The pattern of tumor progression on first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor-based systemic therapy for Chinese advanced hepatocellular carcinoma -CLEAP 004 study.

Background: For decades, stratification criteria for first-line clinical studies have been highly uniform. However, there is no principle or consensus for restratification after systemic treatment progression based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The aim of this study was to assess the patterns of disease progression in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not eligible for surgical intervention, following the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: This is a retrospective study that involved patients with inoperable China liver stage (CNLC) IIIa and/or IIIb. The patients were treated at eight centers across China between January 2017 and October 2022. All patients received at least two cycles of first-line treatment containing immune checkpoint inhibitors. The patterns of disease progression were assessed using RECIST criteria 1.1. Different progression modes have been identified based on the characteristics of imaging progress. The study's main outcome measures were post-progression survival (PPS) and overall survival (OS). Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method to compare the difference among the four groups. Subgroup analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of different immunotherapy combinations. Variations in the efficacy of immunotherapy have also been noted across patient groups exhibiting alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels equal to or exceeding 400ng/mL, in contrast to those with AFP levels below 400ng/mL. Results: The study has identified four distinct patterns of progress, namely p-IIb, p-IIIa, p-IIIb, and p-IIIc. Diverse patterns of progress demonstrate notable variations in both PPS and OS. The group p-IIb had the longest PPS of 12.7m (95% 9.3-16.1) and OS 19.6m (95% 15.6-23.5), the remaining groups exhibited p-IIIb at PPS 10.5 months (95%CI: 7.9-13.1) and OS 19.2 months (95%CI 15.1-23.3). Similarly, p-IIIc at PPS 5.7 months (95%CI: 4.2-7.2) and OS 11.0 months (95%CI 9.0-12.9), while p-IIIa at PPS 3.4 months (95%CI: 2.7-4.1) and OS 8.2 months (95%CI 6.8-9.5) were also seen. Additional stratified analysis was conducted and showed there were no differences of immunotherapy alone or in combination in OS (HR= 0.92, 95%CI: 0.59-1.43, P=0.68) and PPS (HR= 0.88, 95%CI: 0.57-1.36, P=0.54); there was no significant difference in PPS (HR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.55-1.12, P=0.15) and OS (HR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.61-1.24, P=0.39) for patients with AFP levels at or over 400ng/mL. However, it was observed that patients with AFP levels above 400ng/mL experienced a shorter median progression of PPS (8.0 months vs. 5.0 months) after undergoing immunotherapy. Conclusion: In this investigation of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma among Chinese patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, we identified four distinct progression patterns (p-IIb, p-IIIa, p-IIIb and p-IIIc) that showed significant differences in PPS and OS. These findings demonstrate the heterogeneity of disease progression and prognosis after immunotherapy failure. Further validation in large cohorts is necessary to develop prognostic models that integrate distinct progression patterns to guide subsequent treatment decisions. Additionally, post-immunotherapy progression in patients with AFP levels ≥400ng/mL indicates a shortened median PPS. These findings provide valuable insights for future personalized treatment decisions.

Surgical treatment improves overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastases after conversion therapy: a multicenter retrospective study.

Systemic therapy is typically the primary treatment choice for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with extrahepatic metastases. Some patients may achieve partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) with systemic treatment, leading to the possibility of their primary tumor becoming resectable. This study aimed to investigate whether these patients could achieve longer survival through surgical resection of their primary tumor. We retrospectively collected data from 150 HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases treated at 15 different centers from January 1st, 2015, to November 30th, 2022. We evaluated their overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS) and analyzed risk factors impacting both OS and PFS were analyzed. Patients who received surgical treatment had longer OS compared to those who did not (median OS 16.5 months vs. 11.3 months). However, there was no significant difference in progression-free survival between the two groups. Portal vein invasion (P = 0.025) was identified as a risk factor for poor prognosis in patients, while effective first-line treatment (P = 0.039) and surgical treatment (P = 0.005) were protective factors. No factors showed statistical significance in the analysis of PFS. Effective first-line treatment (P = 0.027) and surgical treatment (P = 0.006) were both independent protective factors for prolonging patient prognosis, while portal vein invasion was an independent risk factor (P = 0.044). HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases who achieve PR/CR with conversion therapy may experience longer OS through surgical treatment. This study is the first to analyze the clinical outcomes of patients receiving surgical treatment for HCC with extrahepatic metastases.

The emerging therapies are reshaping the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: Given the superior performance of various therapies over sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the absence of direct comparisons, it is crucial to explore the efficacy of these treatments in phase III randomized clinical trials. Objectives: The goal is to identify which patients are most likely to benefit significantly from these emerging therapies, contributing to more personalized and informed clinical decision-making. Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data sources and methods: PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and international conference databases have been searched from 1 January 2010 to 1 December 2023. Results: After screening, 17 phase III trials encompassing 18 treatments were included. In the whole-population network meta-analysis, the newly first-line tremelimumab plus durvalumab (Tre + Du) was found to be comparable with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo + Beva) in providing the best overall survival (OS) benefit [hazard ratio (HR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-1.92]. Concerning OS benefits, sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar (Sint + Beva), camrelizumab plus rivoceranib (Camre + Rivo), and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (Lenva + Pemb) appear to exhibit similar effects to Tre + Du and Atezo + Beva. In the context of progression-free survival, Atezo + Beva seemed to outperform Tre + Du (HR: 0.66 CI: 0.49-0.87), while the effects are comparable to Sint + Beva, Camre + Rivo, and Lenva + Pemb. Upon comparison between Asia-Pacific and non-Asia-Pacific cohorts, as well as between hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected and non-HBV-infected populations, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments seemed to exhibit heightened efficacy in the Asia-Pacific group and among individuals with HBV infection. However, combined ICI-based therapies did not show more effectiveness than molecular-targeted drugs in patients without macrovascular invasion and/or extrahepatic spread. As for grades 3-5 adverse events, combined therapies showed comparable safety to sorafenib and lenvatinib. Conclusion: Compared with sorafenib and lenvatinib, combination therapies based on ICIs significantly improved the prognosis of advanced HCC and demonstrated similar safety. At the same time, the optimal treatment approach should be tailored to individual patient characteristics, such as etiology, tumor staging, and serum alpha-fetoprotein levels. With lower incidence rates of treatment-related adverse events and non-inferior efficacy compared to sorafenib, ICI monotherapies should be prioritized as a first-line treatment approach for patients who are not suitable candidates for ICI-combined therapies. Trial registration: PROSPERO, CRD42022288172.

Lay summary/Key points The efficiency of various systemic therapies in advanced HCC patients with specific characteristics remains to be explored. This study revealed that the efficacy of ICI combined therapies is influenced by factors such as tumor staging, etiology, patient demographics, and more. Additionally, ICI monotherapies should be prioritized as a first-line treatment approach for patients who are not suitable candidates for ICI combined therapies. Complementing to recent guidelines, this study indicated that several critical factors needed to be took into consideration for patients with advanced HCC.

Efficacy and Safety of Conversion Surgery for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of conversion surgery for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). Patients and Methods: Data from 172 HCC patients treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2016 and June 2021 with effective assessment of HAIC treatment response were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical pathological data, treatment process, survival, and occurrence of adverse events were recorded. Patients were grouped according to whether they achieved imaging remission after HAIC, underwent conversion surgery, and met the surgical resection criteria. Efficacy and safety were analyzed. Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the imaging remission group were 8.6 months and 26.3 months, respectively, which were longer than the 4.6 months (P<0.05) and 15.6 months (P<0.05) in the nonremission group. Compared with 6.7 months and 18.9 months in the HAIC maintenance group, the median PFS and median OS in the conversion surgery group were 16.5 months (P<0.05) and 45.0 months (P<0.05), but there was a higher risk of treatment-related hemoglobin decrease, alanine aminotransferase increase, aspartate aminotransferase increase, and total bilirubin increase (P<0.05). The risk of biliary fistula, abdominal hemorrhage and ascites in the HAIC conversion surgery group was higher than that of the single surgery group (P<0.05). Compared with the conversion surgery group, the median PFS and median OS of patients in the HAIC maintenance group who met the resection criteria were shorter: 7.1 months (P<0.05) and 21.7 months (P<0.05), respectively. All adverse events during the study were less than moderate, and no toxicity-related deaths occurred during follow-up. Conclusion: HAIC-based conversion therapy had acceptable toxic effects and could effectively stabilize intrahepatic lesions in advanced HCC, improve the survival benefit of patients, and provide some patients with the opportunity for conversion surgery to further improve prognosis.

Change of indocyanine green clearance ability and liver function after transcatheter intra-arterial therapies and its impact on outcomes of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Indocyanine green (ICG) clearance test is a classical measurement of hepatic reserve, which involves surgical safety and patient recovery of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The authors aim to compare effects of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) on liver function and outcomes of subsequent hepatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: HCC patients receiving HAIC/TACE in SYSUCC with repeated ICG clearance tests were retrospectively enrolled. ICG eliminating rate (ICG-K), ICG retention rate at 15 min (ICG-R15) and ordinary laboratory tests were collected. Peri-therapeutic changes of values were compared between the groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighing (IPTW) were employed to validate findings. Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed in patients with subsequent curative hepatectomy. RESULTS: Two hundred and four patients treated with HAIC ( n =130) and TACE ( n =74) were included. ΔICG-R15 was greater in the HAIC arm before matching (mean, 3.8% vs. 0.7%, P <0.001), after PSM (mean, 4.7% vs. 1.1%, P =0.014) and IPTW (mean, 2.0% vs. -3.6%, P <0.001). No difference was found for ΔALB, ΔALBI, ΔTBIL, ΔALT, ΔAST and ΔPT-INR. Multivariable analyses revealed elder age, cirrhosis, HAIC, greater ΔTBIL and ΔALBI were associated with deteriorating ICG-R15. Among those (105 for HAIC and 48 for TACE) receiving hepatectomy, occurrence of grade B/C PHLF (4.8% vs. 8.3%, P =0.616), OS (median, unreached vs. unreached, P =0.94) and RFS (median, 26.7 vs. 17.1 months, P =0.096) were comparable between the two arms. In subgroup analyses, preoperative HAIC yield superior RFS (median, 26.7 vs. 16.2 months, P =0.042) in patients with baseline ICG-R15 less than or equal to 10%. CONCLUSION: Preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC caused apparent impairment of ICG clearance ability than TACE yet comparable impact on liver function and post-hepatectomy outcomes.

Prognoses of Patients Treated With Surgical Therapy Versus Continuation of Local-Plus-Systemic Therapy Following Successful Down-Staging of Intermediate-Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Real-World Study.

BACKGROUND: The difference in the prognoses between treatment with surgical therapy and continuation of local-plus-systemic therapy following successful down-staging of intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. METHODS: Data of 405 patients with intermediate-advanced HCC treated at 30 hospitals across China from January 2017 to July 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received local-plus-systemic therapy and were divided into the surgical (n = 100) and nonsurgical groups (n = 305) according to whether they received surgical therapy. The differences between long-term prognoses of the 2 groups were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed in 173 HCC patients who met the criteria for surgical resection following down-staging. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis of all patients showed that surgical therapy, hazard ratio (HR): 0.289, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.136-0.613) was a protective factor for overall survival (OS), but not for event-free survival (EFS). Multivariable analysis of 173 intermediate-advanced HCC patients who met the criteria for surgical resection after conversion therapy showed that surgical therapy (HR: 0.282, 95% CI, 0.121-0.655) was a protective factor for OS, but not for EFS. Similar results were obtained after propensity score matching. For patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B (HR: 0.171, 95% CI, 0.039-0.751) and C (HR: 0.269, 95% CI, 0.085-0.854), surgical therapy was also a protective factor for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, for patients with intermediate-advanced HCC who underwent local-plus-systemic therapies, surgical therapy is a protective factor for long-term prognosis and can prolong OS, and for those who met the surgical resection criteria after conversion therapy, surgical therapy is recommended.

Systemic Inflammation Score Using Pretherapeutic Inflammatory Markers to Predict Prognosis for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients After Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy.

