Material-Intrinsic NIR-Fluorescence Enables Image-Guided Surgery for Ceramic Fracture Removal.

Hip arthroplasty effectively treats advanced osteoarthritis and is therefore entitled as "operation of the 20th century." With demographic shifts, the USA alone is projected to perform up to 850 000 arthroplasties annually by 2030. Many implants now feature a ceramic head, valued for strength and wear resistance. Nonetheless, a fraction, up to 0.03% may fracture during their lifespan, demanding complex removal procedures. To address this, a radiation-free, fluorescence-based image-guided surgical technique is presented. The method uses the inherent fluorescence of ceramic implant materials, demonstrated through chemical and optical analysis of prevalent implant types. Specifically, Biolox delta implants exhibited strong fluorescence around 700 nm with a 74% photoluminescence quantum yield. Emission tails are identified extending into the near-infrared (NIR-I) biological transparency range, forming a vital prerequisite for the label-free visualization of fragments. This ruby-like fluorescence could be attributed to Cr within the zirconia-toughened alumina matrix, enabling the detection of even deep-seated millimeter-sized fragments via camera-assisted techniques. Additionally, fluorescence microscopy allowed detection of µm-sized ceramic particles, enabling debris visualization in synovial fluid as well as histological samples. This label-free optical imaging approach employs readily accessible equipment and can seamlessly transition to clinical settings without significant regulatory barriers, thereby enhancing the safety, efficiency, and minimally invasive nature of fractured ceramic implant removal procedures.

Validity of leg length measurement in the supine and standing position compared with pelvic survey X-ray after total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The correct adjustment of leg length is a major goal in the implantation of total hip replacements (THRs). Differences in leg length can lead to functional impairment and patient dissatisfaction. By determining leg length at an early stage, before the patient is discharged from hospital, compensatory measures such as the production of special insoles or orthopaedic footwear can be initiated promptly if there is a difference in leg length. Due to shortening of the period of time spent in hospital, the traditional measurement of leg length in a standing position may be increasingly subject to error. A protective posture immediately after surgery or the presence of a twisted pelvis, for example, due to scoliotic spinal misalignments, falsifies the measurement result in the standing position. Here, the measurement of leg length in the supine position may prove to be accurate immediately postoperatively, regardless of potential sources of error, and is to be compared with measurement in the standing position versus radiological measurement on the AP pelvic survey. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present retrospective study included 190 patients who had undergone primary total hip arthroplasty. The leg length difference (LLD) of the patients was determined pre- and postoperatively both in the supine and standing position and compared with the postoperative radiological pelvic survey image. RESULTS: Postoperatively, it was shown that the mean length measured was 0.35 mm too long in the supine position and 0.68 mm too short in the standing position (p value < 0.001). Determination of the average absolute measurement error produces a deviation of 4.06 mm in the standing and 4.51 mm in the supine position (p value 0.126). CONCLUSIONS: It is shown that the postoperative measurement of LLD in the supine and standing position is equally valid and sufficiently accurate, compared with the gold standard of measurement on a radiograph.

A Retrospective Analysis of the Association Between Male Facial Hair and the Incidence of Peri-Prosthetic Infections.

Background: The wearing of male facial hair has been undergoing something of a renaissance for a number of years, with medical colleagues in the surgical disciplines being no exception. Meanwhile, there are a few reports in the literature that beards might have an increased bacterial colonization. This study aims to determine if wearing a beard leads to an increased rate of infection in total hip or knee arthroplasty. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 20,394 primary hip and knee replacements that were implanted at a single university hospital. The rate of infections that occurred within one year after surgery and the surgeons performing the surgery were recorded. The surgeons were classified into clean-shaven and beard wearers. The beard wearers were further classified by individual facial hair styles, namely a moustache, chin beard, round beard, or full beard. Results: The overall rate of surgical site infections 365 days after surgery is 0.75%. There was no statistically significant association between surgical site infection and the presence of facial hair (p = 0.774) or specific beard types (p = 0.298). Conclusions: The results presented in this study show no differences in infection rates across different facial hair styles of male surgeons.

"Koehlers teardrop is not a reliable landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after Total hip arthroplasty" - a retrospective radiological study.

PURPOSE: Various anatomical landmarks have become established in radiography for the assessment of cup positioning after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The most important one is Koehler's teardrop figure (KTF). However, there is a lack of data on the validity of this landmark, which is widely used clinically for assessing the centre of rotation of the hip. METHOD: A retrospective measurement of the lateral and cranial distance of the KTF to the centre of hip rotation was performed on the basis of 250 X-ray images of patients who had undergone THA. In addition, the dependence of these distances on pelvic tilt was determined in 16 patients by means of virtual X-ray projections based on pelvic CTs. RESULTS: It was shown that the distance of the KTF from the centre of hip rotation in the horizontal plane is gender-dependent (men: 42.8 ± 6.0 mm vs. women: 37.4 ± 4.7 mm; p < 0.001) and age-dependent (Pearson correlation - 0.114; p < 0.05). Furthermore, the vertical and horizontal distances are subject to variation depending on height (Pearson correlation 0.14; p < 0.05 and 0.40; p < 0.001, respectively) and weight (Pearson correlation 0.158; p < 0.05). The distance between the KTF and the centre of hip rotation varies slightly depending on pelvic tilt. CONCLUSION: The KTF is not a sufficiently valid landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after THA. It is influenced by many different disturbance variables. However, it is largely robust against changes in pelvic tilt, so that it can be used as a reference point when comparing different intraindividual radiographs to assess the change in the centre of rotation due to implantation or to detect cup migration.

The use of acetabular screws in total hip arthroplasty and its influence on wear and periacetabular osteolysis in the long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: The cementless implantation of hip replacement cups may be performed with and without the additional use of acetabular screws. If the surgeon uses screws or not depends on variable factors. In general, the use of screws is intended to increase the primary stability of the cup. Whether screws increase the initial stability of the cup construct, or even reduce it in part, is the subject of considerable debate in the literature. It is also unclear whether the additional screws lead to increased wear or increased periacetabular osteolysis over the long-term course. METHODS: Two hundred eleven patients from a previous study with a minimum follow-up of 10.7 years were included. Of these, 68 patients with 82 total hip arthroplasties (THA) were given clinical and radiological follow-up examinations. Of these, 52 had been fitted without screws and 30 with screws. On the basis of radiographs, annual wear and osteolysis were quantified. The clinical results were recorded by means of VAS, HHS, and WOMAC scores. RESULTS: Significantly more periacetabular osteolysis was found if additive acetabular screws had been used. No difference was found in relation to the volumetric wear per year. Likewise, no difference was found with regard to the clinical scores. CONCLUSIONS: The use of additive acetabular screws leads to increased osteolysis in the periacetabular bone stock. Insofar as the primary stability of the cementless cup construct allows it, no additional acetabular screws should be used.

