had an episode of inflammatory bowel disease or colectomy before 2002. The cumulative incidences of colectomy and restorative surgery were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 98 691 patients were included in the study, 76 129 in England and 22 562 in Sweden. The 5-year cumulative incidence of all restorative surgery after colectomy in England was 33% vs 46% in Sweden (P-value < 0.001). Of the patients undergoing restorative surgery, 92.3% of English patients had a pouch vs 38.8% in Sweden and 7.7% vs 59.1% respectively had an ileorectal anastomosis (IRA). The 5-year cumulative incidence of colectomy in this study cohort was 13% in England and 6% in Sweden (P-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Following colectomy for UC only one-third of English patients and half of Swedish patients underwent restorative surgery. In England nearly all these patients underwent pouches, in Sweden a less significant majority underwent IRAs. It is surprising to demonstrate this discrepancy in a comparable cohort of patients from similar healthcare systems. The causes and consequences of this international variation in management are not fully understood and require further investigation.

Colectomy prior to diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis is associated with improved prognosis in a nationwide cohort study of 2594 PSC-IBD patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite the close relationship between primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the association between colectomy and the prognosis of PSC remains controversial. AIM: To explore whether colectomy prior to PSC-diagnosis is associated with transplant-free survival. METHODS: A nationwide cohort study in Sweden including all patients aged 18 to 69 years in whom both PSC and IBD was diagnosed between 1987 and 2014 was undertaken. Each patient was followed from date of both PSC and IBD diagnoses until liver transplantation or death, or 31 December 2014. Patients with colon in situ, and colectomy prior to PSC-diagnosis were compared. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: Of the 2594 PSC-IBD patients, 205 patients were treated with colectomy before PSC-diagnosis. During follow-up, liver transplantations were performed in 327 patients and 509 died. The risk of liver transplantation or death was lower in patients treated with colectomy prior to PSC-diagnosis (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.95) than in patients with colon in situ. Male gender, longer time between IBD and PSC-diagnosis and older age were all associated with an increased risk of liver transplantation or death. Colectomy after PSC-diagnosis was however not associated with an increased risk of liver transplantation or death during long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In PSC-IBD patients, colectomy prior to PSC-diagnosis is associated with a decreased risk of liver transplantation or death.

Population-based study of factors predicting treatment intention in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Local recurrence of rectal cancer (LRRC) is associated with poor survival unless curative treatment is performed. The aim of this study was to investigate predictive factors for treatment with curative intent in patients with LRRC. METHODS: Population-based data for patients treated for primary rectal cancer between 1995 and 2002, and with LRRC reported as first event were collected from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and medical records. The associations between patient-, primary tumour- and LRRC-related factors and intention of the treatment for LRRC were determined. The impact of the identified predictive factors on prognosis after treatment with curative intent was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 426 patients were included in the study, of whom 149 (35·0 per cent) received treatment with curative intent. Factors significantly associated with treatment of the LRRC with palliative intent were primary surgery with abdominoperineal resection (odds ratio (OR) 5·16, 95 per cent c.i. 2·97 to 8·97), age at diagnosis of LRRC at least 80 years (OR 4·82, 2·37 to 9·80), symptoms at diagnosis (OR 2·79, 1·56 to 5·01) and non-central location of the LRRC (OR 1·79, 1·15 to 2·79). The overall 5-year survival rate was 8·9 per cent for all patients and 23·1 per cent among those treated with curative intent. In patients treated with curative intent, factors associated with increased risk of death were age 80 years or more (hazard ratio (HR) 2·44, 95 per cent c.i. 1·55 to 3·86), presence of symptoms (HR 1·92, 1·20 to 3·05), non-central tumour location (HR 1·51, 1·01 to 2·26) and presence of hydronephrosis (HR 2·02, 1·18 to 3·44). CONCLUSION: Non-central location of the LRRC, presence of symptoms and age at least 80 years at diagnosis of the LRRC were associated with treatment with palliative intent.

Assessing bicycle-related trauma using the biomarker S100B reveals a correlation with total injury severity.

