RESUMEN
ALK-rearranged RCC refractory to several lines of treatment has a durable response when treated with alectinib.
Asunto(s)
Quinasa de Linfoma Anaplásico , Carbazoles , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Reordenamiento Génico , Neoplasias Renales , Piperidinas , Humanos , Quinasa de Linfoma Anaplásico/genética , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Carbazoles/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , FemeninoRESUMEN
Approximately 65% of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are diagnosed at a localized stage. We investigated the chromosome 5q gain impact on disease-free survival (DFS) in RCC patients. Overall, 676 patients with stages 1-2 RCC and having cytogenetic analysis were included. Gain of 5q was observed in 108 patients, more frequently in clear cell (ccRCC) than non-clear cell tumors. Gain of 5q is likely an independent prognostic factor since the concerned patients had a decreased recurrence risk in stages 1-2 RCC, confirmed in multivariable analysis. Detecting 5q gain could enhance recurrence risk assessment, allowing tailored post-surgery surveillance, and reducing unnecessary treatments.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , CromosomasRESUMEN
Bladder cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed genitourinary malignancies. For many years, the primary treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) was predicated on the use of platinum-based chemotherapy. More recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were approved by regulatory agencies such as the US FDA for use in both the first- and second-line settings. This review outlines the approved ICIs for mUC in the second-line setting and as an alternative to chemotherapy in the first-line setting, as well as the novel agents that have also been incorporated into the treatment of this malignancy. Single-agent ICIs are often used in second-line settings in mUC, and there are three drugs currently approved for those who progress after receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. In the first-line setting, the preferred treatment regimen remains cisplatin-based chemotherapy. However, single-agent ICI can be an alternative first-line treatment for those who are not candidates for cisplatin-based therapy. There are also clinical trials adding ICIs to chemotherapy as combination regimens. However, treatment for mUC has now expanded even beyond immunotherapy. Newer targeted agents such as erdafitinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor, and two antibody-drug conjugates, enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan, have been recently approved. As new drug agents are discovered, it will be important to assess both the treatment outcomes as well as the effects on patients' quality of life. Furthermore, integrating genetic and molecular information can help guide treatment decisions as next-generation sequencing is more commonly acquired during the evaluation of newly diagnosed patients with advanced and metastatic cancer.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Cisplatino , Calidad de Vida , Inmunoterapia , Toma de DecisionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Men with grade group 2 or 3 prostate cancer are often considered ineligible for active surveillance; some patients with grade group 2 prostate cancer who are managed with active surveillance will have early disease progression requiring radical therapy. This study aimed to investigate whether MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy can safely reduce treatment burden for patients with localised grade group 2 or 3 intermediate-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: In this single-arm, multicentre, phase 2b study conducted at eight health-care centres in the USA, we recruited men aged 50 years and older with unilateral, MRI-visible, primary, intermediate-risk, previously untreated prostate adenocarcinoma (prostate-specific antigen ≤20 ng/mL, grade group 2 or 3; tumour classification ≤T2) confirmed on combined biopsy (combining MRI-targeted and systematic biopsies). MRI-guided focused ultrasound energy, sequentially titrated to temperatures sufficient for tissue ablation (about 60-70°C), was delivered to the index lesion and a planned margin of 5 mm or more of normal tissue, using real-time magnetic resonance thermometry for intraoperative monitoring. Co-primary outcomes were oncological outcomes (absence of grade group 2 and higher cancer in the treated area at 6-month and 24-month combined biopsy; when 24-month biopsy data were not available and grade group 2 or higher cancer had occurred in the treated area at 6 months, the 6-month biopsy results were included in the final analysis) and safety (adverse events up to 24 months) in all patients enrolled in the study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01657942, and is no longer recruiting. FINDINGS: Between May 4, 2017, and Dec 21, 2018, we assessed 194 patients for eligibility and treated 101 patients with MRI-guided focused ultrasound. Median age was 63 years (IQR 58-67) and median concentration of prostate-specific antigen was 5·7 ng/mL (IQR 4·2-7·5). Most cancers were grade group 2 (79 [78%] of 101). At 24 months, 78 (88% [95% CI 79-94]) of 89 men had no evidence of grade group 2 or higher prostate cancer in the treated area. No grade 4 or grade 5 treatment-related adverse events were reported, and only one grade 3 adverse event (urinary tract infection) was reported. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: 24-month biopsy outcomes show that MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy is safe and effectively treats grade group 2 or 3 prostate cancer. These results support focal therapy for select patients and its use in comparative trials to determine if a tissue-preserving approach is effective in delaying or eliminating the need for radical whole-gland treatment in the long term. FUNDING: Insightec and the National Cancer Institute.