An Isoelastic Monoblock Cup Retains More Acetabular and Femoral Bone Than a Modular Press-Fit Cup: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: For cup revision after total hip arthroplasty, sufficiently good periacetabular bone stock is a prerequisite for fixation of the revision implant. Cementless cups can lead to a relevant reduction of peri-implant bone mineral density (BMD) through stress-shielding. METHODS: Fifty patients were included in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Group 1 (RM group) received an isoelastic monoblock cup (RM Pressfit vitamys; Mathys). Group 2 (IT group) received a modular titanium cup (Allofit-S IT Alloclassic with a polyethylene liner; Zimmer). Periacetabular BMD was determined and subdivided into 4 regions of interest by dual x-ray absorptiometry at 1 week (baseline) and at 4 years postoperatively. Our primary outcome was reduction in periacetabular BMD. RESULTS: Periacetabular BMD was reduced by an average of 15.1% in the RM group and 16.5% in the IT group at 4 years postoperatively. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups over the periacetabular structure as a whole. However, the decrease of BMD in the polar region was significantly different in the RM group (4.9% ± 10.0%) compared with the IT group (15.9% ± 14.9%, p = 0.005). Use of the isoelastic RM cup showed significantly less bone loss than the modular IT cup. CONCLUSIONS: Relevant loss of BMD at 4 years after surgery was identified in the periacetabular region in both groups. No differences between the 2 cup systems were found when looking at the overall periacetabular region. As a secondary outcome, less postoperative periacetabular bone loss occurred in the polar region when an isoelastic cup was used. Longer follow-up is required to allow for conclusions to be drawn about the long-term course of the 2 cup systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Association Between Lumbar Spinal Degeneration and Anatomic Pelvic Parameters.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to prove the association between anatomic pelvis parameters and specific types of lumbar spinal degeneration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Different spinopelvic sagittal profile types are suggested to be associated with specific degenerative lumbar spine pathologies. Because pelvic morphology plays a key role defining the spinal shape as well as its load and function it thereby potentially predisposes the development of spinal degeneration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal degeneration who were surgically treated in 2 spine departments from March 2011 until August 2016 were included in this retrospective analysis. Single-level degenerative pathologies were classified as lumbar disc herniation (LDH), degenerative disc disease (DDD), lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), and degenerative spondylolisthesis (DSPL). The constant anatomic pelvic parameters pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic radius (PR), and sacral table angle (STA) were assessed in lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine and compared between the pathologies. RESULTS: In total, 249 patients were assigned to the LDH (n=73), DDD (n=67), LSS (n=42), and DSPL (n=67) groups. Group comparisons revealed significant differences in the anatomic pelvic parameters PR (LDH, 139.5±10.8 mm; DDD, 135.9±14.0 mm; LSS, 127.8±14.3 mm; DSPL, 135.8±12.7 mm; P<0.001), PI (LDH, 53.1±10.0 degrees; DDD, 50.0±9.9 degrees; LSS, 54.5±9.6 degrees; DSPL, 57.1±10.8 degrees; P=0.001), and STA (LDH, 95.3±12.7 degrees; DDD, 105.4±9.0 degrees; LSS, 105.9±11.5 degrees; DSPL, 98.6±9.5 degrees; P<0.001). Post hoc tests indicated significant differences between the PR of the LSS group and that of all other subgroups (P<0.012), the PI of the DDD group and that of DSPL (P<0.001), and the STA of the LDH/DSPL groups and that of the LSS/DDD group (P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: We found all the constant anatomic parameters to be specific for distinct types of degeneration, suggesting pelvis shape is a predisposing factor for their development. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Patient Obesity Influences Pelvic Lift During Cup Insertion in Total Hip Arthroplasty Through a Lateral Transgluteal Approach in Supine Position.

BACKGROUND: Movement of the pelvis during implantation of total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a major influence on the positioning of the acetabular cup. Strong traction caused by retractors leads to iatrogenic pelvic lift and can thus be partly responsible for cup malpositioning. The objective of this study was to investigate such factors that influence pelvic lift. METHODS: The dynamic movement of the pelvis was measured during implantation of THA in 67 patients. This was done by measuring the acceleration using the SensorLog app on a smartphone. RESULTS: At its maximum, the pelvis was lifted by an average of 6.7°. When impacting the press-fit cup, the surgical side was raised by 4.4° compared with the time of skin incision. This lift at the time of cup implantation correlates significantly with the body mass index and the patient's abdominal and pelvic circumference. CONCLUSION: Every surgeon performing THA must be aware of the pelvic lift during an operation. Especially in patients with a high body mass index, a large abdominal circumference, or a large pelvic circumference, there is an increased risk of malpositioning of the acetabular cup. When impacting the cup, we recommend releasing the traction of the retractor, so that the pelvis can tilt back into its natural position, and thus, the anticipated cup positioning can be implemented as exactly as possible.

