Heterogeneity in the half-life of factor VIII concentrate in patients with hemophilia A is due to variability in the clearance of endogenous von Willebrand factor.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported marked interindividual variation in factor VIII (FVIII) clearance in patients with hemophilia (PWH) and proposed a number of factors that influence this heterogeneity. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the importance of the clearance rates of endogenous von Willebrand factor (VWF) compared with those of other FVIII half-life modifiers in adult PWH. METHODS: The half-life of recombinant FVIII was determined in a cohort of 61 adult PWH. A range of reported modifiers of FVIII clearance was assessed (including plasma VWF:antigen and VWF propeptide levels; VWF-FVIII binding capacity; ABO blood group; and nonneutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies). The FVIII-binding region of the VWF gene was sequenced. Finally, the effects of variation in FVIII half-life on clinical phenotype were investigated. RESULTS: We demonstrated that heterogeneity in the clearance of endogenous plasma VWF is a key determinant of variable FVIII half-life in PWH. Both ABO blood group and age significantly impact FVIII clearance. The effect of ABO blood group on FVIII half-life in PWH is modulated entirely through its effect on the clearance rates of endogenous VWF. In contrast, the age-related effect on FVIII clearance is, at least in part, VWF independent. In contrast to previous studies, no major effects of variation in VWF-FVIII binding affinity on FVIII clearance were observed. Although high-titer immunoglobulin G antibodies (≥1:80) were observed in 26% of PWH, these did not impact FVIII half-life. Importantly, the annual FVIII usage (IU/kg/y) was significantly (p = .0035) increased in patients with an FVIII half-life of <12 hours. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that heterogeneity in the half-life of FVIII concentrates in patients with hemophilia A is primarily attributable to variability in the clearance of endogenous VWF.

Plasma Thrombin Generation and Sensitivity to Activated Protein C Among Patients With Myeloma and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance.

The etiology of the prothrombotic state in myeloma has yet to be definitively characterized. Similarly, while recent evidence suggests that patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) may also be at increased risk of thrombosis, the magnitude and the etiology of this risk have also yet to be defined. The present study aims to characterize patterns of plasma thrombin generation and sensitivity to the anticoagulant activity of activated protein C (APC) at the time of initial diagnosis of myeloma and in response to therapy in comparison to that observed among patients with MGUS and matched, healthy volunteers. Patients presenting with newly diagnosed/newly relapsed myeloma (n = 8), MGUS (n = 8), and matched healthy volunteers (n = 8) were recruited. Plasma thrombin generation was determined by calibrated automated thrombography. Peak thrombin generation was significantly higher in patients with myeloma (383.4 ± 33.4 nmol/L) and MGUS (353.4 ± 16.5 nmol/L) compared to healthy volunteers (276.7 ± 20.8 nmol/L; P < .05). In the presence of APC, endogenous thrombin potential was significantly lower in control plasma (228.6 ± 44.5 nmol/L × min) than in either myeloma (866.2 ± 241.3 nmol/L × min, P = .01) or MGUS plasma (627 ± 91.5 nmol/L × min, P = .003). Within the myeloma cohort, peak thrombin generation was significantly higher at diagnosis (353.2 ± 15.9 nmol/L) than following completion of the third cycle of therapy (282.1 ± 15.2 nmol/L; P < .005). Moreover, sensitivity to APC increased progressively with each cycle of chemotherapy. Further study of the etiology and evolving patterns of hypercoagulability among patients with these conditions is warranted and may have future implications for thromboprophylaxis strategies.

Differing coagulation profiles of patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma.

The link between myeloma and thrombosis is well established. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) has also been associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. It was recently demonstrated that patients with myeloma display changes in thromboelastometry that may indicate a prothrombotic state. There is little data with regard to changes in thromboelastography in patients with myeloma or MGUS. The aim of this study was to investigate the differing coagulation profiles of patients of patients with myeloma and MGUS by means of conventional coagulation tests and thromboelastography. Blood was taken by direct venepuncture from patients with myeloma, MGUS and normal controls. Routine coagulation tests were performed in an accredited hospital laboratory. Thromboelastography (TEG(®)) was performed as per the manufacturer's protocol. Eight patients were recruited in each group. Patients with myeloma had a significantly lower mean haemoglobin level than patients with MGUS or normal controls (p < 0.001). Patients with myeloma had a significantly more prolonged mean prothrombin time than normal controls (p = 0.018) but not patients with MGUS. Patients with myeloma had significantly higher median D-dimer levels than normal controls (p = 0.025), as did patients with MGUS (p = 0.017). Patients with myeloma had a significantly higher mean factor VIII level than normal controls (p = 0.009) and there was a non-significant trend towards patients with MGUS having higher factor VIII levels than normal controls (p = 0.059). There was no significant difference in thromboelastographic parameters between the three groups. Patients with MGUS appear to have a distinct coagulation profile which is intermediate between patients with myeloma and normal controls.

Venous thromboembolism in patients with myeloma: incidence and risk factors in a "real-world" population.

Myeloma has a well-described association with venous thromboembolism (VTE). There are few dedicated studies investigating the incidence and risk factors. Many assessment scores have been suggested to estimate the risk of VTE in patients with cancer but these have been validated in solid organ tumors. The records of patients with myeloma attending a university hospital between January 2007 and December 2012 were reviewed to investigate the incidence of VTE and the associated risk factors. In all, 217 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age at diagnosis of 65 (12) years were included. Of 217 patients, 12% had an episode of VTE, 69% received at least 1 immunomodulatory agent, and 95% had low or intermediate risk of VTE according to the Khorana score. Venous thromboembolism was a frequent occurrence in this cohort. Patients had many risk factors for VTE but no one was predictive. As myeloma outcomes continue to improve, a dedicated prospective study is warranted to investigate the most appropriate thromboprophylaxis strategy.

Direct-to-patient expert system and home INR monitoring improves control of oral anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Internet-based disease management programs have the potential to improve patient care. The objective of this study was to determine whether an interactive, internet-based system enabling supervised, patient self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy provided management comparable to an established anticoagulation clinic. PATIENTS/METHODS: Sixty patients receiving chronic oral anticoagulant therapy who had access to the internet and a printer, were enrolled into this prospective, single-group, before-after study from a single clinic and managed between March 2002 and January 2003. Patients learned how to use a home prothrombin time monitor and how to access the system through the internet. Patients used the system for six months, with daily review by the supervising physician. The primary outcome variable was the difference in time in therapeutic range prior to and following introduction of internet-supervised patient self-management. RESULTS: The mean time in therapeutic range increased from 63% in the anticoagulation clinic (control period) to 74.4% during internet-supervised patient self-management (study period). The mean difference score between control and study periods was 11.4% (P = 0.004, 95% confidence interval 5.5-17.3%). There were no hemorrhagic or thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSIONS: This novel approach of internet-supervised patient self-management improved time in therapeutic range compared to an anticoagulation clinic. This is the first demonstration of an internet-based expert system enabling remote and effective management of patients on oral anticoagulants. Expert systems may be applicable for management of other chronic diseases.

A multi-dose pharmacokinetic study of dalteparin in haemodialysis patients.

Low-molecular-weight heparins undergo renal elimination, and therefore the proper dosing in hemodialysis (HD) patients is unclear. It was the objective of this study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of dalteparin in patients receiving chronic HD for end-stage renal disease. We performed a multidose PK study with prophylactic doses of dalteparin in twelve HD patients. Dalteparin 5,000 IU was administered subcutaneously daily for four consecutive days, with HD performed on day 2 and day 4. Anti-factor Xa activity was determined daily and at multiple blood samples after the 3rd and 4th dose. Eleven of 12 patients completed the study. The mean (range) PK parameters determined after the 4th dose were as follows: i) maximum concentration (Cmax ) was 0.31 IU/ml (0.06 to 0.55 IU/ml); ii) time to Cmax was 3.55 hours (2.59 to 4.96 hr); iii) area under the curve was 3.24 IU*hr/ml (0.64 to 6.44 IU*hr/ml); iv) half-life was 3.82 hr (2.03 to 9.63 hr); and v) trough anti-factor Xa activity 0.04 IU/ml (0.02 to 0.08 IU/ml). No major bleeding was observed. In general, patients with lower body weight exhibited a higher Cmax . From this pilot PK study, we have determined initial PK parameters for dalteparin in HD patients. Although a standard prophylactic dose was used, we found that in this patient population differences in body weight influenced the Cmax. Future studies to evaluate the PK parameters of dalteparin in patients receiving chronic HD may have to use weight-based dosing and will need to be performed over a longer period of time.

Anti-beta2 glycoprotein 1 and the anti-phospholipid syndrome.

PURPOSE: To describe a patient who presented with bilateral retinal vascular occlusion and the use of anti-beta2 glycoprotein 1 (GPI) antibody testing in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome. DESIGN: Observational case report. METHODS: Hematological investigations were performed on a 49-year-old man who presented with rapid onset of bilateral severe central retinal vein occlusion. RESULTS: Lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibody testing was negative. Markedly raised titers of anti-beta2 GPI antibodies were detected on two separate occasions. CONCLUSIONS: The raised titers of anti-beta2 GPI antibodies were considered to strongly suggest an underlying diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome.

Management of lepirudin therapy for a patient with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome using the whole blood ecarin clot time and activated partial thromboplastin time.

A patient with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) and a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia required lepirudin therapy. The patient had an abnormal baseline activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), complicating management of his therapy. We investigated whether an alternative monitoring system, using a dry reagent technology [Thrombolytic Assessment System (TAS)], could be used to monitor the patient's whole blood ecarin clot time (ECT) and aPTT. Baseline values for the ECT and aPTT were normal with this system. During a continuous infusion of lepirudin, the patient's whole blood ECT was maintained between a desired range of 150-200 s for 73% of the time. Similarly, his whole blood aPTT was maintained between 60 and 80 s for 80% of the time. In contrast, the patient's plasma-based aPTT by standard methods was consistently > 150 s. The patient underwent surgical procedures without complications. To further investigate the finding that the patient's antibody did not affect the aPTT with this system, we performed the ECT and the aPTT assays on the TAS Analyzer with plasma samples from 10 patients with APS and abnormal aPTTs. All 10 samples had plasma ECT values within the normal range. Four patients had normalization of the aPTT, suggesting that a subset of patients with APS may benefit from the TAS aPTT assay when monitoring heparin or other anticoagulation therapy.

