RESUMEN
Background: The increase in patient visits to emergency departments is a global challenge. We wished to survey patient inflow and patient composition over time at two Norwegian university hospitals. Material and method: A retrospective, descriptive study of patient contacts (patients ≥ 16 years of age) in the emergency departments of Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, and St Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital in the period 2012-21. Data were retrieved from patient records and the patient administration system. Result: A total of 585 780 patient contacts were included. The number of patient contacts in the emergency departments was 30 696 in 2012 and 40 396 in 2021 at Haukeland University Hospital, and 18 967 in 2012 and 28 822 in 2021 at St Olav's Hospital. The largest increase during the study period appeared to be in the age group 67-79 years, with an increase of 57 % (from 6 190 to 9 691) at Haukeland University Hospital, and 77 % (from 3 849 to 6 817) at St Olav's Hospital. The proportion of patient contacts that ended in hospitalisation was 82 % in 2012 and 74 % in 2021 at Haukeland University Hospital, and 87 % in 2012 and 61 % in 2021 at St Olav's Hospital. Of the patients that were admitted, the median age was 65 years, while the median age of those who were discharged from the emergency department was 48 years at Haukeland University Hospital and 52 years at St Olav's Hospital. Interpretation: The study showed an increase in patient contacts in the emergency departments at Haukeland University Hospital and St Olav's Hospital over a period of ten years. The number of older adults in the population will continue to increase in the years ahead, and the need for urgent care assessments will correspondingly increase. It is important that the health services are aware of changes in patient influx and patient composition in order to ensure patient safety and the working environment of emergency departments in the future.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Noruega , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Distribución por EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) crowding is a common healthcare issue with multiple causes. One important knowledge area is understanding where patients arrived from and what care they received prior to ED admission. This information could be used to inform strategies to provide care for low acuity patients outside of the hospital and reduce unnecessary ED admissions. The aim of this scoping review was to provide a comprehensive overview of global published research examining the acute care trajectory of all ED patients. METHODS: The scoping review was performed according to the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the PRISMA-SCR checklist. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify studies describing where patients arrived from and/or whose pathway of care was before an ED visit. The search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception through December 5th, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the records. RESULTS: Out of the 6,465 records screened, 14 studies from Australia, Canada, Haiti, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Belgium, Indonesia, and the UK met the inclusion criteria. Four studies reported on where patients physically arrived from, ten reported how patients were transported, six reported who referred them, and six reported whether medical care or advice was sought prior to visiting an ED. CONCLUSION: This scoping review revealed a lack of studies describing patients' pathways to the ED. However, studies from some countries indicate that a relatively large proportion of patients first seek care or guidance from a primary care physician (PCP) before visiting an ED. However, further research and published data are needed. To improve the situation, we recommend the development and implementation of a template for the uniform reporting of factors outside the ED, including where the patient journey began, which healthcare facilities they visited, who referred them to the ED, and how they arrived.