Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor expression in advanced atherosclerotic plaques.

Experimental evidence indicates that follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), an essential hormone for reproduction, can act directly on endothelial cells inducing atherosclerosis activation and development. However, it remains unknown whether the FSH-receptor (FSHR) is expressed in human atherosclerosis plaques. To demonstrate the FSHR presence, we used immunohistochemical and immunoelectron microscopy involving a specific monoclonal antibody FSHR1A02 that recognizes an epitope present in the FSHR-ectodomain. In all 55 patients with atherosclerotic plaques located in carotid, coronary, femoral arteries, and iliac aneurysm, FSHR was selectively expressed in arterial endothelium covering atherosclerotic plaques and endothelia lining intraplaque neovessels. Lymphatic neovessels were negative for FSHR. M1-macrophages, foam cells, and giant multinucleated cells were also FSHR-positive. FSHR was not detected in normal internal thoracic artery. Immunoelectron microscopy performed in ApoEKO/hFSHRKI mice with atherosclerotic plaques, after injection in vivo with mouse anti-hFSHR monoclonal antibody FSHR1A02 coupled to colloidal gold, showed FSHR presence on the luminal surface of arterial endothelial cells covering atherosclerotic plaques. Therefore, FSHR can bind, internalize, and deliver into the plaque circulating ligands to FSHR-positive cells. In conclusion, we report FSHR expression in endothelial cells, M1-macrophages, M1-derived foam cells, giant multinucleated macrophages, and osteoclasts associated with human atherosclerotic plaques.

Development of a multivariate prediction model for nocturia, based on urinary tract etiologies.

PURPOSE: The main objective of our study was to determine which combination of modifiable and non-modifiable parameters that could discriminate patients with nocturia from those without nocturia. This was a post-hoc analysis of 3 prospective, observational studies conducted in Ghent University. Participants completed frequency volume chart (FVC) to compare characteristics between patients with and without nocturia. METHOD: This was a post hoc analysis of three prospective, observational studies conducted in Ghent University. Participants completed frequency volume chart (FVC) to compare characteristics between adults with and without nocturia. Study 1: adults with and without nocturia (n = 148); Study 2: patients ≥65 years with and without nocturnal LUTS (n = 54); Study 3: menopausal women before and after hormone replacement therapy (n = 43). All eligible patients (n = 183) completed a FVC during 24 hours (n = 13), 48 hours (n = 30) or 72 hours (n = 140). The combination of algorithms and number of determinants obtaining the best average area under the receiver operating curve (AUC-ROC) led to the final model. Differences between groups were assessed using the AUC-ROC and Mann- Whitney-Wilcoxon tests. Holm corrections were applied for multiple statistical testing. Also, the stability of the feature selection was evaluated. RESULTS: The best discrimination was obtained when 13 determinants were included. However, a logistic regression model based on seven determinants selected with random forest had comparable discrimination including an optimal signature stability. It was able to discriminate almost perfectly between nights with and without nocturia. CONCLUSION: Relevant information to accomplish the excellent predictability of the model is; functional bladder capacity, 24 hours urine output, nocturnal output, age, BMI. The multivariate model used in this analysis provides new insights into combination therapy as it allows simulating the effect of different available treatment modalities and its combinations.

Systematic review of proposed definitions of nocturnal polyuria and population-based evidence of their diagnostic accuracy.

Background Evidence of diagnostic accuracy for proposed definitions of nocturnal polyuria is currently unclear. Purpose Systematic review to determine population-based evidence of the diagnostic accuracy of proposed definitions of nocturnal polyuria based on data from frequency-volume charts. Methods Seventeen pre-specified search terms identified 351 unique investigations published from 1990 to 2016 in BIOSIS, Embase, Embase Alerts, International Pharmaceutical Abstract, Medline, and Cochrane. Thirteen original communications were included in this review based on pre-specified exclusion criteria. Data were extracted from each paper regarding subject age, sex, ethnicity, health status, sample size, data collection methods, and diagnostic discrimination of proposed definitions including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value. Results The sample size of study cohorts, participant age, sex, ethnicity, and health status varied considerably in 13 studies reporting on the diagnostic performance of seven different definitions of nocturnal polyuria using frequency-volume chart data from 4968 participants. Most study cohorts were small, mono-ethnic, including only Caucasian males aged 50 or higher with primary or secondary polyuria that were compared to a control group of healthy men without nocturia in prospective or retrospective settings. Proposed definitions had poor discriminatory accuracy in evaluations based on data from subjects independent from the original study cohorts with findings being similar regarding the most widely evaluated definition endorsed by ICS. Conclusions Diagnostic performance characteristics for proposed definitions of nocturnal polyuria show poor to modest discrimination and are not based on sufficient level of evidence from representative, multi-ethnic population-based data from both females and males of all adult ages.

Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Expression in Endometriotic Lesions and the Associated Vasculature: An Immunohistochemical Study.

Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) is present on endothelial cells of blood vessels and endometrial glands of the proliferative and secretory endometrium. So far, the expression of FSHR in endometriosis has not been studied. We evaluated FSHR expression in 194 tissue specimens representing 3 relevant types of endometriosis: rectovaginal endometriotic nodules, ovarian endometriotic cysts, and peritoneal endometriotic implants. Specimens of normal endometrium were used as controls. Archival formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded material was analyzed immunohistochemically with a highly specific monoclonal antihuman FSHR antibody using the peroxidase method. A robust vascular FSHR expression was found in all 194 patients, irrespective of the endometriosis lesion location. Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor was not detected in normal host tissues located more than 5 mm from the lesions. The endometriotic lymphatic vessels do not express FSHR. The density of FSHR-positive vessels in patients with rectovaginal endometriotic nodules was 46.0 ± 5.7 vessels/mm(2) Similar values were obtained for ovarian endometriotic cysts and peritoneal endometriosis. The density of FSHR-positive vessels associated with the core of rectovaginal endometriotic nodules was 2-fold higher than that of the perilesional, adjacent normal host tissue (64.2 ± 8.2 vs 27.2 ± 3.2 vessels/mm(2), respectively). Expression of FSHR was also detected either in endometriotic glandular epithelial cells, endometriotic stromal cells, or in both cell types (23%, 25%, and 21% of patients, respectively). Normal endometrium expressed FSHR predominately in basalis, in a cellular distribution dependent on hormonal environment. In conclusion, our data suggest novel FSHR expression in endometriotic lesions, qualitatively and quantitatively different from that of normal endometrium.

Long-term tolerability and efficacy of degarelix: 5-year results from a phase III extension trial with a 1-arm crossover from leuprolide to degarelix.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of up to 5 years of degarelix treatment and the effects of crossing over from leuprolide to degarelix in the extension phase of a phase III pivotal 1-year trial. METHODS: Patients receiving degarelix who completed the 1-year trial continued on 80 mg (n = 125) or 160 mg (n = 126) maintenance doses. Patients who received leuprolide were rerandomized to degarelix 240/80 mg (n = 69) or 240/160 mg (n = 65). Safety and tolerability were assessed (primary end point), as well as testosterone and prostate-specific antigen levels and prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (secondary end points). RESULTS: Adverse event frequency was similar between both the groups. Adverse events included initial injection site reactions, hot flushes, and increased weight. Testosterone and prostate-specific antigen values during the extension study were similar to those seen during the 1-year trial in patients who continued on degarelix or crossed over from leuprolide. The prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival hazard rate was decreased significantly after the crossover in the leuprolide to degarelix group (from 0.20 to 0.09; P = .002), whereas in patients who continued on degarelix, the rate did not change significantly. In patients with baseline prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL, the same hazard rate change pattern was observed on crossover (from 0.38 to 0.19; P = .019). CONCLUSION: Degarelix was well tolerated; no safety concerns were identified. The significant prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival benefit established for degarelix over leuprolide during year 1 remained consistent at 5 years.

The effect of baseline testosterone on the efficacy of degarelix and leuprolide: further insights from a 12-month, comparative, phase III study in prostate cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of baseline testosterone on testosterone control and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) suppression using data from a phase III trial (CS21) comparing degarelix and leuprolide in prostate cancer. METHODS: In CS21, patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer (all stages) were randomized to degarelix 240 mg for 1 month followed by monthly maintenance doses of 80 or 160 mg, or leuprolide 7.5 mg/month. Patients receiving leuprolide could receive antiandrogens for flare protection. Treatment effects on testosterone and PSA reduction, testosterone surge, and microsurges were investigated in 3 baseline testosterone subgroups: <3.5, 3.5-5.0, and >5.0 ng/mL. Data are presented for the groups receiving degarelix 240/80 mg (the approved dose) and leuprolide 7.5 mg. RESULTS: Higher baseline testosterone delayed castration with both treatments. However, castrate testosterone levels and PSA suppression occurred more rapidly with degarelix irrespective of baseline testosterone. With leuprolide, the magnitude of testosterone surge and microsurges increased with increasing baseline testosterone. There was no overall correlation between baseline testosterone and initial PSA decrease in either treatment group, although PSA suppression tended to be slowest with leuprolide and fastest with degarelix in the high baseline testosterone subgroup. CONCLUSION: Patients with high baseline testosterone may have greater risk of tumor stimulation (clinical flare) and mini-flares during gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist treatment and so the need for flare protection with antiandrogens in these patients is obvious, especially in metastatic disease. Although higher baseline testosterone delays castration, castrate testosterone and PSA suppression occur more rapidly with degarelix, irrespective of baseline testosterone, without the need for flare protection.

