The Italian severe/uncontrolled asthma registry (RItA): A 12-month clinical follow-up.

BACKGROUND: follow-up studies on registries of severe/uncontrolled asthma (SUA) patients are scanty. OBJECTIVE: to analyze baseline and follow-up characteristics of SUA patients and their longitudinal patterns. METHODS: 180 adult patients (age ≥15 yrs) were investigated at baseline and 12-month follow-up through the Italian SUA registry (RItA). Latent transition analysis (LTA) was performed to detect cross-sectional SUA phenotypes and longitudinal patterns. Risk factors for longitudinal patterns were assessed through logistic regression. RESULTS: a significant/borderline improvement of asthma control outcomes in the last 2-4 weeks emerged at follow-up with respect to baseline for: daily activities limitations (Δ -16%), frequent diurnal symptoms (Δ -25%), uncontrolled asthma symptoms according to ACT (Δ -26%). Last 12-month use of oral corticosteroids was less frequent at follow-up than at baseline (Δ -25%). Health status improvement was confirmed by lung function test results. Through LTA, two longitudinal patterns were detected considering last 12-month control outcomes: "persistence/worsening" (53.9%), "under control/improvement" (46.1%). A lower likelihood of having "persistence/worsening" SUA was exhibited by patients under anti-IgE (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.84) and inhaled corticosteroids-bronchodilator association treatment (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01-1.26, borderline value), while a higher likelihood was shown by older age at first asthma diagnosis (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07). CONCLUSION: the implementation of a SUA registry, the availability of patient-level data and the application of an innovative longitudinal analysis allowed to observe a general improvement in asthma control, one year after baseline, and a lower risk of SUA "persistence/worsening" in patients under anti-IgE and regular ICS-bronchodilator association use.

ROSE: radiology, obstruction, symptoms and exposure - a Delphi consensus definition of the association of COPD and bronchiectasis by the EMBARC Airways Working Group.

INTRODUCTION: The coexistence of COPD and bronchiectasis seems to be common and associated with a worse prognosis than for either disease individually. However, no definition of this association exists to guide researchers and clinicians. METHODS: We conducted a Delphi survey involving expert pulmonologists and radiologists from Europe, Turkey and Israel in order to define the "COPD- [bronchiectasis] BE association".A panel of 16 experts from EMBARC selected 35 statements for the survey after reviewing scientific literature. Invited participants, selected on the basis of expertise, geographical and sex distribution, were asked to express agreement on the statements. Consensus was defined as a score of ≥6 points (scale 0 to 9) in ≥70% of answers across two scoring rounds. RESULTS: 102 (72.3%) out of 141 invited experts participated in the first round. Their response rate in the second round was 81%. The final consensus definition of "COPD-BE association" was: "The coexistence of (1) specific radiological findings (abnormal bronchial dilatation, airways visible within 1 cm of pleura and/or lack of tapering sign in ≥1 pulmonary segment and in >1 lobe) with (2) an obstructive pattern on spirometry ([forced expiratory volume in 1 s] FEV1/[forced vital capacity] FVC <0.7), (3) at least two characteristic symptoms (cough, expectoration, dyspnoea, fatigue, frequent infections) and (4) current or past exposure to smoke (≥10 pack-years) or other toxic agents (biomass, etc.)". These criteria form the acronym "ROSE" (Radiology, Obstruction, Symptoms, Exposure). CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi process formulated a European consensus definition of "COPD-BE association". We hope this definition will have broad applicability across clinical practice and research in the future.

Inhalation therapy in the next decade: Determinants of adherence to treatment in asthma and COPD.

Proceedings of the European Seminars in Respiratory Medicine course, Inhalation therapy in the next decade: Determinants of adherence to treatment in asthma and COPD, held in Taormina, Italy, on 3-4 March, 2017.

Efficacy and safety of aclidinium/formoterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone: a phase 3 COPD study.

