Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 54(6): 689-95, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20455880

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dispatching centres were fused into one of the 112 entity, which caused concerns regarding whether the medical calls could be processed effectively also in the new centre. We evaluated the effects of the reform on key performance criteria in medical calls. METHODS: This observational study in the Helsinki Dispatching Centre consisted of two periods: Period I 2 years before the reform and Period II 2 years after. The main outcome measures were answering and call processing times, accuracy of risk assessment and appropriate use of ambulances. RESULTS: In Period I (n=574,276), 92.2% of all incoming phone calls were answered within 10 s and in Period II (n=758,022) 82.8% (P<0.0001). Time to dispatch a first responding fire unit increased from 98 to 113 s (P<0.0001) and an advanced life support unit in category A calls increased from 73 to 84 s (P<0.0001). In Period I 47.7%, 34.8% and 17.5% of phone calls were completed in <3, 3-5 and >5 min and in Period II 29.8%, 36.1% and 34.1% (P<0.0001). The number of three studied non-transportation call types and unnecessary lights-and-siren responses increased significantly (P<0.0001 and 0.0001, respectively). Neither the accuracy of risk assessment in the three studied call types nor the rate of telephone-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation changed. CONCLUSIONS: The reform increased the total number of ambulance dispatches, prolonged answering and call processing times and had a negative effect on the appropriate use of ambulances. The accuracy of risk assessment was not affected. Evidence-based data should be the basis for the future as dispatching centre processes are shown to be vulnerable during organisational reforms.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Comunicación entre Servicios de Urgencia/organización & administración , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Ambulancias/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas de Comunicación entre Servicios de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Finlandia , Primeros Auxilios , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Teléfono , Factores de Tiempo , Triaje , Salud Urbana
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 49(10): 1527-33, 2005 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16223401

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to report the rate and causes for multiple casualty incidents (MCI) to analyse the prehospital part of responding to MCIs, report mortality and find areas for improvement. METHODS: A prospective cohort study conducted in an urban emergency medical service (EMS) between 1.3.1998 and 28.2.2004. RESULTS: Fifty-nine MCIs involving 263 patients (167 walking, 96 non-walking) occurred. The incidence of MCIs was 1.8/100,000 inhabitants year(-1). Traffic accidents were the most common cause followed by residential fires, intoxications and stabbings or shootings. Early MCI alarm by the dispatching centre was performed in 18 MCIs. Deviations from standard emergency medical care occurred in 12% of patients. Lack of immobilization of the neck or back in trauma patients and lack of administration of 100% oxygen in suspected carbon monoxide intoxication were the most common deviations. Deviations were related to the lack of presence of on-scene medical command (P = 0.0013) and inadequate resources (P = 0.0342). One hundred and ninety-two patients were transported to emergency departments. Mortality during the prehospital phase was 4.9% (13/263) and during the next 28 days 2.3% (6/263). Adequate resources for safe and effective management of a MCI were related to an early MCI alarm by the dispatching centre (P = 0,022) and to the presence of on-scene medical command (P < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: Traffic accidents, residential fires and intoxications were the leading causes for MCIs. Emergency medical service could respond to most MCIs efficiently and safely. Majority of deviations from standard medical care seemed potentially preventable. Several areas for improvement were identified. From prehospital links, the dispatching centre and on-scene medical command had a vital role in the successful management of MCIs.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ambulancias , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Documentación , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Sistemas de Manutención de la Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Transporte de Pacientes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...