Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Parasit Vectors ; 16(1): 440, 2023 Nov 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38012748

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Compliant ectoparasiticide product use is a comprehensive way to control ticks and reduce the risk of tick-borne pathogen transmission to dogs. Because the systemically acting isoxazoline ectoparasiticides require tick attachment for drug delivery, fast speed of kill is essential to minimize tick-borne pathogen transmission risk. METHODS: Dogs of satisfactory tick-carrying capacity were randomly allocated to treatment groups and administered, per label instructions, Bravecto® Chews (minimum 25 mg/kg fluralaner), Simparica TRIO® (minimum 1.2 mg/kg sarolaner, 24 µg/kg moxidectin, 5 mg/kg pyrantel), or no treatment. Dogs were infested with approximately 50 unfed adult (35 female, 15 male) Ixodes scapularis on Day -2, 21 and 28. Live tick counts were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 24 h post-treatment (Day 0) and post-infestation on Day 21 and 28. Tick control efficacy was determined by comparing live tick means for each product-treated group to the untreated control group and each other at all time points using a linear mixed model. The percent of dogs free of live ticks was analyzed using the Fisher's exact test for treatment group comparison. RESULTS: The untreated control group maintained adequate tick infestations throughout the study. Using geometric means, an existing I. scapularis infestation was controlled by 99.7% and 93.0% 12 h post-treatment and by 100% and 99.5% 24 h post-treatment, for Bravecto® and Simparica TRIO®-treated dogs, respectively. Ixodes scapularis infestations were controlled more quickly for Bravecto®- compared to Simparica TRIO®-treated dogs on Day 21 at 8 h (efficacy 74.0% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.003) and 12 h (efficacy 99.2% vs. 39.4%, p < 0.001) post-infestation and Day 28 at 8 h (efficacy 92.2% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001) and 12 h (efficacy 99.6% vs. 27.7%, p < 0.001) post-infestation. On Day 28 post-treatment, the efficacy of Bravecto® and Simparica TRIO® to control a new I. scapularis infestation was 100% and 96.6%, respectively, by 24 h post-infestation. Of product-treated dogs, 100% of Bravecto®-treated dogs were free of live ticks by 24 h post-treatment or post-infestation. No treatment-related adverse reactions occurred during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Ixodes scapularis infestations are controlled more quickly 21 and 28 days post-treatment for dogs administered a single dose of Bravecto® compared to dogs administered a single dose of Simparica TRIO®.


Asunto(s)
Acaricidas , Enfermedades de los Perros , Ixodes , Infestaciones por Garrapatas , Animales , Perros , Femenino , Masculino , Pirantel/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Factores de Tiempo , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/prevención & control , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/veterinaria , Acaricidas/uso terapéutico
2.
Parasit Vectors ; 16(1): 147, 2023 Apr 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37106394

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mosquitoes serve as the vector of canine heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis), which represents a significant and persistent threat to canine health. A reduction in the longevity and/or reproductive success of mosquitoes that take a blood meal from fluralaner-treated dogs may consequently reduce the local transmission of heartworm and prevent new infections. A novel secondary effect of an oral formulation of the ectoparasiticide fluralaner (Bravecto®) against a laboratory strain of the mosquito Aedes aegypti, a potential major vector of canine heartworm, was investigated in this study. METHODS: Six dogs were administered a single dose of fluralaner orally in the form of Bravecto® Chews (at the labeled fluralaner dose of 25 mg/kg body weight), while six control dogs received no treatment. Mosquitoes were fed on blood that was collected from each dog prior to treatment and weekly for 15 weeks post-treatment to assess the continued effects of fluralaner as its serum level decreased. Mosquito fitness was assessed by three parameters: rate of successful blood-feeding, survival, and egg laying. RESULTS: Successful blood-feeding rate was similar between control and treatment groups. In the fluralaner treatment, mosquito survival was significantly reduced within the first 24 h after blood-feeding, for the first 12 weeks post-treatment of the dogs (efficacy range = 33.2-73.3%). Survival of mosquitoes up until a potentially heartworm-infective timepoint (14 days post-blood-feeding) was significantly reduced in the fluralaner-treated group at several timepoints (1, 2, 5, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 weeks post-treatment; efficacy range = 49.4-91.4%), but was less consistently reduced at the other timepoints. Egg laying by mosquitoes was almost completely suppressed for the first 13 weeks following treatment of the dogs with fluralaner (treatment efficacy ≥ 99.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Mosquitoes fed blood from fluralaner-treated dogs experienced a significant reduction in survival and fecundity. These findings support the potential for a reduction in heartworm transmission directly by lethal effects on the vector and indirectly through a reduction of the local vector population when mosquitoes are exposed to animals treated with fluralaner.


