Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 27(5): 1372-1384, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32002719

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: ALPPS is found to increase the resectability of primary and secondary liver malignancy at the advanced stage. The aim of the study was to verify the surgical and oncological outcome of ALPPS for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: The study cohort was based on the ALPPS registry with patients from 31 international centers between August 2009 and January 2018. Propensity score matched patients receiving chemotherapy only were selected from the SEER database as controls for the survival analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients undergoing ALPPS were recruited, 99 completed the second stage with median inter-stage duration of 11 days. The median kinetic growth rate was 23 ml/day. R0 resection was achieved in 87 (85%). Initially high rates of morbidity and mortality decreased steadily to a 29% severe complication rate and 7% 90-day morbidity in the last 2 years. Post-hepatectomy liver failure remained the main cause of 90-day mortality. Multivariate analysis revealed insufficient future liver remnant at the stage-2 operation (FLR2) to be the only risk factor for severe complications (OR 2.91, p = 0.02). The propensity score matching analysis showed a superior overall survival in the ALPPS group compared to palliative chemotherapy (median overall survival: 26.4 months vs 14 months; 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates: 82.4%, 70.5% and 39.6% vs 51.2%, 21.4% and 11.3%, respectively, p < 0.01). The survival benefit, however, was not confirmed in the subgroup analysis for patients with insufficient FLR2 or multifocal ICC. CONCLUSION: ALPPS showed high efficacy in achieving R0 resections in locally advanced ICC. To get the most oncological benefit from this aggressive surgery, ALPPS would be restricted to patients with single lesions and sufficient FLR2.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos , Colangiocarcinoma/cirugía , Hepatectomía/métodos , Fallo Hepático/prevención & control , Vena Porta/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Ascitis/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Ligadura , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros , Programa de VERF , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
ANZ J Surg ; 79(9): 624-8, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19895518

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A new approach towards achieving bloodless liver resection is the use of heat coagulative necrosis. The latest stage of this technique is a four-probe device (Habib Sealer), which we used for a variety of resections to find the best indications for the method. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2006 we performed 28 liver resections in 20 consecutive patients. The most common indication was metastatic colorectal cancer (75%). We treated a heterogeneous patient collective in terms of tumour localization and extent of resection. Resection was performed after creating a necrotic zone. The device achieved an area of coagulation of 1-cm width in which even larger vessels and bile ducts were safely sealed. RESULTS: Operative spectrum covered atypical resections (8), one- or bisegmentectomies at different locations (15), hemihepatectomies (4) and one extended right hepatectomy. With one exception intra-operative blood loss was lower than 100 mL. Four patients (20%) developed operation-related complications comprising abscess formation at the resection site. Follow-up shows tumour-free survival for 13 of 18 patients 12 months after resection. CONCLUSION: Liver resection using the sealer device seems safe. In proximity of hilar structures or large vessels the method is not favourable for the fear of thermal damage. Extended resections are possible but not parenchyma saving. Good indications are atypical (deep) resections - especially in Segment IVb.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Hepatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Hígado/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Necrosis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...