Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 6 de 6
1.
J Radiol Prot ; 41(2)2021 06 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33461178

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been available since the late 1990s for use in dentistry. European legislation requires optimisation of protection and the use of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) as well as regular quality control (QC) of the imaging devices, which is well outlined in existing international recommendations. Nevertheless, the level of application is not known. Earlier studies have indicated that few European countries have established DRLs and that patient doses (exposure parameters) have not been properly optimised. The EURADOS Working Group 12-Dosimetry in Medical Imaging undertook a survey to identify existing practices in Member States. Questionnaires were developed to identify equipment types, clinical procedures performed, and exposure settings used. The surveys were circulated to 22 countries resulting in 28 responses from 13 countries. Variations were identified in the exposure factors and in the doses delivered to patients for similar clinical indicators. Results confirm that patient doses are still not properly optimised and DRLs are largely not established. There is a need to promote the importance of performing QC testing of dental CBCT equipment and to further optimise patient exposure by establishment and use of DRLs as a part of a continuous optimisation process.


Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Diagnostic Reference Levels , Humans , Quality Control , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 186(2-3): 391-396, 2019 Dec 31.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31832648

The pilot dose survey on paediatric general radiography, fluoroscopy and CT procedures was performed in four university hospitals. The analysis of data was focused on the radiography and CT imaging of head, chest, abdomen, pelvis and spine and fluoroscopic procedures of gastrointestinal and urinary tracts. The survey was conducted by the National Radiation Protection Institute. Two hospitals exported data from the patient dose management system, while the others collected the data manually. The methodology of diagnostic reference levels assessment was proposed and tested. Local diagnostic reference levels were calculated in terms of air kerma-area product $P_{KA}$, CT air kerma-length product $P_{KL,CT}$ and volumetric CT air kerma index $C_{VOL}$. The lack of procedure standardisation, e.g. in tube voltage setting irrespective of patient's weight, was revealed at one hospital. Dose and exposure parameters distributions with respect to patient's anatomical constitution are presented in this article. In future, this pilot study will be a base for national survey of paediatric diagnostic reference levels.


Fluoroscopy/methods , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiation Exposure/analysis , Radiography, Interventional/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Urologic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Child , Czech Republic , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Pilot Projects , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection
3.
Phys Med ; 32(1): 42-51, 2016 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26508013

A comparison of calibration results and procedures in terms of air kerma length product, PKL, and air kerma, K, was conducted between eight dosimetry laboratories. A pencil-type ionization chamber (IC), generally used for computed tomography dose measurements, was calibrated according to three calibration methods, while its residual signal and other characteristics (sensitivity profile, active length) were assessed. The results showed that the "partial irradiation method" is the preferred method for the pencil-type IC calibration in terms of PKL and it could be applied by the calibration laboratories successfully. Most of the participating laboratories achieved high level of agreement (>99%) for both dosimetry quantities (PKL and K). Estimated relative standard uncertainties of comparison results vary among laboratories from 0.34% to 2.32% depending on the quantity, beam quality and calibration method applied. Detailed analysis of the assigned uncertainties have been presented and discussed.


Ions , Laboratories/standards , Radiometry/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Air , Calibration , Europe , International Cooperation , Models, Statistical , Observer Variation , Radiation Dosage , Reproducibility of Results
4.
Eur Radiol ; 23(3): 623-31, 2013 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22940731

OBJECTIVE: To survey procedures and protocols in paediatric computed tomography (CT) in 40 less resourced countries. METHODS: Under a project of the International Atomic Energy Agency, 146 CT facilities in 40 countries of Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America responded to an electronic survey of CT technology, exposure parameters, CT protocols and doses. RESULTS: Modern MDCT systems are available in 77 % of the facilities surveyed with dedicated paediatric CT protocols available in 94 %. However, protocols for some age groups were unavailable in around 50 % of the facilities surveyed. Indication-based protocols were used in 57 % of facilities. Estimates of radiation dose using CTDI or DLP from standard CT protocols demonstrated wide variation up to a factor of 100. CTDI(vol) values for the head and chest were between two and five times those for an adult at some sites. Sedation and use of shielding were frequently reported; immobilisation was not. Records of exposure factors were kept at 49 % of sites. CONCLUSION: There is significant potential for improvement in CT practice and protocol use for children in less resourced countries. Dose estimates for young children varied widely. This survey provides critical baseline data for ongoing quality improvement efforts by the IAEA.


Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Protection/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Africa/epidemiology , Asia/epidemiology , Europe/epidemiology , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Latin America/epidemiology , Radiation Dosage
5.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 198(5): 1021-31, 2012 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22528891

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency of pediatric CT in 40 less-resourced countries and to determine the level of appropriateness in CT use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on the increase in the number of CT examinations during 2007 and 2009 and appropriate use of CT examinations were collected, using standard forms, from 146 CT facilities at 126 hospitals. RESULTS: The lowest frequency of pediatric CT examinations in 2009 was in European facilities (4.3%), and frequencies in Asia (12.2%) and Africa (7.8%) were twice as high. Head CT is the most common CT examination in children, amounting to nearly 75% of all pediatric CT examinations. Although regulations in many countries assign radiologists with the main responsibility of deciding whether a radiologic examination should be performed, in fact, radiologists alone were responsible for only 6.3% of situations. Written referral guidelines for imaging were not available in almost one half of the CT facilities. Appropriateness criteria for CT examinations in children did not always follow guidelines set by agencies, in particular, for patients with accidental head trauma, infants with congenital torticollis, children with possible ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction, and young children (< 5 years old) with acute sinusitis. In about one third of situations, nonavailability of previous images and records on previously received patient doses have the potential to lead to unnecessary examinations and radiation doses. CONCLUSION: With increasing use of CT in children and a lack of use of appropriateness criteria, there is a strong need to implement guidelines to avoid unnecessary radiation doses to children.


Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Africa , Asia , Child , Child, Preschool , Europe , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , International Agencies , Latin America , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 120(1-4): 155-8, 2006.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16782748

Since 2002, the postal audit in dental radiography has been supplementing standard quality control (QC) tools for dental intraoral X-ray machines. An aim of the audit is to check basic X-ray machine parameters (field size, exposure reproducibility), and a quality of the whole process of diagnostic imaging (entrance surface air-kerma measurement, a check of film processing and an image quality evaluation). The standard QC tests, performed by private companies, check mainly the X-ray unit. Conversely, the audit gives better information about the patient examination practices. During the period of January 2002 to May 2004 approximately 4000 audits were performed. The results confirmed that main problems in dental radiography are due to incorrect film processing, non-optimised setting of the exposure parameters and use of obsolete X-ray machines. Only approximately 30% of performed audits were satisfactory with respect to all checked parameters.


Dental Audit , Film Dosimetry/statistics & numerical data , Film Dosimetry/standards , Radiography, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Dental/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/statistics & numerical data , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Czech Republic , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires
...