Asunto(s)
Aedes , Dirofilaria immitis , Enfermedades de los Perros , Insecticidas , Animales , Perros , Insecticidas/farmacología , Mosquitos Vectores , Fertilidad , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control
3.
Parasit Vectors ; 15(1): 32, 2022 Jan 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35062996

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the timing of dog owner ectoparasiticide purchases to estimate administration compliance and assess the consequent impact of dose purchase gaps on the proportion of time that dogs were protected over a 12-month period. METHODS: Ectoparasiticide purchase transactions over a 12-month period were evaluated for 626 US veterinary hospitals to determine dose purchase timing and identify consequent gaps between dose administration in dogs. Orally administered prescription ectoparasitic medications with active ingredients from the isoxazoline family (afoxolaner, fluralaner, lotilaner, or sarolaner) were included in the analysis. A period was calculated for each of the four isoxazoline-containing medications that represented the duration of protection provided by two doses of ectoparasiticide plus the average gap between these two doses. The maximum percentage of time possible for ectoparasiticide protection for this aggregate period was then calculated for each active ingredient. RESULTS: Ectoparasiticide transaction records of owners were analyzed for 506,637 dogs. These showed that 43% of dog owners purchased just one dose over the 12-month period considered. If a dog owner purchased more than one dose, then the timing of their transactions could create a time gap between the completion of ectoparasite protection from the first dose and onset of protection from the subsequent purchase and administration of the second dose. Such gaps were observed in purchases made by 31-65% of dog owners, depending on the selected active ingredient and number of doses. The average gap duration between dose purchases was calculated for all possible dose combinations over 12 months of ectoparasite protection. Time gaps between the first and second doses are as follows: for sarolaner, 20.3 weeks; for afoxolaner, 12.9 weeks; for fluralaner ,12.8 weeks; and for lotilaner, 8.9 weeks. The proportion of time when protection was provided during the aggregate period between administration of the first and second doses was as follows: for fluralaner, 65%; for lotilaner, 49%; for afoxolaner, 40%; and for sarolaner, 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Dog owner ectoparasiticide purchase transactions showed that there were time gaps between doses leading to reduced ectoparasite protection. The longer re-administration interval for fluralaner, a consequence of its extended duration of activity, resulted in dog owners gaining the greatest proportion of ectoparasite protection time with this medication compared with shorter-acting monthly re-treatment medications.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros , Infestaciones Ectoparasitarias , Insecticidas , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Administración Oral , Animales , Enfermedades de los Perros/parasitología , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Perros , Infestaciones Ectoparasitarias/prevención & control , Infestaciones Ectoparasitarias/veterinaria , Hospitales Veterinarios , Insecticidas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
4.
Open Vet J ; 11(3): 458-467, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34722211

RESUMEN

Background: Fluralaner (Bravecto®) is an isoxazoline class compound that is the only topically applied systemic ectoparasiticide approved for dosing at up to 12-week intervals for flea and tick control in cats. Aim: To describe veterinarian recommendations for ectoparasiticide medications used in the UK and France along with veterinary recommendations previously reported from the US, as well as to assess cat owners' experience with a commercial transdermal spot-on fluralaner formulation administered to cats in the US and similarly describe the experiences of cat owners from the UK or France who administered fluralaner for feline flea and tick prevention. Methods: Clients of participating veterinary practices in the US, UK, or France who were visiting the clinic for a routine wellness visit, were currently treating their cat with fluralaner (Bravecto®), and had purchased at least two doses were asked to complete a short two-page survey about their experience with flea and tick medications including fluralaner and other products they may have been administered. Results: Owners in the US (451 cats), UK (512 cats), and France (520 cats) completed surveys. Most cat owners (66%-75%) had previously administered other flea and tick products. More than 94% of cat owners surveyed in each country were satisfied or very satisfied with fluralaner. The most frequently reported benefit of using fluralaner was the 12-week dosing interval, selected by 76% of respondents in the US, 82% in the UK, and 70% in France. 79%-88% of cat owners (depending on the country) thought that dosing with extended duration fluralaner was more convenient than dosing with monthly flea and tick products and 86%-89% of cat owners that had used other flea and tick products preferred fluralaner over the other flea and tick products. Conclusion: Veterinarians in the US, UK, and France recommended 12 months of flea protection and 9-11 months of tick protection per year, even though, in this study, cat owners usually purchased 1-3 months of protection per year. A longer flea and tick dosing interval, as seen with fluralaner, correlates with higher user satisfaction and preference among cat owners. Owners identified the 12-week dosing interval and single dose efficacy as the top reasons for selecting the fluralaner product for their cat. In all three countries, most cat owners indicated that they were more likely to deliver doses of extended duration fluralaner on time, compared to flea and tick products dosed monthly.


Asunto(s)
Siphonaptera , Garrapatas , Animales , Gatos , Francia , Isoxazoles , Satisfacción Personal , Reino Unido
5.
Parasit Vectors ; 14(1): 264, 2021 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34016157

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The study objective was to examine cat owner ectoparasiticide purchases in the United States and estimate the impact of purchase gaps on timely ectoparasite protection administration. These purchase gaps lead to periods of time when cats are unprotected from ectoparasites. METHODS: Ectoparasiticide purchase transactions for individual cats from 671 U.S. veterinary clinics from January 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019 were evaluated to determine time "gaps" between doses of ectoparasiticides purchased in a defined 12-month period. Ectoparasiticides examined were topically applied products that contained fluralaner, fipronil/(S)-methoprene/pyriproxyfen, imidacloprid/pyriproxyfen or selamectin as active ingredients. The duration of protection following administration of one dose was 8-12 weeks for the fluralaner-containing product and one month for the other products. RESULTS: Ectoparasiticide purchase records were obtained from 114,853 cat owners and analysis found that most owners bought ≤ 6 months of protection during the year, with 61-75% (depending on the product) purchasing just 1-3 months of protection. The size of the average purchase gap was determined for all dose combinations out to 12 months of protection (5-7 doses for fluralaner and 12 doses for the other three products dosed monthly. The largest gaps occurred between the first and second doses and the second and third doses. Average purchase gaps for the four different products between doses 1 and 2 ranged from 11.2 to 13.9 weeks and between doses 2 and 3 ranged from 7.7 to 12.2 weeks. The fraction of purchases separated by gaps and the average length of the gap tended to decrease with increasing number of doses purchased. Owners purchasing the 8 to 12-week duration product containing fluralaner provided ectoparasite protection ("doses plus gap period") for a larger proportion of each 2-dose period compared with owners purchasing products administered monthly. CONCLUSIONS: When cat owners purchase flea and tick medication, gaps between subsequent purchases reduces the proportion of time ectoparasite protection can be provided. The duration of the gap between doses has an impact on the effectiveness of flea/tick medication because it inserts a period without flea and tick protection between doses of flea and tick medication. The gaps between purchases were shorter and the period of ectoparasite protection was larger for owners purchasing a 12-week product than for owners purchasing a monthly product.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Gatos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infestaciones por Pulgas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infestaciones por Pulgas/veterinaria , Insecticidas/administración & dosificación , Isoxazoles/administración & dosificación , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/veterinaria , Animales , Enfermedades de los Gatos/economía , Enfermedades de los Gatos/parasitología , Gatos , Ctenocephalides/efectos de los fármacos , Ctenocephalides/crecimiento & desarrollo , Infestaciones por Pulgas/economía , Infestaciones por Pulgas/parasitología , Hospitales de Veteranos/economía , Humanos , Insecticidas/economía , Isoxazoles/economía , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/economía , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/parasitología , Garrapatas/efectos de los fármacos , Garrapatas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Estados Unidos
6.
Open Vet J ; 11(1): 80-88, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33898287

