Prevalence and Outcomes of High versus Low Ratio Plasma to Red Blood Cell Resuscitation in a Multi-Institutional Cohort of Severely Injured Children.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of targeting high ratio fresh frozen plasma (FFP):red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in pediatric trauma resuscitation is unclear as existing studies are limited to patients who retrospectively met criteria for massive transfusion. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of high ratio FFP:RBC transfusion and the association with outcomes in children presenting in shock. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of a 24-institution prospective observational study (4/2018-9/2019) of injured children <18 years with elevated age-adjusted shock index was performed. Patients transfused within 24 hours were stratified into cohorts of low (<1:2) or high (>1:2) ratio FFP:RBC. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square were used to compare characteristics and mortality. Competing risks analysis was used to compare extended (≥75th percentile) ventilator, intensive care, and hospital days while accounting for early deaths. RESULTS: Of 135 children with median (IQR) age 10 (5,14) years and weight 40 (20,64) kg, 85 (63%) received low ratio transfusion and 50 (37%) high ratio despite similar activation of institutional massive transfusion protocols (MTP; low-38%, high-46%, p = .34). Most patients sustained blunt injuries (70%). Median injury severity score was greater in high ratio patients (low-25, high-33, p = .01); however, hospital mortality was similar (low-24%, high-20%, p = .65) as was the risk of extended ventilator, ICU, and hospital days (all p > .05). CONCLUSION: Despite increased injury severity, patients who received a high ratio of FFP:RBC had comparable rates of mortality. These data suggest high ratio FFP:RBC resuscitation is not associated with worst outcomes in children who present in shock. MTP activation was not associated with receipt of high ratio transfusion, suggesting variability in MTP between centers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Characterizing long-term outcomes following AMA discharges after assault-related penetrating trauma.

BACKGROUND: Patients discharged against medical advice do not receive adequate treatment and have a greater risk of readmission. This study assessed the rate of discharges against medical advice following assault-related penetrating trauma, with secondary aims to evaluate long term pre/post-injury hospitalizations and mortality. METHODS: Adult assault-related penetrating injuries admitted to a Level 1 Trauma Center were identified in the prospectively maintained database. Chart review was conducted for hospitalizations ± 5 years from index injury and statewide mortality data was used to identify deaths outside of hospital care. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1,744 assault-related penetrated injuries, 3.2% (52/1630) of survivors discharged against medical advice. Reasons for discharge against medical advice included: unknown (38%), home/child/family/pets (25%), unhappy with care/restrictions (23%), and work/money/other (13%). Post-discharge mortality did not differ between routine (6.5%) and against medical advice discharge (3.9%). Against medical advice and routine discharge had similar rates of any hospitalization (38.5 v 28.2%) and trauma hospitalization in prior 5-years (35 v 36%). However, significantly more against medical advice discharges had prior hospitalizations involving drug or alcohol abuse (65 v 38%), but not mental health diagnosis (55 v 55%). Significantly more against medical advice discharges have post-injury hospitalizations compared to routine discharges (48 vs 26.5%); however, include similar rates of repeat traumatic injury (36 v 32%). CONCLUSIONS: Those with against medical advice discharges were significantly more likely to have prior hospitalizations involving drug or alcohol abuse and significantly higher rates of post-injury hospitalizations. However, we did not see an increase in repeat traumatic injury or post-discharge mortality in those with against medical advice discharges when compared to those with routine discharges.

Pooled Analysis of Trauma Centers Better Predicts Risk Factors for Firearm Violence Reinjury.

