Colorectal Serrated Neoplasia: An Institutional 12-Year Review Highlights the Impact of a Screening Programme.

BACKGROUND: As the malignant potential of sessile serrated lesions/polyps (SSL/Ps) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) has been clearly demonstrated, it is important that serrated polyps are identified and correctly classified histologically. AIM: Our aim was to characterize the clinicopathological features of a series of SSL/Ps & TSAs, to assess the accuracy of the pathological diagnosis, the incidence, and the rate of dysplasia in SSL/Ps & TSAs. METHODS: We identified all colorectal serrated polyps between 01/01/2004 and 31/05/2016, by searching the laboratory information system for all cases assigned a "serrated adenoma" SNOMED code. All available and suitable slides were reviewed by one pathologist, who was blinded to the original diagnosis and the site of the polyp. Subsequently discordant cases, SSL/Ps with dysplasia, and all TSAs were reviewed by a second pathologist. RESULTS: Over a 149-month period, 759 "serrated adenoma" polyps were identified, with 664 (from 523 patients) available for review. 41.1% were reviewed by both pathologists; 15.1% (100/664) were reclassified, with the majority being changed from SSL/P to hyperplastic polyp (HYP) (66/664; 9.9%). 80.3% of these HYPs were located in the left colon, and the majority exhibited prolapse effect. There were 520 SSL/Ps (92.2%) & 40 TSAs (7.1%). The majority of SSL/Ps were in the right colon (86.7%) and were small (64.5% <1 cm), while most TSAs were in the left colon (85.7%) and were large (73.1%≥1 cm). 6.7% of SSL/Ps exhibited dysplasia, the majority of which were large (66.7%≥1 cm). Following consensus review, 13/520 (2.5%) SSL/Ps were downgraded from SSL/P with dysplasia to SSL/P without dysplasia. Detection of SSL/Ps peaked in the most recent years reviewed (87.5% reported between 2013 and 2016, inclusive), coinciding with the introduction of "BowelScreen" (the Irish FIT-based colorectal cancer screening programme). CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of, and adherence to, diagnostic criteria is essential for accurate classification of colorectal polyps.

Reducing febrile neutropenia rates in early breast cancer. Experience of two UK cancer centres.

PURPOSE: Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is used in many institutions across the UK due to unacceptable febrile neutropenia (FN) rates with FEC-D (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide-docetaxel). The resultant reduction in FN rate is thought to maintain dose intensity and improve patient experience. This retrospective study was performed to assess whether the addition of G-CSF primary prophylaxis into daily clinical practice has achieved these aims. METHODS: Collaborative audit performed in two UK cancer centres before and after the integration of G-CSF primary prophylaxis with FEC-D. The primary objective was FN rate. RESULTS: Data from 342 patients were analysed, 151 before routine use of primary G-CSF and 191 after. The FN rates were 30 and 11%, respectively. Despite the 99% adherence to primary G-CSF policy, there were more dose reductions (8 increased to 13%) and dose delays (11 increased to 23%) following the use of G-CSF primary prophylaxis. This appeared to be due to non-FN toxicities. Inpatient days decreased substantially from 93 to 16 and antibiotic courses from 28 to 13 (per hundred patients). CONCLUSIONS: Near universal adherence to the G-CSF policy in FEC-D treatment has led to a reduction in FN rate and inpatient days but has not translated into improved dose intensity. This collaborative audit allows sufficient data to give insight into current practice and generate hypotheses for further investigation.

Adjuvant epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) vs CMF in early breast cancer: results with over 7 years median follow-up from the randomised phase III NEAT/BR9601 trials.