Purpose: To assess the clinical value of the pretherapeutic systemic inflammation score (SIS) in predicting the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). Methods: From February 2016 to April 2021, 415 advanced HCC patients who underwent HAIC at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were randomly divided into training (n = 277) and validation cohorts (n = 138) and analyzed. The aspartate aminotransferase-alanine aminotransferase ratio (AAR), lymphocyte × albumin (L × A), and neutrophil × monocyte (N × M) were used to construct the SIS score based on a multivariate Cox analysis in the training cohort. A nomogram consisting of the SIS score was created and evaluated by calibration plot, areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses revealed that the SIS score was an independent predictor of OS. A high SIS score was associated with large tumor size (P < 0.05), multiple lesions (P < 0.01), high AFP level (P < 0.01), extrahepatic metastasis (P < 0.05), and advanced BCLC stage (P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the patients with a high SIS had shorter OS than those with a low SIS in both the non-PD (p = 0.015) and PD group (p = 0.023). The calibration plots showed good concordance between the nomogram's prediction and the actual observations in both the training and validation cohorts. In the training cohort, the AUCs of the nomogram predicting the 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 0.749 and 0.739, respectively; in the validation cohort, they were 0.760 and 0.681, respectively. Based on the AUC and DCA, the nomogram showed better predictive ability than other predictors. Conclusion: The pretherapeutic SIS score is a potential prognostic predictor for HCC patients undergoing HAIC.

Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy.

Purpose: The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) versus tenofovir (TDF) on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent FOLFOX-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) remains unclear. In this study, we compared the outcomes between ETV and TDF in HBV-related advanced HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC. Methods: A total of 683 patients diagnosed with HBV-related HCC who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC and received TDF or ETV between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), HBV reactivation, and liver function of patients were compared between the ETV and TDF groups by propensity score matching (PSM). Results: In the PSM cohort, for all patients and patients with ≥ 4 cycles of FOLFOX-HAIC, the median OS in the ETV group (15.2 months, 95% CI: 13.0-17.4 months; 16.6 months, 95% CI: 14.8-18.5 months; respectively) was shorter than that in the TDF group (23.0 months, 95% CI: 10.3-35.6 months; 27.3 months, 95% CI: 16.5-NA months; p=0.024, p=0.028; respectively). The median PFS in the ETV group (8.7 months, 95% CI: 7.9-9.5 months; 8.9 months, 95% CI: 8.0-9.8 months; respectively) was also shorter than that in the TDF group (11.8 months, 95% CI: 8.0-15.6 months; 12.7 months, 95% CI: 10.8-14.6 months; p=0.036, p=0.025; respectively). The rate of HBV reactivation in the ETV group was higher than that in the TDF group (12.3% vs 6.3%, p=0.040; 16.5% vs 6.2%, p=0.037, respectively). For liver function, the rate of ALBI grade that remained stable or improved in the ETV group was lower than that in the TDF group (44.6% vs 57.6%, p=0.006; 37.2% vs 53.8%, p=0.019, respectively). Conclusion: Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a better prognosis, lower proportion of HBV reactivation, and better preservation of liver function in advanced HBV-HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC, especially those who received ≥ 4 cycles.

Comparison of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with mFOLFOX vs. first-line systemic chemotherapy in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Background: Systemic chemotherapy (SC) remains the only first-line treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been recently proven to be effective in managing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hence, our study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of HAIC in treating unresectable iCCA patients. Methods: We reviewed 146 patients with unresectable iCCA who had received HAIC or SC between March 2016 and March 2022 in a retrospective manner. Outcomes of patients and safety were compared between the HAIC and SC groups. Results: There were 75 and 71 patients in the HAIC and SC groups, respectively. The median OS in the HAIC and SC groups was 18.0 and 17.8 months (p = 0.84), respectively. The median PFS in the HAIC and SC groups was 10.8 and 11.4 months (p = 0.59), respectively. However, the HAIC group had significantly longer intrahepatic progression-free survival (IPFS) than the SC group (p = 0.035). The median IPFS in the HAIC and SC groups was 13.7 and 11.4 months, respectively. According to the OS (p = 0.047) and PFS (p = 0.009), single-tumor patients in the HAIC group appeared to benefit more. In addition, the overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was lower in the HAIC group than that in the SC group. Conclusion: Our study revealed that HAIC was a safe and effective therapeutic regimen for unresectable iCCA with better intrahepatic tumor control when compared to SC. Meanwhile, patients with single tumor were more likely to benefit from HAIC than SC.

