RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is a commonly performed group of procedures for individuals with severe obesity, and its impact on mental health, particularly depression, has gained significant attention. In Saudi Arabia, the prevalence and consequences of depression following bariatric surgery among adults is an area of growing concern. The study aimed to assess the prevalence of depression after bariatric surgery and estimate the consequences of depression after bariatric surgery. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among adults in Saudi Arabia who had undergone bariatric surgery. The participants were recruited from different bariatric surgery centers across the country. The data was collected using a self-administered questionnaire that had three main sections, including demographic information, clinical characteristics, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to assess depression. RESULTS: The results of the study showed that among adults in Saudi Arabia who had undergone bariatric surgery, the prevalence of depression was high. Of the participants, 23.5% were found to have depression after bariatric surgery. This high prevalence suggests that depression is a significant consequence of bariatric surgery. CONCLUSION: A high number of adults in Saudi Arabia experience depression after bariatric surgery. This shows a need for mental health checks and support before and after the surgery. With mental healthcare as a regular part of bariatric programs, patients would have a better chance of success and overall well-being. More research is needed to understand why depression happens after surgery and how to prevent it.
RESUMEN
Cholecystectomy is a widespread surgical procedure for gallbladder diseases. Evolving techniques and technologies, such as intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), enhance safety and outcomes by providing real-time biliary system visualization during surgery. This systematic review explored available data on using IOC during cholecystectomy, highlighting its effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness. To perform this systematic review, a thorough literature search was conducted using relevant keywords in electronic databases, such as PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. We included studies published during the last 10 years exploring the use of IOC during cholecystectomy. The findings showed success rates of up to 90% with a median time of 21.9 minutes without complications. Most (90%) patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis underwent cholecystectomy with IOC, with unclear IOC results in 10.7% and failure in 14.7%. IOC failure factors included age, body mass index (BMI), male sex, concurrent acute cholecystitis, common bile duct (CBD) stone evidence on imaging, CBD diameter of >6 mm, total bilirubin of >4 mg/dL, abnormal liver tests, and gallstone pancreatitis. The detection of choledocholithiasis by IOC prompted trans-cystic duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Biliary abnormalities and stone identification were observed using IOC, and routine use increased bile duct stone detection while decreasing bile duct injury and readmission rates. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of IOC for common bile duct stone detection were reported at 77%, 98%, 97.2%, 63%, and 99%, respectively. Routine IOC was projected to provide substantial quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and cost-effectiveness gains compared to selective IOC. Regarding safety, IOC was generally associated with reduced complication and open surgery conversion risks, with similar rates of CBD injury and bile leaks. These findings indicate that IOC enhances cholecystectomy outcomes through precision and decreasing complications.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Assessing the medico-economic outcomes of a healthcare pathway including day-case bariatric surgery versus the conventional pathway. METHODS: This economical evaluation is a prospective cohort study with historical controls. Between March 2019 and December 2020, 30 patients eligible for bariatric surgery were considered in the day-case group. Surgical procedures included sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The day-case pathway included patient education, post-discharge follow-up by a community nurse twice-daily and standardized communications to surgeons. Day-case patients were paired with 30 inpatients, based on the type of intervention, age, and ASA status. The primary outcome was the cost of care episodes from the preoperative visit to the 30-day postoperative visit. Micro-costing methodology and activity-based costing were used. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, rate of unanticipated events, and patient' satisfaction assessment. RESULTS: Male-to-female ratio was 1/2. In the day-case versus inpatient group, age, number of associated medical conditions, and BMI (42.9 ± 4.9 versus 42.6 ± 4.6, p > 0.05) were similar. In the day-case group, there were 7 overnight stays (23.3%), 3 readmissions (10%), and 4 unscheduled consultations (13.3%). The overall length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (0.65 ± 0.33, versus 2.9 ± 0.4 days, p < 0.0001). The complication rate was 6.6% in both groups. The cost of the care episode was 4272.9 ± 589.7 for the day-case group versus 4993.7 ± 695.6 for inpatients, corresponding to a 14.4% cost reduction (p = 0.0254). CONCLUSIONS: Day-case bariatric surgery appears to be safe and beneficial in terms of costs. It involves a specific organization with postdischarge follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT04423575.