During development intense Sox2 expression marks not only Prox1-expressing taste bud cell but also perigemmal cell lineages.

Sox2 is proposed to regulate the differentiation of bipotential progenitor cells into taste bud cells. However, detailed expression of Sox2 remains unclear. In this report, Sox2 expression during taste bud development in the fungiform (FF), circumvallate (CV) and soft palate (SP) areas is examined together with Prox1. First, we immunohistochemically checked Prox1 expression in adults and found that almost all taste bud cells are Prox1-positive. During FF development, intense Sox2 expression was restricted to taste bud primordia expressing Prox1 at E12.5. However, at E14.5, Sox2 was intensely expressed outside the developing taste buds resolving to perigemmal Sox2 expression in adults. In the SP, at E14.5, taste bud primordia emerged as Prox1-expressing cell clusters. However, intense Sox2 expression was not restricted to taste bud primordia but was detected widely in the epithelium. During development, Sox2 expression outside developing taste buds was generally down-regulated but was retained in the perigemmal region similarly to that in the FF. In the CV, the initial stage of taste bud development remained unclear because of the lack of taste bud primordia comparable to that in the FF and SP. Here, we show that Prox1-expressing cells appear in the apical epithelium at E12.5, in the inner trench wall at E17.5 and in the outer trench wall at E18.5. Sox2 was again not restricted to developing taste bud cells expressing Prox1 during CV development. The expression patterns support that Sox2 does not serve as a cell fate selector between taste bud cells and surrounding keratinocytes but rather may contribute to them both.

The glossopharyngeal nerve controls epithelial expression of Sprr2a and Krt13 around taste buds in the circumvallate papilla.

Tastants reach the tip of taste bud cells through taste pores which are openings in the epithelium. We found Sprr2a is selectively expressed in the upper layer of the epithelium surrounding taste buds in the circumvallate papilla (CV) where the epithelium is organized into taste pores. Sprr2a is a member of a small proline-rich protein family, which is suggested to be involved in the restitution/migration phase of epithelial wound healing. The expression of Sprr2a was restricted to the upper layer and largely segregated with Ptch1 expression that is restricted to the basal side of the epithelium around the taste buds. Denervation resulted in the gradual loss of Sprr2a-expressing cells over 10 days similarly to that of taste bud cells which is in contrast to the rapid loss of Ptch1 expression. We also found that denervation caused an increase of Keratin (Krt)13 expression around taste buds that corresponded with the disappearance of Sprr2a and Ptch1 expression. Taste buds were surrounded by Krt13-negative cells in the CV in control mice. However, at 6 days post-denervation, taste buds were tightly surrounded by Krt13-positive cells. During taste bud development, taste bud cells emerged together with Krt13-negtive cells, and Sprr2a expression was increased along with the progress of taste bud development. These results demonstrate that regional gene expression surrounding taste buds is associated with taste bud formation and controlled by the innervating taste nerve.

Decline of umami preference in aged rats.

The effects of aging on the umami sensation were compared between the preference and neural responses from the greater superficial petrosal nerve (GSP innervating the soft palate) and the chorda tympani nerve (CT innervating the fungiform papillae) in the Sprague Dawley rat. A two-bottle preference test revealed that younger rats (5-12 weeks) preferred significantly 0.001 M 5'-inosine monophosphate (IMP), 0.01 M mono sodium glutamate (MSG), and binary mixtures of 0.001 M IMP+0.01 M MSG than deionized water. However, aged rats (21-22 months) showed no significant preference to these umami solutions compared to deionized water. Among the other four basic taste stimuli, there were no significant differences in preference between young and aged rats. Regardless of the age of the rat, neural responses from the GSP and CT produced robust integrated responses to all three umami solutions used in the two-bottle tests. These results indicate that the lack of preference to umami in aged rats is a central nervous system phenomenon and suggests that the loss of preference to umami taste in aged rats is caused by homeostatic changes in the brain incurred by aging.

Diverse contributions of Tas1r2/Tas2rs within the rat and mouse soft palate to sweet and bitter neural responses.

Neural responses to sweet and bitter stimuli in the rat and mouse are compared to the expression of the molecular taste receptors, Tas1r2/Tas2rs. Integrated taste responses from the greater superficial petrosal nerve (GSP) innervating the soft palate (SP) and the chorda tympani (CT) nerve innervating the fungiform papillae (FF) were recorded in C57BL mice and SD rats. The sum of the phasic and tonic response magnitudes (SRM) was calculated by summating all relative mean responses to a concentration series of QHCl (10(-6)-10(-2)M) or Suc (10(-4)-1.0M). Molecular expression was analyzed by double-colored in situ hybridization for Gα-gustducin with Tas1r2 or Tas2rs in the SP and FF. The vast majority of cells expressing Tas1r2 or Tas2rs were included in Gα-gustducin-expressing cells in the SP of both species. Unexpectedly, a comparison between species revealed that the SRM from the GSP is not positively correlated with receptor expression in the SP. In the rat SP, the percentage of Tas2rs with Gα-gustducin (Tas2rs/gust, 65%) was twice larger than that for Tas1r2/gust (33%), while the SRM to Suc in the rat GSP was 1.5 times (tonic and phasic) larger than that to QHCl. In the mouse SP, the percentage of Tas2rs/gust (46%) was less than that in the rat and similar to that of Tas1r2/gust (40%). However, the SRM to QHCl in the mouse GSP was 2.4 (phasic) and 4.7 (tonic) times larger than to Suc. On the other hand, threshold to Suc in the rat GSP was 10(-3)M, one log unit lower than in mouse, and the threshold to QHCl in the mouse GSP was 10(-6)M, one log unit lower than in rat. These results suggest that the robust GSP response to Suc in rat and to QHCl in mouse likely do not depend upon a large number of taste cells expressing the taste receptors Tas1r2 for Suc or Tas2rs for QHCl, but upon a higher density of Tas1r2/Tas2rs within the respective taste cells of the two species.

Gα-gustducin is extensively coexpressed with sweet and bitter taste receptors in both the soft palate and fungiform papillae but has a different functional significance.

To clarify the regional differences in the expression and functional significance of Gα-gustducin in soft palate (SP) and fungiform (FF) taste buds, we examined the coexpression of Gα-gustducin with taste receptors and the impact of Gα-gustducin knockout (gKO) on neural responses to several sweet and bitter compounds. Sweet responses from both the greater superficial petrosal (GSP) and chorda tympani (CT) nerves in gKO mice were markedly depleted, reflecting overlapping expression of Gα-gustducin and Tas1r2. However, although Gα-gustducin was expressed in 87% and 88% of Tas2rs cells in the SP and FF, respectively, there were no statistically significant differences in the CT responses to quinine-HCl (QHCl) and denatonium (Den) between gKO and wild-type (WT) mice. In contrast, GSP responses to these compounds were markedly reduced in gKO mice with an apparent elevation of thresholds (>10-fold). These results suggest that 1) Gα-gustducin plays a critical role in sweet transduction in both the SP and the FF, 2) other Gα subunits coexpressed with Gα-gustducin in the FF are sufficient for responses to QHCl and Den, and 3) robust GSP responses to QHCl and Den occur in the SP by a Gα-gustducin-dependent mechanism, which is absent in the FF.