The efficacy and safety of twice-daily aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate was compared with that of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in patients with stable, moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).AFFIRM COPD (Aclidinium and Formoterol Findings in Respiratory Medicine COPD) was a 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled study. Patients were randomised (1:1) to aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 µg twice-daily via Genuair/Pressair or salmeterol/fluticasone 50/500 µg twice-daily via Accuhaler. The primary end-point was peak forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at week 24. Other end-points included Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score at week 24, TDI and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) responders, COPD Assessment Test and SGRQ scores, assessment of COPD symptoms and exacerbations, use of reliever medication, and device preference. Adverse events were monitored throughout.In total, 933 patients were eligible (mean age 63.4 years, 65.1% male). Aclidinium/formoterol was superior to salmeterol/fluticasone in peak FEV1 and noninferior in TDI. Health status and reduction in exacerbation risk were similar in both groups. While both treatments were well tolerated, pneumonia occurred less frequently with aclidinium/formoterol than salmeterol/fluticasone.In stable COPD, aclidinium/formoterol significantly improved bronchodilation versus salmeterol/fluticasone, with equivalent benefits in symptom control and reduction in exacerbation risk. Both treatments were well tolerated and treatment-related adverse events were less common with aclidinium/formoterol.

Acute administration of bronchodilators on exercise tolerance in treated COPD patients.

Exercise intolerance is a major feature in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Bronchodilators increase endurance time (ET) and reduce dynamic hyperinflation (DH). We evaluated whether a single-dose of salbutamol/ipratropium + flunisolide (BD+ICS), added on top of the regular treatment, may improve ET in COPD patients. In a single-blind randomized crossover pilot trial, nebulised BD+ICS or placebo (PL) was administered 30 min before a constant load cardiopulmonary test, in 22 moderate-to-severe COPD patients (FEV1: 53.9% pred). ET was the primary outcome measured. BD+ICS did not improve ET or VO2 peak with respect to PL. BD+ICS increased pre-test FEV1 and pre-test Inspiratory Capacity but did not modify DH. In a retrospective analysis, patients were divided in Improvers (N=11) and Non-Improvers (N=11) according to the difference in ET between BD+ICS and PL (> 25 s). Improvers had a worst BODE index, a higher static hyperinflation and poorer Vd/Vt ratio at peak of exercise with respect to Non-Improvers. Improvers only had a significant increase from BD+ICS on pre-test FEV1 and IC. In conclusion, although a single-dose BD+ICS did not improve ET in COPD patients under regular treatment, a subgroup of more severe patients may have some benefit from that.

Beclomethasone dipropionate blunts allergen-induced early increase in urinary LTE4.

BACKGROUND: The inhibitory effect of corticosteroids (CS) on the secretions of cysteinyl-leukotrienes (Cys-LTs) in asthma is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of CS on allergen-induced increase in urinary leukotriene E4 (uLTE4) during early (EAR) and late (LAR) asthmatic responses in mild untreated asthmatics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nine subjects with mild untreated allergic asthma performed two allergen challenges, after 1-week treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP, 500 microg b.i.d) or placebo. Forced Expiratory Volume in one second 1 (FEV1) was monitored to assess EAR and LAR, and uLTE4 was measured before and during EAR and LAR. RESULTS: After placebo, uLTE4 increased significantly during EAR, but not during and after LAR, in comparison with baseline values. Beclomethasone dipropionate induced a significant attenuation of the uLTE4 increase during EAR, in comparison with placebo, in association with a good protection of LAR (P = 0.002) and a mild protection of EAR (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Beclomethasone dipropionate blunts the early increase in uLTE4 excretion due to allergen challenge, in association with a significant effect on the severity of LAR. These data support the hypothesis that inhaled CS may inhibit the allergen-induced release of cys-LTs in asthma.

Office spirometry can improve the diagnosis of obstructive airway disease in primary care setting.

INTRODUCTION: Spirometry may reveal pre-clinical abnormal airway function in asymptomatic subjects and allow a better definition of severity in clinically diagnosed asthma and COPD. The hypothesis of this study was that telespirometry might increase the diagnostic accuracy of asthma and COPD. METHODS: In the Italian "Alliance" study, 638 general practitioners (GPs) were trained to perform telespirometry and were asked to enroll the following categories of subjects: (a) current or ex-smokers without respiratory symptoms; (b) subjects with respiratory symptoms but without a pre-existing diagnosis of asthma or COPD; (c) subjects with a pre-existing clinical diagnosis of asthma; and (d) subjects with a pre-existing clinical diagnosis of COPD. Subjects completed a case report form (CRF) and performed telespirometry in the GP's office. Traces were sent by telephone to a Telespirometry Central Office, where they were interpreted by a pulmonary specialist, according to appropriately defined criteria. The results were returned in real time to the GP. RESULTS: Overall, 9312 subjects were recruited and 7262 (78%) performed an acceptable telespirometric examination and the CRF. In the asymptomatic group, 340/1437 (24%) of the telespirometries were abnormal (147 with moderate-to-severe airway obstruction, i.e. FEV(1) <80% of predicted). Among symptomatic subjects, 1433/3725 (38%) had abnormal telespirometries (682 with moderate-to-severe obstruction). Of the asthmatic subjects, 336/1285 (26%) had moderate-to-severe airway obstruction, while telespirometry was normal in 184/815 (23%) of the COPD group. CONCLUSION: Telespirometry, performed in a GP's office, can aid the diagnosis of obstructive airway diseases and could help GPs to better manage airway obstruction.