Rapid elimination kinetics of free PSA or human kallikrein-related peptidase 2 after initiation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone-antagonist treatment of prostate cancer: potential for rapid monitoring of treatment responses.

BACKGROUND: The utility of conventional prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements in blood for monitoring rapid responses to treatment for prostate cancer is limited because of its slow elimination rate. Prior studies have shown that free PSA (fPSA), intact PSA (iPSA) and human kallikrein-related peptidase 2 (hK2) are eliminated more rapidly after radical prostatectomy. In contrast, all three markers have similarly slow elimination rates after castration induced by gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, possibly due to the slow onset of castration. Therefore, we assessed elimination rates of tPSA, fPSA, iPSA and hK2 after rapid induction of castration with degarelix (Firmagon(®)), a novel GnRH antagonist. METHODS: This study included 24 patients treated with degarelix. Blood was taken at 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after injection of degarelix. Free and total PSA were measured with a commercial dual-label assay, and with inhouse research assays of intact PSA and hK2. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range, IQR) tPSA at baseline was 23.4 (15.8, 59.8). Twenty-two patients (92 % ) reached castrate levels of testosterone within 24 h of degarelix initiation, and all patients did so within 72 h. All kallikrein forms declined in an exponential fashion after degarelix administration. The median time to 50 % reduction in biomarker level was 8 ­ 9 days for tPSA or complexed PSA vs. 2-4 days for hK2, iPSA and fPSA. The percentage eliminated at day 3 and day 7 was significantly higher for hK2, iPSA and fPSA than for tPSA (all p < 0.02), while tPSA and complexed PSA were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid decline of fPSA, iPSA and hK2 after fast induction of castration with degarelix is similar to that reported after prostatectomy and offers a novel, informative method to monitor rapid onset of therapeutic action targeting signaling of the androgen receptor.

A phase III extension trial with a 1-arm crossover from leuprolide to degarelix: comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and antagonist effect on prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We investigated the efficacy and safety of degarelix treatment and the effects of switching from leuprolide to degarelix in an ongoing extension study with a median 27.5-month followup of a pivotal 1-year prostate cancer trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who completed a 1-year pivotal phase III trial continued on the same monthly degarelix maintenance dose (160 or 80 mg in 125 each), or were re-randomized from leuprolide 7.5 mg to degarelix 240/80 mg (69) or 240/160 mg (65). Data are shown on the approved degarelix 240/80 mg dose. The primary end point was safety/tolerability and the secondary end points were testosterone, prostate specific antigen, luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone responses, and prostate specific antigen failure and progression-free survival. RESULTS: During followup testosterone and prostate specific antigen suppression were similar to those in the 1-year trial in patients who continued on degarelix or switched from leuprolide. The prostate specific antigen progression-free survival hazard rate was decreased significantly after the switch in the leuprolide/degarelix group while the rate in those who continued on degarelix was consistent with the rate in treatment year 1. The same hazard rate change pattern occurred in the group with baseline prostate specific antigen greater than 20 ng/ml. Adverse event frequency was similar between the groups and decreased with time. CONCLUSIONS: Data support the statistically significant prostate specific antigen progression-free survival benefit for degarelix over leuprolide seen during year 1 and the use of degarelix as first line androgen deprivation therapy as an alternative to a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist.

Cardiovascular safety of degarelix: results from a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open label, parallel group phase III trial in patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We assessed the cardiovascular safety profile of degarelix, a new gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is the first report to our knowledge on cardiovascular safety data from a completed 1-year randomized controlled trial of leuprolide acetate vs degarelix. Outcomes considered in these analyses included the QT interval by central reading and analysis, and cardiovascular adverse events. On multivariate analyses relationships between selected baseline factors and cardiovascular events were evaluated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between treatment groups for mean change in Fridericia's correction of QT during the trial. Markedly abnormal Fridericia's correction of QT values (500 milliseconds or greater) were observed in only a small number of subjects by treatment group, that is 2 (less than 1%) in the pooled degarelix group and 2 (1%) in the leuprolide group. Supraventricular arrhythmias were the most common type of arrhythmias, affecting 2% of subjects in the pooled degarelix group and 4% in the leuprolide group. Other arrhythmias occurred in 1% or less of subjects by treatment group. The most frequently reported cardiac disorder was ischemic heart disease, which occurred in 4% of subjects treated with degarelix and 10% of those on leuprolide. Cox proportional hazard ratio estimates for selected baseline covariates showed a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular events by age (p=0.0459) and systolic blood pressure (p=0.0061). CONCLUSIONS: In men with prostate cancer degarelix and leuprolide have similar cardiovascular safety profiles. These observations suggest that the cardiovascular events associated with both agents result from hypogonadism rather than a direct drug effect.

Changes in alkaline phosphatase levels in patients with prostate cancer receiving degarelix or leuprolide: results from a 12-month, comparative, phase III study.

Study Type - Therapy (RCT) Level of Evidence 1b OBJECTIVE To compare the activity of degarelix, a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) blocker, with leuprolide depot 7.5 mg in the control of total serum alkaline phosphatase (S-ALP) levels in patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the randomized, phase III trial (CS21), patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer (all stages), were randomized to one of three regimens: degarelix subcutaneous 240 mg for 1 month followed by monthly maintenance doses of 80 mg or 160 mg, or intramuscular leuprolide 7.5 mg/month. Patients receiving leuprolide could also receive antiandrogens for flare protection. We report exploratory S-ALP analyses from CS21, focusing on the comparison of degarelix 240/80 mg with leuprolide 7.5 mg, in line with the recent approvals of this dose by the USA Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. RESULTS Overall, 610 patients were included, with a median age of 73 years and median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 19.0 ng/mL. Baseline S-ALP levels were high in metastatic patients and highest in patients with metastatic disease and a haemoglobin level of <13 g/dL. In metastatic disease, after initial peaks in both groups, S-ALP levels were suppressed below baseline with degarelix but were maintained around baseline with leuprolide. The late rise in S-ALP seen with leuprolide was not apparent with degarelix. The pattern of S-ALP response was similar in patients with a baseline PSA level of > or =50 ng/mL. Between-treatment differences in patients with metastatic disease and those with a PSA level of > or =50 ng/mL were significant at day 364 (P = 0.014 and 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSION Patients with metastatic disease or those with PSA levels of > or =50 ng/mL at baseline had greater reductions in S-ALP levels with degarelix than with leuprolide. Patients in the degarelix group maintained S-ALP suppression throughout the study, in contrast to those in the leuprolide group. This suggests that degarelix might offer better S-ALP control than leuprolide and might prolong control of skeletal metastases, compared with GnRH agonists, over a 1-year treatment period.

The efficacy and safety of degarelix: a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase III study in patients with prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of degarelix, a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (blocker), vs leuprolide for achieving and maintaining testosterone suppression in a 1-year phase III trial involving patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 610 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (any stage; median age 72 years; median testosterone 3.93 ng/mL, median prostate-specific antigen, PSA, level 19.0 ng/mL) were randomized and received study treatment. Androgen-deprivation therapy was indicated (neoadjuvant hormonal treatment was excluded) according to the investigator's assessment. Three dosing regimens were evaluated: a starting dose of 240 mg of degarelix subcutaneous (s.c.) for 1 month, followed by s.c. maintenance doses of 80 mg or 160 mg monthly, or intramuscular (i.m.) leuprolide doses of 7.5 mg monthly. Therapy was maintained for the 12-month study. Both the intent-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol populations were analysed. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of the trial was suppression of testosterone to

A 1-year, open label, randomized phase II dose finding study of degarelix for the treatment of prostate cancer in North America.

PURPOSE: Degarelix is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist (blocker) with rapid onset of action suppressing gonadotropins, testosterone and prostate specific antigen in prostate cancer. In the present open label, randomized study in North America we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a starting dose of 200 mg degarelix followed by monthly injections of 60 or 80 mg during 1 year of prostate cancer treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 127 patients (median age 76 years, range 47 to 93) with histologically confirmed prostate cancer were enrolled in the study. Efficacy was assessed by measuring serum testosterone and prostate specific antigen. RESULTS: Median baseline testosterone and prostate specific antigen levels were 4.13 ng/ml (P25-P75 3.03-5.11) and 13.4 ng/ml (P25-P75 6.80-25.7), respectively. The starting dose induced a rapid suppression of testosterone in that 88% of the patients had testosterone levels of 0.5 ng/ml or less 1 month after the injection. For patients who had testosterone levels of 0.5 ng/ml or less after 1 month, 93% and 98% of those receiving maintenance doses of 60 and 80 mg, respectively, had testosterone levels that were consistently 0.5 ng/ml or less at all monthly measurements from 1 month to 1 year. No evidence of testosterone surge was detected. In both groups prostate specific antigen decreased by 96% after 1 year and median time to 90% reduction in prostate specific antigen was 56 days. Six patients (5%) withdrew from the study due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Degarelix treatment for 1 year resulted in a fast, profound and sustained suppression of testosterone and prostate specific antigen with no evidence of testosterone surge. Degarelix was well tolerated.