Hypercoagulable states and antithrombotic strategies in recurrent vascular access site thrombosis.

Vascular access site thrombosis is a major cause of morbidity in patients receiving hemodialysis. The role of hypercoagulable states in recurrent vascular access site thrombosis remains poorly understood. Data are limited regarding systemic anticoagulation to improve access graft patency, because of concern about hemorrhagic complications. We determined the prevalence of hypercoagulable states and clinical outcome (thrombotic and hemorrhagic) after initiation of antithrombotic therapy in a series of patients with recurrent vascular access site thrombosis. We evaluated 31 patients who had sustained 119 thrombotic events that resulted in vascular access graft failure during the year before evaluation. Sixty-eight percent of patients tested had elevated concentrations of antibody to anticardiolipin or topical bovine thrombin, and 18% of patients tested had heparin-induced antibodies. More than 90% of patients had elevated factor VIII concentration, 62% had elevated fibrinogen concentrations, and 42% had elevated C-reactive protein concentrations. Twenty-nine patients were given antithrombotic therapy: 13 with warfarin sodium, 12 with unfractionated heparin (UFH), and 11 with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Seven patients received more than one antithrombotic agent, sequentially. Nineteen patients have had no thrombotic events since beginning antithrombotic therapy (10 with warfarin, 3 with UFH, 6 with LMWH). Mean follow-up was 8.6 months (median, 7 months). Eight patients sustained 10 bleeding complications (5 with warfarin, 3 with UFH, and 2 with LMWH). In conclusion, hypercoagulable states are common in patients with recurrent vascular access site thrombosis. Antithrombotic therapy may increase vascular access graft patency, but is associated with significant risk for hemorrhage. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the role and safety of antithrombotic agents in improving vascular access graft patency.

Alternative methods of anticoagulation for dialysis-dependent patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Dialysis patients who are continually exposed to heparin are at risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Heparin-induced antibodies have been reported to occur in 0-12% of hemodialysis (HD) patients. The diagnosis or suspicion of HIT in this patient population requires careful confirmation of the diagnosis and substitution of heparin with an alternate anticoagulant for dialysis. Alternate agents such as the direct thrombin inhibitors (hirudin and argatroban) are available, but careful dosing and monitoring of the anticoagulant effect are required. Despite careful dosing, hemorrhagic complications have occurred with these agents. Unfortunately there are limited options for treatment of hemorrhagic complications and no specific antidotes are available for the direct thrombin inhibitors. In this report the currently available alternatives to heparin for dialysis, including dosing and monitoring recommendations, are reviewed.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: clinical presentations and therapeutic management.

With increasing indications for heparin usage, an understanding of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) as a complication of heparin therapy is more essential than ever. Complications of HIT can result in significant morbidity and mortality. We review the clinical presentations of HIT, laboratory and diagnostic workup, and treatment agents available or being evaluated.

Issues in the utilization of low molecular weight heparins.

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are parenteral anticoagulants that are widely used for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. These agents possess several advantages compared to standard heparin, including a more predictable anticoagulant response, better bioavailability allowing for subcutaneous therapy, and a longer half-life. Laboratory monitoring of the LMWHs uses an anti-factor Xa assay, but monitoring is generally not necessary for most patients. However, certain patient populations do benefit from an individualized approach to therapy and, in some cases, therapeutic monitoring, because of an increased bleeding risk and/or relative contraindications to anticoagulant therapy. For example, since LMWHs are cleared by the kidney, they must be used with caution in renal insufficiency. LMWHs are safe and effective during pregnancy but may not be the optimal antithrombotic agent in pregnant women with prosthetic valves. In addition, management around the time of delivery can be difficult because of the bleeding risk, particularly associated with epidural anesthesia. Therapeutic monitoring also may be useful for the morbidly obese, in children, and for patients with malignancy.

Frequency of anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies in hemodialysis patients and correlation with recurrent vascular access thrombosis.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), characterized by the formation of antibodies to a complex of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin, is a well-recognized risk factor for thromboembolic complications. The frequency of antibody development varies among patient populations. Hemodialysis patients have repeated heparin exposure and should be at risk of developing HIT. This might, contribute to the development of vascular access thrombosis. We prospectively evaluated 88 hemodialysis patients for the presence of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. Eighteen patients (20%) had a prior history of 1 or more prior access thrombosis. One patient (1.14%), without a history of graft thrombosis, tested positive for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. In our study, the presence of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies was rare and was not increased in patients with a history of vascular access thrombosis.