Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Value Health ; 27(6): 805-814, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492926

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the psychometric properties of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) across age groups using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. METHODS: Data: English peer-reviewed articles reporting studies of the development, translation, or validation of GOHAI. SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE from Jan 1990 until December 31, 2023. Methodological evaluation: based on COSMIN methodology. The results are presented overall and for 4 age groups (≥60 years, all ages, <60 years, ≤45 years). Structural validity was summarized qualitatively. Internal consistency and reliability were synthesized via random-effects meta-analysis of T-transformed Cronbach α values, and Fisher's Z transformed correlation coefficients. Construct validity and responsiveness were assessed using effect sizes. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety-seven records were identified, 72 underwent full-text assessment, resulting in 60 included reports. Structural validity was inconsistent across all age groups and overall. Internal consistency was sufficient with overall α = 0.81, and high evidence quality. Test-retest reliability was consistently sufficient across age groups with overall r = 0.84. For construct validity 361 hypotheses were assessed (37.4% for convergent-, 62.6% for known-groups validity). The percentage of confirmed hypotheses in ≥60-years, all ages, <60-years and ≤45-years were 75.5%, 66.7%, 78.9%, and 88.9%, respectively. Responsiveness was not assessed in the <60-years and ≤45-years age groups, leading to indeterminate overall rating with very low evidence quality. CONCLUSIONS: This review affirms that GOHAI has sufficient psychometric properties as an oral health-related quality of life instrument in various age groups, but its responsiveness is scarcely researched and its utility for individual-level follow-up is limited. The measurement properties of oral health-related quality of life tools must be scrutinized in the changing demands of personalized and value-based dental care. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022384132).


Asunto(s)
Salud Bucal , Psicometría , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Edad , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Adulto , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años
2.
Fogorv Sz ; 106(3): 91-5, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Húngaro | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24344564

RESUMEN

Fabrication of a complete mandibular denture that offers patient comfort, function, and aesthetics along with stability and acceptable retention remains one of the most challenging procedures in dental practice. Based on a thorough treatment planning and a successful surgical procedure implants have been shown to be reliable abutment for both retention and support of overdentures. During planning important relevant factors must be considered such as old age, systemic diseases, increased financial capability, etc. Implants retained overdentures can be divided into three groups according to the type of support: mucosal, muco-implantal and implantal. Key factors concerning the planning of prosthetic rehabilitation are the number and length of the implants, together with the quality and quantity of the anchoring bone tissue.


Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Prótesis Dental de Soporte Implantado , Retención de Dentadura , Prótesis de Recubrimiento , Dentadura Parcial Removible , Arcada Edéntula/rehabilitación , Arcada Edéntula/cirugía , Mandíbula/cirugía , Prótesis Dental de Soporte Implantado/métodos , Prótesis Dental de Soporte Implantado/tendencias , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA