Ultrasonography surveillance improves prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

To examine the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance, the prognosis of HCC patients who underwent such screening at an expert medical institution or at general clinics were analyzed, as well as those without US surveillance. From October 2006 to December 2014, 872 patients with naïve HCC were enrolled and divided into the surveillance (S)-group (n=398), who underwent follow-up examinations with US, and the non-S group (n=474). The S-group was further subdivided into patients who underwent follow-up surveillance at Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, an expert medical institution (SE-group, n=189), and those who received surveillance at general clinics (SG-group, n=209). Prognosis and clinical characteristics were analyzed. In the non-S group, the frequency of patients without viral hepatitis (NBNC-HCC) and Tumor, Node, Metastasis stage was greater. As a result, the median survival time (MST) of the non-S group was reduced, compared with the S group (non-S group, 34.1 vs. S group, 68.2 months; P<0.001). Tumor size was significantly different between the SE- and SG-groups (SE-group, 2.0±1.0 vs. SG-group, 2.5±1.3 cm; P<0.001), whereas tumor number (SE-group: 1.5±1.1 vs. SG-group, 1.7±1.2; P=0.164) and MST (SE-group, 72.1 vs. SG-group, 67.1 months; P=0.931) were not significantly different. Surveillance performed at either an expert medical institution or general clinic improved the prognosis of HCC patients. Dissemination of findings demonstrating the importance of surveillance for HCC to all clinicians as well as patients with chronic liver disease is important, and establishment of an effective surveillance strategy for NBNC-HCC is required.

Proposed a simple score for recommendation of scheduled ultrasonography surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma after Direct Acting Antivirals: multicenter analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To develop a scoring method using with common clinical data for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development after sustained virological response at 24 weeks (SVR24) after treatment with direct acting antivirals (DAAs), we retrospectively evaluated clinical features of patients who obtained SVR24. METHODS: From October 2014 to December 2017, 1069 hepatitis C virus patients without a past history of HCC, who obtained SVR24 by DAAs at two different areas, were enrolled (the training [n = 484, ChuShikoku-group] and validation [n = 585, Chubu-group] sets). All were examined by ultrasonography as surveillance for HCC at the time of starting DAAs and twice a year after SVR24. We identified three parameters at SVR24, male gender, FIB-4 index > 3.25, and α-fetoprotein level > 5.0 ng/mL, as risk factors for HCC development and gave them point values, with the sum used as After DAAs Recommendation for Surveillance (ADRES) score. RESULTS: In the ChuShikoku-group, the respective 1-/2-year rates for HCC incidence rates ADRES score 0 were 0.0%/0.0%, for a score 1 were 1.1%/2.1%, score 2 were 8.8%/15.9%, and score 3 were 17.1%/28.1%. On the other hand, those respective scores for the Chubu-group were 0.0%/0.0%, 0.0%/0.7%, 7.9%/10.6%, and 19.5%/not available. The c-index of the predictive value for HCC development in the training set after SVR24 was 0.835 while 0.899 in the validation set. Finally, those of the entire cohort were 0.0%/0.0%, 0.5%/1.6%, 8.4%/13.4%, and 18.0%/32.8%. CONCLUSION: The present ADRES score was simple and easy to use and may be useful for predicting risk of HCC development in short term after reaching SVR24 by DAAs.

Abdominal Ultrasound Findings of Tumor-Forming Hepatic Malignant Lymphoma.

AIM/BACKGROUND: Evaluations of abdominal ultrasonography (US) findings of primary and secondary tumor-forming hepatic malignant lymphoma (HML) have not been adequately reported. In this study, we elucidated US and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) findings in patients with HML. MATERIALS/METHODS: From January 2006 to March 2017, 25 patients with HML were enrolled (primary 7, secondary 18), each of whom was diagnosed pathologically. They were divided into 2 groups based on tumor diameter (cutoff, 30 mm). US imaging findings were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: All tumors in patients with a small HML (<30 mm in diameter, small group, n = 14) were revealed as homogeneous hypo-echoic type (100%), with penetrating sign observed in only 1 patient. Tumors in 11 patients in the small group, examined with CEUS, showed homogeneous enhancement in the early vascular phase (91%) and a washout pattern in the portal phase (100%), and they were revealed as defective in the post-vascular phase (100%). In the large group (≥30 mm; n = 11), tumors were revealed as a heterogeneous hypo-echoic lesion in 10 (91%) and penetrating sign was observed in 8 (73%). Dilatation of the distal intrahepatic bile duct by the tumor was observed in 4 patients in the large group. In 7 large group patients examined with CEUS, imaging findings in the early vascular phase varied, with 5 (71%) showing a washout pattern in the portal phase and 5 (71%) revealed as defective in the post-vascular phase. CONCLUSION: We found that US imaging features of HML differ depending on the tumor diameter.

Ultrasonography screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in Japanese patients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Effective surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in diabetes mellitus (DM) has not been established. We elucidated the risk factors for HCC in DM patients. METHODS: From 2000 to 2014, 80 patients diagnosed with HCC for the first time who had concomittant DM but no other etiology of liver disease were enrolled as the DM-HCC group. From 2005 October to 2014, after introduction of the abdominal ultrasonography (US) report database, 2083 DM patients with no viral hepatitis, no known autoimmune hepatic diseases, and/or no evidence of alcohol abuse (>60 g/day) were enrolled as the DM-US group. Findings from the first US screening were evaluated. "Elderly" patients were defined as those aged >65 years. Clinical features of DM-HCC patients were evaluated and compared with those of DM-US patients. RESULTS: In the DM-HCC group (54 men, 26 women), the mean (± SD age was 74.1 ± 8.5 years, and mean HbA1c and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index were 7.3 ± 1.3% and 4.50 ± 3.42, respectively. Mean tumor diameter was 5.7 ± 3.5 cm, there were 63/13/2/2 patients classified as Child-Pugh A/B/C/unknown, and 56/24 were single/multiple lesions. In the DM-US group, HCC was detected in three patients (0.14%; 0.3% of those classified as elderly). The mean age and FIB-4 index of these three patients (one man, two women) were 75.6 years (range 67-92 years) and 4.84 (range 2.87-6.98), respectively. Mean tumor diamter was 7.6 cm and there were one and two single and multiple lesions, respectively. In elderly DM-US patients with a high FIB-4 index (≥4), the rate of HCC detection was 5.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Being elderly and having a high FIB-4 index are characteristic features of DM-HCC. Similar characteristics were noted for patients with HCC in the DM-US group. HCC surveillance with US is recommended for DM patients, especially those who are elderly (≥65 years) and have a high FIB-4 index.