Psoriatic lesions on the scalp, face, intertriginous, genitals, palms/soles, and nails are often delay diagnosed, hard-to-treat, and cause disability. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is one of the most frequent and significant comorbidities in psoriasis. Many studies have discovered a link between psoriasis and MetS, but none have specifically assessed the hard-to-treat psoriasis in Indonesian population. This is a multicenter study involving four dermatology referral hospitals to investigate the association between psoriasis severity that has hard-to-treat lesions with the prevalence of MetS in Jakarta, Indonesia. Data was collected from April to October 2022. The severity of 84 hard-to-treat psoriasis patients was measured by Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) scores. The participants divided into PASI score >10 (severe) and ≤ 10 (mild-moderate) groups. MetS was identified based on the modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. MetS was found in 64.3% of patients. Patients with a PASI score>10 had a significantly higher risk of metabolic syndrome compared to those with a score ≤ 10 (78.6% vs 50%, OR 3.667; 95% CI 1.413-9.514; p = 0.006). The prevalence of hypertension (p = 0.028), low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (p = 0.01), mean fasting blood sugar (p = 0.018), and triglyceride levels (p = 0.044) between the two groups differed significantly. This study found most frequent components of MetS were abdominal obesity, decreased levels of HDL cholesterol, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and hypertriglyceridemia respectively. Individuals with severe hard-to-treat psoriasis had a 3.67 times more likely to have MetS rather than the mild-moderate group.
Metabolic Syndrome , Psoriasis , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Metabolic Syndrome/complications , Indonesia/epidemiology , Male , Female , Psoriasis/epidemiology , Psoriasis/complications , Middle Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Prevalence
Objective: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is widely known as an alternative therapy for androgenetic alopecia (AGA); however, there is no standardized method for its preparation and application. This study aims to compare the thrombocyte count elevation and clinical AGA improvements between single- and double-spin PRP preparation methods. Methods: This preliminary, double-blind, randomized clinical trial included 30 male subjects with AGA aged 25 to 59 years with Hamilton-Norwood stages III to VI. Subjects were divided into a single-spin group (3,000rpm for 15 minutes) and a double-spin group (first spinning at 1,500rpm for 6 minutes, continuing at 2,500rpm for 15 minutes). The study was conducted for six weeks, with a two-week visit interval. Baseline and PRP thrombocyte counts were assessed on the initial appointment. A total of 1cc of PRP was intradermally injected into a 6×4cm predetermined area, administered at Weeks 0, 2, and 4. At every visit, clinical progress was assessed by overall hair appearance, photography, trichoscopy, and trichoscan. All subjects were instructed to use minoxidil twice daily during the study. This study has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID No. NCT05681897). Results: Both groups increased thrombocyte counts by 4 to 5 times from their initial levels; however, the increase in the single-spin group was more significant. Significant improvements were observed in both groups, including hair density, hair rate, and hair count of anagen, telogen, vellus, and terminal hair. Limitations: Limitations include lack of placebo or vehicle control. Conclusion: Both PRP preparation methods significantly raise thrombocyte counts, substantially improve nearly all hair parameters, and have tremendous therapeutic promise for treating AGA. Clinicians may designate one of the two techniques.
Background: Stroke is one of the top causes of death and disability in several nations. Patients with psoriasis are susceptible to multiple comorbidities, including stroke. In addition to acute ischemic stroke, psoriasis and chronic inflammation require comprehensive treatment. Here, we present a comprehensive management case of a patient with an acute ischemic stroke and psoriasis. Case Presentation. A 42-year-old man came to the emergency department complaining of sudden left-sided weakness that started two and a half hours before being admitted to the hospital. The patient was treated with cyclosporine from 2013 to 2019 for a history of psoriasis. The patient was then treated for secondary stroke prevention using aspirin, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, folic acid, simvastatin, cyclosporine, and topical treatment. After two days of treatment, the patient's condition improved clinically, and he was discharged without further neurological deficits. As a home medication, the patient's cyclosporine was switched to the initial dose of methotrexate (7.5 mg/week) and titrated weekly to a response dose of 10 mg in the 10th week. After three months of follow-up, the patient's condition remained stable, devoid of similar symptoms or sequelae. Conclusions: Cyclosporine should only be used for a maximum of 1 year for stroke management with psoriasis and be substituted for other systemic agents such as methotrexate. In addition, anticoagulants, antihypertensive, antihyperlipidemic, vitamin B6, vitamin 12, and folic acid regimens are highly recommended for comprehensive therapy of cardiovascular comorbidities.