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Anciano , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To elucidate which patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma have the highest risk for disease relapse after curative nephrectomy is challenging but is acutely relevant in the era of approved adjuvant therapies. Pathological and genetic markers were used to improve the University of California Los Angeles Integrated Staging System (UISS) for the risk stratification and prognostication of recurrence free survival (RFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Necrosis, sarcomatoid features, Rhabdoid features, chromosomal loss 9p, combined chromosomal loss 3p14q and microvascular invasion (MVI) were tested in univariable and multivariable analyses for their ability to improve the discriminatory ability of the UISS. RESULTS: In the development cohort, during the median follow-up time of 43.4 months (±SD 54.1 months), 50/240 (21%) patients developed disease recurrence. MVI (HR: 2.22; p = 0.013) and the combined loss of chromosome 3p/14q (HR: 2.89; p = 0.004) demonstrated independent association with RFS and were used to improve the assignment to the UISS risk category. In the current UISS high-risk group, only 7/50 (14%) recurrence cases were correctly identified; while in the improved system, 23/50 (45%) were correctly prognosticated. The concordance index meaningfully improved from 0.55 to 0.68 to distinguish patients at intermediate risk versus high risk. Internal validation demonstrated a robust prognostication of RFS. In the external validation cohort, there was no case with disease recurrence in the low-risk group, and the mean RFS times were 13.2 (±1.8) and 8.2 (±0.8) years in the intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adding MVI and combined chromosomal loss3p/14q to the UISS improves the ability to define the patient group with clear cell renal cell carcinomawho are at the highest risk for disease relapse after surgical treatment.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Femenino , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Los Angeles , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Nefrectomía , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), resistance to androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies, such as enzalutamide, remains an issue. Inactivation of inhibitory PTEN activates PI3K/AKT signaling and contributes to resistance to androgen deprivation therapy and poor outcomes. Therefore, dual targeting of AR and PI3K/AKT pathways may limit tumor growth and reverse resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase I study (NCT02215096), patients with PTEN-deficient mCRPC who progressed on prior enzalutamide received once-daily enzalutamide 160 mg plus PI3Kß inhibitor GSK2636771 at 300 mg initial dose, with escalation or de-escalation in 100-mg increments, followed by dose expansion. Primary objectives were to evaluate safety/tolerability, determine the recommended phase II dose, and assess the 12-week non-progressive disease (PD) rate. RESULTS: Overall, 37 patients were enrolled; 36 received ≥1 dose of GSK2636771 (200 mg: n = 22; 300 mg: n = 12; 400 mg: n = 2) plus 160 mg enzalutamide. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 5 patients (200 mg: n = 1; 300 mg: n = 2, 400 mg: n = 2). No new or unexpected adverse events or evidence of drug-drug interaction were observed. At the recommended dose of GSK2636771 (200 mg) plus enzalutamide, the 12-week non-PD rate was 50% (95% confidence interval: 28.2-71.8, n = 22); 1 (3%) patient achieved a radiographic partial response lasting 36 weeks. Four of 34 (12%) patients had prostate-specific antigen reduction of ≥50%. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was acceptable safety and tolerability with GSK2636771 plus enzalutamide in patients with PTEN-deficient mCRPC after failing enzalutamide, limited antitumor activity was observed.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Benzamidas , Humanos , Imidazoles , Masculino , Morfolinas , Nitrilos/uso terapéutico , Feniltiohidantoína , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/genética , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-aktRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation uses directional thermal ultrasound under magnetic resonance imaging thermometry feedback control for prostatic ablation. We report 12-month outcomes from a prospective multicenter trial (TACT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 115 men with favorable to intermediate risk prostate cancer across 13 centers were treated with whole gland ablation sparing the urethra and apical sphincter. The co-primary 12-month endpoints were safety and efficacy. RESULTS: In all, 72 (63%) had grade group 2 and 77 (67%) had NCCN® intermediate risk disease. Median treatment delivery time was 51 minutes with 98% (IQR 95-99) thermal coverage of target volume and spatial ablation precision of ±1.4 mm on magnetic resonance imaging thermometry. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 9 (8%) men. The primary endpoint (U.S. Food and Drug Administration mandated) of prostate specific antigen reduction ≥75% was achieved in 110 of 115 (96%) with median prostate specific antigen reduction of 95% and nadir of 0.34 ng/ml. Median prostate volume decreased from 37 to 3 cc. Among 68 men with pretreatment grade group 2 disease, 52 (79%) were free of grade group 2 disease on 12-month biopsy. Of 111 men with 12-month biopsy data, 72 (65%) had no evidence of cancer. Erections (International Index of Erectile Function question 2 score 2 or greater) were maintained/regained in 69 of 92 (75%). Multivariate predictors of persistent grade group 2 at 12 months included intraprostatic calcifications at screening, suboptimal magnetic resonance imaging thermal coverage of target volume and a PI-RADS™ 3 or greater lesion at 12-month magnetic resonance imaging (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The TACT study of magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound whole gland ablation in men with localized prostate cancer demonstrated effective tissue ablation and prostate specific antigen reduction with low rates of toxicity and residual disease.
