Influence of Sorafenib on Host Immunity in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stratified by Etiology.

AIM: We previously reported that sorafenib induces Th1 [interferon-γ (IFNγ)-positive interleukin 4 (IL4)-negative] dominance which prevents tumor cells from escaping the host immune system in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). However, in that study we did not assess the influence of sorafenib on host immunity according to the etiology of LC. Therefore, this study was retrospectively performed to evaluate the impact of sorafenib therapy for aHCC on host immunity in patients stratified according to the etiology of LC: Patients and Methods: A total of 116 adult Japanese patients with LC and aHCC received sorafenib therapy at our hospital. Blood samples were collected before and after treatment for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients had hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related LC, 62 patients had hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related LC, 22 patients had alcoholic LC, and 10 patients had LC without these causative factors. In patients receiving sorafenib at a dose of 400 mg/day, patients in Child-Pugh class A, and patients with stage IVA aHCC, Th2 (IFNγ-negative/IL4-positive) cells decreased significantly after treatment, although there was no significant impact on the tumor response. In addition, Th2 cells decreased significantly in patients with HCV-related LC after treatment, while there were no significant changes in the other groups. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib might prevent tumor cells from escaping the host immune system in patients with aHCC and HCV-related LC, although it does not seem to do so in those with LC of other etiologies.

VEGF in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma receiving intra-arterial chemotherapy.

AIM: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a primary driving force for both physiological and pathological angiogenesis and over-expression of VEGF has been detected in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of the present study was to clarify the usefulness of VEGF for monitoring the response to intra-arterial chemotherapy in patients with HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) and advanced HCC (aHCC) received hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC: leucovorin (LV) at 12 mg/h, cisplatin (CDDP) at 10 mg/h and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at 250 mg/22 h) via the proper hepatic artery every 5 days for 4 weeks using a catheter connected to a subcutaneous drug delivery system. RESULTS: i) Serum VEGF levels were higher in patients with progressive disease than those in patients with a partial response or stable disease. ii) VEGF levels were higher in patients with alcoholic LC than those in patients with hepatitis C-related or hepatitis B-related LC. iii) VEGF levels were higher in stage IVB patients than those in patients with stage III or IVA disease. iv) VEGF levels were significantly higher in patients with giant or confluent multinodular tumors than those in patients with multiple discrete nodules. v) Serum VEGF levels were higher in patients with vascular invasion than in patients without vascular invasion. CONCLUSION: Monitoring the serum VEGF level is useful for predicting the response of aHCC to HAIC, as well as for predicting metastasis, tumor type and vascular invasion.

Sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) still have a very poor prognosis, even though the oral multikinase inhibitor sorafenib has revolutionized treatment of aHCC in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). Standardization of multimodal therapy for aHCC with PVTT has not yet been achieved. AIM: This retrospective study was performed to clarify the usefulness of combined treatment with sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for patients with LC, aHCC and PVTT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty adult Japanese patients with LC underwent HAIC (HAIC group) between 2002 and 2009, while 18 patients received HAIC after treatment with sorafenib between 2009 and 2014 (SF-HAIC group). RESULTS: Among patients with Child-Pugh class A disease, the median survival time of the SF-HAIC group (315 days) was significantly longer than that of the HAIC group (197 days), while there was no significant difference between the two groups (234 and 228 days) among patients with Child-Pugh class B disease. HAIC led to a partial response (PR) in 16.7% of patients with class A disease and 21.4% of patients with class B disease. With SF-HAIC, PR was obtained in 63.8% and 42.9% of patients respectively, although the PR rate was only 9.1% and 0.0%, respectively, after treatment with sorafenib alone for four weeks. CONCLUSION: When multimodal therapy is employed for patients with LC in Child-Pugh class A disease with aHCC and PVTT, performing HAIC after four weeks of sorafenib treatment might improve both the tumor response and patient survival.