PURPOSE: Worldwide, the use of bicycles, for both recreation and commuting, is increasing. S100B, a suggested protein biomarker for cerebral injury, has been shown to correlate to extracranial injury as well. Using serum levels of S100B, we aimed to investigate how S100B could be used when assessing injuries in patients suffering from bicycle trauma injury. As a secondary aim, we investigated how hospital length of stay and injury severity score (ISS) were correlated to S100B levels. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, database study including all patients admitted for bicycle trauma to a level 1 trauma center over a four-year period with admission samples of S100B (n = 127). Computerized tomography (CT) scans were reviewed and remaining data were collected from case records. Univariate- and multivariate regression analyses, linear regressions and comparative statistics (Mann-Whitney) were used where appropriate. RESULTS: Both intra- and extracranial injuries were correlated with S100B levels. Stockholm CT score presented the best correlation of an intracranial parameter with S100B levels (p < 0.0001), while the presences of extremity injury, thoracic injury, and non-cervical spinal injury were also significantly correlated (all p < 0.0001, respectively). A multivariate linear regression revealed that Stockholm CT score, non-cervical spinal injury, and abdominal injury all independently correlated with levels of S100B. Patients with a ISS > 15 had higher S100 levels than patients with ISS < 16 (p < 0.0001). Patients with extracranial, as well as intracranial- and extracranial injuries, had significantly higher levels of S100B than patients without injuries (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). The admission serum levels of S100B (log, µg/L) were correlated with ISS (log) (r = 0.53) and length of stay (log, days) (r = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: S100B levels were independently correlated with intracranial pathology, but also with the extent of extracranial injury. Length of stay and ISS were both correlated with the admission levels of S100B in bicycle trauma, suggesting S100B to be a good marker of aggregated injury severity. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Helmet use in bicycle trauma patients: a population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, the increasing number of bicyclists has evoked the debate on use of bicycle helmet. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between helmet use and injury pattern in bicycle trauma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective population-based study of 186 patients treated for bicycle-related injuries at a Level 1 Trauma Centre in Sweden during a 3-year period. Data were collected from case records. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: 43.5% of the 186 patients used a bicycle helmet at the time of the crash. Helmet users were less likely to get head and facial injuries in collisions than non-helmet users (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.07-0.8, and OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.3), whereas no difference was seen in single-vehicle accidents. The risk of limb injuries was higher among helmet users. CONCLUSIONS: Non-helmet use is associated with an increased risk of injury to head and face in collisions, whereas helmet use is associated with an increased risk of limb injuries in all types of crashes.

Probability, rate and timing of reconstructive surgery following colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease in Sweden: a population-based cohort study.

AIM: Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) need colectomy, but the rate of reconstructive surgery with restoration of intestinal continuity is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the probability, rate and timing of reconstructive surgery after colectomy in patients with IBD in a population-based setting. METHOD: The study cohort included all patients with IBD in Sweden who underwent colectomy from 2000 to 2009. Each patient was followed from admission for colectomy to admission for reconstructive surgery, date of death, migration or 31 December 2010. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Poisson regression models were used to describe the probability, rate and timing of reconstructive surgery. RESULTS: Out of 2818 IBD patients treated with colectomy, 61.0% were male and 78.9% had ulcerative colitis. No reconstructive surgery had been performed in 1595 (56.6%) patients by the end of follow-up. Of the remaining 1223 patients, 526 underwent primary reconstructive surgery and 697 had a secondary reconstruction following a median interval of 357 days from primary surgery in the form of colectomy. The probability of reconstructive surgery was dependent on age (55.6% and 18.1% at ages 15-29 and ≥ 59 years, respectively), and the chance of reconstructive surgery was higher in hospitals that performed more than 13 colectomies for IBD per year [incidence rate ratio and 95% confidence interval 1.27 (1.09-1.49)]. CONCLUSION: Fewer than half of the patients having a colectomy for IBD underwent subsequent reconstructive surgery. Older age and low hospital volume were risk factors for no reconstructive surgery.