RESUMEN

Background: Fluralaner is a novel isoxazoline compound and the only systemically distributed ectoparasiticide approved in the United States for redosing at up to 12-week intervals for flea and tick control in cats. Other feline ectoparasiticides, including other systemic isoxazolines, are approved for redosing at monthly intervals. A survey developed in 2016 to assess the satisfaction, preference, and adherence of dog owners prescribed fluralaner as an ectoparasiticide with the treatment and veterinary flea and tick protection recommendations was adapted for completion by cat owners in the USA. Aim: The study objective was to use cat-owner survey data obtained at US veterinary practices to assess client satisfaction and utilization practices for fluralaner, and to evaluate owner adherence to current flea and tick control recommendations. Methods: US veterinary practices (n = 26) were asked to obtain completed surveys for up to 25 active clients who were currently treating their cats with a topical preparation of fluralaner for flea and tick control. Clients who had previously used flea and tick products for cats other than fluralaner were enrolled in the study. Participating cat owners completed an 11-question survey on their satisfaction with, preference for, and adherence to treatment recommendations for topically applied fluralaner as a feline flea and tick control medication. Results: The average cat in this study had a mean (± SD) body weight of 5.1 (± 0.9) kg and was 7.1 (±1.4) years old. Most cats lived in a home versus an apartment and more than half spent some time outside. Satisfaction was assessed with a 5-point Likert scale, with nearly all cat owners (97%) indicating that they were satisfied or very satisfied with fluralaner. Most of them (66%) had previously used other monthly flea and tick products for cats. Owners were not excluded if they had previously used a canine flea and tick product. The extended dosing interval up to 12 weeks was the most frequently selected benefit of fluralaner. Nearly 9 out of 10 respondents indicated they readministered fluralaner mostly on time or delayed by a few days, and most said they were more likely to give a repeat dose of fluralaner at the recommended redosing interval compared to monthly products. 87% of the responding cat owners preferred topical fluralaner over the monthly flea and tick products they had used. Conclusion: The extended dosing interval of up to 12 weeks was the leading preference factor and the key driver of user satisfaction with fluralaner leading to improved adherence to redosing recommendations. Cat owners said they were more likely to administer fluralaner at the recommended redosing interval compared to monthly products, indicating that less frequent redosing contributes to improved adherence.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Gatos/psicología , Infestaciones por Pulgas/psicología , Insecticidas/administración & dosificación , Isoxazoles/administración & dosificación , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/psicología , Administración Tópica , Animales , Enfermedades de los Gatos/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Gatos/prevención & control , Gatos , Infestaciones por Pulgas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infestaciones por Pulgas/prevención & control , Propiedad , Satisfacción Personal , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/prevención & control , Estados Unidos
7.
Parasit Vectors ; 13(1): 541, 2020 Oct 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33129346

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Safe and effective flea and tick treatment options for cats are important in companion animal practice because of feline ectoparasite infestation prevalence and the potential for parasitic disease transmission. Retrospective cat owner purchasing transactions at United States of America (USA) veterinary clinics were obtained for three topical feline flea and tick ectoparasiticides. One medication, fluralaner, had a 12-week redosing interval, while two other medications (fipronil/s-methoprene/pyriproxyfen; imidacloprid/pyriproxyfen) were approved for monthly redosing. The annual number of doses purchased by cat owners was determined for each of the three medications and then compared between medications. The objective was to evaluate whether 12-week retreatment intervals resulted in a different duration of coverage compared to monthly treatments for ectoparasiticide products. METHODS: Study results were obtained by analyzing the transactional records from a commercial database derived from veterinary practice management software. The study database consisted of cat owner purchasing records from January 2017 through June 2019 from 671 veterinary practices representing 41,630 cats. RESULTS: Cat owners purchased an average of 1.5 doses of fluralaner per year which, based on a 12-week redosing interval, provides 4.2 months of treatment coverage. Cat owners who used monthly flea and tick medications respectively purchased 3.6 months (fipronil/s-methoprene/pyriproxyfen combination) and 2.8 months (imidacloprid/pyriproxyfen) annually of each of the two medications. Average yearly cat owner purchases of fluralaner provide a significantly longer duration of coverage than for cat owners purchasing fipronil/s-methoprene/pyriproxyfen (17% more) or imidacloprid/pyriproxyfen (50% more). CONCLUSIONS: Cat owners who obtained a flea and tick treatment with a 12-week redosing interval (fluralaner) protected their cats for up to 17% or 50% longer duration each year, respectively, compared to the duration of protection obtained by cat owners who used a medication re-dosed monthly. Cat owners should increase their duration of flea and tick coverage to come closer to achieving veterinary recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Infestaciones Ectoparasitarias/veterinaria , Hospitales Veterinarios , Insecticidas/economía , Propiedad , Mascotas , Animales , Enfermedades de los Gatos/tratamiento farmacológico , Gatos , Infestaciones Ectoparasitarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infestaciones Ectoparasitarias/epidemiología , Adhesión a Directriz , Insecticidas/farmacología , Isoxazoles/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Siphonaptera/efectos de los fármacos , Garrapatas/efectos de los fármacos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
Open Vet J ; 10(2): 135-143, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32821658

