RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: "Macintosh"-videolaryngoscopes (VLs) are VLs that allow both direct and indirect laryngoscopy for intubation. We describe the decision-making and implementation-processes that our hospital used regarding the choice of device. We compared the performances of 4 Macintosh-VLs both in direct and indirect laryngoscopy. METHODS: A quality-improvement-project for airway management aiming at implementing Macintosh-VL for all intubation procedures performed in the operating room, involving 4 Macintosh-VLs (McGrath-Mac, C-MAC-S, C-MAC-S-Pocket-Monitor [PM], and APA). Three consecutive steps were described: (1) direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh-VL, (2) indirect laryngoscopy with Macintosh-VL (intubation attempt with Macintosh-style blade in case of Cormack I or II), (3) intubation attempt with hyperangulated blade in case of Cormack III/IV or failure of Macintosh-style blade. The main end point was the need to move to step III and use a hyperangulated blade. A mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to compare devices on the main end point while considering site as a random effect. Comparison of means was performed using analysis of variance and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons (number of laryngoscopy attempts, numeric rate scale [NRS] difficulty of intubation and NRS user-friendliness). Comparison of percentages was performed using a χ2 test for the need to move to step III and a Kruskal-Wallis test for the quality of image (bad, passable, good, very good, excellent). A P value ≤.008 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: From May to September 2017, 589 patients were included. Using the McGrath-Mac (22/180 [12%]) was associated with less use of hyperangulated blade than using the C-MAC-S (39/132 [30%], odds ratio [OR] [99.2% confidence interval {CI}] 0.34 [0.16-0.77], P = .0005), the APA (35/138 [25%], OR [99.2% CI] 0.42 [0.19-0.93]; P = .004), but not the C-MAC-S-PM (29/139 [21%], OR [99.2% CI] 0.53 [0.23-1.2]; P = .04).Overall, the number of intubation attempts was significantly lower using the McGrath Mac than the C-MAC-S or the C-MAC-S-PMVLs. Subjective appreciation of intubation difficulty and user-friendliness of the devices showed respectively lower and higher NRS scores for the McGrath-Mac compared to the other devices, whereas subjective assessment of image quality showed higher quality for the C-MAC-S and C-MAC-S-PM compared to the APA or McGrath-Mac. CONCLUSIONS: Among 4 single-use Macintosh-VLs, glottic visualization in direct and indirect laryngoscopy with the Macintosh-style blade was significantly improved with the McGrath-Mac compared to other Macintosh-VLs, leading to a less frequent need to resort to the hyperangulated blade and reduced overall number of intubation attempts.
Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Laringoscopios , Laringoscopía/instrumentación , Quirófanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Grabación en Video/instrumentación , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Intubación Intratraqueal/normas , Laringoscopios/normas , Laringoscopía/efectos adversos , Laringoscopía/normas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quirófanos/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Grabación en Video/normasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The sex of the patients has been shown to affect postoperative pain and morphine consumption; still a clear understanding able to explain the reasons behind this difference struggles to emerge. Our research aimed to investigate one specific aspect of the variability in morphine consumption between sexes. Previous studies have shown that circadian rhythm can influence opioid consumption. Furthermore, circadian rhythm is different between female and male. Our analysis investigated the presence of differences in daily rhythmicity of morphine consumption between males and females. DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of data collected during 2 years long multicenter clinical trial (NCT01233752). SETTINGS: Clinical data were collected in two Italian hospitals: IRCCS Foundation Policlinico S. Matteo (Pavia) and San Gerardo Hospital (Monza). PATIENTS: The authors recorded data about morphine consumption in 157 patients who underwent major abdominal surgery, who received morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) as postoperative analgesia. INTERVENTIONS: The authors analyzed the daily periodicity of effective boluses delivered by morphine IV-PCA with Poisson multilevel models, adjusted by the time of start for each pump. An effective bolus was defined as a correctly delivered bolus of 1 mg of morphine. The authors also evaluated the interactions among the time of the day and sex, age (≥55 y), and body mass index (BMI;≥30 kg/m2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Differences in sex of morphine consumption rhythms over the 24 hours of the day. RESULTS: Morphine consumption showed a statistically significant daily periodicity (p < 0.001) in our study population. Consumption was higher around 2 AM (rate 0.4 mg/min·patient) and lower around 12 PM (rate 0.05 mg/min·patient). Global consumption was not associated with the pump start time, age, or sex. The daily periodicity of morphine consumption was different between males and females (p = 0.004), with males consuming more morphine during the night. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis confirmed the presence of daily rhythm for morphine consumption in patients treated with IV-PCA morphine after major abdominal surgery. A difference in the daily periodicity was observed between sexes. No difference emerged in daily periodicity for the categories of age and BMI.
Asunto(s)
Cavidad Abdominal/cirugía , Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Ritmo Circadiano , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Caracteres Sexuales , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morfina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: High interindividual variability in postoperative opioid consumption is related to genetic and environmental factors. We tested the association between morphine consumption, postoperative pain, and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within opioid receptor µ 1 (OPRM1), catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), uridine diphosphate glucose-glucuronosyltransferase-2B7, and estrogen receptor (ESR1) gene loci to elucidate genetic prediction of opioid consumption. We analyzed 20 SNPs in 201 unrelated Caucasian patients who underwent abdominal surgery and who were receiving postoperative patient-controlled analgesia-administered morphine. Morphine consumption and pain intensity were dependent variables; age and sex were covariates. A haplotype of 7 SNPs in OPRM1 showed significant additive effects on opioid consumption (P = .007); a linear regression model including age and 9 SNPs in ESR1, OPRM1, and COMT explained the highest proportion of variance of morphine consumption (10.7%; P = .001). The minimal model including 3 SNPs in ESR1, OPRM1, and COMT explained 5% of variance (P = .007). We found a significant interaction between rs4680 in COMT and rs4986936 in ESR1 (P = .007) on opioid consumption. SNPs rs677830 and rs540825 of OPRM1 and rs9340799 of ESR1 were nominally associated with pain Numeric Rating Scale scores. Combinations of genetic variants within OPRM1, COMT, and ESR1 better explain variability in morphine consumption than single genetic variants. Our results contribute to the development of genetic markers and statistical models for future diagnostic tools for opioid consumption/efficacy. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the efforts dedicated to detect correlations between the genetic polymorphisms and the clinical morphine effect self-administered by patients using a patient-controlled analgesia pump after major surgery. The clinical effect is expressed in terms of morphine consumption and pain scores. REGISTERED ON CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01233752.