Survival benefit and impact of adjuvant therapies following FOLFOX-HAIC-based conversion therapy with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the conversion therapies of FOLFOX-HAIC for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) have dramatically increased the tumor responses and conversion rate; thus, the prognosis of uHCC patients was expected to be prolonged. However, the postoperative recurrence of uHCC patients who successfully underwent conversion therapies stayed high. The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of postoperatively adjuvant therapy in treating uHCC patients who received FOLFOX-HAIC-based conversion therapy. METHODS: In this real-world retrospective study, uHCC patients who received FOLFOX-HAIC-based conversion therapy were included. The recurrence-free survival (RFS), as primary outcomes, was compared between patients who received adjuvant therapy (AT group) or non-adjuvant therapy (nAT group) using survival analysis and Cox regression. Imbalances in baseline clinical features between the two groups were adjusted through propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: Between January 2016 and December 2022, 204 uHCC patients who received FOLFOX-HAIC-based conversion therapy were included and assigned into AT group (n = 47) and nAT group (n = 157), respectively. The median RFS was significantly longer in the AT group than the nAT group before adjustment [19.2 vs. 10.8 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.584; 95% CI, 0.383-0.892; P = 0.028], after PSM and after IPTW. Subsequent subgroup analyses revealed the RFS of adjuvant therapy was best in uHCC patients with younger than 60 years, macrovascular invasion, and positive hepatitis B surface antigen. CONCLUSION: Postoperatively, adjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival outcomes compared with non-adjuvant therapy after FOLFOX-HAIC-based conversion therapy among uHCC patients, especially for patients with macrovascular invasion and positive hepatitis B surface antigen.

Survival benefit of preoperative hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin followed by hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Background: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX) demonstrated promising efficacy against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as an alleviative treatment. We aimed to explore the survival benefit of preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC and establish a predictive nomogram. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed data from 1251 HCC patients who underwent liver resection. 1027 patients received liver resection alone (LR group), and 224 patients were treated with FOLFOX-HAIC followed by liver resection (HLR group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted between the two groups. The nomogram was established based on the findings of the multivariable Cox regression analysis. Results: After Propensity score matching according to initial tumor characteristics, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 85.4, 72.0, and 67.2% in the LR group and 95.2, 84.7, and 75.9% in the HLR group, respectively (p = 0.014). After PSM according to preoperative tumor characteristics, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 87.9, 76.6, and 72.3% in the LR group and 95.4, 84.4, and 75.1% in the HLR group, respectively (p = 0.24). Harrell's C-indexes of the nomogram for OS prediction in patients with preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC were 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.86) in the training cohort and 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.93) in the validation cohort and the nomogram performed well-fitted calibration curves. Conclusion: Preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC is associated with a longer survival outcome for HCC patients. The novel nomogram efficiently predicted the OS of patients who underwent preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC.

Laparoscopic Hepatectomy versus Open Hepatectomy After Conversion Therapy Using Transarterial Chemoembolization or Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Patients with Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Background: Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) is more advantageous than open hepatectomy (OH) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, surgical methods of conversion resection for patients with HCC have not been compared. We aimed to compare LH with OH for HCC after conversion therapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 334 patients who underwent conversion resection between January 2016 and December 2020 at Sun Yat-sen University, China. Propensity score matching (PSM) of patients in a ratio of 1:2 was conducted, and 62 patients and 121 patients who underwent LH and OH, respectively, were matched. Results: The LH and OH groups differed at baseline in terms of ALT (P=0.008), AFP (P=0.042), largest tumor size (P=0.028), macrovascular invasion (P=0.006), BCLC stages (P=0.021), and CNLC stages (P=0.048). The incidences of postoperative complications before and after PSM were lower in the LH group than in the OH group (P=0.007 and 0.003, respectively). There were no significant differences in the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the two groups (P=0.79 and 0.8, respectively). According to the multivariable Cox regression analyses, the largest tumor size (P<0.0001) and tumor number (P=0.004) were significant and independent prognostic factors of OS. Conclusion: In our study, we found that LH is technically feasible and safe in patients after conversion therapy. Compared with OH, LH showed similar OS and RFS and was associated with fewer postoperative complications.