RESUMEN

Background: An extended duration flea and tick medication of the isoxazoline class (fluralaner) was introduced in 2014 in the United States and other countries. A survey was developed in 2016 to gauge dog owner adherence with veterinary recommendations around the administration of preventive flea and tick medications. Current fluralaner-using dog owners were also asked to compare their experience with opinions on monthly flea and tick products. Aim: To survey dog owners who were current users of fluralaner on their opinions, experiences, and attitudes around the administration of flea and tick medications to their dogs in light of current veterinarian recommendations. Methods: Dog owners in the United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), and Australia that gave fluralaner oral chews to their dogs were asked to compare their experience using fluralaner (12-week dosing) and monthly flea and tick medications. The survey responses of dog owners in the UK and Australia were compared against responses to a similar survey conducted in the US in 2017. Surveys were completed by dog owners who were in the clinic for any reason other than a sickness visit. Additionally, veterinarians that prescribed fluralaner from all three countries provided their annual flea and tick treatment recommendation for dogs. Results: A sample of veterinarians from the US, UK, and Australia that prescribe fluralaner recommend that dog owners obtain approximately 12 months of flea protection per year and 9-12 months of tick protection per year. A variable proportion of owners (22%-90%) reported that their dog participates in outdoor and social activities associated with an increased flea and tick exposure risk. A similarly variable proportion of owners reported prior experience of finding fleas (24%-50%) or ticks (18%-35%) on their dogs. All participating owners treated their dogs currently with fluralaner and most (68%-77%) had previously treated their dog with monthly flea and tick products. The convenience of 12-week dosing and less frequent dosing were the most frequently identified product qualities associated with their choice of an extended effect flea and tick treatment. Conclusion: Most veterinarians surveyed in this survey recommended year-round use of a flea and tick medication for dogs in the US, UK, and Australia. Dog owners recalled the veterinary recommendation for flea and tick prevention as 8-10 months per year. Most dog owners from the clinics in the US, UK, and Australia had used shorter-acting (monthly) flea/tick medications previously. The majority of those who currently gave fluralaner doses to their dogs were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the extended duration flea and tick product. Preference for a 12-week duration medication over monthly re-treatment was also high (82%-92%) in all three countries and was associated with convenience.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Infestaciones por Pulgas/veterinaria , Isoxazoles/administración & dosificación , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/veterinaria , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Animales , Australia , Niño , Perros , Femenino , Infestaciones por Pulgas/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción Personal , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/prevención & control , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
9.
Parasit Vectors ; 11(1): 581, 2018 Nov 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30400923

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Veterinary clinic transaction records from the USA were examined to determine dog owner purchase patterns for three prescription ectoparasiticides. In-clinic purchases of formulations of fluralaner (with 12-week duration per dose) were compared with dog owner purchases of afoxolaner and spinosad (both with 4 week duration per dose) in a population of 231,565 dogs over a 12 month period. Prior studies in human and animal medicine have suggested that patients more closely adhere to prescriber dosing recommendations when they receive a longer-duration medication. RESULTS: Veterinary clinic transaction records were examined for the period June 2014 through March 2017 using records from approximately 650 veterinary clinics. Ectoparasiticide purchase patterns were compared for two products (afoxalaner and spinosad) with monthly dosing and one product (fluralaner) with an extended (12 week) dosing interval. The average dog owner who obtained fluralaner purchased significantly more months of flea/tick protection (5.7 months) over the 12-month study period than the average dog owner that selected either afoxolaner (4.6 months) or spinosad (3.3 months). The proportion of dog owners who obtained only one dose of ectoparasiticide per 12-month period was 42% for fluralaner, 30% for afoxolaner and 37% for spinosad. The proportion of dog owners who obtained 2 doses or less per 12-month period was 67% for fluralaner, 52% for afoxoalaner and 67% for spinosad. Owners that obtained fluralaner were significantly more likely to obtain 7.0-12.0 months of flea and tick protection and significantly less likely to purchase 1.0-6.9 months compared with dog owners who purchased afoxolaner or spinosad. CONCLUSIONS: Dog owners who obtained a flea and tick medication with a longer duration of action acquired significantly more months of protection in a year than dog owners who obtained shorter duration (1 month) products. Dog owners were better able to adhere to veterinary recommendations on ectoparasites control with a longer-acting flea/tick medication.