Asunto(s)
Ultrasonido Enfocado de Alta Intensidad de Ablación , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Aim: To examine the prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in the adjuvant renal cell carcinoma setting. Materials & methods: Patients received adjuvant sunitinib (50 mg/day; 4 weeks on/2 weeks off) or placebo. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Results: In 609 patients, DFS was similar for baseline PLR <140 versus ≥140 overall (median: 6.4 vs 5.9 years; hazard ratio: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.7-1.2). A ≥25% decrease in PLR at week 4 overall was associated with longer DFS versus no change (hazard ratio: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.6-1.0). Conclusion: Baseline PLR was not prognostic for DFS with adjuvant sunitinib treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00375674 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Asunto(s)
Plaquetas , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Linfocitos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Renales/sangre , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Expression of carbonic-anhydrase IX (CAIX) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) makes it an attractive vaccine target. We developed a fusion-gene construct, granulocyte-macrophage (GM) colony-stimulating factor+CAIX, delivered by an adenoviral vector (Ad) into autologous dendritic cells (DCs) in this phase 1 study. The injected immature DCs were expected to stimulate an antigen-specific immune response against CAIX expressing RCC. Three dose-escalation cohorts (5, 15, and 50×10 cells/administration) were injected intradermally q2wk×3 doses based on a 3+3 design. The primary objective was the safety of the injections. Secondary objectives were immune responses using enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot, a serum biomarker panel, and clinical response. Fifteen patients with metastatic RCC were enrolled, and 9 patients received all 3 doses. No serious adverse events were seen. There were 3 (33%) patients with grade 1 fatigue, 1 of whom subsequently experienced grade 2 fatigue. One patient (11%) experienced grade 1-2 leukopenia. Only 1 patient (11%) experienced grade 2 flu-like symptoms. Of the 9 patients who received treatment, 1 expired of progressive disease, 2 patients were lost to follow-up and 6 patients are alive. Of the 6 patients, 5 have progressive disease, and 1 has completed treatment with stable disease at 27 months follow-up. Immune response measurements appeared more robust in higher dose cohorts, which appeared to be related to patients with stable disease at 3 months. These early data show that autologous immature DC-AdGMCAIX can be safely given to metastatic RCC patients without any serious adverse events with CAIX-specific immune response elicited by the treatment. These preliminary data support further study of Ad-GMCAIX, particularly with combination therapies that may enhance clinical activity.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Neoplasias/genética , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/administración & dosificación , Anhidrasa Carbónica IX/genética , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/genética , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Antígenos de Neoplasias/inmunología , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/genética , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/metabolismo , Anhidrasa Carbónica IX/inmunología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/inmunología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/metabolismo , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Renales/inmunología , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: ZEN-3694 is a bromodomain extraterminal inhibitor (BETi) with activity in androgen-signaling inhibitor (ASI)-resistant models. The safety and efficacy of ZEN-3694 plus enzalutamide was evaluated in a phase Ib/IIa study in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had progressive mCRPC with prior resistance to abiraterone and/or enzalutamide. 3+3 dose escalation was followed by dose expansion in parallel cohorts (ZEN-3694 at 48 and 96 mg orally once daily, respectively). RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were enrolled (N = 26 and 14 in dose expansion at low- and high-dose ZEN-3694, respectively). Thirty (40.0%) patients were resistant to abiraterone, 34 (45.3%) to enzalutamide, and 11 (14.7%) to both. ZEN-3694 dosing ranged from 36 to 144 mg daily without reaching an MTD. Fourteen patients (18.7%) experienced grade ≥3 toxicities, including three patients with grade 3 thrombocytopenia (4%). An exposure-dependent decrease in whole-blood RNA expression of BETi targets was observed (up to fourfold mean difference at 4 hours post-ZEN-3694 dose; P ≤ 0.0001). The median radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) was 9.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.6-12.9] and composite median radiographic or clinical progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.0-7.8). Median duration of treatment was 3.5 months (range, 0-34.7+). Lower androgen receptor (AR) transcriptional activity in baseline tumor biopsies was associated with longer rPFS (median rPFS 10.4 vs. 4.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: ZEN-3694 plus enzalutamide demonstrated acceptable tolerability and potential efficacy in patients with ASI-resistant mCRPC. Further prospective study is warranted including in mCRPC harboring low AR transcriptional activity.
