Development and External Validation of a Model Predicting New-Onset Chronic Uveitis at Different Disease Durations in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and externally validate a prediction model for new-onset chronic uveitis in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) for clinical application. METHODS: Data from the international Pharmachild registry were used to develop a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Predictors were selected by backward selection, and missing values were handled by multiple imputation. The model was subsequently validated and recalibrated in 2 inception cohorts: the UK Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study (CAPS) study and the German Inception Cohort of Newly diagnosed patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (ICON) study. Model performance was evaluated by calibration plots and C statistics for the 2-, 4-, and 7-year risk of uveitis. A diagram and digital risk calculator were created for use in clinical practice. RESULTS: A total of 5,393 patients were included for model development, and predictor variables were age at JIA onset (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.77-0.89]), ANA positivity (HR 1.59 [95% CI 1.06-2.38]), and International League of Associations for Rheumatology category of JIA (HR for oligoarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and undifferentiated arthritis versus rheumatoid factor-negative polyarthritis 1.40 [95% CI 0.91-2.16]). Performance of the recalibrated prediction model in the validation cohorts was acceptable; calibration plots indicated good calibration and C statistics for the 7-year risk of uveitis (0.75 [95% CI 0.72-0.79] for the ICON cohort and 0.70 [95% CI 0.64-0.76] for the CAPS cohort). CONCLUSION: We present for the first time a validated prognostic tool for easily predicting chronic uveitis risk for individual JIA patients using common clinical parameters. This model could be used by clinicians to inform patients/parents and provide guidance in choice of uveitis screening frequency and arthritis drug therapy.

A Snapshot on the On-Label and Off-Label Use of the Interleukin-1 Inhibitors in Italy among Rheumatologists and Pediatric Rheumatologists: A Nationwide Multi-Center Retrospective Observational Study.

Background: Interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors have been suggested as possible therapeutic options in a large number of old and new clinical entities characterized by an IL-1 driven pathogenesis. Objectives: To perform a nationwide snapshot of the on-label and off-label use of anakinra (ANA) and canakinumab (CAN) for different conditions both in children and adults. Methods: We retrospectively collected demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data from both adult and pediatric patients treated with IL-1 inhibitors from January 2008 to July 2016. Results: Five hundred and twenty-six treatment courses given to 475 patients (195 males, 280 females; 111 children and 364 adults) were evaluated. ANA was administered in 421 (80.04%) courses, CAN in 105 (19.96%). Sixty-two (32.1%) patients had been treated with both agents. IL-1 inhibitors were employed in 38 different indications (37 with ANA, 16 with CAN). Off-label use was more frequent for ANA than CAN (p < 0.0001). ANA was employed as first-line biologic approach in 323 (76.7%) cases, while CAN in 37 cases (35.2%). IL-1 inhibitors were associated with corticosteroids in 285 (54.18%) courses and disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in 156 (29.65%). ANA dosage ranged from 30 to 200 mg/day (or 1.0-2.0 mg/kg/day) among adults and 2-4 mg/kg/day among children; regarding CAN, the most frequently used posologies were 150mg every 8 weeks, 150mg every 4 weeks and 150mg every 6 weeks. The frequency of failure was higher among patients treated with ANA at a dosage of 100 mg/day than those treated with 2 mg/kg/day (p = 0.03). Seventy-six patients (14.4%) reported an adverse event (AE) and 10 (1.9%) a severe AE. AEs occurred more frequently after the age of 65 compared to both children and patients aged between 16 and 65 (p = 0.003 and p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: IL-1 inhibitors are mostly used off-label, especially ANA, during adulthood. The high frequency of good clinical responses suggests that IL-1 inhibitors are used with awareness of pathogenetic mechanisms; adult healthcare physicians generally employ standard dosages, while pediatricians are more prone in using a weight-based posology. Dose adjustments and switching between different agents showed to be effective treatment strategies. Our data confirm the good safety profile of IL-1 inhibitors.

Refractory vasculitic ulcer of the toe in an adolescent suffering from systemic lupus erythematosus treated successfully with hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

Skin ulcers are a dangerous and uncommon complication of vasculitis. We describe the case of a teenager suffering from Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with digital ulcer resistant to conventional therapy, treated successfully with Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy. The application of hyperbaric oxygen, which is used for the treatment of ischemic ulcers, is an effective and safe therapeutic option in patients with ischemic vasculitic ulcers in combination with immunosuppressive drugs. Further studies are needed to evaluate its role as primary therapy for this group of patients.

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocker in treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis refractory to second-line agents: results of a multinational survey.

OBJECTIVE: Uveitis occurs in 10%-15% of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). If topical treatment fails, second-line agents are used to control the disease. However, some patients need the addition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) antagonist (anti-TNF). We organized a cross-sectional cohort to investigate use and efficacy of anti-TNF treatment in patients with JIA-associated uveitis. METHODS: The international pediatric rheumatology community was queried about the use and efficacy of anti-TNF in treatment of JIA-associated uveitis using an E-mail survey. RESULTS: Of the 33 responding centers following 884 patients with uveitis, only 15 centers, following 404 patients, were using anti-TNF for this indication. A total of 47 patients with JIA-related uveitis treated with anti-TNF because of an insufficient response to previous therapy were reported. The mean age of the patients was 12.5 years. The mean duration from onset of uveitis to start of anti-TNF treatment was 45.1 months. Three different anti-TNF agents were used: etanercept in 34 cases, infliximab in 25 cases, and adalimumab in 3 cases. In 12 of the 34 patients etanercept was inefficacious and patients were switched to infliximab. The final response was rated according to a composite index as 53%/12%/32%, and according to physician rating as 47%/12%/38% representing good, moderate, and poor, respectively, in the etanercept group; and 70%/30%/0% and 68%/24%/0% in the infliximab group. All 3 patients taking adalimumab were responders. Infliximab was statistically significantly more efficacious for the treatment of JIA-associated uveitis than etanercept (chi-square p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Anti-TNF seems to be an effective treatment for refractory JIA-associated uveitis. In this cohort infliximab was more efficacious than etanercept.