Asunto(s)
Infestaciones por Pulgas/veterinaria , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Propiedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros , Drogas Veterinarias/uso terapéutico , Medicina Veterinaria , Animales , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Perros/epidemiología , Perros , Combinación de Medicamentos , Infestaciones por Pulgas/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitales Veterinarios , Humanos , Insecticidas/administración & dosificación , Insecticidas/uso terapéutico , Isoxazoles/administración & dosificación , Isoxazoles/uso terapéutico , Macrólidos/administración & dosificación , Macrólidos/uso terapéutico , Naftalenos/administración & dosificación , Naftalenos/uso terapéutico , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/administración & dosificación , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Siphonaptera/efectos de los fármacos , Garrapatas/efectos de los fármacos , Estados Unidos
10.
Parasit Vectors ; 11(1): 422, 2018 Jul 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30012222

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An investigation was conducted in West Central Florida, USA to evaluate the efficacy of either topically applied fluralaner or topically applied selamectin to control flea infestations, minimize dermatologic lesions and reduce pruritus in naturally flea infested cats over a 12-week period. When dogs were present in the households, they were treated with either oral fluralaner (if household cats were treated with topical fluralaner) or oral sarolaner (if household cats were treated with topical selamectin). METHODS: Thirty-one cats in 20 homes were treated once with fluralaner topical solution on day 0 and 18 dogs in these homes were administered a single fluralaner chewable. Twenty-nine cats in 18 homes were treated once monthly with a selamectin topical solution for 3 treatments and 13 dogs in these same homes were treated once monthly for 3 treatments with a sarolaner chewable. Fleas on cats were counted by flea combing, fleas on dogs were estimated using visual area counts and fleas in the indoor premises were assessed using intermittent-light flea traps. Blinded-assessments of feline dermatologic lesions were conducted monthly and pruritus severity was evaluated by pet owners. RESULTS: A single topical application of fluralaner reduced flea populations on cats by 96.6% within 7 days and by 100% at 12 weeks post-treatment. This efficacy was significantly greater than selamectin treatment where single topical application reduced flea populations on cats by 79.4% within 7 days of initial treatment and 3 consecutive monthly treatments reduced flea populations by 91.3% at the end of 12 weeks. At the end of the 12-week study, all fluralaner-treated cats were flea-free and this was significantly greater than the 38.5% of selamectin treated cats that were flea-free. At the end of the study, fleas were completely eradicated (from cats, dogs and homes) in 95.0% of fluralaner treatment group homes, significantly greater than the 31.3% of selamectin/sarolaner treatment group homes with complete flea eradication. Owner reported cat pruritus was reduced similarly in both treatment groups. Significant improvements in dermatologic lesion scores were achieved by day 30 in fluralaner treated cats and by day 60 in selamectin treated cats. CONCLUSIONS: An in-home investigation in subtropical Florida found that 1 application of topical fluralaner eliminated flea infestations on cats and in homes significantly more effectively than 3 consecutive monthly doses of selamectin.


Asunto(s)
Antiparasitarios/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de los Gatos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infestaciones por Pulgas/veterinaria , Isoxazoles/uso terapéutico , Ivermectina/análogos & derivados , Administración Tópica , Animales , Antiparasitarios/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades de los Gatos/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Gatos/parasitología , Gatos , Infestaciones por Pulgas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infestaciones por Pulgas/epidemiología , Florida/epidemiología , Isoxazoles/administración & dosificación , Ivermectina/administración & dosificación , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico
11.
Vet Parasitol ; 257: 15-20, 2018 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29907187

