Modeling cue-exposure therapy for alcohol use disorder in rhesus monkeys: Effects of putative cognitive enhancers.

BACKGROUND: Cue-exposure therapy (CET) is an effective approach for anxiety-related disorders, but its effectiveness for substance use disorders is less clear. One potential means of improving CET outcomes is to include a cognitive-enhancing pharmacotherapy. This study evaluated d-cycloserine (DCS) and RY-023, putative cognitive enhancers targeting glutamate and GABA systems, respectively, in a monkey model of CET for alcohol use disorder. METHODS: Male rhesus monkeys (n = 4) underwent multiple cycles of the CET procedure. During baseline (Phase 1), monkeys self-administered an ethanol solution under a fixed-ratio schedule and limited access conditions such that every 5th response in a 3-h session resulted in 30-s access to a drinking spout and a change in ethanol-paired cue lights from white to red. Behavior then was extinguished (Phase 2) by omitting the ethanol solution yet retaining the ethanol-paired stimulus lights. Monkeys also received injections of vehicle, DCS (3 mg/kg), a partial agonist at the glycine modulatory site on glutamatergic NMDA receptors, or the α5GABAA receptor-selective inverse agonist RY-023 (0.03 or 0.3 mg/kg). Once responding declined, monkeys underwent a cue reactivity test (Phase 3), and then returned to self-administration the following day to assess reacquisition (Phase 4). RESULTS: Through multiple cycles, self-administration remained stable. Compared to vehicle, DCS facilitated extinction of ethanol seeking (Phase 2) and delayed reacquisition of ethanol self-administration (Phase 4). In contrast, RY-023 facilitated extinction (Phase 2) and reduced cue reactivity (Phase 3). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive pharmacotherapy can improve CET outcomes, but the choice of pharmacotherapy should be dependent on the outcome of interest.

Methamphetamine-Induced Sleep Impairments and Subsequent Slow-Wave and Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Rebound in Male Rhesus Monkeys.

Use of amphetamine-type stimulants is associated with numerous adverse health outcomes, with disturbed sleep being one of the most prominent consequences of methamphetamine use. However, the extent to which methamphetamine alters sleep architecture, and whether methamphetamine-induced sleep impairment is associated with next-day sleep rebound effects, has received relatively little investigation. In the present study, we investigated the effects of acute morning methamphetamine administration on sleep parameters in adult male rhesus monkeys (N = 4) using a fully-implantable telemetry system. Monkeys were prepared with telemetry devices that continuously monitored electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG) and electrooculography (EOG) throughout the night. We investigated the effects of morning (10h00) administration of methamphetamine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg, i.m.) on sleep during the night of the injection. In addition, we investigated sleep during the subsequent night in order to assess the possible emergence of sleep rebound effects. Methamphetamine administration dose-dependently increased sleep latency and wake time after sleep onset (WASO). Methamphetamine also decreased total sleep time, which was reflected by a decrease in total time spent in N2, slow-wave (N3) and REM sleep stages, while increasing the percentage of total sleep time spent in sleep stage N1. Importantly, methamphetamine decreased time spent in N3 and REM sleep even at doses that did not significantly decrease total sleep time. Sleep rebound effects were observed on the second night after methamphetamine administration, with increased total sleep time reflected by a selective increase in time spent in sleep stages N3 and REM, as well as a decrease in REM sleep latency. Our findings show that methamphetamine administered 8 h prior to the inactive (dark) phase induces marked changes in sleep architecture in rhesus monkeys, even at doses that do not change sleep duration, and that sleep rebound effects are observed the following day for both N3 and REM sleep stages.

Alprazolam-induced EEG spectral power changes in rhesus monkeys: a translational model for the evaluation of the behavioral effects of benzodiazepines.

RATIONALE: Benzodiazepines induce electroencephalography (EEG) changes in rodents and humans that are associated with distinct behavioral effects and have been proposed as quantitative biomarkers for GABAA receptor modulation. Specifically, central EEG beta and occipital EEG delta activity have been associated with anxiolysis and sedation, respectively. The extent to which nonhuman primates show the same dose- and topography-dependent effects remained unknown. OBJECTIVES: We aimed at establishing a nonhuman primate model for the evaluation of benzodiazepine EEG pharmacology. METHODS: Four adult male rhesus monkeys were prepared with fully implantable telemetry devices that monitored activity, peripheral body temperature, and contained two EEG (central and occipital), one electromyography (EMG), and one electrooculography channel. We investigated daytime alprazolam-induced changes in EEG spectral power, sleep-wake states, EMG activity, locomotor activity, and body temperature. Alprazolam (0.01-1.8 mg/kg, i.m.) or vehicle was administered acutely, and telemetry recording was conducted for 1 h. RESULTS: Daytime alprazolam dose-dependently increased central EEG power (including beta activity), increased occipital EEG delta power, and decreased occipital EEG alpha, theta, and sigma power. There was an ~8-fold difference in the potency of alprazolam to increase central EEG beta vs. occipital EEG delta activity (based on relative EEG power). The highest dose, which increased both central EEG beta and occipital EEG delta relative power, induced sedative effects (increased time spent in N1 and N2 sleep stages) and decreased peripheral body temperature and locomotor activity. CONCLUSIONS: Alprazolam induces dose- and topography-dependent EEG changes in rhesus monkeys and provides a valuable model for studying benzodiazepine pharmacology.

Correction to: GABAA Receptor Subtype Mechanisms and the Abuse-Related Effects of Ethanol: Genetic and Pharmacological Evidence.

The chemical name appearing in the first column of Table 1 on the 3rd row from bottom of the table is wrong.

GABAA Receptor Subtype Mechanisms and the Abuse-Related Effects of Ethanol: Genetic and Pharmacological Evidence.

Ethanol's reinforcing and subjective effects, as well as its ability to induce relapse, are powerful factors contributing to its widespread use and abuse. A significant mediator of these behavioral effects is the GABAA receptor system. GABAA receptors are the target for γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the CNS. Structurally, they are pentameric, transmembrane chloride ion channels comprised of subunits from at least eight different families of distinct proteins. The contribution of different GABAA subunits to ethanol's diverse abuse-related effects is not clear and remains an area of research focus. This chapter details the clinical and preclinical findings supporting roles for different α, ß, γ, and δ subunit-containing GABAA receptors in ethanol's reinforcing, subjective/discriminative stimulus, and relapse-inducing effects. The reinforcing properties of ethanol have been studied the most systematically, and convergent preclinical evidence suggests a key role for the α5 subunit in those effects. Regarding ethanol's subjective/discriminative stimulus effects, clinical and genetic findings support a primary role for the α2 subunit, whereas preclinical evidence implicates the α5 subunit. At present, too few studies investigating ethanol relapse exist to make any solid conclusions regarding the role of specific GABAA subunits in this abuse-related effect.