The intraosseous course of the mandibular incisive nerve in the mandibular symphysis.

The use of the mandibular symphysis as a source of autogenous bone grafting material has been well documented. Currently, no references in the literature describe the intraosseous distribution of the neurovascular complex anterior to the mental nerve with respect to its position buccolingually and apicocoronally. The objective of this study was to evaluate the distribution of the incisive nerve and measure its location buccolingually and apicocoronally in the anterior mandible and determine its possible significance to clinical practice. According to macroscopic dissection, the mandibular incisive nerve is a normal structure that typically extends closer to the midline than previously reported. To reduce postoperative neurovascular morbidity, this should be considered when using the mandibular symphysis as a source of autogenous bone or during placement of implants in the anterior mandible.

The effects of a single course of a calculus-softening scaling and root planing gel. A scanning electron microscopic study.

The effect of a calculus scaling gel was evaluated as an adjunct to instrumentation in a double blind, split-mouth, clinical study. Fifteen comparable periodontally involved teeth from 5 patients were instrumented on the mesio-buccal root surface with the aid of either the test gel, placebo gel, or no gel until smoothness was achieved. Test or placebo gel was applied subgingivally for 10 minutes. Instrumentation time, ease, number of strokes, and gingival/tooth surfaces changes were recorded. Scanning electronic microscopic (SEM) evaluation of root surface topography was evaluated. The results demonstrated effective calculus removal in all treatment groups with no differences found between them. Instrumentation time, ease, and number of strokes were similar for all treatment groups. There were no harmful effects to soft or hard tissues. The results of this study do not support the use of calculus scaling gel as an adjunct to root instrumentation.

Comparison of postoperative bupivacaine with lidocaine on pain and analgesic use following periodontal surgery.

The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative administration of bupivacaine, a long-acting local anesthetic, with lidocaine, a short-acting local anesthetic, on pain perception and analgesic use following periodontal surgery. Ten male subjects were selected on the basis of having similar bilateral mandibular quadrants with moderate to severe periodontal disease requiring osseous surgery. The study was a matched-pair, double-blind design. Carpules of 2% xylocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine were wrapped in opaque tape and placed in separate coded envelopes. At the time of suturing, the quadrant was injected with one Carpule from one envelope. The Carpules from the second envelope were saved for the second surgery, which took place approximately one month later. Subjects were given standardized postoperative instructions and prescriptions for Peridex and Tylenol #3. They were told not to take the analgesic unless pain or discomfort occurred. They were given a self-administered questionnaire and asked to assess pain and/or discomfort 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after the procedure, the amount of analgesic taken, and time when complete sensation returned. Results showed that the quadrants which received lidocaine maintained postoperative anesthesia an average of 2.47 hours while the Marcaine quadrants had a significantly longer duration of 5.62 hours. A large intra- and intersubject variability was noted in the amount of analgesic taken. The lidocaine group reported an average of 3.70 tablets versus a significantly smaller amount for the bupivacaine group of 1.60 tablets. Throughout all time intervals, the bupivacaine group reported significantly less pain than the lidocaine group. When used at the end of a mandibular periodontal surgical procedure, bupivacaine provides a significantly greater duration of anesthesia, decreased postoperative pain, and a reduction of anesthesia, decreased postoperative pain, and a reduction in the amount of analgesics taken.

The effectiveness of scaling and root planing with curets designed for deep pockets.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing with longer shank, thinner blade, rigid curets compared to the standard rigid Gracey curet. A total of 35 non-molar teeth from 7 patients provided 140 root surfaces for evaluation; 52 root surfaces were instrumented with the rigid longer shank curets; 52 with the standard rigid Gracey curets; and 36 provided untreated controls. A bilateral matched design was utilized where contralateral teeth in the same arch were instrumented. Instrumentation was standardized at 15 minutes per tooth. Both scaled and unscaled teeth were extracted immediately after the experimental procedures. They were viewed under a stereomicroscope with a 0.10 mm grid to assess the percent of surface covered by calculus and unaltered cementum. The curet efficiency was also evaluated. The results indicated a significant treatment effect compared to the controls in relation to the percentage of residual calculus and curet efficiency. However, there was no significant difference between the rigid longer shank and standard rigid Gracey curets. There was a difference noted when tooth surfaces were evaluated. Mesial tooth surfaces had the least remaining calculus and demonstrated the best curet efficiency.

Bacteremia following subgingival irrigation and scaling and root planing.

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of bacteremia after a single professional subgingival irrigation with a 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse (CHX) as well as after a subsequent scaling and root planing (S/RP) during the same visit. Thirty subjects each with at least 1 site that probed 4 mm or more and bled on probing were randomly assigned to the following groups: 1) irrigation with 0.12% CHX; 2) irrigation with sterile water; and 3) non-irrigated controls. To begin the study blood was drawn just before and 2 minutes after irrigation. Thirty minutes later, blood was drawn again just before and 2 minutes after S/RP at the same site. Specimens were cultured for anaerobic and aerobic microorganisms using standard cultural techniques. Eighteen blood cultures from 15 subjects yielded positive cultures resulting in 23 isolates. Gram-positive rods comprised 34.8% of the total isolates; Gram-positive cocci 34.8%, Gram-negative rods 21.7%, and Gram-negative cocci 8.7%. In the CHX group, bacteremia was detected in 5 subjects after irrigation and in 2 other subjects after S/RP. In the water group, bacteremia was detected in one subject after irrigation and in 4 subjects after S/RP. The control group had 3 bacteremias after S/RP. There was no significant difference between the incidence of bacteremia associated with irrigation by CHX or sterile water (P = 0.141). There was also no significant difference in the incidence of bacteremia after S/RP between the CHX and sterile water irrigation groups and in patients who did not receive irrigation (control group) (P = 0.88).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival and gingival marginal irrigation with chlorhexidine gluconate.

Recent interest in the local delivery of antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory agents has stimulated interest in the efficacy of various treatment regimens. Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) delivered daily by home-applied marginal irrigation as a 0.04% solution in combination with a single professional irrigation of 0.12% CHX was tested over a 3-month period. Sixty periodontal maintenance patients each having at least 2 pockets greater than or equal to 4 mm probing depth, and bleeding on probing were assigned to either Group 1: one professional subgingival 0.12% CHX (Peridex) irrigation (Perio Pik) followed by adjunctive daily home marginal 0.04% CHX irrigation (Pik Pocket); Group 2: one professional subgingival 0.12% CHX irrigation followed by adjunctive daily home marginal water irrigation; Group 3: one professional subgingival water irrigation followed by adjunctive daily home marginal water irrigation; or Group 4: control. At baseline and 3 month visits, subgingival plaque samples were taken from 2 sites per patient. Cultural microbiological analysis was performed using non-selective and selective media. Plaque Index, Gingival Index, pocket probing depths, and gingival recession were assessed. Scaling and root planing (supportive periodontal treatment) was provided for each patient followed by subgingival irrigation as outlined above. At 3 months the Gingival Index and pocket probing depths were both significantly reduced (P less than .05) in all irrigation groups compared to baseline. There were no significant changes in clinical parameters in the control group from baseline to 3 months. In Group 1 the GI was significantly reduced (P less than .05) compared to Group 4 at 3 months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of subgingival irrigation on bacteremia following scaling and root planing.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of professional subgingival irrigation, together with subsequent patient administered home marginal irrigation, on the incidence of bacteremia after scaling and root planing (Sc/RP). A total of 60 periodontal maintenance patients were assigned to either Group 1: subgingival irrigation, with 0.12% CHX and daily marginal irrigation with 0.04% CHX; Group 2: subgingival irrigation with 0.12% CHX and daily marginal irrigation with water; Group 3: subgingival and daily marginal irrigation with water; Group 4: Non-irrigation (control). Patients entered the study after receiving a thorough periodontal maintenance appointment including a complete examination, Sc/RP, and standard oral hygiene instruction. Blood samples were taken at the 3-month visit before and after Sc/RP. Microbiological culturing was done using the Septi-Chek system, selective and non-selective media. Results from 54 patients showed that bacteremia was detected prior to Sc/RP in 2 patients and after Sc/RP in 10 patients. No significant effect by treatment regimens on post Sc/RP bacteremia could be detected. The organisms isolated included Eubacterium lentum, Propionibacterium acnes, Streptococcus species, Neisseria species, Candida albicans, Staphylococcus species, and un-identified Gram-negative rods.

Clinical enhancement of post-periodontal surgical therapy by a 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse.

Previous studies have demonstrated the potential beneficial effects of post-surgical rinsing with 0.2% chlorhexidine. In the present investigation a new chlorhexidine formulation (Peridex) (CHx) and concentration (0.12%) was evaluated clinically to determine if similar effects could be detected from the use of the new product and treatment regimen. A double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was carried out in 40 patients during a 6 week period. Patients who had moderate periodontitis (AAP Class III) received osseous periodontal surgery in one quadrant. Each surgical site received periodontal dressing and patients were given a placebo or CHx mouthrinse to be used twice each day. Compared to placebo, CHx significantly reduced plaque at all examinations (54.4% reduction over placebo at 6 weeks, P less than 0.05). Visible plaque (PlI greater than 2) in the CHx group was reduced by 99% over the placebo group at 6 weeks and at 4 weeks post-surgical, gingival inflammation scores were significantly lower in the CHx group (17% reduction over the placebo at 4 weeks, P less than 0.05). Gingival bleeding scores (GI greater than 2) were significantly lower in the CHx group at 4 and 6 weeks (41% and 40% reduction over the placebo group, P less than 0.05). Probing pocket depth and attachment level changes were not significantly different between both groups. Epithelialization rates and pain assessment demonstrated consistently better results in the CHx group, although differences were not statistically significant. Use of 0.12% chlorhexidine immediately following periodontal surgery, for 6 weeks, has been shown to be a clinically effective adjunct providing enhancement of the post-surgical management of periodontal surgical patients.