Autofeedback from ultrasound images provides rapid improvement in palpation skills for identifying joint swelling in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Joint swelling, an important factor in the classification criteria and disease activity assessment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), renders joint palpation a necessary skill for physicians. Ultrasound (US) examination that visualizes soft tissue abnormalities is now used to assess musculoskeletal disease. We assessed the usefulness of US assessments in enhancing physical joint examination skills. METHODS: We examined 1944 joints (bilateral shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal joints 1-5, and knee joints) in 108 patients with RA during April-July 2011. We first physically examined and confirmed joint swelling; subsequently, the same rheumatologist conducted US examinations and multiple assessors graded the joint swelling. When the 2 results differed, we received autofeedback from the US results to improve the physical examination skills. RESULTS: The sensitivities and specificities of physical examination for US-detected swollen joint, the correlation coefficient (CC) of the swollen joint counts, and the concordance rate in each patient for joint swelling sites and power Doppler (PD)-positive sites with the κ coefficients between the physical and US examinations were compared over time. We found that the sensitivity of physical examination increased by 42 percentage points (pp), while the specificity decreased by 18 pp. The average CC in June-July was greater than that in April-May. The percentage of κ coefficients > 0.8 increased from 8.8% to 17% for joint swelling and from 8.3% to 14% for PD-positive sites. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that autofeedback from US assessment provides quick improvement in palpation skills for identifying joint swelling in patients with RA.

Recent trends in use of nonbiologic DMARDs and evaluation of their continuation rates in single and dual combination therapies in rheumatoid arthritis patients in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to examine changes in usage of nonbiologic, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and evaluate their continuation rates in Japan. METHODS: We analyzed DMARD treatment data for 3,734 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from 1998 to 2009 at Juntendo Hospital in Tokyo, Japan. The DMARD usage rate per month was determined to evaluate RA treatment history in the last decade. We also evaluated continuation rates of nonbiologic DMARDs in single and combination therapies and number of nonbiologic DMARD combination therapies used in each patient. RESULTS: We found that nonbiologic DMARD usage has dramatically changed in the last decade, with the most commonly used DMARD shifting from bucillamine to methotrexate (MTX). MTX showed the highest continuation rate; however, much lower continuation rate was observed when used alone rather than in combination treatments. Further, MTX was also used in the highest number of different combination therapies for a particular patient. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that single MTX treatment may be unable to keep patients in clinical remission or lower disease activity compared with several combination therapies. Recent change in permitted maximum dosage of MTX from 8 to 16 mg/week may improve its efficacy and continuation rate in treating Japanese RA patients.

Single-center, retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as a second-line DMARD in combination therapy and the risk factors contributing to adverse events in 115 patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with tacrolimus (TAC) and other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). One hundred fifteen rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tacrolimus were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. We collected clinical information, including patient background, treatment efficacy (evaluated using the DAS score), and adverse events observed. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyze factors contributing to clinical response and adverse effects. The disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28) improved significantly at 24 weeks, and continuation rate at 1 year was 57.9%. There was no difference in continuation rate between different DMARD combinations, and not only methotrexate (MTX) but also bucillamine (BUC) and salazosulfapyridine (SSZ) were effective combination partners with TAC. No serious adverse events were observed, and no different inefficacy or safety was observed between non-elderly (<65 years old) and elderly (≥65 years old) RA patients. By conducting multiple logistic regression analysis, combination therapy with MTX and TAC, the number of baseline DMARDs (specifically, ≥3), and old age were identified as risk factors for adverse events. Our findings indicate that TAC is a valuable DMARD for second-line combination therapy in RA.

Effect of various anticoagulant agents on large-volume leukocytapheresis using new Cellsorba CS-180S Filter.

We conducted a study to evaluate the effect of various anticoagulant agents on large-volume leukocytapheresis using the new Cellsorba CS-180S Filter filled with a changed solution of sodium pyrosulfite and sodium carbonate. We conducted the study on a total of 12 cases of rheumatoid arthritis. As the anticoagulant agents we used sodium citrate, nafamostat mesilate and low molecular weight heparin. The new Cellsorba CS-180S was safely used with the various blood anticoagulant agents. Also, through adjustment of the sodium citrate percentage to the blood flow volume, it is hypothesized that it is possible to increase the neutrophil removal rate.

