Patients Journey Before Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Diagnosis Contributes to disease's Activity Level: A Real-Life Study.

INTRODUCTION: The help-seeking process in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is challenging, and its study is limited in Latin America. The study describes the real-life journey before patients' incorporation into an early arthritis clinic (EAC) and its impact on baseline and 1-year cumulative disease activity levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patient's journey was assessed through a questionnaire that captured the patient's path from the first disease-related symptom to the initial assessment in the EAC. A disease activity (28 joints evaluated)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) score >5.1 defined a high-disease activity level. The mean of individual consecutive DAS28-ESR scores summarized cumulative DAS28-ESR. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with a DAS28-ESR score >5.1 at the first assessment. Linear regression analysis assessed the impact of general practitioner (GP)-first consultant and time on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on baseline and cumulative DAS28-ESR scores. RESULTS: Through January 2023, the EAC had 241 RA patients, among whom 209 (86.7%) completed the patients' journey questionnaire (PJQ) and 176 (84.2%) at least 1 year of follow-up. A GP was the first consultant in 76.6% of the patients, and only 12.4% were prescribed DMARDs. Patients had additional evaluations with either rheumatologists (38.6%) or other specialists (31.6%), and half of them were initiated DMARDs. GP-first consultant (adjusted odds ratio: 2.314, 95% confidence interval: 1.190-4.500, p = 0.013) and time on DMARDs (adjusted odds ratio: 0.738, 95% confidence interval: 0.585-0.929, p = 0.010) were associated with baseline DAS28-ESR score >5.1. The B coefficient magnitudes for GP-first consultant and time on DMARDs to predict cumulative DAS28 progressively decreased during the first year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' journey before recent-onset RA diagnosis predicts first-year disease activity levels.

Sleep quality and predictors of optimal sleep in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from a recent-onset cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Sleep disorders are part of the symptomatology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and are related to disease characteristics and comorbidities. The study describes sleep quality among RA patients and identifies predictors of optimal sleep. METHODS: Patients whose data were analysed were identified from the recent-onset RA cohort initiated in 2004. In 2010, the Medical Outcome Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) was incorporated into the patients' assessments. Up to December 2019, the cohort comprised 187 patients with at least one MOS-SS application (in 78 patients at cohort entry) and six months of outcomes behaviour (cumulative) previous to the MOS-SS application: DAS28-ESR, pain-VAS, fatigue, HAQ-DI, SF-36, treatment (corticosteroids, DMARDs/patient and adherence), Charlson score, and major depressive episodes. A trained data abstractor retrospectively reviewed their charts. Multiple logistic regression analysis estimated odds ratios (95% confidence interval) to define baseline and cumulative variables predictive of optimal sleep (dichotomised variable derived from the quantity of sleep dimension of the MOS-SS). RESULTS: At the first MOS-SS application, patients were primarily middle-aged women with short disease duration and low disease activity. They scored higher on the "snoring" and "sleep non-adequacy" MOS-SS dimensions. There were 96 patients (51.3%) with optimal sleep. Lower baseline BMI, better baseline fatigue score, longer follow-up at the clinic, and better SF-36 physical summary score were predictors of optimal sleep (mental summary score also remained in the model when switched to the physical summary score). CONCLUSIONS: Optimal sleep is achieved by half of the RA patients and predicted by BMI, patient-reported outcomes, and follow-up.

Outcomes after rheumatoid arthritis patients complete their participation in a long-term observational study with tofacitinib combined with methotrexate: practical and ethical implications in vulnerable populations after tofacitinib discontinuation.

To describe disease activity and disability during the first year of follow-up, from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who discontinue tofacitinib after they end participation in a clinical trial. From 2008 to 2016, 36 patients were enrolled in the "Long term follow-up study with tofacitinib (and methotrexate) for RA treatment". At the end of the study, tofacitinib was discontinued and patients were proposed to enter an observational study; 35 agree and had scheduled evaluations at baseline, at 15 and 30 days of follow-up, at month 2 and 3, and thereafter every 3 months. Disease activity was evaluated as per DAS28-ESR and disability as per HAQ. During follow-up, treatment was treat-to-target oriented, only conventional DMARDs were indicated. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric test were used. The study was approved by IRB. Patients were primarily females (N = 34), had median (Q25-75) age of 52 years (45-58), and had received tofacitinib for a median of 7.9 years (6.3-8.3). The proportion of patients with remission and low disease activity decreased from day 30 of follow-up and recovered after 270 days, meanwhile patients with high disease activity increased from 0% at baseline to 6.3% at 1 year. At study entry, 20 patients had remission/low disease activity; during follow-up, 85% deteriorated after (median) 30 days; among them, 23.5% recovered their baseline status after a median of 172.5 days. The HAQ showed a similar behavior, but 66.7% recovered. A substantial proportion of RA patients deteriorated outcomes early after tofacitinib cessation; some patients recovered baseline status with traditional DMARDS.