Biological markers in induced sputum of patients with different phenotypes of chronic airway obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by a combination of 3 different disorders, namely chronic asthma, chronic bronchitis and pulmonary emphysema, sometimes simultaneously present in the same subject. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to compare sputum inflammatory markers in patients with different phenotypes of chronic airway obstruction. METHODS: Forty-five subjects (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/vital capacity, FEV(1)/VC: 58.8 +/- 12.2%; FEV(1): 49.8 +/- 11.5% of predicted) were classified as chronic asthma (n = 10) or COPD patients (n = 35); the latter were further divided into patients with prevalent chronic bronchitis (n = 24) or prevalent pulmonary emphysema (n = 11) according to clinical history and functional evaluation, and underwent sputum induction and analysis of inflammatory cell and soluble mediators. RESULTS: Patients with chronic asthma showed higher sputum eosinophil percentages and eosinophilic cationic protein levels, and lower neutrophil percentages and neutrophil elastase levels than COPD patients. Neutrophil chemotactic activity in sputum supernatant was higher than the pool of normal subjects both in chronic asthma and COPD patients. No difference in sputum cell composition and levels of soluble mediators was observed between patients with chronic bronchitis and patients with pulmonary emphysema. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of airway inflammation in induced sputum of patients with chronic asthma is different from that of COPD patients with a similar FEV(1). Among COPD patients, however, the pattern of airway inflammation shows no difference between chronic bronchitis and patients with pulmonary emphysema, suggesting that these two clinically and functionally distinct phenotypes share a common inflammatory pattern as detected by induced sputum.

Magnitude of late asthmatic response to allergen in relation to baseline and allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia in mild asthmatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Late asthmatic response (LAR) to allergen challenge is a validated method for studying the pathogenesis of and new treatments for asthma in the laboratory. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the magnitude of allergen-induced LAR and clinical and biological determinants, including sputum and blood eosinophil percentages and eosinophil cationic protein concentrations. METHODS: Thirty-eight untreated mild asthmatic patients (mean age, 21.2 years) were selected for the presence of allergen-induced early asthmatic response (EAR) and LAR. Each patient measured methacholine responsiveness (provocation dose that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% [PD20FEV1]) at baseline, differential blood cell counts and eosinophil cationic protein levels in blood and induced sputum, and serum neutrophil chemotactic activity at baseline and 24 hours after allergen challenge. RESULTS: A correlation was found between LAR (as area under the curve [AUC]) and sputum eosinophil percentages at baseline (r = 0.51; P = .001) and 24 hours after allergen challenge (r = 0.44; P < .007). Furthermore, we found significant correlations between AUC LAR and AUC EAR, baseline methacholine PD20FEV1, baseline blood eosinophil percentages, and baseline serum neutrophil chemotactic activity. A stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the stronger determinants of AUC LAR were baseline sputum eosinophilia and AUC EAR. CONCLUSION: Baseline sputum eosinophilia and functional findings are determinants of the magnitude of allergen-induced LAR.

Tiotropium and exercise training in COPD patients: effects on dyspnea and exercise tolerance.