Asunto(s)
Androstenos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Benzamidas/administración & dosificación , Nitrilos/administración & dosificación , Feniltiohidantoína/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Androstenos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Benzamidas/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Nitrilos/efectos adversos , Feniltiohidantoína/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Receptores Androgénicos/genética , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In the S-TRAC trial, adjuvant sunitinib improved disease-free survival (DFS) compared with placebo in patients with locoregional renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk of recurrence. This post hoc exploratory analysis investigated the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for predictive and prognostic significance in the RCC adjuvant setting. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional analyses were performed on baseline NLR and change from baseline at week 4 to assess their association with DFS. Univariate P values were two-sided and based on an unstratified log-rank test. RESULTS: 609 of 615 patients had baseline NLR values; 574 patients had baseline and week 4 values. Sunitinib-treated patients with baseline NLR <3 had longer DFS versus placebo (7.1 vs. 4.7; HR, 0.71; P = 0.02). For baseline NLR ≥3, DFS was similar regardless of treatment (sunitinib 6.8 vs. placebo not reached; HR, 1.03; P = 0.91). A ≥25% NLR decrease at week 4 was associated with longer DFS versus no change (6.8 vs. 5.3 years; HR, 0.71; P = 0.01). A greater proportion of sunitinib-treated patients had ≥25% NLR decrease at week 4 (71.2%) versus placebo (17.4%). Patients with ≥25% NLR decrease at week 4 received a higher median cumulative sunitinib dose (10,137.5 mg) versus no change (8,168.8 mg) or ≥25% increase (6,712.5 mg). CONCLUSIONS: In the postnephrectomy high-risk RCC patient cohort, low baseline NLR may help identify those most suitable for adjuvant sunitinib. A ≥25% NLR decrease at week 4 may be an early indicator of those most likely to tolerate treatment and derive DFS benefit.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Linfocitos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Neutrófilos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Renales/sangre , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Renales/sangre , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Nefrectomía , Pronóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Sunitinib/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Co-morbidities may induce local and systemic tumor progression of renal cell carcinoma (RCC); however, the prognostic impact of co-morbidities has not yet been well characterized. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RCC patients (n = 2206) surgically treated at three academic institutions in the US and Europe were included in the analysis. Presence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease, and hypothyroidism were investigated for their association with clinicopathological features and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: Hypertension was associated with less advanced T stages (p = 0.025), a lower risk of lymph-node (p = 0.026) and distant metastases (p = 0.001), and improved cancer specific survival in univariable analysis (HR 0.81 95% CI 0.69-0.96, p = 0.013). However, hypertension was not an independent prognostic factor after adjustment for TNM stages, grading, and ECOG performance status (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.80-1.12; p = 0.530). A correlation between the use of concomitant anti-hypertensive medications and improved survival outcome was not identified. All other investigated co-morbidities did not show significant associations with clinicopathological features or cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSION: Although the investigated co-morbidities are capable or inducing pathophysiological changes that are predisposing factors for tumor progression, none is an independent prognostic factor in patients with RCC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/complicaciones , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Positive surgical margins (PSMs) are associated with treatment failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) for patients with prostate cancer (CaP). We investigated institutional variations in PSM after RP, as well as clinical and demographic factors predicting PSM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing RP for clinically localized CaP were identified in the National Cancer Database in 2010 to 2013 and clinicodemographics were recorded. Treating institution was defined as academic (AMC) or nonacademic medical centers (nAMC). The primary outcome was the PSM rate. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity matching with inverse probability treatment weighing were used to both compare outcomes between AMC and nAMC and to identify predictors of PSM following RP. RESULTS: A total of 167,260 patients met our inclusion criteria. PSM rate was significantly lower in patients treated at AMC (13,435, 18.9%) compared with 22,145 (23.0%) in those treated at nAMC (P < 0.01). The difference between PSM rate in AMC and nAMC was more pronounced in lower volume centers while it was not significant in higher volume centers. On multivariable analysis, age, race, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason score, comorbidity profile, insurance type, income, and treatment facility were significantly associated with PSM rate. CONCLUSION: PSM rates appear to be lower at AMC and higher volume facilities, which can potentially reflect institutional differences in surgical quality. In addition, we identified several socioeconomic and demographic factors that contribute to the likelihood of PSM following RP for localized CaP, suggesting potential systematic variation in the quality of surgical care. The cause of this variation warrants further investigation and evaluation.