RESUMEN

Ticks are an important but under recognized parasitic threat to cats in many areas of the United States. To characterize the species and stages of ticks most commonly recovered from cats and determine the prevalence of disease agents in the ticks, we conducted a survey of ticks removed from cats at veterinary practices in 18 states from April 2016-June 2017. A total of 796 ticks were submitted from 332 cats from 41 different veterinary practices. A single tick was submitted from the majority of cats, with a mean infestation intensity of 2.4 (range 1-46). The most common tick was Ixodes scapularis, accounting for 422/796 (53.0%) ticks submitted, followed by Amblyomma americanum (224/796; 28.1%) and Dermacentor variabilis (131/796; 16.5%); a few I. pacificus, I. banksi, D. occidentalis, A. maculatum, Rhipicephalus sanguineus, and Otobius megnini were also submitted. A majority of ticks were adults (593/796; 74.5%); females predominated in all adult tick submissions including I. scapularis (277/327; 84.7% female), A. americanum (66/128; 51.6% female), and D. variabilis (75/126; 59.5% female). Immature ticks included 186 nymphs and 17 larvae and were primarily I. scapularis and A. americanum. Adult I. scapularis were most reported to be attached to the dorsal head and neck; A. americanum to the abdomen and perianal region; and D. variabilis to the back and ear. Ticks were collected in every month; the largest number of submissions were in May and June (42.5% of ticks) and October and November (35.9% of ticks). Adults of I. scapularis were most commonly submitted October through December, A. americanum March through June, and D. variabilis May through July. Cats with ticks were predominantly male (58.8%) and altered (76.2%), and most reportedly spent >30% of time outdoors, although 64/294 (21.8%) for which lifestyle estimates were provided were reported to live primarily (≤30% of time outside; n = 54) or entirely (100%; n = 10) indoors. Assay of ticks removed from cats revealed I. scapularis were infected with Borrelia burgdorferi (25.7%) and Anaplasma phagocytophilum (4.4%); A. americanum were infected with Ehrlichia chaffeensis (1.3%); and D. variabilis were infected with spotted fever group Rickettsia spp. (3.1%). No ticks in this study tested positive for Cytauxzoon felis. Pet cats, including those that live primarily indoors, are at risk of tick infestation, potentially exposed to tick-borne disease agents, and would benefit from routine tick control.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Gatos/epidemiología , Ixodidae/microbiología , Ixodidae/fisiología , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/veterinaria , Anaplasma phagocytophilum/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Borrelia burgdorferi/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedades de los Gatos/parasitología , Gatos , Dermacentor/crecimiento & desarrollo , Dermacentor/microbiología , Dermacentor/fisiología , Ehrlichia chaffeensis/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Ixodes/crecimiento & desarrollo , Ixodes/microbiología , Ixodes/fisiología , Ixodidae/crecimiento & desarrollo , Larva/crecimiento & desarrollo , Larva/microbiología , Larva/fisiología , Masculino , Ninfa/crecimiento & desarrollo , Ninfa/microbiología , Ninfa/fisiología , Rickettsia/aislamiento & purificación , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/epidemiología , Infestaciones por Garrapatas/parasitología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
Parasit Vectors ; 10(1): 284, 2017 Jun 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28583186

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adherence to a prescribed therapeutic regimen is a critical factor for achieving medication effectiveness and therefore treatment success. In the case of companion animal ectoparasite control, suboptimal owner adherence to medication recommendations is thought to be a common cause of treatment failure, and previous reports have found pet owners applying an average of 4.0-4.6 monthly flea and tick treatments per year to their dogs. This study investigated: US veterinary hospital self-reported flea and tick prevention recommendations; dog owner recollection of these recommendations; dog owner opinion on flea/tick recommendations and estimated owner flea and tick medication adherence based on veterinary hospital purchase records. RESULTS: Veterinarians at 24 veterinary hospitals in 4 United States regions provided their flea and tick prevention recommendations. Five hundred fifty-nine dog owners, clients of the 24 hospitals, completed a survey evaluating their recollection of the hospitals' recommendations and their opinions regarding required treatment frequency. Almost all veterinary hospitals in this study recommended 12 months of flea and tick prevention but only 62% of participating dog owners recalled this recommendation. The average owner response was that their dogs require 10.5 months of flea and tick prevention annually. Owner opinions were significantly different among U.S. regions with pet owners in the northeast U.S. believing that they needed significantly less canine flea and tick protection than pet owners in other parts of the United States. The estimated actual flea and tick prevention coverage was 6.1 months based on owner medication purchases over a 12-month period. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, dog owner opinions and actions show that their flea and tick treatment adherence falls short of veterinarians' recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Infestaciones Ectoparasitarias/veterinaria , Insecticidas/administración & dosificación , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Animales , Estudios Transversales , Perros , Infestaciones Ectoparasitarias/prevención & control , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Veterinarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...