INTRODUCTION: Many trauma centers use the first firearm injury admission as a reachable moment to mitigate reinjury. Understanding repeat firearm violence can be difficult in metropolitan areas with multiple trauma centers and laws that prohibit sharing private health information across health systems. We hypothesized that risk factors for repeat firearm violence could be better understood using pooled data from two major metropolitan trauma centers. METHODS: Two level I trauma center registries were queried (2007-2017) for firearm injury admissions using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision (ICD9/10) Ecodes. A pseudo encryption tool allowed sharing of deidentified firearm injury and repeat firearm injury data without disclosing private health information. Factors associated with firearm reinjury admissions including, age, sex, race, payor, injury severity, intent, and discharge, were assessed by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 2145 patients with firearm injury admissions, 89 of whom had a subsequent repeat firearm injury admission. Majority of repeat firearm admissions were assaulted (91%), male (97.8%), and non-Hispanic Black (86.5%). 31.5% of repeat firearm injury admissions were admitted to a different trauma center from their initial admission. Independent predictors of repeat firearm injuries were age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.94, P < 0.001), male sex (aOR 6.18, P = 0.013), non-Hispanic Black race (aOR 5.14, P = 0.007), or discharge against medical advice (aOR 6.64, P=<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly a third of repeat firearm injury admissions would have been missed in the current study without pooled metropolitan trauma center data. The incidence of repeat firearm violence is increasing and those at the highest risk for reinjury need to be targeted for mitigating interventions.

Firearm injury survival is only the beginning: The impact of socioeconomic factors on unplanned readmission after injury.

BACKGROUND: Firearm trauma remain a national crisis disproportionally impacting minority populations in the United States. Risk factors leading to unplanned readmission after firearm injury remain unclear. We hypothesized that socioeconomic factors have a major impact on unplanned readmission following assault-related firearm injury. METHODS: The 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmission Database of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was used to identify hospital admissions in those aged >14 years with assault-related firearm injury. Multivariable analysis assessed factors associated with unplanned 90-day readmission. RESULTS: Over 4 years, 20,666 assault-related firearm injury admissions were identified that resulted in 2,033 injuries with subsequent 90-day unplanned readmission. Those with readmissions tended to be older (31.9 vs 30.3 years), had a drug or alcohol diagnosis at primary hospitalization (27.1% vs 24.1%), and had longer hospital stays at primary hospitalization (15.5 vs 8.1 days) [all P<0.05]. The mortality rate in the primary hospitalization was 4.5%. Primary readmission diagnoses included: complications (29.6%), infection (14.5%), mental health (4.4%), trauma (15.6%), and chronic disease (30.6%). Over half of the patients readmitted with a trauma diagnosis were coded as new trauma encounters. 10.3% of readmission diagnoses included an additional 'initial' firearm injury diagnosis. Independent predictors of 90-day unplanned readmission were public insurance (aOR 1.21, P = 0.008), lowest income quartile (aOR 1.23, P = 0.048), living in a larger urban region (aOR 1.49, P = 0.01), discharge requiring additional care (aOR 1.61, P < 0.001), and discharge against medical advice (aOR 2.39, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Here we present socioeconomic risk factors for unplanned readmission after assault-related firearm injury. Better understanding of this population can lead to improved outcomes, decreased readmissions, and decreased financial burden on hospitals and patients. Hospital-based violence intervention programs may use this to target mitigating intervention programs in this population.

Burden of unintentional pediatric firearm injury: An examination of the Nationwide Readmission Database.