Systemic therapy with or without transcatheter intra-arterial therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world, multi-center study.

Background: Systemic therapy is the standard care of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), while transcatheter intra-arterial therapies (TRITs) were also widely applied to uHCC patients in Chinese practice. However, the benefit of additional TRIT in these patients is unclear. This study investigated the survival benefit of concurrent TRIT and systemic therapy used as first-line treatment for patients with uHCC. Methods: This real-world, multi-center retrospective study included consecutive patients treated at 11 centers accross China between September 2018 and April 2022. Eligible patients had uHCC of China liver cancer stages IIb to IIIb (Barcelona clinic liver cancer B or C stage), and received first-line systemic therapy with or without concurrent TRIT. Of 289 patients included, 146 received combination therapy and 143 received systemic therapy alone. The overall survival (OS), as primary outcomes, was compared between patients who received systemic therapy plus TRIT (combination group) or systemic therapy alone (systemic-only group) using survival analysis and Cox regression. Imbalances in baseline clinical features between the two groups were adjusted through propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Moreover, subgroup analysis was conducted based on the different tumor characteristics of enrolled uHCC patients. Results: The median OS was significantly longer in the combination group than the systemic-only group before adjustment [not reached vs. 23.9 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.561; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.366 to 0.861; P = 0.008], after PSM (HR, 0.612; 95% CI, 0.390 to 0.958; P = 0.031) and after IPTW (HR, 0.539; 95% CI, 0.116 to 0.961; P = 0.008). Subgroup analyses suggested the benefit of combining TRIT with systemic therapy was greatest in patients with liver tumors exceeding the up-to-seven criteria, with an absence of extrahepatic metastasis, or with alfa-fetoprotein ≥ 400 ng/ml. Conclusion: Concurrent TRIT with systemic therapy was associated with improved survival compared with systemic therapy alone as first-line treatment for uHCC, especially for patients with high-intrahepatic tumor load and no extrahepatic metastasis.

Development and validation of robust metabolism-related gene signature in the prognostic prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumours worldwide. Given metabolic reprogramming in tumours was a crucial hallmark, several studies have demonstrated its value in the diagnostics and surveillance of malignant tumours. The present study aimed to identify a cluster of metabolism-related genes to construct a prediction model for the prognosis of HCC. Multiple cohorts of HCC cases (466 cases) from public datasets were included in the present analysis. (GEO cohort) After identifying a list of metabolism-related genes associated with prognosis, a risk score based on metabolism-related genes was formulated via the LASSO-Cox and LASSO-pcvl algorithms. According to the risk score, patients were stratified into low- and high-risk groups, and further analysis and validation were accordingly conducted. The results revealed that high-risk patients had a significantly worse 5-year overall survival (OS) than low-risk patients in the GEO cohort. (30.0% vs. 57.8%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.411; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.302-0.651; p < 0.001) This observation was confirmed in the external TCGA-LIHC cohort. (34.5% vs. 54.4%; HR 0.452; 95% CI, 0.299-0.681; p < 0.001) To promote the predictive ability of the model, risk score, age, gender and tumour stage were integrated into a nomogram. According to the results of receiver operating characteristic curves and decision curves analysis, the nomogram score possessed a superior predictive ability than conventional factors, which indicate that the risk score combined with clinicopathological features was able to achieve a robust prediction for OS and improve the individualized clinical decision making of HCC patients. In conclusion, the metabolic genes related to OS were identified and developed a metabolism-based predictive model for HCC. Through a series of bioinformatics and statistical analyses, the predictive ability of the model was approved.

