Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Med Econ ; 23(6): 581-592, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32063100

RESUMEN

Aims: To evaluate total costs and health consequences of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program with colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), and expanded use of multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) from the perspectives of Integrated Delivery Networks (IDNs) and payers in the United States.Materials and methods: We developed a budget impact and cost-consequence model that simulates CRC screening for eligible 50- to 75-year-old adults. A status quo scenario and an increased mt-sDNA scenario were modeled. The status quo includes the current screening mix of colonoscopy (83%), FIT (11%), and mt-sDNA (6%) modalities. The increased mt-sDNA scenario increases mt-sDNA utilization to 28% over 10 years. Costs for both the IDN and the payer perspectives incorporated diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopies, adverse events (AEs), and CRC treatment. The IDN perspective included screening program costs, composed of direct nonmedical (e.g. patient navigation) and indirect (e.g. administration) costs. It was assumed that IDNs do not incur the costs for stool-based screening tests or bowel preparation for colonoscopies.Results: In a population of one million covered lives, the 10-year incremental cost savings incurred by increasing mt-sDNA utilization was $16.2 M for the IDN and $3.3 M for the payer. The incremental savings per-person-per-month were $0.14 and $0.03 for the IDN and payer, respectively. For both perspectives, increased diagnostic colonoscopy costs were offset by reductions in screening colonoscopies, surveillance colonoscopies, and AEs. Extending screening eligibility to 45- to 75-year-olds slightly decreased the overall cost savings.Limitations: The natural history of CRC was not simulated; however, many of the utilized parameters were extracted from highly vetted natural history models or published literature. Direct nonmedical and indirect costs for CRC screening programs are applied on a per-person-per modality basis, whereas in reality some of these costs may be fixed.Conclusions: Increased mt-sDNA utilization leads to fewer colonoscopies, less AEs, and lower overall costs for both IDNs and payers, reducing overall screening program costs and increasing the number of cancers detected while maintaining screening adherence rates over 10 years.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/economía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Colonoscopía/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Econométricos , Sangre Oculta , Cooperación del Paciente , Prioridad del Paciente , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estados Unidos
2.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 23(10): 1860-1866, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28858069

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fistulas are a common and often debilitating complication of Crohn's disease (CD). Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and/or seton drainage are effective treatment options. We compared health care utilization and costs for patients with perianal CD who had setons placed before treatment with biologics versus those who did not. METHODS: Patients with CD (≥18 yr) were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan Database by ICD-9 code 555.x (January 1, 2006-March 31, 2015); those with external fistulas were identified by ICD-9 codes 565.1. Biological treatment and seton procedures were identified with the National Drug Codes or Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were grouped into 2 cohorts: seton before biological (SBB) treatment or no seton before biological (NSBB) treatment. RESULTS: SBB (N = 326) and NSBB (N = 1519) groups were similar in baseline age, sex, use of immunosuppressants and steroids, and comorbidity score. Baseline prevalence of asthma and cardiovascular disease, and use of antibiotics and 5-aminosalicylic acid were significantly greater in the SBB group versus the NSBB group. Baseline number of all-cause and fistula-related hospitalizations were greater for the SBB group than in the NSBB group. However, during follow-up, the NSBB group required significantly more hospitalizations than the SBB group (all-cause: 0.41 versus 0.23; fistula related: 0.16 versus 0.07) and had significantly greater health care costs (all-cause: $9711 versus $5514; fistula related: $4156 versus $1900). Results were confirmed in multivariate regressions adjusting for baseline characteristics and prescription drug use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had the setons placed before treatment with biologics used fewer health care resources and incurred lower health care costs compared with those who did not have the procedure.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fístula Rectal/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada/economía , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Fístula Rectal/economía , Fístula Rectal/etiología , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
3.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 23(12): 2089-2096, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28961604

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) negatively impacts patient quality of life and results in greater healthcare utilization. For pediatric CD patients, the burden also extends to their caregivers. We aimed to estimate work loss and productivity costs among caregivers of pediatric CD patients. METHODS: Data were from Truven MarketScan databases (2000-2012). Patients were <18 years old with ≥2 ICD-9 CD diagnostic codes. Controls were those without CD or ulcerative colitis and were matched to patients by age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, index year, and insurance plan category. Continuous enrollment was required ≥6 months before and ≥12 months after index, defined as the patient's first CD diagnosis date. Outcomes included hours of work loss and associated productivity costs of caregivers 1-year postindex. Work loss and productivity costs were compared between caregivers of patients and controls. Adjustments for unbalanced baseline factors were made using a generalized linear regression model. RESULTS: Each cohort included 200 study participants and their caregivers. Unadjusted annual hours of work loss after first diagnosis were 214.4 ± 171.5 and 169.6 ± 157.5 for caregivers of CD patients and controls, respectively (P = 0.007). Annual productivity costs were 27.2% ($1122) higher for caregivers of CD patients than controls, estimated at $5243 and $4,121, respectively (P = 0.004). Adjusted cost analyses yielded similar findings. Over the course of a patient's childhood, accumulated productivity losses were $24,118 for CD patients and $18,957 for control caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers of pediatric CD patients have significantly higher loss in productivity costs compared with controls.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Enfermedad de Crohn/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/economía , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA