Perceived barriers to a career in pain medicine in the Republic of Ireland.

BACKGROUND: As the population ages, musculoskeletal disorders are a prominent contributory factor to loss of mobility and autonomy. Pain is a predictor of disability and worsening frailty and the role of the chronic pain specialist in the management of this cohort cannot be overstated. With growing requirements for pain specialists, we sought to identify barriers to recruitment within this specialty. AIMS: Establish baseline attitudes and perceived barriers towards a career in pain medicine among Irish anaesthesiology trainees. Suggest a framework to improve recruitment to the specialty. METHODS: Ethical approval was obtained. A web-based questionnaire was sent to all anaesthesiologists in training in the Republic of Ireland. Data was analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-eight trainees received the questionnaire, 59 responded. 54.2% male, 45.8% female. 79.7% had previous clinical exposure to pain medicine, most of whom had spent over one month with a service. Only 10.2% of respondents were considering a career in pain medicine. Factors that attracted trainees to the subspeciality included: interventional practice (81%), variation in clinical practice (66.7%), autonomy of practice (61.9%) and perceived good work-life balance (42.9%). Deterrents from the subspecialty included a psychologically challenging patient cohort (69.5%), frequency of clinics (50.8%), and additional exams (32.2%). When asked how to improve engagement with the speciality, 62% suggested earlier exposure to the speciality and 32.2% suggested increased frequency of formal teaching and workshops. CONCLUSIONS: Increased exposure of trainees to the specialty during early stages of training may improve future recruitment to the subspecialty in Ireland.

Simulating high-fidelity emergency front-of-neck access: Training in an obstetric setting.

Introduction: In a cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate scenario (CICO), emergency front of neck access (eFONA) is the final lifesaving step in airway management to reverse hypoxia and prevent progression to brain injury, cardiac arrest and death. The Difficult Airway Society (DAS) guidelines advise the scalpel cricothyroidotomy method for eFONA. Anatomical and physiological changes in pregnancy exacerbate the already challenging obstetric airway. We aim to assess the impact made by introducing formal eFONA training to the perioperative medicine department of an obstetric hospital. Methods: Ethical approval and written informed consent were obtained. 17 anesthetists participated, (two consultants, one senior registrar, four registrars and eight senior house officers). Study design was as follows: Initial participant survey and performance of a timed scalpel cricothyroidotomy on Limbs & Things AirSim Advance X cricothyroidotomy training mannikin. Difficulty of the attempt was rated on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants then watched the DAS eFONA training video. They then re-performed a scalpel cricothyroidotomy and completed a repeat survey. The primary endpoint was duration of cricothyroidotomy attempt, measured as time from CICO declaration to lung inflation confirmed visually. After a three-month period, participants were reassessed. Results: Four anesthetists had previous eFONA training with simulation, only one underwent training in the previous year. The mean time-to-lung inflation pre-intervention was 123.6 seconds and post-intervention was 80.8 seconds. This was statistically significant (p = 0.0192). All participants found training beneficial. Mean improvement of VAS was 3. All participants' confidence levels in identifying when to perform eFONA and ability to correctly identify anatomy improved. On repeat assessment, 11/13 participants successfully performed a surgical cricothyroidotomy, mean improvement from first attempt was 12 seconds (p = 0.68) which was not statistically significant. Conclusion: This method of training is an easily reproducible way to teach a rarely performed skill in the obstetric population.

Public practice regarding disposal of unused medicines in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: Over recent years, a global increase in the use of pharmaceutical products has been observed. EU directives state that "Member states shall ensure that appropriate collection systems are in place for medicinal products that are unused or have expired" (Directive 2001/83/EC and Directive 2004/27/EC). OBJECTIVES: There is no published data on how people in Ireland dispose of unused medicines; therefore the purpose of this study is to establish baseline information on storage and disposal of medicines. DESIGN: Data was collected over two 2-week periods a year apart. People in the streets of Galway and Cork were approached randomly and invited to participate by filling out a questionnaire. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 398 individuals (207 in Galway and 191 in Cork). Unused medicines were kept in the home by 88% of the respondents. The most cited reason for keeping unused medicines was "in case they are needed later" (68%). Of the respondents who had disposed of medicine in the past, 72% had done so inappropriately. Environmentally inappropriate disposal methods were through general waste disposal and via the sewage system. Interestingly, of the people who had received advice on disposal practices from a healthcare professional, 75% disposed of their medicine appropriately. CONCLUSIONS: There is little awareness among members of the public regarding appropriate ways to dispose of unused medicines. Our findings suggest that effective communication and established protocols will promote appropriate disposal practices.