Insight into the functional mechanisms of nitrogen-cycling inhibitors in decreasing yield-scaled ammonia volatilization and nitrous oxide emission: A global meta-analysis.

Soil ammonia (NH3) volatilization and nitrous oxide (N2O) emission decrease nitrogen (N) utilization efficiency and cause some environmental problems. The N-cycling inhibitors are suggested to apply to enhance N utilization efficiency. Quantifying effects of N-cycling inhibitors on yield-scaled NH3 volatilization and N2O emission and functional genes could provide support for the optimal selection and application of N-cycling inhibitor. We conducted a meta-analysis to reveal the effects of N-cycling inhibitors on soil abiotic properties, functional genes and yield-scaled NH3 volatilization and N2O emission by extracting data from 166 published articles and linked their comprehensive relationships. The N-cycling inhibitors in this meta-analysis mainly includes nitrification inhibitors 3, 4-dimethyl pyrazole phosphate, dicyandiamide and 2-chloro-6-trichloromethylpyridine, urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide and biological nitrification inhibitors methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate and 1, 9-decanediol. The N-cycling inhibitor applications significantly increased alkaline soil pH but significantly decreased acidic soil pH. The N-cycling inhibitors decreased soil AOB amoA gene abundances mostly under the condition of pH 4.5-6 (mean: 212%, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 249% and -176%) and significantly decreased nirS gene (mean: 39%; 95% CI: 72% and -6%). The yield-scaled NH3 volatilization was significantly decreased by the N-cycling inhibitors under the condition of soil pH = 7-8.5 (mean: 45%; 95% CI: 59% and -31%). The yield-scaled N2O emission was also significantly reduced by all N-cycling inhibitors and had negative correlations with the soil nirK and nirS gene abundances. The effects of N-cycling inhibitors on soil pH, ammonium-N, nitrate-N and nitrifying and denitrifying genes and yield-scaled NH3 volatilization and N2O emission were dominated by the inhibitor types, soil textures, crop species and environmental pH. Our study could provide technical support for the optimal selection and application of N-cycling inhibitor under different environmental conditions.

Insight into functional mechanisms of percarbamide and nitrification inhibitors in degrading fungicide residues and shaping microbial communities in soil-plant systems.

Fungicides and nitrogen (N) fertilizers are essential to maintain plant yield in current intensive agriculture. Percarbamide is a novel type of N fertilizer with strong oxidizing property, and the nitrification inhibitor is widely used in agricultural production. It may be feasible to apply percarbamide and nitrification inhibitor as N management to promote fungicide dissipations in soil-plant system. This study quantified the effects of percarbamide and nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) and 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) on carbendazim residues, and microbial communities of soil-plant systems, and relationships among carbendazim residues, soil and endophytic microbial communities and plant yields were also comprehensively quantified. Compared with the control, the percarbamide significantly reduced soil carbendazim residues by 29.4% but enhanced the lettuce yield by 28.0%. Soil carbendazim residues were significantly and negatively correlated with the soil total N and NO3--N contents. Soil microbial community structures and co-occurrence networks were more sensitive to N management than their endophytic counterparts. In comparison to the percarbamide alone, the DCD significantly increased the nodes of soil fungal community co-occurrence network which were positively correlated with the plant yield. The DCD outweighed DMPP in increasing the lettuce yield and soil fungal community stability and reshaping soil bacterial community structure. Our study suggested that soil microbial communities were more sensitive to percarbamide and nitrification inhibitor applications than their endophytic counterparts under fungicide pressure and that the DCD outweighed DMPP in reshaping microbial communities. The integrated applications of percarbamide and nitrification inhibitors were promising soil N management strategies to promote fungicide removal and stimulate microbial community in the soil-plant systems.

Combined effects of biochar and fertilizer applications on yield: A review and meta-analysis.

The use of biochar is changing, and the combined application of biochar with fertilizer is increasingly gaining acceptance. However, the yield gains results reported in the existing literature through the co-application of fertilizer with biochar are conflicting. To resolve this, we utilized a meta-analysis of 627 paired data points extracted from 57 published articles to assess the performance of the co-application of biochar and fertilizers on crop yield compared with the corresponding controls. We also studied the impact of biochar characteristics, experimental conditions, and soil properties on crop yield. Our analysis showed that individually, biochar and inorganic fertilizer increased crop yield by 25.3% ± 3.2 (Bootstrap CI 95%) and 21.9% ± 4.4, respectively. The co-application of biochar with both inorganic and organic fertilizers increased crop yield by 179.6% ± 18.7, however, this data needs to be treated with caution due to the limited dataset. The highest yield increase was observed with amendments to very acidic soils (pH ≤5), but the benefits of biochar were not affected by the rate and the time after the application. In addition, the effects of biochar are enhanced when it is produced at 401-500 °C with a C:N ratio of 31-100. Our results suggest that the co-application of biochar with either inorganic and/or organic fertilizers in acidic soils increase crop productivity compared to amendment with either fertilizer or biochar. Our meta-analysis supports the utilization of biochar to enhance the efficiency and profitability of fertilizers.

Short-term application of mulch, roundup and organic herbicides did not affect soil microbial biomass or bacterial and fungal diversity.

Application of synthetic herbicides is currently the most widely used and cost-effective methods to assist with revegetation programs. However, the effects of short-term application of herbicides such as Roundup®, acetic acid, BioWeed™ and Slasher® as compared with mulch, on soil microbial biomass and microbial diversity remain unknown. This study examined the effects of short-term herbicide application on soil microbial biomass, C:N ratio, and fungal and bacterial communities at months 2 and 8 following initiation of treatment application. No effects of treatments on soil pH, C:N and microbial biomass were found. No segregation among treatments in the community structure of bacteria and fungi was observed. However, the fungal phylum Basiodiomycota had one unidentified class, which was only found in the mulch treatment, suggesting the C quality in the mulch treatment may differ compared with the other treatments. The dry and hot conditions experienced throughout the study period may have resulted in fast degradation of the herbicides and may have minimised the impacts of the herbicides on microbial diversity and community structure. Given that the research was undertaken at a single site and over only a short time frame, the results should be extrapolated with caution. Herbicides may have greater impact with long-term use. Future research will need to assess the revegetation success of each treatment and determine if the observed change in Basidiomycota profile and C quality identified in this study becomes significant over the long-term. We hypothesise that mulching may be a preferred treatment to facilitate weed control in riparian zone revegetation.