The impact of cytotoxic therapy on the risk of progression and death in clonal cytopenia(s) of undetermined significance.

ABSTRACT: Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) is defined by a myeloid driver mutation in the context of otherwise unexplained cytopenia. CCUS has an inherent risk of progressing to myeloid neoplasm. However, it is unknown how exposure to previous cytotoxic therapy may impact the risk of progression and survival. We stratified patients with CCUS by prior exposure to DNA-damaging therapy. Of 151 patients, 46 (30%) had received cytotoxic therapy and were classified as therapy-related CCUS (t-CCUS), whereas 105 (70%) had de novo CCUS. A lower proportion of t-CCUS had hypercellular marrows (17.8% vs 44.8%, P = .002) but had higher median bone marrow blast percentages. After a median follow-up of 2.2 years, t-CCUS had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS, 1.8 vs 6.3 years; hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; P = .007) and median overall survival (OS; 3.6 years vs not reached; HR, 2.3; P = .007) compared with CCUS. Univariable and multivariable time-to-event analyses showed that exposure to cytotoxic therapy independently accounted for inferior PFS and OS. Despite the similarities in clinical presentation between CCUS and t-CCUS, we show that exposure to prior cytotoxic therapies was an independent risk factor for inferior outcomes. This suggests that t-CCUS represents a unique clinical entity that needs more stringent monitoring or earlier intervention strategies.

Genetic Counseling and Family Screening Recommendations in Patients with Telomere Biology Disorders.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Telomere biology disorders (TBDs) encompass a spectrum of genetic diseases with a common pathogenesis of defects in telomerase function and telomere maintenance causing extremely short telomere lengths. Here, we review the current literature surrounding genetic testing strategies, cascade testing, reproductive implications, and the role of genetic counseling. RECENT FINDINGS: The understanding of the genetic causes and clinical symptoms of TBDs continues to expand while genetic testing and telomere length testing are nuanced tools utilized in the diagnosis of this condition. Access to genetic counseling is becoming more abundant and is valuable in supporting patients and their families in making informed decisions. Patient resources and support groups are valuable to this community. Defining which populations should be offered genetic counseling and testing is imperative to provide proper diagnoses and medical management for not only the primary patient, but also their biological relatives.

Patients with telomere biology disorders show context specific somatic mosaic states with high frequency of U2AF1 variants.

Somatic mosaic states in telomere biology disorders are characterized by somatic variants in the spliceosome and DNA damage response and repair pathways. A likely maladaptive response to short telomeres that may lead to increased hematological cancer.

Clinical and molecular correlates of somatic and germline DDX41 variants in patients and families with myeloid neoplasms.

The diagnosis of germline predisposition to myeloid neoplasms (MN) secondary to DDX41 variants is currently hindered by the long latency period, variable family histories and the frequent occurrence of DDX41 variants of uncertain significance (VUS). We reviewed 4,524 consecutive patients who underwent targeted sequencing for suspected or known MN and analyzed the clinical impact and relevance of DDX41VUS in comparison to DDX41path variants. Among 107 patients (44 [0.9%] DDX41path and 63 DDX41VUS [1.4%; 11 patients with both DDX41path and DDX41VUS]), we identified 17 unique DDX41path and 45 DDX41VUS variants: 24 (23%) and 77 (72%) patients had proven and presumed germline DDX41 variants, respectively. The median age was similar between DDX41path and DDX41VUS (66 vs. 62 years; P=0.41). The median variant allele frequency (VAF) (47% vs. 48%; P=0.62), frequency of somatic myeloid co-mutations (34% vs 25%; P= 0.28), cytogenetic abnormalities (16% vs. 12%; P=>0.99) and family history of hematological malignancies (20% vs. 33%; P=0.59) were comparable between the two groups. Time to treatment in months (1.53 vs. 0.3; P=0.16) and proportion of patients progressing to acute myeloid leukemia (14% vs. 11%; P=0.68), were similar. The median overall survival in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myloid leukemia was 63.4 and 55.7 months in the context of DDX41path and DDX41VUS, respectively (P=0.93). Comparable molecular profiles and clinical outcomes among DDX41path and DDX41VUS patients highlights the need for a comprehensive DDX41 variant interrogation/classification system, to improve surveillance and management strategies in patients and families with germline DDX41 predisposition syndromes.

Pediatric manifestations of Lynch Syndrome: A single center experience.

Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition caused by a heterozygous variation in one of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes that pre-disposes individuals to early onset colorectal cancers and other malignancies. Lynch syndrome is generally considered an adult-onset disorder, with malignancy rarely manifesting in childhood. Colorectal cancer is extremely rare in children, but hereditary syndromes including Lynch syndrome are an important cause. We aimed to assess the frequency and clinical course of children with Lynch syndrome associated pediatric colorectal cancers at our institution over the last 20 years. In this retrospective study, we describe four cases of children with Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancers age 14-17 years at diagnosis. All patients were diagnosed with Lynch syndrome after diagnosis, despite three of them having family histories consistent with Lynch syndrome. This series highlights a rare but important cause of pediatric malignancy and points to the need for early education on colorectal cancer warning symptoms and open discussion about this condition in affected families. It also illustrates the need for a thorough family history and a high level of suspicion for Lynch syndrome in children based on family background, as early detection may be key to improving cancer outcomes.

Neurofibromatosis 1 in the setting of dual diagnosis: Diagnostic and management conundrums.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common neurocutaneous disorder characterized by development of pigmentary skin changes, neurogenic tumors, and other manifestations involving multiple organ systems. Penetrance is complete, though expressivity is quite variable even among the family members. Given that NF1 is a common hereditary condition, existence of a second genetic disorder in NF1 patients is not unexpected. During comprehensive evaluations of individuals with NF1, we encountered 11 patients with dual diagnosis who contributed to phenotypic complexity and challenges for long-term management. Examples include Prader-Willi Syndrome, Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease, Down syndrome, infantile myofibromatosis, Craniosynostosis, cleft lip and palate, 47,XYY, 22q11.2 duplication, 15q13.3 deletion syndrome, and BRCA2- and ATM- related cancer predisposition syndromes. Presence of dysmorphism, developmental delay, atypical tumors, and family history of other genetic disorders including cancers appears as determinants to consider a second genetic etiology and helps to differentiate from an extreme phenotypic spectrum of NF1. Clinicians should have high index of suspicion to exclude coexisting disorders, as apart from providing comprehensive medical care. This also has potential implications in genetic counseling. Long-term effects of the synergistic mechanisms leading to phenotypic complexity and patient outcomes are yet to be characterized, with follow-up needed.