BACKGROUND: The National Epirubicin Adjuvant Trial (NEAT) and BR9601 trials tested the benefit of epirubicin when added to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (E-CMF) compared with standard CMF in adjuvant chemotherapy for women with early breast cancer. This report details longer follow-up with interesting additional time-dependent analyses. METHODS: National Epirubicin Adjuvant Trial used epirubicin (E) 3-weekly for four cycles followed by classical (c) CMF for four cycles (E-CMF) compared with cCMF for six cycles. BR9601 used E 3-weekly for four cycles followed by CMF 3-weekly for four cycles, compared with CMF 3-weekly for eight cycles. RESULTS: In all, 2391 eligible patients were randomised and with a median 7.4-year follow-up, E-CMF confirmed a significant benefit over CMF in both relapse-free survival (RFS) (78% vs 71% 5 years RFS, respectively, hazard ratio (HR)=0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.86), P<0.0001) and overall survival (OS) (84% vs 78% 5 years OS, respectively, HR=0.76 (95% CI: 0.65-0.89), P=0.0007). Interaction of treatment effect and prognostic factors was demonstrated for duplication of chromosome 17 centromeric enumeration (Ch17CEP) as previously reported. Poor prognostic factors at diagnosis (ER and PR negative and HER2 positive) showed time-dependent annual hazard rates for RFS and OS. In univariate analysis, these factors demonstrated more favourable HRs for RFS after 5 years. Treatment effects also suggested a differential benefit for E-CMF within the first 5 years for poor prognosis tumours. CONCLUSION: Longer follow-up has confirmed E-CMF as significantly superior to CMF for all patients. Ch17CEP duplication was the only biomarker that demonstrated significant treatment interaction. Standard poor prognostic factors at diagnosis were time-dependent, and after 5 years disease-free, poor prognosis patients demonstrated favourable HRs for survival.

Vinorelbine and infusional 5-fluorouracil in anthracycline and taxane pre-treated metastatic breast cancer.

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of intravenous vinorelbine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) given by continuous infusion in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with intravenous vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle together with 5-FU 200 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion. All had previously been treated with an anthracycline and 41% had also been previously treated with a taxane. All had normal haematological, renal and hepatic function and all but three had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 2 or better. RESULTS: The overall response rate by World Health Organization criteria was 46% (28 patients); excluding nine non-evaluable patients gave a response rate of 54%. In patients who had previously been treated with both an anthracycline and a taxane, a response rate of 50% was observed (12 of 24 patients). Severe toxicity was uncommon, as was toxicity attributable to infusional 5-FU. Myelosuppression was rarely severe, but was common and led to delay or dose reduction in 38% of treatments. Eleven patients (18%) were admitted with fever and/or neutropenia and one patient died. The median received dose intensity was vinorelbine 16 mg/m2/week and 5-FU 143 mg/m2/day. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of vinorelbine and infusional 5-FU is active in metastatic breast cancer, including in patients previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. Toxicity is generally manageable, but myelosuppression is significant at this dose regimen. Recommended doses for routine clinical use are 5-FU 200 mg/m2/day and intravenous vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 15 on a 28-day cycle.

Oral antibiotics with early hospital discharge compared with in-patient intravenous antibiotics for low-risk febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer: a prospective randomised controlled single centre study.

Neutropenic sepsis remains a potentially life-threatening complication of anticancer chemotherapy. However, it is possible to identify patients who are at low risk for serious complications and for whom less-intensive, more-convenient treatment may be appropriate. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of oral antibiotics in conjunction with early hospital discharge in comparison with standard in-patient intravenous antibiotics in patients with low-risk neutropenic fever. In all, 126 episodes of low-risk neutropenic fever occurred in 102 patients. Patients were randomised to receive either: an oral regimen of ciprofloxacin (750 mg 12 hourly) plus amoxicillin-clavulanate (675 mg 8 hourly) for a total of 5 days, or a standard intravenous regimen of gentamicin and tazocin (piperacillin/tazobactam) until hospital discharge. Patients randomised to oral antibiotics were eligible for discharge following 24 h of hospitalisation, if clinically stable and symptomatically improved. The efficacy of the two arms was similar: initial treatment was successful without antibiotic modification in 90% of episodes in the intravenous arm and 84.8% of episodes in the oral arm, P=0.55, absolute difference between the groups 5.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference -7 to 17.3%. Only one episode in the oral arm was associated with significant clinical deterioration: this occurred within the initial in-patient assessment period. The median in-patient stay was 4 days in the intravenous arm (range 2-8) and 2 days in the oral arm (range 1-16 days), P&<0.0005. The reduction in hospital stay led to significant cost-savings in the oral arm. In conclusion, this study suggests that oral antibiotics in conjunction with early hospital discharge for patients who remain stable after a 24 h period of in-patient monitoring offers a feasible and cost-effective alternative to conventional management of low-risk neutropenic fever.

