Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Int Urogynecol J ; 2024 Jun 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38942931

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to examine the outcomes of posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) on bladder, bowel, and sexual health-related quality of life among a cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) with refractory lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). METHODS: Patients with MS and refractory LUTS were recruited for a prospective, observational study using PTNS to treat their symptoms. Patients underwent 12 weekly 30-min PTNS sessions and bladder, bowel, and sexual symptoms were evaluated at baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months with voiding diaries, visual analog scales (VAS), and validated patient-reported questionnaires, including the American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUA-SS), Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS), Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index (M-ISI), Health Status Questionnaire, Sexual Satisfaction Scale, and Bowel Control Scale. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were recruited: 18 started PTNS and 14 completed 3 months of PTNS. Of the 18 who started PTNS, the mean age was 52 years (SD 12), 61% were female, 83% were white, and most patients had relapsing remitting (39%) MS. Baseline (n=18) and 3-month voiding (n=11) outcomes showed no significant change in number of voids or incontinence episodes. The median VAS symptom improvement was 49 (IQR 26.5, 26) and 9 (53%) patients elected for monthly maintenance PTNS. On paired analysis, there was a significant improvement in median change in NBSS, AUA-SS, and M-ISI. There was no significant change in bowel or sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, observational study of PTNS in patients with MS with refractory LUTS shows improvement in patient-reported bladder outcomes, but not in number of voids per day or bowel or bladder function.

2.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 31(6): e13677, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35942930

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To understand experiences of patients with genitourinary cancer who experienced delayed cancer care due to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study with an explanatory sequential design. Qualitative findings are reported here. Patients with muscle invasive bladder, advanced prostate or kidney cancer were eligible. Participants were selected for interviews if they self-reported low (0-3/10) or high (6-10/10) levels of distress on a previous survey. Participants were interviewed about their experiences. Interviews were transcribed, coded and categorised using thematic data analysis methodology. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were interviewed. Seven had prostate cancer, six bladder cancer and five kidney cancer. Six themes were derived from the interviews: (1) arriving at cancer diagnosis was hard enough, (2) response to treatment delay, (3) labelling cancer surgery as elective, (4) fear of COVID-19 infection, (5) quality of patient-provider relationship and communication and (6) what could have been done differently. CONCLUSION: These findings offer insight into the concerns of patients with genitourinary cancers who experienced treatment delays due to COVID-19. This information can be applied to support patients with cancers more broadly, should treatment delays occur in the future.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Renales , Neoplasias Urogenitales , Neoplasias Urológicas , Urología , Masculino , Humanos , Pandemias , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Neoplasias Urogenitales/terapia , Investigación Cualitativa , Neoplasias Renales/terapia
3.
J Urol ; 207(3): 627-634, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34698526

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We aimed to characterize the urinary microbiome of catheterizing patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) and to evaluate differences based on type of bladder management or frequency of urinary tract infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, cross-sectional study of urine samples from asymptomatic, catheterizing patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction who used either clean intermittent catheterization or indwelling catheters. Patients without symptoms of urinary tract infection provided a catheterized urine sample for urinalysis, culture and bacterial community microbiome analysis. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients submitted urine for analysis, of whom 69 had sufficient sequence reads (>1,203) for microbiome analysis. Cases with low bacterial signal amplification were associated with use of vaginal estrogen, no intradetrusor botulinum toxin A use and no growth on standard urine culture. The most abundant operational taxonomic units were from the phylum Proteobacteria, classified as Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia. Alpha diversity varied among those who used indwelling catheters vs clean intermittent catheterization, and those who underwent botulinum toxin A injection vs not. On linear discriminate analysis, the relative abundance of the operational taxonomic units identified as Pseudomonas was higher among patients using indwelling catheters relative to clean intermittent catheterization. The operational taxonomic unit identified as Aerococcus was at a higher relative abundance among males compared to females. CONCLUSIONS: Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia were the most abundant genera in the urinary microbiome of patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Urinary microbiome diversity varied based on bladder management type. Future clinical correlations between microbiome of neurogenic patients and clinical presentation may help guide treatment strategies.