Cholesterol and C-reactive protein prognostic score predicted prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors based interventional therapies for intermediate-to-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Serum cholesterol (CHO) and C-reactive protein (CRP) have been successfully used as prognostic predictors for several malignancies, respectively. However, the clinicopathological significance of CHO and CRP levels in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with ICIs-based hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) remains unclear. Serum CHO and CRP levels were measured for a total of 152 HCC patients that had been treated with ICIs-based HAIC from February 2019 to April 2020. Efficacy was evaluated according to tumor response and survival. The median OS was not reached in the CHO-low subgroup and 17.7 months in the CHO-high subgroup (P = 0.015). The median OS was not reached in the CRP-low subgroup and 20.0 months in the CRP-high subgroup (P = 0.010). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that both serum CHO and CRP levels were independent risk factors for the OS of HCC patients treated with ICIs-based HAIC (P < 0.05). Moreover, Cox regression analysis after Propensity Score Matching showed the similar results. CHO and CRP prognostic score (CCPS) combining CHO and CRP levels could significantly stratify HCC patients receiving ICIs-based HAIC into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk subgroups (P < 0.001). Patients in the risk subgroups reported similar disease control rates (P = 0.121) and significantly different overall response rates (low- vs intermediate- vs high-risk groups: 70.6 % vs 46.6 % vs 44.1 %, respectively, P = 0.038) according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). The results of this study support the association between CCPS high risk with the response and OS for HCC patients receiving ICIs-based HAIC.

Levels of pretreatment serum lipids predict responses to PD-1 inhibitor treatment in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: It has been identified that serum lipids can be used as prognostic biomarkers in several types of cancer and are associated with patient survival. We aimed to clarify the prognostic value of the serum lipids and to establish a novel effective nomogram for overall survival (OS) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) patients receiving anti-PD1 therapy. METHODS: Pretreatment serum lipids were retrospectively analyzed for prognostic value, including apolipoprotein B (APOB), apolipoproteinA-1 (APOA1), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides (TG), which were assessed for prediction accuracy using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Cox regression analysis with univariate and multivariate factors was used to identify prognostic factors predictive of OS, and prognostic nomograms were constructed. RESULTS: All the serum lipids showed good discriminatory ability in terms of OS (all P < 0.05), the higher the lipid levels, the better the prognosis, while APOA1 and TG were remarkable independent predictors for OS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 2.177,2.035; confidence interval, 1.393-3.402, 1.184-3.498; P = 0.001, P = 0.01). Four (CA19-9, APOA1, tumor number and TG) independent prognostic factors were chosen to generate the nomogram for OS. The area under the ROC curve at 1-year and 2-year consistently demonstrated that the predictive value of the nomogram was superior to serum lipids. CONCLUSION: In our study, serum lipid levels were used as a prognostic nomogram in the prediction of anti-PD-1 therapy efficacy in patients with iCCA.

The combination treatment strategy of lenvatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study.

PURPOSE: Lenvatinib is recommended as a first-line therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Combination therapy with local therapy (LT) or PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (PI) might improve the antitumor effect of lenvatinib. The objective of this study was to investigate the antitumor effect of lenvatinib-based combination therapies. METHODS: The study retrospectively analyzed 215 HCC patients who received lenvatinib therapy. The outcomes of patients treated with lenvatinib monotherapy as well as combination strategies were compared. Progression-free survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 was the primary endpoint, while PFS by mRECIST, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety were the secondary endpoints. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to overcome the bias of baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Compared with lenvatinib monotherapy, combination therapy prolonged PFS (by RECIST v1.1, 7.77 vs. 4.43 months, P = 0.045; by mRECIST, 6.97 vs. 5.27 months, P = 0.067). A higher ORR was also recorded in the combined-therapy group, according to both RECIST v1.1 (37 vs. 5%, P < 0.001) and mRECIST (53 vs. 11%, P < 0.001). Similar outcomes were obtained after PSM. Moreover, triple therapy (combined with both PI and LT) was significantly superior to dual therapy (combined with either PI or LT) in terms of better PFS according to RECIST v1.1 (8.90 vs. 6.43 months, P = 0.023). However, adverse events occurred in more patients receiving combined therapy and triple therapy. No difference was observed in OS between groups. CONCLUSION: Combination therapies based on lenvatinib were associated with significantly better PFS and tumor response rates than lenvatinib monotherapy in HCC patients.