Randomised, phase II trial comparing oral capecitabine (Xeloda) with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic/advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines.

Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, was designed to generate 5-fluorouracil preferentially at the tumour site. This randomised, phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of capecitabine or paclitaxel in patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Outpatients with locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer whose disease was unresponsive or resistant to anthracycline therapy were randomised to 3-week cycles of intermittent oral capecitabine (1255 mg m(-2) twice daily, days 1-14, (22 patients)) or a reference arm of i.v. paclitaxel (175 mg m(-2), (20 patients)). Two additional patients were initially randomised to continuous capecitabine 666 mg m(-2) twice daily, but this arm was closed following selection of the intermittent schedule for further development. Overall response rate was 36% (95% CI 17-59%) with capecitabine (including three complete responses) and 26% (95% CI 9-51%) with paclitaxel (no complete responses). Median time to disease progression was similar in the two treatment groups (3.0 months with capecitabine, 3.1 months with paclitaxel), as was overall survival (7.6 and 9.4 months, respectively). Paclitaxel was associated with more alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, myalgia and neutropenia, whereas typical capecitabine-related adverse events were diarrhoea, vomiting and hand-foot syndrome. Twenty-three per cent of capecitabine-treated patients and 16% of paclitaxel-treated patients achieved a > or =10% improvement in Karnofsky Performance Status. Oral capecitabine is active in anthracycline-pretreated advanced/metastatic breast cancer and has a favourable safety profile. Furthermore, capecitabine provides a convenient, patient-orientated therapy.

[A comparative randomized phase-II study of Xeloda (capecitabine) and paclitaxel in patients with breast cancer progressing after anthracycline antibiotics]. / Sravnitel'noe randomizirovannoe issledovanie po II faze kselody (kapetsitabina) i paklitaksela u bol'nykh rakom molochnoi zhelezy, progressiruiushchikh posle antratsiklinovykh antibiotikov.

A randomized study of the effectiveness of treatment with capecitabine (Xeloda) (22) and paclitaxel (taxol) (19) was carried out in breast cancer patients resistant to anthracycline antibiotic drugs. Capecitabine and paclitaxel showed comparable effectiveness, although the former appeared less toxic, particularly, in hematologic complication situations. Therefore, it may be administered to out-patients who previously received several courses of chemotherapy.

Low-dose continuous-infusion ceftazidime monotherapy in low-risk febrile neutropenic patients.

One hundred and thirty-five cancer patients admitted with low-risk neutropenic fever received a low-dose schedule of ceftazidime as infusional monotherapy over a total of 180 episodes. Ceftazidime was administered as a 1-g bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 2 g per day. In this patient population the ceftazidime was both practical and well tolerated. Sixty-eight percent of patients responded with clinical improvement and complete resolution of fever within 48 h. Overall, 95% of patients responded, although 18% subsequently required antibiotic modification for persistent fever. Only 5% of episodes were considered failures due to clinical deterioration, and over the study period there was only 1 fatality due to respiratory failure. The median duration of hospitalisation was only 4 days (2-20). In conclusion, monotherapy with low-dose infusional ceftazidime appears safe and highly effective in this low-risk population of neutropenic patients and may reduce antibiotic costs appreciably.

Early evaluation of tumour metabolic response using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: a pilot study following the phase II chemotherapy schedule for temozolomide in recurrent high-grade gliomas.