BACKGROUND: Exercise training improves exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Tiotropium 18 microg once daily induces sustained bronchodilation throughout the day and reduces hyperinflation, one of the pathophysiological factors contributing to exertional dyspnea in COPD patients. AIM: To determine whether tiotropium enhances the effects of exercise training in patients with COPD. DESIGN: Multicenter, 25 week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. SETTING: Twelve Italian Pulmonary Units practicing pulmonary rehabilitation. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: Two hundred thirty four COPD patients (196 males; mean age: 67.4 +/- 7.6; forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1): 41.4 +/- 13.0% predicted) were randomised to tiotropium 18 microg or placebo inhalation capsules taken once daily. Both groups underwent a 8 week pulmonary rehabilitation program (PR) consisting of 3 exercise training session per week. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline, at the end of PR and after 12 weeks, patients completed pulmonary function testing, six minute walking test (6MWT), the Baseline and Transition Dyspnea Index (BDI and TDI), and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). RESULTS: Relative to placebo, tiotropium had larger trough and post-study drug FEV1 responses on all test days. At the end of and 12 weeks following PR, patients on tiotropium showed no statistically significant differences in 6MWT compared to patients on placebo. Compared to the period immediately prior to PR, the mean improvement in 6MWT was only 29.7 meters (7.1%) for the combined cohort. Mean TDI focal scores at the end of PR were 3.60 for tiotropium and 2.25 for placebo (p < 0.01). At 12 weeks after PR, TDI focal scores were 2.71 for tiotropium and 2.11 for placebo (p = 0.16). Reduction in all four SGRQ component scores, indicating an improvement in health-related quality of life, was observed for the tiotropium group over the duration of the study compared to placebo but the differences were not statistically significant. During the study period, there were fewer exacerbations and exacerbation days in the tiotropium group. CONCLUSION: Although significant improvements were observed with perceived dyspnea, compared to placebo, the addition of tiotropium to pulmonary rehabilitation did not improve the 6MWT.

Asthma control in patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis receiving add-on montelukast therapy for 12 months: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Montelukast, a potent leukotriene receptor antagonist, is approved for treatment of both asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR). No studies to date have examined whether montelukast can improve asthma control over a long period of time in patients with seasonal AR and asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate asthma control and use of asthma-related medical resources by patients with inadequately controlled mild to moderate persistent asthma and seasonal AR who required addition of montelukast as part of routine care. METHODS: This multicenter, 24-month, pre-post retrospective observational study included patients receiving current inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy (alone or in combination with long-acting beta-agonist [LABA]), who received add-on treatment with montelukast for 12 consecutive months. The incidence of asthma attacks, defined as emergency department visit, hospitalization, or oral corticosteroid use for asthma, was compared for the year before and the year after addition of montelukast to therapy. RESULTS: For the 696 patients from Italy, Poland, and Spain who were included in the analyses, the proportion of patients experiencing an asthma attack declined from 31.5% in the year before to 10.1% (p < 0.001) the year after addition of montelukast to therapy. Proportions of patients with an asthma-related emergency room visit, hospitalization, and oral corticosteroid use declined from 18.7% to 3.9%, from 5.2% to 1.4%, and from 17.5% to 5.9% (all p < 0.01), respectively. The incidence of these outcomes declined in all three countries, regardless of baseline asthma severity or asthma therapy (ICS alone or ICS + LABA). Important study limitations include the possibility of selection bias or missing medical chart data in this retrospective study design. Also noteworthy is the inclusion of only those patients who remained persistent with montelukast therapy. Therefore, the results of the study are relevant for patients who remain persistent with montelukast therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of montelukast to current ICS therapy improved long-term asthma control and resulted in substantial reductions in asthma-related resource use by patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma and concomitant seasonal AR who were persistent with montelukast therapy in this retrospective observational study.

Inhaled fluticasone propionate is effective as well as oral prednisone in reducing sputum eosinophilia during exacerbations of asthma which do not require hospitalization.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether fluticasone propionate (FP) is effective as well as prednisone (P) in reducing sputum eosinophilia and in improving airway obstruction due to asthma exacerbations not requiring hospitalization. We measured, in a parallel-group, double-blind double-dummy, randomized study, sputum and blood inflammatory cell counts and soluble mediators in 37 asthmatic subjects during a spontaneous exacerbation of asthma (Visit 1) and after a 2 week (Visit 2) treatment with inhaled FP (1000microg bid) (Group A, n=18) or a reducing course of oral P (Group B, n=19). Asthma exacerbation was accompanied by sputum eosinophilia (eosinophils >2%) in almost all patients (95%). FP improved FEV(1) (from 53.9%+/-16.8 at Visit 1 to 76.4%+/-21.2 at Visit 2, p=0.0001) and reduced the percentage of sputum eosinophils (from 38%[0-78] to 3%[1-31, p=0.0008) as well as oral P (FEV(1): from 51.5%+/-14.4 to 83.6%+/-21.1, p=0.0001; sputum eosinophils: from 52%[1-96] to 11%[0-64], p=0.0003). At Visit 2, sputum eosinophils were significantly lower in Group A than in Group B. P but not FP induced significant decrease in blood and sputum ECP. Oxygen saturation, PEF variability, symptom score and use of rescue medication similarly improved in both groups. We conclude that FP is effective at least as well as P in reducing sputum eosinophilia and in improving airway obstruction due to asthma exacerbation. However, the cost/effectiveness ratio of this option should be further evaluated.