A risk-based postresection follow-up strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: The optimal intervals for follow-up after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergo curative liver resection (LR) remain unclear. This study aimed to establish a risk-based post-resection follow-up strategy. METHODS: Patients that were diagnosed with HCC and received LR from three hospitals in China were included. The risk-based strategy was established based on the random survival forest model and compared with a fixed strategy both internally and externally. RESULTS: In total, 3447 patients from three hospitals were included. The authors' strategy showed superiority in the early detection of tumor relapse compared with fixed surveillance. Under fewer total visits, risk-based strategy achieved analogous survival time compared to the total 20 times follow-ups based on fixed strategy. Twelve total visits (five, three, one, two, and one visits in years 1-5, respectively) for American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer T1a stage patients, 13 total visits (five, four, one, two, and one visits in years 1-5, respectively) for T1b stage patients, 15 total visits (eight, three, three, zero, and one visits in years 1-5, respectively) for T2 stage patients, and 15 total visits (eight, four, one, one, and one visits in years 1-5, respectively) for T3 stage patients were advocated. The detailed follow-up arrangements were available to the public through an interactive website (https://sysuccfyz.shinyapps.io/RiskBasedFollowUp/). CONCLUSION: This risk-based surveillance strategy was demonstrated to detect relapse earlier and reduce the total number of follow-ups without compromising on survival. Based on the strategy and methodology of the authors, surgeons or patients could choose more intensive or flexible schedules depending on the requirements and economic conditions. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: A risk-based post-resection follow-up strategy was established by random survival forest model using a larger hepatocellular carcinoma population The strategy was demonstrated to detect tumor relapse earlier and reduce the total number of follow-ups without compromising on survival Our strategy and methodology could be widely applied by other surgeons and patients.

Liver Tumor Markers, HALP Score, and NLR: Simple, Cost-Effective, Easily Accessible Indexes for Predicting Prognosis in ICC Patients after Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the prognostic significance of liver tumor markers, the hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR); and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), for predicting the specific site of recurrence or metastasis after surgery in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: In total, 162 patients with pathologically proven ICC who underwent curative surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between April 2016 and April 2020 were analyzed. Clinicopathological characteristics were collected retrospectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Significant clinical factors were examined by univariate analysis and multivariate analysis and analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The cutoff values for the HALP score, NLR, and PLR were determined to be 43.63, 3.73, and 76.51, respectively, using the surv_cutpoint function of survminer using RFS as the target variable. In multivariate analysis, vascular invasion, pathology nerve tract invasion, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels were independent prognostic factors of OS, whereas the tumor number, pathology microvascular invasion, pathology differentiation, CA19-9 levels, and NLR were independent prognostic factors of RFS. For the whole recurrence analysis, the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) index exhibited the largest ROC curve area of all (AUC = 0.590), and the alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) index exhibited the smallest ROC curve area (AUC = 0.530). The HALP score exhibited the largest ROC curve area of all in predicting intrahepatic recurrence (AUC = 0.588), the NLR showed the best predictive value in predicting lymph node metastasis (AUC = 0.703), and the AUC of the CA19-9 index was the largest of all variables in predicting distant metastasis (AUC = 0.619). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that CA19-9, CEA, HALP score, and NLR are easily accessible, reliable, cost-effective indexes for predicting the specific site of recurrence or metastasis after surgery in ICC patients. Patients with high HALP scores and NLR have a higher risk of intrahepatic and lymph node metastasis recurrence.

Inflammation-Based Scores Predict Responses to PD-1 Inhibitor Treatment in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Purpose: Inflammatory response is related to tumor progression and patient survival. We aimed to clarify the prognostic value of the inflammation-based scores in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients receiving anti-PD1 therapy. Patients and Methods: A total of 73 patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy from February 2019 to February 2021 were included in the study. Representative inflammation-based prognostic scores, including C-reactive protein (CRP), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-CRP ratio (LCR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), CRP-to-albumin ratio (CAR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), and prognostic index (PI), were assessed for prediction accuracy using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC). All the ten inflammation-based prognostic scores were measured before receiving anti-PD1 therapy. Results: All the ten inflammation-based prognostic scores showed good discriminatory ability in terms of overall survival (OS) (all P < 0.01), the higher the score, the worse the prognosis, while the CRP score was a remarkable independent predictor for OS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 6.032; confidence interval, 2.467-14.752; P < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months consistently demonstrated that the predictive value of the CRP score was superior to other inflammation-based scores. Conclusion: Inflammation-based scores predict the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with ICC and CRP score superior to the other inflammation-based prognostic scores in terms of predictive ability.