Quantitation of metabolic changes in tumours may provide an objective measure of clinical and subclinical response to anticancer therapy. This pilot study assesses the value of quantitation of metabolic rate of glucose (MRGlu) measured in mmol min(-1) ml(-1) to assess early subclinical response to therapy in a relatively non-responsive tumour. Nine patients receiving the CRC Phase II study schedule of temozolomide were assessed with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) scans prior to and 14 days after treatment with temozolomide given as 750-1000 mg m(-2) over 5 days every 28 days. Tumour MRGlu was calculated and compared with objective response at 8 weeks. Pretreatment MRGlu was higher in responders than non-responders. The responding patient group had a greater than 25% reduction in MRGlu in regions of high focal tumour uptake (HFU). Whole tumour changes in MRGlu did not correlate with response. Percentage change in HFU standardized uptake value (SUV) did discriminate the responding from the non-responding patients, but not as well as with MRGlu. Large differences also occurred in the normal brain SUV following treatment. Thus, MRGlu appeared to be a more sensitive discriminator of response than the simplified static SUV analysis. Changes in MRGlu may reflect the degree of cell kill following chemotherapy and so may provide an objective, quantitative subclinical measure of response to therapy.

Tumor, normal tissue, and plasma pharmacokinetic studies of fluorouracil biomodulation with N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate, folinic acid, and interferon alfa.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA), folinic acid (FA), and interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) biomodulation on plasma fluorouracil (5FU) pharmacokinetics and tumor and liver radioactivity uptake and retention after [18F]-fluorouracil (5-[18F]-FU) administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one paired pharmacokinetic studies were completed on patients with colorectal, gastric, and hepatocellular cancer, utilizing positron emission tomography (PET), which allowed the acquisition of tumor, normal tissue, and plasma pharmacokinetic data and tumor blood flow (TBF) measurements. The first PET study was completed when the patient was biomodulator-naive and was repeated on day 8 after the patient had been treated with either PALA, FA, or IFN-alpha in recognized schedules. RESULTS: TBF was an important determinant of tumor radioactivity uptake (r = .90; P < .001) and retention (r = .96; P < .001), for which radioactivity represents a composite signal of 5-[18F]-FU and [18F]-labeled metabolites and catabolites. After treatment with PALA, TBF decreased (four of four patients; P = .043), as did tumor radioactivity exposure (five of five patients; P = .0437), with no change in plasma 5FU clearance. With FA treatment, there were no differences observed in whole-body metabolism, plasma 5FU clearance, or tumor and liver pharmacokinetics. IFN-alpha had measurable effects on TBF and 5-[18F]-FU metabolism but had no apparent affect on liver blood flow. CONCLUSION: The administration of PALA and IFN-alpha produced measurable changes in plasma, tumor, and liver pharmacokinetics after 5-[18F]-FU administration. No changes were observed after FA administration. In vivo effects may negate the anticipated therapeutic advantage of 5FU biomodulation with some agents.

Sources of error in tissue and tumor measurements of 5-[18F]fluorouracil.

UNLABELLED: Central to the assessment of variability of pharmacokinetic parameters is knowledge of bias and variability of the measurement technique, preventing observed differences from being ascribed inappropriate significance. This article presents an evaluation of sources of error in the measurement of normal tissue and tumor pharmacokinetics using 18F-labeled 5-fluorouracil (FU) and PET. METHODS: A standard approach to data acquisition, processing and analysis was developed using a PET scanner, filtered backprojection reconstruction and region of interest analysis. Fourteen tracer 5-[18F]FU patient studies and a phantom study were completed, with 4 of the patient studies repeated 1 wk later. These data allowed evaluation of the overall reproducibility of the technique and the components of measurement variability due to tissue sampling. The effect of reconstruction technique and sampling region size on quantification was assessed using phantom data. RESULTS: All measured radioactivity versus time curves were tissue specific. Week-to-week variability in the area under this curve (representing combined physiological and measurement difference) was -3% to +15% for liver and -9% to -16% for spleen and kidney. Metastasis variability was greatest at -20%. Visual and computer realignment of the second paired study produced similar results. Interobserver effects were small compared to differences between studies. CONCLUSION: These results confirm the feasibility of using PET as a pharmacokinetic tool for 5-[18F]FU studies. Although overall experimental error (i.e., random variation in data acquisition, processing and analysis) was low, constraints in data interpretation emerged.