BACKGROUND: Significant increases in firearm-related mortality in the US pediatric population drive an urgent need to study these injuries to drive prevention policies. The purpose of this study was (1) to characterize those with and without readmissions, (2) to identify risk factors for 90-day unplanned readmission, and (3) to examine reasons for hospital readmission. METHODS: The 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmission Database of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was used to identify hospital admissions with unintentional firearm injury in patients younger than 18 years. Ninety-day unplanned readmission characteristics were assessed and detailed. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with unplanned 90-day readmission. RESULTS: Over 4 years, 1,264 unintentional firearm injury admissions resulted in 113 subsequent readmissions (8.9%). There were no significant differences in age or payor, but more women (14.7% vs. 23%) and older children (13-17 years [80.5%]) had readmissions. The mortality rate during primary hospitalization was 5.1%. Survivors of initial firearm injury were more frequently readmitted if they had a mental health diagnosis (22.1% vs. 13.8%; p = 0.017). Readmission diagnosis included complications (15%), mental health or drug/alcohol (9.7%), trauma (33.6%), a combination of the prior three (28.3%), and chronic disease (13.3%). More than a third (38.9%) of the trauma readmissions were for new traumatic injury. Female children, those with longer lengths of stay, and those with more severe injuries were more likely to have unplanned 90-day readmissions. Mental health and drug/alcohol abuse diagnoses were not an independent predictor for readmission. CONCLUSION: This study provides insight into the characteristics of and risk factors for unplanned readmission in the pediatric unintentional firearm injury population. In addition to using prevention strategies, the utilization of trauma-informed care must be integrated into all aspects of care for this population to help minimize the long-term psychological impact of surviving firearm injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

American Burn Association Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Treatment of Severe Frostbite.

This Clinical Practice Guideline addresses severe frostbite treatment. We defined severe frostbite as atmospheric cooling that results in a perfusion deficit to the extremities. We limited our review to adults and excluded cold contact or rapid freeze injuries that resulted in isolated devitalized tissue. After developing population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) questions, a comprehensive literature search was conducted with the help of a professional medical librarian. Available literature was reviewed and systematically evaluated. Recommendations based on the available scientific evidence were formulated through consensus of a multidisciplinary committee. We conditionally recommend the use of rapid rewarming in a 38 to 42°C water bath and the use of thrombolytics for fewer amputations and/or a more distal level of amputation. We conditionally recommend the use of "early" administration of thrombolytics (≤12 hours from rewarming) compared to "later" administration of thrombolytics for fewer amputations and/or a more distal level of amputation. No recommendation could be formed on the use of vascular imaging studies to determine the use of and/or the time to initiate thrombolytic therapy. No recommendation could be formed on the use of intravenous thrombolytics compared to the use of intra-arterial thrombolytics on fewer amputations and/or a more distal level of amputation. No recommendation could be formed on the use of iloprost resulting in fewer amputations and/or more distal levels of amputation. No recommendation could be formed on the use of diagnostic imaging modalities for surgical planning on fewer amputations, a more distal level of amputation, or earlier timing of amputation.

Crystalloid volume is associated with short-term morbidity in children with severe traumatic brain injury: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter trial post hoc analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined differences in clinical and resuscitation characteristics between injured children with and without severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) and aimed to identify resuscitation characteristics associated with improved outcomes following sTBI. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective observational study of injured children younger than 18 years (2018-2019) transported from the scene, with elevated shock index pediatric-adjusted on arrival and head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥3. Timing and volume of resuscitation products were assessed using χ 2t test, Fisher's exact t test, Kruskal-Wallis, and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: There were 142 patients with sTBI and 547 with non-sTBI injuries. Severe traumatic brain injury patients had lower initial hemoglobin (11.3 vs. 12.4, p < 0.001), greater initial international normalized ratio (1.4 vs. 1.1, p < 0.001), greater Injury Severity Score (25 vs. 5, p < 0.001), greater rates of ventilator (59% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) and intensive care unit (ICU) requirement (79% vs. 27%, p < 0.001), and more inpatient complications (18% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.001). Severe traumatic brain injury patients received more prehospital crystalloid (25% vs. 15%, p = 0.008), ≥1 crystalloid boluses (52% vs. 24%, p < 0.001), and blood transfusion (44% vs. 12%, p < 0.001) than non-sTBI patients. Among sTBI patients, receipt of ≥1 crystalloid bolus (n = 75) was associated with greater ICU need (92% vs. 64%, p < 0.001), longer median ICU (6 vs. 4 days, p = 0.027) and hospital stay (9 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001), and more in-hospital complications (31% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.003) than those who received <1 bolus (n = 67). These findings persisted after adjustment for Injury Severity Score (odds ratio, 3.4-4.4; all p < 0.010). CONCLUSION: Pediatric trauma patients with sTBI received more crystalloid than those without sTBI despite having a greater international normalized ratio at presentation and more frequently requiring blood products. Excessive crystalloid may be associated with worsened outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, seen among pediatric sTBI patients who received ≥1 crystalloid bolus. Further attention to a crystalloid sparing, early transfusion approach to resuscitation of children with sTBI is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Bleeding Complications in Patients With Severe Frostbite Injury.