Asunto(s)
Microbiota , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/terapia , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Orina/microbiología , Catéteres de Permanencia , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Cateterismo Uretral Intermitente , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
4.
Spinal Cord ; 59(9): 997-1002, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34345004

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Cross sectional. OBJECTIVES: To identify variables associated with severe bowel symptoms in spinal cord injured people. SETTING: National cohort. METHODS: Adult spinal cord injured (SCI) people were recruited for an online registry and 1373 were included for analysis. Univariate analysis and logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between severity of bowel symptoms and variables. Bowel symptoms were assessed by the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) score and patients scoring ≥14 were categorized as having severe bowel symptoms. Autonomic dysreflexia (AD) severity was measured using a six item questionnaire and reported as total AD score (0-24). Bladder management was categorized as: voiding, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), surgery (augmentation/diversion) or indwelling catheter. RESULTS: Severe bowel symptoms were reported in 570 (42%) On multivariable logistic regression, every point increase of AD total score was associated with 5% increased odds of having more severe bowel symptoms [OR 1.05 95% CI 1.03-1.10]. Type of bladder management was also associated with more severe symptoms (p = 0.0001). SCI people with indwelling catheters (OR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.40-3.32) or reconstructive surgery (OR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.08-3.32) were almost twice as likely to report more severe bowel symptoms than those performing CIC.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Uretral Intermitente , Intestino Neurogénico , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Intestino Neurogénico/epidemiología , Intestino Neurogénico/etiología , Intestino Neurogénico/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/epidemiología , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/terapia , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/epidemiología , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/etiología , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/terapia
5.
Urol Pract ; 8(3): 367-372, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37145655

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The arrival of coronavirus disrupted health care systems and forced delays in cancer treatment. We explored the experience of urologists who had to delay their patients' cancer care. METHODS: Urologists who treat prostate, bladder, and renal cancers, selected through purposive sampling, responded to a survey about cancer treatment delay. They were asked about their practice setting, decision making and interactions with patients, and they were asked to reflect on their personal experience. A 0 to 10 point scale, modeled on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network' Distress Thermometer (NCCN-DT), validated for cancer patients with cancer, was used to estimate physician distress. We used descriptive statistics to analyze survey results. RESULTS: Of the 64 participating urologists, 98% delayed surgical treatment; fewer delayed cases of advanced cancers (42% for ≥T3/T4 or Gleason ≥8 prostate cancers, 58% for muscle invasive bladder cancer, 61% for ≥T2 renal cancers). They reported feeling anxious (44%) and helpless (29%), and their median distress score was 5 (range 0-10). They relied on their own risk assessments (67%) and consulted colleagues (56%) and national guidelines (53%) when making treatment deferral decisions. They identified a number of concerns as they resumed surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a comparison to the NCCN-DT clinical cutoff distress level of 4, urologists experienced moderately high levels of distress as they delayed cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic and expressed concerns going forward. While the focus on patient care is paramount in a pandemic, it is important to recognize physician distress and develop practical and psychological strategies for distress mitigation.