Influence of Surgical Approach on Pelvic Lift in Hip Arthroplasty During Cup Insertion.

The position of the acetabular cup is a major factor in the long-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Malpositioning of the acetabular cup frequently has been reported with the use of a minimally invasive implantation technique. It remains unclear whether the limited visibility or the increased retractor traction and thus tilting of the pelvis during cup implantation is the cause. This study investigated the influence of iatrogenically related pelvic lift using an anterolateral minimally invasive THA technique. In a group of 30 consecutive patients who underwent THA via a minimally invasive anterolateral approach, iatrogenic lifting of the pelvis was measured with a smartphone using a 3-axis accelerometer and compared with patients in a historical age- and sex-matched control group who underwent THA using a transgluteal approach. Postoperatively, the inclination and anteversion of the cup was determined on pelvic radiographs. In the anterolateral group, the pelvis was lifted by a maximum of 6.3° and by an average of 3.9° when the acetabular cup was impacted; no difference was noted compared with the transgluteal group. In contrast, the cups in the anterolateral group showed significantly increased inclination and reduced anteversion. In both techniques, the iatrogenic tilting of the pelvis at the time of cup implantation occurred to a comparable extent. Therefore, the significant differences in postoperative radiographs cannot be attributed to increased retractor traction on exposure of the acetabulum, which means that the limited visibility must be responsible. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):e589-e593.].

Course of pelvic lift during total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The position of the cup makes a major contribution to the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). In conventional implantation of the prosthesis without navigation, the surgeon relies on the spatial position of the pelvis. However, iatrogenic manipulation of the pelvis during different surgical steps constantly changes the position of the pelvis during the operation. The position of the pelvis is substantial for the correct placement of the cup. The objective of this study was to investigate and visualize the course of this pelvic lift and correlate it to certain surgical steps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pelvic lift was measured in 67 patients during implantation of a THA. This was done by measuring acceleration using the SensorLog app on a smartphone. It was placed on the patient's contralateral anterior superior iliac spine and recorded the movement of the pelvis throughout the whole surgical procedure. The position of the pelvis was allocated to each of eight relevant surgical steps during the operation. These surgical steps were normed over the time axis and transferred to a diagram. RESULTS: We found an average pelvic lift displacement of up to 14.9° upon placement in the figure-of-four position. This lift is particularly critical when exposing the acetabulum, as the true cup position can be unconsciously influenced. Average values of between 5.6° and 6.9° were found here. CONCLUSIONS: When implanting a THA in supine position, the pelvis is not fixed on the operating table. Rather, the side to be operated on is lifted to a greater or lesser degree, depending on the surgical step to be performed. The retractor traction immediately before cup implantation should be minimized. Nevertheless, it should be taken into account that anteversion of the cup implant in relation to the table plane is systematically higher than in relation to the pelvic entry plane.

CT Lesion Model-Based Structural Allografts: Custom Fabrication and Clinical Experience.

BACKGROUND: Patients requiring knee and hip revision arthroplasty often present with difficult anatomical situations that limit options for surgery. Customised mega-implants may be one of few remaining treatment options. However, extensive damage to residual bone stock may also be present, and in such cases even customised prosthetics may be difficult to implant. Small quantities of lost bone can be replaced with standard allografts or autologous bone. Larger defects may require structural macro-allografts, sometimes in combination with implants (allograft-prosthesis composites). METHODS: Herein, we describe a process for manufacturing lesion-specific large structural allografts according to a 3D, full-scale, lithographically generated defect model. These macro-allografts deliver the volume and the mechanical stability necessary for certain complex revisions. They are patient-and implant-matched, negate some requirements for additional implants and biomaterials and save time in the operating theatre by eliminating the requirement for intra-operative sizing and shaping of standard allografts. CONCLUSION: While a robust data set from long-term follow-up of patients receiving customised macro-allografts is not yet available, initial clinical experience and results suggest that lesion-matched macro-allografts can be an important component of revision joint surgery.