Analysis of sputum cell counts during spontaneous moderate exacerbations of asthma in comparison to the stable phase.

BACKGROUND: Acute airway inflammation is considered to characterize asthma exacerbations, but its specific cellular pattern has not yet been completely evaluated. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of sputum eosinophilia during acute asthma exacerbations of moderate severity, compared with a stable phase of the disease, and to assess the concordance between changes in pulmonary function and sputum eosinophilia in the period between exacerbation and post exacerbation. METHODS: We compared sputum and blood inflammatory cell counts in 29 asthmatic subjects during a spontaneous moderate exacerbation of asthma (visit 1) with sputum and blood cell counts measured 4 weeks after the resolution of asthma exacerbation (visit 2). At visit 1, all subjects required an appropriate 1 week treatment with oral corticosteroids. RESULTS: At visit 1, all subjects were able to collect spontaneous sputum, whereas at visit 2 sputum was induced by inhalation of hypertonic saline (NaCl 3, 4, and 5%, 10 minutes each) with beta2-agonist pretreatment. Asthma exacerbation was accompanied by a significant increase in sputum eosinophil percentages compared with levels after exacerbation [25% (1-78) versus 4% (0-23), p<0.05). Only four subjects showed low sputum eosinophil percentages during exacerbation, and these showed no differences in main clinical findings with respect to subjects with sputum eosinophilia. At visit 2, the stability of asthma was assessed on the basis of PEF, FEV1, symptoms, and use of rescue beta2-agonist. Asthma was defined as stable in 21 out of 29 subjects. Sputum eosinophil percentages fell significantly between visit 1 and visit 2 in both stable and unstable patients, but at visit 2 sputum eosinophil percentages were still high in subjects with unstable asthma. In patients who proved to be stable at visit 2, there was a significant correlation between the changes recorded in sputum eosinophil percentages and in FEV1 between the two visits (rho: 0.723, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Sputum cosinophil but not neutrophil percentages increase in most asthmatic subjects during moderate exacerbation of asthma. Changes in the degree of airway eosinophilic inflammation are related to changes in the severity of airway obstruction during asthma exacerbation.

Induced sputum is a reproducible method to assess airway inflammation in asthma.

To evaluate the reproducibility of induced sputum analysis, and to estimate the sample size required to obtained reliable results, sputum was induced by hypertonic saline inhalation in 29 asthmatic subjects on two different days. The whole sample method was used for analysis, and inflammatory cells were counted on cytospin slides. Reproducibility, expressed by intra-class correlation coefficients, was good for macrophages (+0.80), neutrophils (+0.85), and eosinophils (+0.87), but not for lymphocytes (+0.15). Detectable differences were 5.5% for macrophages, 0.6% for lymphocytes, 5.2% for neutrophils, and 3.0% for eosinophils. We conclude that analysis of induced sputum is a reproducible method to study airway inflammation in asthma. Sample sizes greater than ours give little improvement in the detectable difference of eosinophil percentages.

Ozone exposure increases eosinophilic airway response induced by previous allergen challenge.

We investigated whether exposure to ozone (O(3)) 24 hours after an allergen challenge test would increase airway eosinophilia induced by allergen in subjects with mild asthma with late airway response. Twelve subjects with mild atopic asthma participated in a randomized, single-blind study. Subjects underwent allergen challenge 24 hours before a 2 hour exposure to O(3) (0.27 ppm) or filtered air. Pulmonary function was monitored during the allergen challenge and after the exposure to O(3) or air. Six hours later, induced sputum was collected. After 4 weeks, the experiment was repeated with the same subjects. Allergen induced a comparable late airway response in both challenges. O(3) exposure induced a significant decrease in FVC, FEV(1), and vital capacity, and was associated with a significant increase in total symptom score compared with air exposure. The percentage of eosinophils, but not the percentage of neutrophils, in induced sputum was significantly higher after exposure to O(3) than after exposure to air (p = 0.04). These results indicate that O(3) exposure after a late airway response elicited by allergen challenge can potentiate the eosinophilic inflammatory response induced by the allergen challenge itself in subjects with mild atopic asthma. This observation may help explain the synergistic effect of air pollution and allergen exposure in the exacerbation of asthma.