The Charing Cross Hospital experience with temozolomide in patients with gliomas.

Temozolomide, a new oral cytotoxic agent, was given to 75 patients with malignant gliomas. The schedule used was for the first course 150 mg/m2 per day for 5 days (i.e. total dose 750 mg/m2), escalating, if no significant myelosuppression was noted on day 22, to 200 mg/m2 per day for 5 days (i.e. total dose 1000 mg/m2) for subsequent courses at 4-week intervals. There were 27 patients with primary disease treated with two courses of temozolomide prior to their radiotherapy and 8 (30%) fulfilled the criteria for an objective response. There were 48 patients whose disease recurred after their initial surgery and radiotherapy and 12 (25%) fulfilled the criteria for an objective response. This gave an overall objective response rate of 20 (27%) out of 75 patients. Temozolomide was generally well tolerated, with little subjective toxicity and predictable myelosuppression. However, the responses induced with this schedule were of short duration and had relatively little impact on overall survival. In conclusion, temozolomide given in this schedule has activity against high grade glioma. However, studies evaluating chemotherapy in primary brain tumours should include a quality-of-life/performance status evaluation in addition to CT or MRI scanning assessment.

A weekly alternating chemotherapy regimen with low toxicity for the treatment of aggressive lymphoma.

A total of 50 consecutive adult patients with newly diagnosed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated with a weekly alternating combination chemotherapy schedule, BEMOP/CA, including bleomycin, etoposide, methotrexate, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and Adriamycin. Two-thirds of the patients were over 60 years old or had stage 4 disease. Clinical remission was achieved in 56% of cases. The 3-year survival is 53% (95% confidence interval, 39-66%). The presence of B symptoms and a serum albumin value of <33 g/l at presentation were poor prognostic indicators for survival in a multivariate proportional-hazards model. Overall, the response rate and survival for this group of patients with intermediate- and high-grade lymphomas is similar to results previously reported. The BEMOP/CA treatment was brief (16 weeks) and associated with a low fatal toxicity (one early death and one late fatality from Pneumocystis pneumonia), and the drug costs are equivalent to those for eight cycles of CHOP.

Flavone acetic acid (FAA) with recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) in advanced malignant melanoma: I. Clinical and vascular studies.

A trial of FAA and rIL-2 has been performed both to study the clinical efficacy of this combination and to determine whether they cause haemorrhagic necrosis by acting upon tumour vasculature. FAA and rIL-2 were given to 23 patients with progressing metastatic melanoma. FAA 4.8 gm m-2 was given as a 1 h infusion without urine alkalinisation on days 1, 8 and 15. rIL-2 (6-18 x 10(6) IU/m2/day) was given as a continuous infusion days 8-12 and 15-19 (nine patients) or days 8-12 only (14 patients). Treatment was repeated after 2 weeks unless there was disease progression. Of the 21 assessable patients there have been one complete (skin and liver) and two partial responses (skin and liver, skin and nodes) lasting 20 + 17 + and 15 months, overall response rate 14%. Unexpectedly severe hypotension after the third FAA, when given 2-4 days after RIL-2, was the major toxicity (8/15 grade 3 or 4). No alteration in coagulation parameters were seen during therapy of the first ten patients. No increase in tumour necrosis was seen in any of the 15 biopsies taken from ten patients after therapy. This suggests that FAA does not have similar vascular effects in human as it does in murine tumours.

Flavone acetic acid (FAA) with recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) in advanced malignant melanoma. III: Cytokine studies.

