Secondary Fracture Prevention: Consensus Clinical Recommendations from a Multistakeholder Coalition.

Osteoporosis-related fractures are undertreated, due in part to misinformation about recommended approaches to patient care and discrepancies among treatment guidelines. To help bridge this gap and improve patient outcomes, the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research assembled a multistakeholder coalition to develop clinical recommendations for the optimal prevention of secondary fractureamong people aged 65 years and older with a hip or vertebral fracture. The coalition developed 13 recommendations (7 primary and 6 secondary) strongly supported by the empirical literature. The coalition recommends increased communication with patients regarding fracture risk, mortality and morbidity outcomes, and fracture risk reduction. Risk assessment (including fall history) should occur at regular intervals with referral to physical and/or occupational therapy as appropriate. Oral, intravenous, andsubcutaneous pharmacotherapies are efficaciousandcanreduce risk of future fracture.Patientsneededucation,however, about thebenefitsandrisks of both treatment and not receiving treatment. Oral bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate are first-line options and are generally well tolerated; otherwise, intravenous zoledronic acid and subcutaneous denosumab can be considered. Anabolic agents are expensive butmay be beneficial for selected patients at high risk.Optimal duration of pharmacotherapy is unknown but because the risk for second fractures is highest in the earlypost-fractureperiod,prompt treatment is recommended.Adequate dietary or supplemental vitaminDand calciumintake shouldbe assured. Individuals beingtreatedfor osteoporosis shouldbe reevaluated for fracture risk routinely, includingvia patienteducationabout osteoporosisandfracturesandmonitoringfor adverse treatment effects.Patients shouldbestronglyencouraged to avoid tobacco, consume alcohol inmoderation atmost, and engage in regular exercise and fall prevention strategies. Finally, referral to endocrinologists or other osteoporosis specialists may be warranted for individuals who experience repeated fracture or bone loss and those with complicating comorbidities (eg, hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease).

Secondary Fracture Prevention: Consensus Clinical Recommendations from a Multistakeholder Coalition.

Osteoporosis-related fractures are undertreated, due in part to misinformation about recommended approaches to patient care and discrepancies among treatment guidelines. To help bridge this gap and improve patient outcomes, the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research assembled a multistakeholder coalition to develop clinical recommendations for the optimal prevention of secondary fracture among people aged 65 years and older with a hip or vertebral fracture. The coalition developed 13 recommendations (7 primary and 6 secondary) strongly supported by the empirical literature. The coalition recommends increased communication with patients regarding fracture risk, mortality and morbidity outcomes, and fracture risk reduction. Risk assessment (including fall history) should occur at regular intervals with referral to physical and/or occupational therapy as appropriate. Oral, intravenous, and subcutaneous pharmacotherapies are efficacious and can reduce risk of future fracture. Patients need education, however, about the benefits and risks of both treatment and not receiving treatment. Oral bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate are first-line options and are generally well tolerated; otherwise, intravenous zoledronic acid and subcutaneous denosumab can be considered. Anabolic agents are expensive but may be beneficial for selected patients at high risk. Optimal duration of pharmacotherapy is unknown but because the risk for second fractures is highest in the early post-fracture period, prompt treatment is recommended. Adequate dietary or supplemental vitamin D and calcium intake should be assured. Individuals being treated for osteoporosis should be reevaluated for fracture risk routinely, including via patient education about osteoporosis and fractures and monitoring for adverse treatment effects. Patients should be strongly encouraged to avoid tobacco, consume alcohol in moderation at most, and engage in regular exercise and fall prevention strategies. Finally, referral to endocrinologists or other osteoporosis specialists may be warranted for individuals who experience repeated fracture or bone loss and those with complicating comorbidities (eg, hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease). © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Leveraging Scarce Resources With Bone Health TeleECHO to Improve the Care of Osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis is a common condition with serious consequences because of fractures. Despite availability of treatments to reduce fracture risk, there is a large osteoporosis treatment gap that has reached crisis proportions. There are too few specialists to provide services for patients who need them. Bone Health Extension for Community Health Care Outcomes (TeleECHO) is a strategy using real-time ongoing videoconferencing technology to mentor health care professionals in rural and underserved communities to achieve an advanced level of knowledge for the care of patients with skeletal diseases. Over the first 21 months of weekly Bone Health TeleECHO programs, there were 263 registered health care professionals in the United States and several other countries, with 221 attending at least 1 online clinic and typically 35 to 40 attendees at each session at the end of the reported period. Assessment of self-confidence in 20 domains of osteoporosis care showed substantial improvement with the ECHO intervention (P = 0.005). Bone Health TeleECHO can contribute to mitigating the crisis in osteoporosis care by leveraging scarce resources, providing motivated practitioners with skills to provide better skeletal health care, closer to home, with greater convenience, and lower cost than referral to a specialty center. Bone Health TeleECHO can be replicated in any location worldwide to reach anyone with Internet access, allowing access in local time zones and languages. The ECHO model of learning can be applied to other aspects of bone care, including the education of fracture liaison service coordinators, residents and fellows, and physicians with an interest in rare bone diseases.

The Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: vertebral fracture assessment.

Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) is a low-cost method of accurately identifying individuals who have clinically unrecognized or undocumented vertebral fractures at the time of bone density test. Because prevalent vertebral fractures predict subsequent fractures independent of bone mineral density and other clinical risk factors, their recognition is an important part of strategies to identify those who are at high risk of fracture, so that prevention therapies for those individuals can be implemented. The 2007 Position Development Conference developed detailed guidelines regarding the indications for acquisition of, and interpretation and reporting of densitometric VFA tests. The purpose of the 2013 VFA Task Force was to simplify the indications for VFA yet keep them evidence based. The Task Force reviewed the literature published since the 2007 Position Development Conference and developed prediction models based on 2 large cohort studies (the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures and the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study) and the densitometry database of the University of Chicago. Based on these prediction models, indications for VFA were reduced to a simplified set of criteria based on age, historical height loss, use of systemic glucocorticoid therapy, and self-reported but undocumented prior vertebral fracture.

Indications of DXA in women younger than 65 yr and men younger than 70 yr: the 2013 Official Positions.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the method of choice to assess fracture risk for women 65 yr and older and men 70 yr and older. The 2007 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Official Positions had developed guidelines for assessing bone density in younger women during and after the menopausal transition and in men 50-69 yr and the 2008 National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) guidelines recommended testing in postmenopausal women younger than 65 yr and men 50-69 yr only in the presence of clinical risk factors. The purpose of the 2013 DXA Task Force was to reassess the NOF guidelines for ordering DXA in postmenopausal women younger than 65 yr and men 50-69 yr. The Task Force reviewed the literature published since the 2007 Position Development Conference and 2008 NOF, reviewing clinical decision rules such as the Osteoporosis Screening Tool and FRAX and sought to keep recommendations simple to remember and implement. Based on this assessment, the NOF guidelines were endorsed; DXA was recommended in those postmenopausal women younger than 65 yr and men 50-69 yr only in the presence of clinical risk factors for low bone mass, such as low body weight, prior fracture, high-risk medication use, or a disease or condition associated with bone loss.

Appraising osteoporosis care gaps.

To evaluate physician response to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) report within the Geisinger Medical Center's Mobile DXA Program and treatment adherence at 1 year. Between 10/01/2004 and 3/30/2005, 1381 DXA scans were performed in our Mobile DXA Program. Within this cohort, we identified 366 high-risk, drug-naive patients and report the percentage of patients placed on prescription drug therapy within 90 days of DXA result. Additionally, we identified 191 patients with Z-score of -1.0 or worse and report whether laboratory tests were ordered within 90 days of DXA results in this group. Finally, we determined treatment adherence at 1 year. 269 patients (74%) were offered prescription therapy within 3 months of DXA results. Of those, 210 (57%) were still adherent to drug therapy at 1 year. The main reason for discontinuation of treatment was an adverse drug side effect. Additionally, in 50% cases, physicians ordered 1 or more laboratory tests to evaluate low Z-score. Within our Mobile DXA Program, 74% of high-risk, drug-naïve patients were treated. Interestingly, in 50% cases, when a low Z-score was reported, our physicians ordered 1 or more laboratory tests. Treatment adherence was 57% at 1 year.

Consultative DXA reporting improves guideline-driven quality of care-implications for increasing DXA reimbursement.

Since 2001, Geisinger Health System densitometrists have interpreted dual-energy X-ray absorptiometries (DXAs) in a guideline-driven, consultative fashion. We believe that this approach results in more patients receiving appropriate treatment. Recently, one of our DXA centers chose to stop consultative reporting, providing us an opportunity to review the care rendered with 2 different styles of DXA reporting formats: Consultative vs Results Only. In this retrospective chart review, 100 consecutive DXAs with Consultative reporting and 100 consecutive DXAs with Results Only reporting were identified. The electronic health record was reviewed for a 3-mo interval after DXA result to identify whether a prescription medication was prescribed per system guidelines. Logistic regression compared the proportion of patients receiving a prescription treatment between the 2 groups. The Consultative report group received more prescription treatment compared with Results Only format (72% vs 50%) after controlling for patients' age and gender, odds ratio=2.64, 95% confidence interval=1.45-4.79 (p=0.0014). Our study demonstrates that Consultative DXA reporting results in better care. Importantly, Consultative reporting takes additional time; yet, reimbursement for these efforts and expertise has been dramatically reduced. To appropriately reward the value of DXA testing and interpretation, Consultative reporting should be reimbursed at the previous higher reimbursement rate.

