Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Chir Belg ; 114(5): 338-43, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26021539

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: When performing low anterior resection for rectal cancer with the double staple technique, -closing the rectum with a linear stapler in the abdomen can be challenging, especially when dealing with a narrow pelvis. For such instances we proposed to modify this technique by pulling the rectal stump through the anus, doing an extra-anal resection of the tumor and linear suture of the rectal stump, before performing a standard, stapled colorectal anastomosis. The purpose of this study was to assess the adequacy of this modification of the double staple technique. METHODS: Retrospective review of 108 patients undergoing a stapled, low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis, after -eversion, extra-anal resection of the tumor and linear closure of the rectal stump for colorectal cancer, from January 1990 to December 2012. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 0.9%. Fourteen patients (13%) presented early, surgery-related complications -consisting of 7 anastomotic leaks, 5 wound infections, 1 ureteral lesion, and 1 peristomal abscess. Late complications related to surgery included 5 incisional hernias (4.6%), 4 anastomotic strictures (3.7%), 4 neurogenic bladders (3.7%) and 2 fecal incontinences (1.8%). The incidence of local disease recurrence was 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical and oncological results validate the proposed modification of the double staple technique, when facing difficulties in suturing the rectum from the abdomen.


Asunto(s)
Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentación , Suturas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 39(2): 139-45, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20005750

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of systematic coronary angiography followed, if needed, by coronary artery angioplasty (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) on the incidence of cardiac ischaemic events after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients without evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2008, 426 patients, candidates for CEA, with no history of CAD and with normal cardiac ultrasound and electrocardiography (ECG), were randomised into two groups. In group A (n=216) all the patients had coronary angiography performed before CEA. In group B, all the patients had CEA without previous coronary angiography. In group A, 66 patients presenting significant coronary artery lesions at angiography received PCI before CEA. They subsequently underwent surgery under aspirin (100 mg day(-1)) and clopidogrel (75 mg day(-1)). CEA was performed within a median delay of 4 days after PCI (range: 1-8 days). Risk factors, indications for CEA and surgical techniques were comparable in both groups (p>0.05). The primary combined endpoint of the study was the incidence of postoperative myocardial ischaemic events combined with the incidence of complications of coronary angiography. Secondary endpoints were death and stroke rates after CEA and incidence of cervical haematoma. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was 0% in group A and 0.9% in group B (p=0.24). One postoperative stroke (0.5%) occurred in group A, and two (0.9%) in group B (p=0.62). No postoperative myocardial event was observed in group A, whereas nine ischaemic events were observed in group B, including one fatal myocardial infarction (p=0.01). Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that preoperative coronary angiography was the only independent variable that predicted the occurrence of postoperative coronary ischaemia after CEA. The odds ratio for coronary angiography (group A) indicated that when holding all other variables constant, a patient having preoperative coronary angiography before carotid surgery was 4 times less likely to have a cardiac ischaemic event after carotid surgery. No complications related to coronary angiography were observed and no cervical haematomas occurred in patients undergoing surgery under aspirin and clopidogrel in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic preoperative coronary angiography, possibly followed by PCI, significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative myocardial events after CEA in patients without clinical evidence of CAD.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Coronaria/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Stents , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Ecocardiografía , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Isquemia Miocárdica/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...