Frostbite is caused by exposure to cold temperatures and can lead to severe injury resulting in amputations. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is a thrombolytic agent that has demonstrated efficacy preventing amputation in frostbite patients. The goal of frostbite management with tPA is to salvage tissue without causing clinically significant bleeding complication. The purpose of this study was to characterize bleeding complications in severe frostbite patients managed with and without tPA. Retrospective chart review of severe frostbite patients admitted to a single ABA verified burn center. Bleeding events were grouped: category 0: no bleed; category 1: bleed not resulting in change or intervention; category 2: bleed resulting in change of management; and category 3: bleed resulting in change of management and intervention. Over a 7-year period, 188 patients were included in the study. Most patients had no documentation suggesting a bleeding complication: 69.7% category 0, 19.1% category 1, 4.8% category 2, and 6.4% category 3. There was no significant difference in category 2 or 3 bleeding complications between patients treated with or without tPA. Overall, 9 of the 143 patients (6.3%) treated with tPA had a category 2 or 3 bleeding complication within 12 hours of tPA completion and 12 of 143 (8.4%) within 24 hours of tPA completion. Based on the low risk of severe bleeding and significant benefit relative to limb or digit salvage demonstrated in this study, we conclude that tPA is safe and effective for the treatment of frostbite in appropriately selected patients.

Biopsychosocial factors associated with complications in patients with frostbite.

Cold weather injuries can be devastating and life changing. Biopsychosocial factors such as homelessness and mental illness (especially substance use disorders [SUDs]) are known risk factors for incurring frostbite. Based on clinical experience in an urban level 1 trauma center, we hypothesized that complications following frostbite injury would be influenced by homelessness, SUDs, and other forms of mental illness. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between biopsychosocial factors and both amputations and unplanned hospital readmissions after cold injuries. Patients admitted with a diagnosis of frostbite between the winters of 2009 and 2018 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression assessed factors associated with outcomes of interest. Of the 148 patients in the study, 40 had unplanned readmissions within 1 year. Readmitted patients were significantly less likely to have a stable living situation (48.7% vs 75.0%, P = .005) and more likely to have an SUD (85.0% vs 60.2%, P = .005) or other psychiatric disorder (70.0% vs 50.9%, P = .042). Homelessness and SUDs were independent predictors of unplanned readmission. Overall, 18% of frostbite injuries resulted in amputation. Any history of drug and/or alcohol use independently predicted amputations. The study results suggest that additional hospital and community resources may need to be marshaled to prevent vulnerable patients with biopsychosocial risk factors from having complications after frostbite. Complications place a high downstream burden on healthcare systems. Clinicians caring for frostbite patients with comorbid conditions can use these findings to inform care and discharge decisions.

Revision Surgery Following Severe Frostbite Injury Compared to Similar Hand and Foot Burns.

Severe frostbite is associated with loss of digits or limbs and high levels of morbidity. The current practice is to salvage as much of the limb/digit as possible with the use of thrombolytic and adjuvant therapies. Sequelae from amputation can include severe nerve pain and poor wound healing requiring revision surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the rate of revision surgery after primary amputation and compare this to revision surgery in isolated hand/foot burns. Frostbite and burn patients from 2014 to 2019 were identified in the prospectively maintained database at a single urban burn and trauma center. Patients with primary amputations related to isolated hand/foot burns or frostbite were included in the study. Descriptive statistics included Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test. A total of 63 patients, 54 frostbite injuries and 9 isolated hand or foot burns, met inclusion criteria for the study. The rate of revision surgery was similar following frostbite and burn injury (24% vs 33%, P = .681). There were no significant differences in age, sex, or length of stay on the primary hospitalization between those that required revision surgery and those that did not. Neither the impacted limb nor the presence of infection or cellulitis on primary amputation was associated with future need for revision surgery. Of the 16 patients requiring revision surgery, 5 (31%) required additional debridement alone, 6 (38%) required reamputation alone, and 5 required both. A total of 6 patients (38%) had cellulitis or infection at the time of revision surgery. Time from primary surgery to revision ranged from 4 days to 3 years. Planned, delayed primary amputation is a mainstay of frostbite management. To our knowledge, this is the first assessment of revision surgery in the setting of severe frostbite injury. Our observed rate of revision surgery following frostbite injury did not differ significantly from revision surgery in the setting of isolated hand or foot burns. This study brings up important questions of timing and surgical planning in these complex patients that will require a multicenter collaborative study.

A Multicenter Analysis of the Early Impact of COVID-19 on Junior Resident Operative Case Volume.

INTRODUCTION: Institutions have reported decreases in operative volume due to COVID-19. Junior residents have fewer opportunities for operative experience and COVID-19 further jeopardizes their operative exposure. This study quantifies the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on resident operative exposure using resident case logs focusing on junior residents and categorizes the response of surgical residency programs to the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted; 276,481 case logs were collected from 407 general surgery residents of 18 participating institutions, spanning 2016-2020. Characteristics of each institution and program changes in response to COVID-19 were collected via surveys. RESULTS: Senior residents performed 117 more cases than junior residents each year (P < 0.001). Prior to the pandemic, senior resident case volume increased each year (38 per year, 95% confidence interval 2.9-74.9) while junior resident case volume remained stagnant (95% confidence interval 13.7-22.0). Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, junior residents reported on average 11% fewer cases when compared to the three prior academic years (P = 0.001). The largest decreases in cases were those with higher resident autonomy (Surgeon Jr, P = 0.03). The greatest impact of COVID-19 on junior resident case volume was in community-based medical centers (246 prepandemic versus 216 during pandemic, P = 0.009) and institutions which reached Stage 3 Program Pandemic Status (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Residents reported a significant decrease in operative volume during the 2019 academic year, disproportionately impacting junior residents. The long-term consequences of COVID-19 on junior surgical trainee competence and ability to reach cases requirements are yet unknown but are unlikely to be negligible.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Small and Large Animals in Burn Research: Proceedings of the 2021 Research Special Interest Group.

Multiple animal species and approaches have been used for modeling different aspects of burn care, with some strategies considered more appropriate or translatable than others. On April 15, 2021, the Research Special Interest Group of the American Burn Association held a virtual session as part of the agenda for the annual meeting. The session was set up as a pro/con debate on the use of small versus large animals for application to four important aspects of burn pathophysiology: burn healing/conversion, scarring, inhalation injury, and sepsis. For each of these topics, two experienced investigators (one each for small and large animal models) described the advantages and disadvantages of using these preclinical models. The use of swine as a large animal model was a common theme due to anatomic similarities with human skin. The exception to this was a well-defined ovine model of inhalation injury; both of these species have larger airways which allow for incorporation of clinical tools such as bronchoscopes. However, these models are expensive and demanding from labor and resource standpoints. Various strategies have been implemented to make the more inexpensive rodent models appropriate for answering specific questions of interest in burns. Moreover, modeling burn-sepsis in large animals has proven difficult. It was agreed that the use of both small and large animal models has merit for answering basic questions about the responses to burn injury. Expert opinion and the ensuing lively conversations are summarized herein, which we hope will help inform experimental design of future research.

Firearm trauma: Race and insurance influence mortality and discharge disposition.

BACKGROUND: Health insurance and race impact mortality and discharge outcomes in the general trauma population. It remains unclear if disparities exist by race and/or insurance in outcomes following firearm injuries. The purpose of this study was to assess differences in mortality and discharge based on race and insurance status following firearm injuries. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2016) was queried for firearm injuries by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/Tenth Revision, Ecodes. Patients with known discharge disposition, age (18-64 years), race, and insurance were included in analysis (N = 120,005). To minimize bias due to missing data, we used multiple imputation for variables associated with outcomes following traumatic injury: Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, and sex. Multivariable regression analysis was additionally adjusted for age, sex, Injury Severity Score, intent, Glasgow Coma Scale score, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, year, and clustered by facility to assess differences in mortality and discharge disposition. RESULTS: The average age was 31 years, 88.6% were male, and 50% non-Hispanic Blacks. Overall mortality was 11.5%. Self-pay insurance was associated with a significant increase in mortality rates in all racial groups compared with non-Hispanic Whites with commercial insurance. Hispanic commercial, Medicaid, and self-pay patients were significantly less likely to discharge with posthospital care compared with commercially insured non-Hispanic Whites. When examining racial differences in mortality and discharge by individual insurance types, commercially insured non-Hispanic Black and other race patients were significantly less likely to die compared with similarly insured non-Hispanic White patients. Regardless of race, no significant differences in mortality were observed in Medicaid or self-pay patients compared with non-Hispanic White patients. CONCLUSION: Victims of firearm injuries with a self-pay insurance status have a significantly higher rate of mortality. Hispanic patients regardless of insurance status were significantly less likely to discharge with posthospital care compared with non-Hispanic Whites with commercial insurance. Continued efforts are needed to understand and address the relationship between insurance status, race, and outcomes following firearm violence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiologic, Level IV.

Comparing Firearm and Stabbing Injuries in the Pediatric Trauma Population Using Propensity Matching.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare differences in mortality and nonhome discharge in pediatric patients with firearm and stab injuries, while minimizing bias. Our secondary objective was to assess the influence of insurance on these same outcomes. METHODS: Patients aged 0 to 17 years included in the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2015) with firearm and stabbing injury were matched by propensity score. Logistic regression was used to assess associations of injury type and insurance with long-term care discharge and death. RESULTS: The average age was 14.8 years, 19.2% were female, 48% were African American, 58.4% had an injury severity score ≤8, and assaults accounted for 73.1% of cases. Firearm injuries were associated with a higher risk of discharge to long-term care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.07) compared with propensity-matched patients who were stabbed. Similarly, we found a higher risk of mortality in those with firearm injuries compared with stabbing injuries (aOR, 1.85). Regardless of mechanism, self-pay insurance status was associated with a higher risk of mortality (aOR, 2.41). When compared with stab wound patients with commercial insurance, self-pay firearm-injured patients were found to have an increased risk of mortality (aOR, 5.25). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric victims of firearm violence were more likely to die or need additional care outside the home than victims of other types of penetrating injury when accounting for confounding characteristics to minimize bias.

Analysis of pediatric sternal fractures using the Kid's Inpatient Database (KID).

PURPOSE: This study aims to determine if sternal fracture is a predictor of discharge requiring additional care and mortality. METHODS: Blunt pediatric trauma admissions (<18 years) in the Kid's Inpatient Database (2016) were included in analysis. Weighted incidence of sternal fracture was calculated and adjusted for using survey weight, sampling clusters, and stratum. Regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with poor outcomes. RESULTS: Annual incidence of sternal fracture in the pediatric blunt trauma population was 0.43 per 100,000. Of 50,076 patients identified, 236 had sternal fractures. The sternal fracture patients were older (median 16 vs 10 years, P < 0.001) and motor vehicle accident was more frequently the mechanism of injury (78% vs 24%, P < 0.001). Common injuries associated with sternal fracture included clavicle fracture (43%), abdominal organ injury (28%), spinal fracture (47%), lung injury (65%), and rib fracture (47%).  Sternal fracture patients were more frequently discharged to receive additional care (22% vs 5%, P < 0.001) and to die of their injuries (3.8% vs 0.9%, P < 0.001). When adjusting for other factors associated with poor outcomes, sternal fracture was not an independent predictor of mortality or discharge to care. CONCLUSIONS: Sternal fracture is a severe injury in the pediatric population, but it is not independently associated with need for a higher level of care after discharge or mortality.