Preoperative treatment selection in rectal cancer: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer reduce local recurrence rates but is also associated with side effects. Thus, it is important to identify patients in whom the benefits exceed the risks. This study assessed the pretherapeutic parameters influencing the selection to preoperative treatment. METHODS: Data on all patients in the Stockholm-Gotland area, Sweden, who underwent elective trans-abdominal surgery for rectal cancer in 2000-2010, was retrieved from the Regional Cancer Registry and the Swedish National Patient Register. Clinical variables were analysed in relation to selected preoperative therapy. Odds Ratios were derived from univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: In total 2619 patients were included. Of these 1789 (68.3%) received preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Over time, use of preoperative therapy increased (p < 0.001). In a multivariable model, age (≥ 80 years) and comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥ 2) were strongly correlated to omittance of preoperative treatment (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.04-0.07 and 0.29; 95% CI: 0.21-0.39) but there was no difference between genders. Pre-treatment tumour stage was a strong predictor for selection to preoperative (chemo-) radiotherapy. However, 8.2% of patients with intermediate or advanced tumours were selected to no preoperative treatment while 55.0% of patients with early tumours were selected to preoperative therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of preoperative (chemo-) radiotherapy increased over time. Suboptimal adherence to guidelines appears to exist leading to a risk of overtreatment and to a small extent also undertreatment. More robust selection criteria, also including age and comorbidity should be developed.

Mortality after total colectomy in 3084 patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: A high post-operative mortality has been reported following colectomy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially in some patient groups. AIMS: To investigate the 40-day mortality following colectomy in patients with IBD. The secondary aim was to assess whether colectomised IBD patients have an increased mortality compared to the general population. METHODS: This is a population-based register study of all patients with IBD in Sweden who underwent total colectomy in 2000-2010. The cohort was identified using international classification codes for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Patients registered with both UC and CD before colectomy (UCCD) were analysed separately. Each patient was followed-up to the date of death, migration or 31st of December 2010, whichever came first. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Cox proportional hazards models and relative mortality rates were used to describe mortality. RESULTS: In the cohort of 3084 patients, 2424 were diagnosed with UC, 326 with CD and 334 with UCCD. The 40-day, 1-year and 3-year mortality was 1.3%, 3.1% and 6.0%, respectively. The highest 40-day mortality was seen in patients ≥59 years of age (4.4%). Colectomy at the primary hospitalisation for IBD did not significantly increase the risk of post-operative mortality, nor did hospital volume. The relative survival after 3 years was 0.99, 0.98, 0.97 and 0.90 in those <30, 30-43, 44-58 and ≥59 years old, respectively. CONCLUSION: The 40-day mortality following total colectomy in IBD patients in Sweden is low, except in patients ≥59 years old.

Elevated anal squamous cell carcinoma risk associated with benign inflammatory anal lesions.

BACKGROUND: The association between benign anal lesions and anal cancer is still unclear. Few data from large cohort studies are available. METHODS: We conducted a register based retrospective cohort study including 45,186 patients hospitalised for inflammatory anal lesions (anal fissures, fistulas, and perianal abscesses) as well as 79,808 haemorrhoid patients, from 1965 to 2002. Multiple record linkages identified all incident anal (squamous cell carcinoma only) and colorectal cancers through to 2002. Relative risk was estimated by standardised incidence ratio (SIR), the ratio of observed number of cases divided by that expected in the age, sex, and calendar year-matched general Swedish population. RESULTS: There was a distinct incidence peak in the first three years of follow up among patients with inflammatory lesions. SIR then levelled off at around 3 and remained at this level throughout follow up (SIR during years 3-37 of follow up was 3.3 (95% confidence interval 1.8-5.7)). A similar initial incidence peak was observed among haemorrhoid patients but was confined to the first year; SIR was 2.8 in the second year, and then it decreased further and was close to unity in the following years (SIR during years 3-37 was 1.3 (95% confidence interval 0.7-2.1)). Among inflammatory lesion and haemorrhoid patients, a significantly increased risk of colorectal cancer was observed only in the first year after hospitalisation. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory benign anal lesions are associated with a significantly increased long term risk of anal cancer. In contrast, haemorrhoids appear not to be a risk factor for this malignancy.