Twelve patients undergoing IL-2 and flavone acetic acid (FAA) combination immunotherapy for advanced melanoma were studied throughout treatment for the induction of measurable levels of bioactive TNF, GM-CSF and IL-6 in their serum. This was to assess the extent of secondary cytokine induction in these patients and the possible role of such cytokines in both the toxic and therapeutic responses. The nature of the treatment schedule enabled these cytokines to be measured in response to FAA alone, FAA/IL-2 and FAA alone following IL-2/FAA activation of target cells. A small rise in the serum levels of these cytokines was seen on the initial course of FAA/IL-2 but this was minor compared to the marked elevation in levels 2-8 h following the initiation of the third course of FAA given with or without IL-2 and at a time point which coincided with maximum toxicity in those patients who experienced it. These results show that FAA alone can induce cytokine release from primed target cells. This may be associated with the therapeutic effect and/or toxicity of the agent.

Flavone acetic acid (FAA) with recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) in advanced malignant melanoma. IV: Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of flavone acetic acid and its metabolites.

Flavone acetic acid (FAA) was administered at a dose of 4.8 g m-2 over 1 h to patients with advanced malignant disease in combination with Interleukin II. A new high performance liquid chromatography method is described to determine both the parent compound and eight drug-related products, and the conditions required to determine these components in plasma are discussed. The half-life over the first 8 h was 2.3 h, but the terminal clearance of the drug was extremely slow. Severe (WHO Grade 4) hypotension was observed in some patients. However, incidence of this did not appear to be associated with any differences in FAA plasma concentrations, nor were there differences in FAA clearance between those patients whose tumour responded to the drug combination and those who did not.

Mismanagement of choriocarcinoma due to a false low HCG measurement.

Accurate measurement of HCG is essential for the diagnosis and management of patients with choriocarcinoma. It is therefore important that clinicians are aware of the possible analytical problems associated with the HCG assay if delay in the diagnosis of this curable tumor is to be avoided. We describe the case of a 43-year-old woman with extensive lung metastases who had an unnecessary hysterectomy and lung biopsy and in whom the diagnosis of this potentially rapidly fatal tumor was delayed because of a falsely low HCG level measured by a commercial kit. This underestimation of HCG was due to the 'high dose hook' effect, which is described in detail, and methods for avoiding this analytical problem are described.

Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease.

Diagnosis of molar pregnancy relies on serum and urine human chorionic gonadotropin estimations in addition to characteristic appearances on histology. Approximately 92% of hydatidiform moles resolve spontaneously after evacuation, and with careful human chorionic gonadotropin follow-up, the remainder can be successfully treated with a minimum of toxicity. Non-post-mole gestational choriocarcinoma is also highly curable with modern chemotherapy, and in the rare cases when drug resistance develops, surgery can be an effective salvage treatment. In cases when doubt exists as to whether a patient has a true gestational tumor or a human chorionic gonadotropin-producing carcinoma, the origin of the tumor can sometimes be determined by DNA analysis. This determination can help to avoid inappropriate chemotherapy for patients with nongestational tumors.

Temozolomide: a new oral cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent with promising activity against primary brain tumours.

Temozolomide, a new oral cytotoxic agent, has been given to 28 patients with primary brain tumours. Treatment was given at a dose of 150 mg/m2/day for 5 days (i.e. total dose 750 mg/m2) escalating, if no significant myelosuppression was noted on day 22, to 200 mg/m2/day for 5 days (i.e. total dose 1000 mg/m2) for subsequent courses at 4 week intervals. A major improvement in computer tomography (CT) scan was noted in 5/10 patients with astrocytomas recurrent after radiotherapy, with a major clinical improvement but minor improvement on CT scan in one further patient. Reduction in the size of the CT lesion was also observed in 4/7 patients with newly diagnosed high grade astrocytomas given 2-3 courses of temozolomide prior to irradiation. 1 patient with recurrent medulloblastoma had a clinical response in bone metastases. Temozolomide was well tolerated with little subjective toxicity and usually predictable myelosuppression and is a promising new drug in the treatment of primary brain tumours.