Socioeconomic and Comorbid Factors Associated With Frostbite Injury in the United States.

Frostbite largely affects the extremities and often results in long-term disability due to amputation. More regions are experiencing extremes in temperature which increases the risk of frostbite injury. The aim of this study was to detail social and comorbid factors associated with frostbite injury compared to isolated hand or foot burns. We used the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2018 to identify admissions included in this study. Weighted incidence and multivariable analysis assessed characteristics and outcomes of frostbite and isolated hand or foot burn injury. In the United States, the estimated incidence of frostbite injury in those aged 15 and older was 0.95 per 100,000 persons and 4.44 per 100,000 persons with isolated hand and foot burns. Homelessness, mental health disorder, drug or alcohol abuse, and peripheral vascular disease were all associated with the risk of frostbite injury when compared to burn injury. We found that other insurance was associated with amputation following burn injury, while black race and homelessness were associated with amputation during a nonelective primary admission following frostbite injury. The differing risk factors associated with early amputation in frostbite and burn patients warrant a multicenter study including burn centers in North America.

The Effects of Rapid Rewarming on Tissue Salvage in Severe Frostbite Injury.

Frostbite is a high morbidity injury caused by soft tissue freezing, which can lead to digit necrosis requiring amputation. Rapid rewarming is a first-line treatment method that involves placing affected digits into a warm water bath. This study aims to assess the clinical practices for frostbite at facilities outside of dedicated burn centers, and any impact these practices have on tissue salvage. Retrospective chart review at a single burn center identified frostbite patients admitted directly or as transfers over a 7-year period. Records were reviewed to identify initial treatment strategies. If given, time to thrombolytics from admit was noted. Tissue salvage rates were calculated from radiologically derived tissue at-risk scores and final amputation scores. One-hundred patients were transferred from outside facilities, and 108 were direct admissions (N = 208). There was no significant difference in group demographics. Rapid rewarming was the initial treatment modality more commonly in direct admit patients (P = .016). The use of rapid rewarming did not correlate with tissue salvage (P = .112). Early use of thrombolytics had a positive impact on tissue salvage (P = .003). Thrombolytics were given 1.2 hours earlier in direct admit patients (P = .029), however there was no difference in tissue salvage rates between the groups (P = .127). Efforts should focus on larger scale study to further assess the effectiveness of rapid rewarming. Although rapid rewarming did not significantly impact tissue salvage in this study, we continue to recommend its use over less studied treatment methods, and continue to view it as an important bridge to burn center transfer and administration of thrombolytic therapy.

Hyperbaric Oxygen and Mortality in Burns With Inhalation Injury: A Study of the National Burn Repository.

Mortality in burn injury is primarily influenced by three factors: age, percent burn (%TBSA), and presence of inhalation injury. Numerous modalities have been tried in an attempt to treat those patients with burns and inhalation injury, including the use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO). The aim of our study was to find the national prevalence of HBO for burns with inhalation injury, and whether HBO influenced mortality in these often severely injured patients. This retrospective study used the National Burn Repository (NBR) to identify hospital admissions of patients with both cutaneous burn and inhalation injuries. After applying exclusion criteria, a total of 13,044 patients were identified. Variables included in the multivariate regression analysis included age, sex, race, payer, mechanism of burn injury, TBSA group, total procedure number, mechanical ventilator days, and treatment with HBO. The main outcome variable was mortality. Of the 13,044 patients, 67 had HBO therapy. The HBO patients were older (mean age 51.7 vs 42.8 years, P < .001), but had smaller burns and thus a similar Baux score (66.6 vs 65.2, P = .661). The HBO patients had a higher mortality (29.9% vs 17.5%, P = .01). On multivariate regression analysis, HBO was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio = 2.484, P = .004). Other significant predictors of mortality included age, black race, Medicaid or uninsured patients, and %TBSA. The use of HBO for patients with burns and inhalation injury is uncommon in this database. It is unclear whether that reflects low prevalence or if individual centers do not all impute HBO into the NBR. For those patients in this database, HBO is an independent predictor of mortality. It can be difficult to determine the severity of inhalation injury in the NBR, so those patients receiving HBO could theoretically have more severe inhalation injury.

Social Determinants of Poor Outcomes Following Frostbite Injury: A Study of the National Inpatient Sample.

Severe frostbite injury can result in significant disability from amputation of limbs and digits which may be mitigated through prompt medical care. The reported rates of amputation vary widely between centers. Our aim was to describe the incidence and factors associated with amputation secondary to frostbite injury in the United States using a national sample of hospitalizations. Admissions for frostbite injury were identified in the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2018). Factors associated with amputation were assessed by multivariable logistic regression and clustered by hospital. The overall incidence of frostbite injury in the United States is 0.83 of 100,000 people. Of the social factors associated with frostbite injury, homelessness and the black race were independently associated with a higher likelihood of amputation at the primary admission. Diagnosis of cellulitis was a predictor of amputation. Homeless frostbite patients were more frequently discharged against medical advice and were less likely to discharge with supportive medical care, despite having a higher rate of more severe injury. Disability from amputation following frostbite injury affects at least 20% of frostbite-injured patients and disproportionally affects the homeless population. Further study is needed to ascertain the decision making that leads to early amputation following frostbite injury, especially in the homeless and black population. Outreach and education efforts should be initiated to promote salvage of functional limb length following frostbite injury.

High Cost and Resource Utilization of Frostbite Readmissions in the United States.

Frostbite is a high morbidity, high-cost injury that can lead to digit or limb necrosis requiring amputation. Our primary aim is to describe the rate of readmission following frostbite injury. Our secondary aims are to describe the overall burden of care, cost, and characteristics of repeat hospitalizations of frostbite-injured people. Hospitalizations following frostbite injury (index and readmissions) were identified in the 2016 and 2017 Nationwide Readmission Database. Multivariable logistic regression was clustered by hospital and additionally adjusted for severe frostbite injury, gender, year, payor group, severity, and comorbidity index. Population estimates were calculated and adjusted for by using survey weight, sampling clusters, and stratum. In the 2-year cohort, 1065 index hospitalizations resulted in 1907 total hospitalizations following frostbite injury. Most patients were male (80.3%), lived in metropolitan/urban areas (82.3%), and nearly half were insured with Medicaid (46.4%). Of the 842 readmissions, 53.7% were associated with complications typically associated with frostbite injury. Overall, 29% of frostbite injuries resulted in at least one amputation. The average total cost and total length of stay of readmissions were $236,872 and 34.7 days. Drug or alcohol abuse, homelessness, Medicaid insurance, and discharge against medical advice (AMA) were independent predictors of unplanned readmission. Factors associated with multiple readmissions include discharge AMA and Medicare insurance, but not drug or alcohol abuse or homelessness. The population-based estimated unplanned readmission rate following frostbite injury was 35.4% (95% confidence interval 32.2%-38.6%). This is the first study examining readmissions following frostbite injury on a national level. Drug or alcohol abuse, homelessness, Medicaid insurance, and discharge AMA were independent predictors of unplanned readmission, while only AMA discharge and Medicare insurance were associated with multiple readmissions. Supportive resources (community and hospital-based) may reduce unplanned readmissions of frostbite-injured patients with those additional risk factors.