Observational cross-sectional study revealing less aggressive treatment in Japanese elderly than nonelderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have more aging-related complications than nonelderly patients with RA. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to investigate the treatment status of elderly patients with RA. METHODS: Between January and March 2008, 969 patients with RA were enrolled in this observational cross-sectional study. Prescription of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and corticosteroids and laboratory data related to RA, including matrix metalloproteinase 3, rheumatoid factor, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody levels, were compared between the elderly and the nonelderly patients. RESULTS: Fewer DMARDs were prescribed to the elderly patients (1.40 [SD, 0.57] vs. 1.51 [SD, 0.61]; P = 0.029). Furthermore, a lower percentage of patients received methotrexate (MTX) (47.2% vs. 56.9%; P = 0.0001), a lower average dosage of MTX was administered (5.46 [SD, 1.66] mg/wk vs. 5.96 [SD, 1.77] mg/wk; P = 0.0001), and fewer biologic DMARDs were used (1.46% vs. 5.59% for infliximab, P = 0.0008; 0.58% vs. 3.19% for etanercept, P = 0.0038) in the elderly group. The laboratory data suggested that the disease status was uncontrolled to a greater extent, and complications were more common in the elderly group. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with RA receive less aggressive treatment than nonelderly patients with RA, despite laboratory evidence for poorly controlled disease status among the elderly. The use of a less aggressive regimen could be attributed to the higher prevalence of complications and problems. Therefore, the elderly with RA should be considered a different patient population from the viewpoint of treatment and be administered specialized medical care.

Fluctuations in peripheral blood leukocyte and platelet counts and leukocyte recruitment with large volume leukocytapheresis in healthy volunteers.

Based on sporadic reports indicating that the effectiveness of leukocytapheresis (LCAP) is proportional to the number of leukocytes removed, it is anticipated that increasing the volume of blood treated, and thus the number of leukocytes removed, will improve the effectiveness of therapy. In advance of its clinical application, the possible clinical usefulness of large volumes of LCAP (pulse LCAP), which treats 5000 mL of blood rather than the usual volume of 3000 mL, was investigated in healthy subjects. As compared with conventional LCAP, pulse LCAP provided comparable safety and enabled the removal of approximately 4.7 times more neutrophils, 1.2 times more lymphocytes, and 1.6 times more monocytes. It also resulted in a more pronounced overshoot phenomenon, as well as lymphocyte and monocyte overshoot, which are not seen with conventional LCAP. The neutrophil overshoot resulted from the recruitment of leukocytes from the bone marrow neutrophil pool as well as from the circulating neutrophil pool and marginal neutrophil pool. Recruitment from the bone marrow pool involved not only recruitment of mature neutrophils but also recruitment from all stages of differentiation and proliferation, including the pluripotent stem cell (CFU-GEMM) fraction; granulocyte-monocyte precursor cell (CFU-GM) fraction; and the fraction of juvenile granulocyte precursors cells capable of cell division, from myeloblasts to myelocytes. Based on the lymphocyte and monocyte overshoot, it was inferred that cells were recruited from mucosal lymphatic tissue, in addition to the lymph nodes, spleen, thymus, and bone marrow. These phenomena might play an important role in the mechanism that underlies the effectiveness of LCAP and the increased effectiveness of pulse LCAP, and it will be necessary to work to elucidate them. Moreover, it appears that investigating the clinical efficacy of pulse LCAP in patients who do not respond to conventional LCAP would be of major significance.

Investigation of the clinical effect of large volume leukocytapheresis on methotrexate-resistant rheumatoid arthritis.

Leukocytapheresis (LCAP) is already being used in a clinical setting for the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis, and it has been reported to be effective. However, it is totally or partially ineffective in some patients, which has forced clinicians to rethink therapeutic strategies and concurrent treatment. With the aim of enhancing the therapeutic effect, we carried out large volume leukocytapheresis, with a throughput of 5000 mL instead of the 3000-mL throughput of conventional leukocytapheresis in nine patients with rheumatoid arthritis resistant to methotrexate treatment. Using Cellsorba, the column filled with the unwoven fabric made of the polyethylene phthalate, a leukocyte removal filter, large volume leukocytapheresis was carried out once a week for a total of five sessions. The observation period was the 12-week period following completion of treatment. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core set was used for assessment of efficacy. Eight weeks after completion of treatment, a 20% improvement in ACR was observed in 77.8% (7/9) of subjects, a 50% improvement in ACR was seen in 55.6% (5/9) of subjects, and a 70% improvement in ACR was observed in 22.2% (2/9) of subjects. C-reactive protein decreased gradually as treatment progressed, and a significant decrease was observed 4 weeks after completion of treatment. The fact that some subjects had an ACR70 response, few reports of which are observed in the case of conventional leukocytapheresis, and the fact that the effect continued up to 12 weeks after completion of treatment suggests that the degree and duration of the effect of large volume leukocytapheresis might be longer than those of conventional leukocytapheresis.