6.
J Urol ; 205(2): 477-482, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33035138

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Individuals with spinal cord injuries frequently use urgent and emergent medical care. We hypothesized that urological causes are a primary driver of hospitalizations/emergency room visits in a contemporary spinal cord injury cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Neurogenic Bladder Research Group spinal cord injury registry is a prospective cohort study evaluating neurogenic bladder related quality of life after traumatic spinal cord injury. Questionnaires were administered to participants querying whether a hospitalization or emergency room visit occurred during the interval 1-year followup and reason for visit. Primary outcome was the rate of urological related hospitalizations/emergency room visits in 1 year. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for urology related hospitalization/emergency room visit. RESULTS: Of the 1,479 participants enrolled 1,260 had 1-year followup. In all, 16.7% (211/1,260) reported at least 1 urological hospitalization/emergency room visit, and urinary tract infections were the most common reason cited. Patients with an indwelling catheter had the greatest odds of having a hospitalization/emergency room episode for a urological indication (OR 3.35, CI 1.68-6.67, p=0.001), followed by clean intermittent catheterization (OR 2.56, CI 1.36-4.84, p=0.004) as compared to those who voided spontaneously. Other predictors included SF-12 physical scores (OR 0.98, CI 0.96-0.996, p=0.014), diminished hand function (OR 1.83, CI 1.05-3.19, p=0.033), and unemployment (OR 1.64, CI 1.13-2.37, p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: There was a high incidence of hospitalizations/emergency room visits for patients with spinal cord injuries during a 1-year followup and urological complications were the most common reason for admission. Patient self-reported physical health as well as unemployment, and bladder management strategy, particularly indwelling catheter use, were associated with increased risk of urology related hospitalization/emergency room visits.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/etiología , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/terapia , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoinforme
7.
Urology ; 144: 214-219, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32634446

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the risks of urinary diversion performed to address adverse effects of gynecologic radiation, with the hypothesis that high grade complications would be more common in sarcopenic women and in those undergoing continent diversion (vs noncontinent) or concomitant cystectomy (vs bladder-sparing diversion). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patient records of women who underwent urinary diversion for urinary adverse effects of gynecologic radiotherapy during the period of 2008-2018 from 3 tertiary centers. Skeletal muscle index was calculated to assess for sarcopenia based on preoperative computed tomography scans. Outcomes include high-grade postoperative complications within 90 days of surgery, 30-day readmission rate, and long-term (>90 days) outcomes. RESULTS: Among 34 women who met the inclusion criteria, the majority were white/Caucasian (73.5%). Twenty-six of 34 (76.5%) underwent noncontinent diversion. Seventy nine percent (27/34) (79.4%) of women experienced complications within 90 days; 9 of 34 (26.5%) experienced high-grade (Clavien grade ≥3) complications. Thirty-two percent (11/34) were readmitted within 30 days. Rates of high-grade complications were not significantly impacted by diversion type (P = .49), concurrent cystectomy (P = .70), or sarcopenia (P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Urinary diversion for late adverse effects of gynecologic radiotherapy is associated with high peri-operative risk, even in skilled hands. In this series, neither sarcopenia, nor continent diversion, nor cystectomy were associated with increased complications. Patients and surgeons should consider risks and benefits when deciding to proceed with urinary diversion, however further study is needed to elucidate significant preoperative markers which may predispose patients to significant complications.


Asunto(s)
Cistectomía , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/radioterapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/cirugía , Derivación Urinaria/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos por Radiación/complicaciones , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcopenia/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 38(7): 1901-1906, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31297852

RESUMEN

AIMS: Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at risk of developing renal calculi. This study describes the management of renal calculi among patients with SCI with attention to factors influencing surgical management vs observation. METHODS: This retrospective, cohort study identified patients with SCI and renal calculi between 2009 to 2016 from an institutional neurogenic bladder database and detailed the management of their stones. A stone episode was defined as radiographic evidence of new calculi. RESULTS: Of 205 patients with SCI, 34 had renal stones, for a prevalence of 17%. The mean age was 50 years (range 22,77) and most had cervical SCI (n = 22, 65%). There were 41 stone episodes with 98 individual stones identified with a mean stone size of 4.9 mm (range 1-19). Of the 41 episodes, 10 (24%) underwent surgery after initial diagnosis. Pain was the most common primary indication for surgery (n = 9, 60%). The median time from diagnosis to intervention for all patients was 4 months (interquartile range 1,23). Of the 41 episodes, 31 (76%) were initially observed and among these, 5 ultimately required surgery (16%) while 26 (84%) did not. Of these 26, 12 (46%) stones passed spontaneously and 14 (53%) remained unchanged. The need for surgery correlated with more stone episodes (P = .049). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients with SCI and small, nonobstructing renal stones, 76% (n = 31) were offered observation. Of these observed patients, 84% (n = 26) did not require further intervention at a median of 4 years of follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Cálculos Renales/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA