RESUMEN
This retrospective analysis of longitudinal data was developed to determine which types, combinations, and intensities of topical fluorides more effectively prevent new caries-related restorations and extractions in high caries risk adults. We included data from October 1, 2008, through June 30, 2018, from electronic dental and medical records and pharmacy database from the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Veterans who were eligible for continuing and comprehensive care, met the criteria of high caries risk (received 2 or more caries-related restorations within a 365-d period), and had 3 y of follow-up were included. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated the odds of caries-related treatment during the 1-y observation period, controlling for age, gender, race and ethnicity, illness burden (Selim comorbidity index), use of prescription medications, attendance at dental prophylaxis appointments, number of caries-related restorations during the index year, and time between first and last caries-related restoration during the index year. The study sample included 68,757 veterans, who were primarily male (91.5%), were White (73.6%), had a mean age of 59.2 ± 13.5 y, and had significant medical comorbidity as measured by the Selim index (3.7 ± 2.4 physical and 1.3 ± 1.2 mental diagnoses). They had 10.8 ± 6.3 prescription VA drug classes, took 0.6 ± 0.8 strong anticholinergic medications, and had 3.9 ± 2.6 teeth restored due to caries during the index year. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression models showed veterans who received a varnish or gel/rinse fluoride intervention versus no fluoride had an approximately 29% decreased odds of receiving caries-related treatment during the observation period (gel/rinse adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.76; varnish AOR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.67-0.75). The receipt of a varnish and gel/rinse did not demonstrate statistically better odds than each intervention alone (AOR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.64-0.75). A dose-response effect was observed. Two-plus applications of varnish versus none (AOR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69-0.77) and 2-plus applications of gel/rinse versus none (AOR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.67-0.75) were more effective than 1 application of either modality versus none.
Asunto(s)
Caries Dental , Fluoruros Tópicos , Adulto , Anciano , Cariostáticos/uso terapéutico , Caries Dental/epidemiología , Caries Dental/prevención & control , Susceptibilidad a Caries Dentarias , Fluoruros/uso terapéutico , Fluoruros Tópicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
This study was conducted to determine whether demographic factors, variables related to HIV risk status, or personal attitudes predicted public support for condom availability programs in high schools and needle exchange programs. Data for these analyses were collected from the 1997 Massachusetts Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) among adults aged 18-64. Overall, 79% of Massachusetts adults aged 18-64 supported condom availability programs, and 60% supported needle exchange programs. Younger age was the strongest demographic predictor of support for condom availability, and higher socioeconomic status was the strongest predictor of support for needle exchange programs. Support for both programs was weakly associated with personal HIV risk status but strongly associated with positive attitudes toward teaching about HIV in schools and advising sexually active teens to use condoms. Our data suggest that there is broad-based public support for implementation of condom availability and needle exchange programs as tools for HIV prevention.