From a Place of Love: The Experiences of Birthing in a Black-Owned Culturally-Centered Community Birth Center.

Introduction: Racial and ethnic disparities in perinatal health outcomes are among the greatest threats to population health in the United States. Black birthing communities are most impacted by these inequities due to structural racism throughout society and within health care settings. Although multiple studies have shown that structural racism and the disrespect associated with this system of inequity are the root causes of observed perinatal inequities, little scholarship has centered the needs of Black birthing communities to create alternative care models. Leaning on reproductive justice and critical race theoretical frameworks, this study explores good birth experiences as described by Black birthing people. Methods: Thematic analysis of two focus groups and three one-on-one interviews conducted with clients at a Black-owned free-standing culturally-centered birth center (n=10). Results: We found that Black birthing persons' concerns centered on three main themes: agency, historically- and culturally-safe birthing experiences, and relationship-centered care. Many participants pointed directly to past experiences of medical mistreatment and obstetric racism when defining their ideal birth experience. Conclusion: Black birthing people seeking care from culturally-informed providers often do so because they have been mistreated, disregarded, and neglected within traditional care settings. The needs articulated by our study participants provide a powerful framework for understanding alternative patient-centered models of care that can be developed to improve the care experiences of Black birthing people in the pursuit of birth equity.

The Power of Community Voices for Enhancing Community Health Needs Assessments.

As required by the Affordable Care Act, Community Health Needs Assessments (CHNAs) are formalized processes nonprofit hospitals must perform at least every 3 years. CHNAs are designed to help hospitals better tailor health services to the needs of local residents. However, CHNAs most often use quantitative, population-level data, and rarely incorporate the actual voices of local community members. This is particularly a problem for meeting the needs of residents who are also racial or ethnic minorities. This article discusses one model for integrating residents' voices into the CHNA process. In this model, we videotaped interviews with community members and then coded and analyzed interview data to identify underlying themes. We created a short video aimed at starting conversations about community members' concerns. In addition to demonstrating how other nonprofit hospitals may use qualitative data in the CHNA process, this article illustrates how adding qualitative data may change how we think about health promotion. We find that community members requested that health care providers view culture as a health resource, foster community connections, and be present in the community.

Implementing a Community-Driven Research Partnership: The Backyard Initiative Community Health Survey Methods and Approach.

BACKGROUND: In community-based participatory research (CBPR), issues such as creating a setting where community members drive decisions and creating culturally relevant processes remain largely underachieved. The Backyard Initiative (BYI) provided the setting for implementing a community-centered collaborative research process. The BYI is a partnership between Allina Health, the Cultural Wellness Center (CWC), and community residents to improve health. OBJECTIVES: To describe the unique community-centered method used in the 2013 BYI Community Health Survey (CHS) as a viable approach for collecting meaningful and valid health related data. With this approach, the community operates as the agent of change rather than the target. METHODS: At the core was the BYI assessment team, which brought together conventional researchers and community members to collaboratively design, implement, analyze, interpret, and disseminate the CHS results. Focusing on the CHS, this structure and process permitted and facilitated important and difficult discussions about approach, content and outcomes of the research. RESULTS: We held seven sessions (239 participants). Participants were 37% African American/African and 34% Native American, 65% female, and 72% spoke English at home. Achievement of our recruitment goals, participation of groups typically underrepresented in research, and positive community feedback were indications that the BYI approach to survey research was successful. CONCLUSIONS: The BYI CHS community-centered methods built trust among research partners and participants, engaged populations often underrepresented in research, and collected meaningful data. Our success indicates that it is possible to co-design and implement a lengthy survey to inform future research and community activities.