A Randomized Parallel Study to Compare the Effects of Powered and Manual Tooth Brushing on Gingival Health and Plaque.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of powered and manual tooth brushing on plaque and gingivitis following two and six weeks of home use. METHODS: This was a randomized, three-arm, parallel-design clinical trial. Eligible participants were manual toothbrush users who were generally healthy non-smokers, aged 18-65 years, with a plaque score of = 1.8 per Lobene and Soparkar Modified Plaque Index (MPI), and mild to moderate gingivitis, defined as a Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) = 1 on at least 20 sites. Subjects with advanced periodontal disease, excessive gingival recession, and heavy deposits of calculus or rampant decay were excluded. Enrolled participants were randomly dispensed one of three devices: a powered toothbrush (Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart with Premium Gum Care brush head) used in either Gum Heath mode (DC-GH) or Clean mode (DC-C), or an ADA reference manual toothbrush (MTB). Efficacy and safety variables were assessed at Baseline, and at two and six weeks following twice-daily product home use. RESULTS: For the primary endpoint, reduction in gingivitis per Modified Gingival Index (MGI) at Week 2, 188 subjects completed and were included in the analysis. Expressed as percent reduction from Baseline, the adjusted mean reduction and Standard Error (SE) estimates were 60.31% (1.95%) for DC-GH, 53.08% (1.95%) for DC-C, and 16.59% (1.96%) for MTB. The difference between each power toothbrush group and the manual toothbrush was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Statistically significant differences were also observed between DC-GH, DC-C, and manual tooth brushing for MGI at Week 6, as well as for MPI and GBI at Weeks 2 and 6. CONCLUSIONS: The powered toothbrush, used in either Gum Health or Clean mode, was statistically significantly superior to a manual tooth brush in reducing gingival inflammation, gingival bleeding, and plaque following two and six weeks of home use.

Gingival Health and Plaque Regrowth Response Following a Four-Week Interdental Hygiene Intervention.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of three adjunct interproximal cleaning methods versus a manual toothbrush alone on gingivitis, and demonstrate that the Philips Sonicare AirflossPro™ interproximal (IP) cleaning device provides a similar reduction in gingivitis and plaque compared to string floss. METHODS: A randomized, single-blind, parallel-design study was conducted on generally healthy adults exhibiting mild to moderate gingivitis. Eligible subjects were non-smokers, aged 18-65 years, with ≥ 0.5 per the Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI) and a Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) of ≥ 1 on at least 10 sites. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned to use one of four oral hygiene regimens: manual toothbrush (MTB) alone; MTB plus string floss (SF); MTB plus Philips Sonicare AirflossPro used with Cool Mint Listerine® Antiseptic (AFPL); and MTB plus Philips Sonicare AirflossPro used with BreathRx™ (AFPB). Subjects were followed over a 28-day home-use period, with follow-up visits for efficacy and safety conducted at Days 14 and 28. All subjects were instructed to use the MTB twice daily and perform interproximal cleaning once daily, if assigned. Study efficacy endpoints included the Modified Gingival Index (MGI), Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index, and the Gingival Bleeding Index. RESULTS: Of 290 randomized subjects, 287 were followed to Day 14 and 286 were followed to Day 28. For the primary endpoint at Day 14, significantly larger reductions in MGI were observed in each of the three IP cleaning groups compared to MTB alone (p < 0.001). The adjusted mean reductions and standard error estimates (SE) for MGI expressed as a percent reduction from Baseline at Day 14 were: 0.22% (0.55%) for MTB; 4.30% (0.44%) for SF; 4.55% (0.45%) for AFPL; and 4.20% (0.44%) for AFPB. A non-inferiority test comparing AirflossPro to SF showed AirflossPro to be non-inferior to SF (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of interproximal cleaning to manual tooth brushing statistically significantly reduces gingivitis and plaque compared to manual tooth brushing alone. Among the adjunct interproximal cleaning regimens, AirflossPro provides a similar reduction in gingivitis and plaque to string floss. All study regimens were safe on oral tissues.