Background: The efficacy of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) secretome for skin aging has been established, yet no studies hitherto directly investigated the best administration method for such purpose. Purpose: We aimed to compare microneedling (MN) versus fractional CO2 laser (FL) as methods of delivery for ADMSCs secretome in the treatment of aging skin. Patients and Methods: A single-blind, randomized split-face clinical trial was conducted on 30 Indonesian women (aged 35-59 years old) with signs of facial cutaneous senescence. Their initial aging status was assessed by dermoscopy photoaging scale (DPAS) and Janus-III measurement system. In the second and fourth weeks, all participants were treated with both MN and FL, followed by the application of a four-fold concentrated ADMSC secretome. The assignment of which side of the face received MN or FL was done by computer-based randomization. Skin parameters were reevaluated on the fourth and sixth weeks, along with patient satisfaction, level of comfort, preference for administration techniques, and also adverse events experienced during the study. Appropriate statistical analyses were subsequently performed at a significance level of 0.05. Results: Significant improvements in total DPAS and wrinkles were found in the MN and FL groups at the end of the trial. In contrast, no statistical differences in all parameters were observed between groups in the fourth and sixth weeks. FL scored higher than MN for satisfaction and preference, but lower in terms of comfort. Pain, burning sensation, and itch were the side effects experienced by subjects upon treatment. Two patients had prolonged reddish skin succeeding FL treatment, which relieved with moisturizer application. Conclusion: Both MN and FL yielded comparable results for improving several skin aging features. However, subjective preference for ADMSCs secretome administration method may differ when considering satisfaction, comfort, and possible adverse events.
INTRODUCTION: Scabies is caused by Sarcoptes scabiei var hominis, often causing secondary bacterial infections, especially by Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus. Permethrin 5% cream is the first-line of treatment that is recommended, combined with Fusidic acid 2% cream as the first-line topical antibiotic. We investigated the efficacy of a combination of permethrin 5% cream and fusidic acid 2% cream for the treatment of impetiginized scabies. METHODOLOGY: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial was organized at two Islamic boarding schools in Bogor, West Java, Indonesia. Forty subjects were randomly allocated into the intervention group (permethrin 5% and fusidic acid 2%; n = 20), and the control group (permethrin 5% and placebo; n = 20). Treatment efficacy was determined through the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pruritus and pain, and by examining bacterial cultures. RESULTS: Treatment efficacy in the intervention group was higher than in the control group on day 7 (80% vs. 35%) and day 14 (95% vs 35%, p ≤ 0.001, RR 2.714) with decreasing VAS for pruritus (p = 0.04) and pain (p = 0.035). The most common bacterium was Staphylococcus aureus. Some minor adverse effects such as itch and heat occurred temporarily. CONCLUSIONS: Treating impetiginized scabies with permethrin 5% and fusidic acid 2% cream is more effective than treating with only 5% premethrin. The most common bacterium causing secondary infection in impetiginized scabies is Staphylococcus aureus.
Scabies , Staphylococcal Infections , Fusidic Acid/therapeutic use , Humans , Pain , Permethrin/therapeutic use , Pruritus/drug therapy , Scabies/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus
INTRODUCTION: Acute extrinsic atopic dermatitis (AD) requires long-term treatment. Cimetidine could be used as an adjuvant therapy for acute-extrinsic AD due to immunomodulatory effects. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of cimetidine as an adjuvant to standard treatment in acute extrinsic AD. METHODS: This is a double-blind randomized controlled trial involving 26 AD patients aged 12-60 years from 2017 to 2020. Effectiveness of cimetidine was assessed by comparing SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and objective SCORAD changes in both groups at week 2, 4, 6, and 8. Serum levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE), interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)-12, and IL-4 were also documented. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in SCORAD changes at week 2, 4, 6, and 8 (p = 0.004; p = 0.001; p < 0.001; and p < 0.001 respectively), objective SCORAD changes at week 2, 4, 6, and 8 (p = 0.004, p = 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001 respectively), and IgE level changes at week 8 (p = 0.002) between the two groups. However, there were no significant changes in IFN-γ, IL-12, and IL-4 levels between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Cimetidine is a safe and effective adjuvant therapy for acute-extrinsic AD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04018131.