A rare lymphoma in a patient with amyopathic dermatomyositis.

A 37-year-old Caucasian woman was evaluated for a photosensitive dermatitis. A positive anti-nuclear antibody with a titer of 1 : 1280 and a speckled pattern was noted and she was diagnosed with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE). Although the initial dermatologic diagnosis was SCLE, a skin biopsy suggested the additional possibility of dermatomyositis because of increased dermal mucin. We began following her at the request of the dermatology department, and a diagnosis of amyopathic dermatomyositis was made based on the lack of objective muscle weakness, normal muscle enzymes, negative double-stranded DNA, SSA/SSB, and RNP/Smith antibody panel, and especially on the cutaneous examination findings. A malignancy evaluation included a normal CT scan of her chest, abdomen, and pelvis, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, mammography, pelvic ultrasound, Papanicolaou smear, and endometrial biopsy. She developed vaginal bleeding 1 year after the onset of her skin manifestations. Repeat gynecologic evaluation, including cervical biopsy, revealed a large B-cell cervical lymphoma. Amyopathic dermatomyositis and lymphoma of the cervix are both rare conditions. Our case emphasizes the importance of considering underlying malignancy at the time of diagnosis and while the patient is followed clinically. Additionally, the clinician must remain vigilant in evaluating any new clinical changes in follow-up care. To our knowledge, this is the first documented case of lymphoma of the cervix in the setting of amyopathic dermatomyositis.

Hereditary angioedema in a family presenting as transient periarthritis.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare condition known to cause episodic, self-limiting, nonpruritic, nonpitting edema that involves skin and visceral organs. It may affect any external body surface including face, extremities, and genitalia. Most commonly involved viscera are gastrointestinal and respiratory systems. Patients may have severe abdominal pain because of edema of the bowel wall. This disease can cause life threatening laryngeal edema if it involves the airway.We describe a patient with HAE who was initially diagnosed with arthritis after she had recurrent edema around her peripheral joints. Diagnosis of HAE in her led to the same diagnosis in her sister and her father. HAE should be considered in the differential diagnosis of recurrent attacks of periarticular swelling.

Tumor necrosis factor antagonist responsiveness in a United States rheumatoid arthritis cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to investigate responsiveness according to whether patients satisfy eligibility criteria from randomized controlled trials of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists in a multicentered US cohort. METHODS: Biologic-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were prescribed TNF antagonists (n=465) in the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America registry were included. Patients were stratified by whether they met eligibility criteria from 3 major TNF antagonist trials. Two cohorts were examined: Cohort A (n=336) included patients with complete American College of Rheumatology response criteria except acute phase reactants, and cohort B (n=129) included patients with complete response criteria. Study outcomes included modified American College of Rheumatology 20% and 50% improvement responses (cohort A) and standard American College of Rheumatology improvement (cohort B). RESULTS: A minority of patients (5.4%-19.4%) prescribed TNF antagonists met trial eligibility criteria and predominantly had high disease activity (78.5%-100%). For patients who met eligibility criteria in cohort A, rates of 20% improvement (52.3%-63.6%) and 50% improvement (30.8%-45.5%) were achieved. Among patients failing to meet eligibility criteria, rates of 20% improvement (16.2%-20.4%) and 50% improvement (8.9%-10.8%) were consistently inferior (P<.05 all comparisons). For cohort B, similar differences were observed. CONCLUSION: This multicentered US cohort study demonstrates that the majority of patients receiving TNF antagonists would not meet trial eligibility criteria and achieve lower clinical responses. These findings highlight the tradeoff between defining treatment responsive populations and achieving results that can be generalized for broader patient populations.

Remitting seronegative symmetrical synovitis with pitting edema syndrome in a rural tertiary care practice: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical and laboratory features of remitting seronegative symmetrical synovitis with pitting edema (RS3PE) in a rural tertiary care rheumatology practice, describe treatments and outcomes, and compare our results to previous reports in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed as having RS3PE who were seen in the Department of Rheumatology at Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, from January 1, 1992, to December 31, 2005. RESULTS: We identified 12 men and 2 women, all of whom were white. Mean +/- SD age was 74.0 +/- 6.6 years; mean +/- SD erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 35.9 +/- 21.1 mm/h at presentation. Onset of illness was sudden in 9 patients and insidious in 5. All patients were initially treated with prednisone (15-20 mg/d). Although the response in all was excellent, 9 patients received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, either because of ongoing disease activity or in an effort to decrease the use of corticosteroids. Hydroxychloroquine was used alone in 7 patients. At the mean +/- SD time of last follow-up (31.4 +/- 23.1 months), 5 patients continued to receive therapy. Complications of treatment included worsening of preexisting hypertension in 3 patients, gastritis in 2, and exacerbation of preexisting diabetes mellitus in 1. Carpal tunnel syndrome occurred in 6 patients. Duration of therapy ranged from 5 to 120 months (mean, 29 months). Three patients developed malignancies, ie, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, and prostate carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Our population of patients with RS3PE is similar to those documented in previous reports: elderly, predominantly male, and responsive to corticosteroids. However, our series is clinically differentiated by a greater use of adjunctive disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (primarily hydroxychloroquine). Confirming previous reports, we also observed a possible association between RS3PE and malignancy.

Development and evaluation of a vertebral fracture assessment program using IVA and its integration with mobile DXA.

Currently, it is unusual to combine evaluation for vertebral fracture with measurement of bone mineral density in clinical practice. Using Quantitative Morphometric Vertebral Analysis (Instant Vertebral Assessment [IVA]) in our existing Mobile Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Program, we implemented a testing procedure that examined 5 different IVA protocols focusing on clinical utility and cost. Using small-scale tests of change (PDSA cycles), data from the preceding cycle drives the development of the next cycle. In this article, we describe the process and rationale for selecting patients for the IVA study. In addition, we review the literature on vertebral fracture assessment using DXA and emphasize the clinical utility of point of service testing by providing the needed knowledge for best patient care by simultaneous DXA and IVA testing. The application of this new technology increased identification of the high-risk patient by 11%, with a nominal additional cost per DXA study of $14. This study provides a useful framework for the integration of IVA into a clinical DXA program.

Osteomyelitis resulting from chronic filamentous fungus olecranon bursitis.

We describe a case of Phaeoacremonium olecranon osteomyelitis. The patient, initially felt to have traumatic olecranon bursitis, was found to have an indolent filamentous fungus cultured from the olecranon bursa. In retrospect, x-rays revealed bony erosion, which heightened the index of suspicion for infection in this particular case. Surgical bursal excision was performed and antifungal therapy was administered with clinical resolution. This case emphasizes that aspiration, synovial fluid analysis, and culture of bursal fluid is essential in excluding typical and atypical causes of chronic bursitis.

"The rheumatologist can see you now": Successful implementation of an advanced access model in a rheumatology practice.

OBJECTIVE: To provide rheumatologic care to patients in a timely and patient-centered manner. METHODS: We developed and implemented processes to measure and help eliminate backlog, created access time for same-day patients, and retooled the appointments process to be more efficient and patient focused. In addition, we developed a protocol to be used by our primary care colleagues to care for osteoarthritis of the knee in a standardized manner. RESULTS: The third available rheumatology appointment fell from about 60 days to <2 days. Cancellations fell from 40% to <20%. Patient satisfaction measures (composite score, physician score, and accessibility score) improved significantly. The number of new patients seen for knee osteoarthritis decreased by 6.7%, whereas the number of new rheumatoid arthritis referrals increased by 50.4%. Financial performance improved as well. CONCLUSIONS: This advanced access model in a busy academic rheumatology practice demonstrated considerable improvement in access, patient satisfaction, and finances. Using a team approach, we are now able to give the patient the rheumatologic care they want and need at a time they want and need it.

Using mobile DXA to improve access to osteoporosis care: unit design, program development, implementation, and outcomes.

Osteoporosis diagnosis and monitoring is best accomplished with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), but technology availability can hinder access to care. We designed a mobile DXA program incorporating a Hologic Delphi-C trade mark bone densitometer housed in a specially configured 30-ft Winnebago trade mark. The mobile DXA program provided osteoporosis testing and education at the convenience of the patient's primary care site within our rural health care system. DXA results were sent electronically to the patient's physician within 48-72 h. The mobile DXA patient group tended to be older and at high risk for future fracture. The service provided was rated as excellent by patients. Given the volume of patients studied, the program was financially self-sustaining. Other healthcare systems or groups should consider development of a similar program.