Asunto(s)
Márgenes de Escisión , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) comprises nearly 90% of all diagnosed RCC subtypes and has the worst prognosis and highest metastatic potential. The strongest prognostic factors for patients with ccRCC include histological subtype and Fuhrman grade, which are incorporated into prognostic models. Since ccRCC is a highly vascularized tumor, there may be differences in enhancement patterns on multidetector CT (MDCT) due to the hemodynamics and microvessel density (MVD) of the lesions. This may provide a noninvasive method to characterize incidentally detected low- and high-grade ccRCCs on MDCT. The purpose of our study was to determine the correlation between MDCT enhancement parameters, ccRCC MVD, and Fuhrman grade to determine its utility and value in assessing tumor vascularity and grade in vivo. METHODS: In this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study with waiver of informed consent, 127 consecutive patients with 89 low-grade (LG), and 43 high-grade (HG) ccRCCs underwent preoperative four-phase MDCT. A 3D volume of interest (VOI) was obtained for every tumor and absolute enhancement and the wash-in/wash-out of enhancement for each phase was assessed. Immunohistochemistry on resected specimens was used to quantify MVD. Linear regression and Pearson correlation were used to investigate the strength of the association between 3D VOI enhancement and MVD. Stepwise logistic regression analysis determined independent predictors of HG ccRCC. Cut-off values and odds Ratio (OR) with 95% CIs were reported. The clinical, radiomic, and pathologic features with the highest performance in the stepwise logistic regression analysis were evaluated using receiver operator characteristics (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Absolute enhancement in the nephrographic phase < 52.1 Hounsfield Units (HU) (HR 0.979, 95% CI 0.964-0.994, p value = 0.006), lesion size > 4.3 cm (HR 1.450, 95% CI 1.211-1.738, p value < 0.001), and an intratumoral MVD < 15% (HR 0.932, 95% CI 0.867-1.002, p value = 0.058) were independent predictors of HG ccRCC with an AUC of 0.818 (95% CI 0.725-0.911). HG ccRCCs had a significant association between 3D VOI enhancement and MVD in each post-contrast phase (r2 = 0.238 to 0.455, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Absolute enhancement of the entire lesion obtained from a 3D VOI in the nephrographic phase on preoperative MDCT can provide quantitative data that are a significant, independent predictor of a high-grade clear cell RCC and can be used to assess tumor vascularity and grade in vivo.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Densidad Microvascular , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The approval of immunotherapeutic agents and immunotherapy-based combination strategies in recent years has revolutionized the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Nivolumab, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor monoclonal antibody, was approved as monotherapy in 2015 for aRCC after treatment with a VEGF-targeting agent. In April 2018, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, a CTLA-4 inhibitor, was approved for intermediate- and poor-risk, previously untreated patients with aRCC. Then, in 2019, combinations therapies consisting of pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) or avelumab (anti-PD-ligand (L) 1) with axitinib (a VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) were also approved to treat aRCC and are likely to produce dramatic shifts in the therapeutic landscape. To address the rapid advances in immunotherapy options for patients with aRCC, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) reconvened its Cancer Immunotherapy Guidelines (CIG) Renal Cell Carcinoma Subcommittee and tasked it with generating updated consensus recommendations for the treatment of patients with this disease.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/etiología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias Renales/etiología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The current World Health Organization classification recognises 12 major subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Although these subtypes differ on molecular and clinical levels, they are generally managed as the same disease, simply because they occur in the same organ. Specifically, there is a paucity of tools to risk-stratify patients with papillary RCC (PRCC). The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a tool to risk-stratify patients with clinically non-metastatic PRCC following curative surgery. METHODS: We studied clinicopathological variables and outcomes of 556 patients, who underwent full resection of sporadic, unilateral, non-metastatic (T1-4, N0-1, M0) PRCC at five institutions. Based on multivariable Fine-Gray competing risks regression models, we developed a prognostic scoring system to predict disease recurrence. This was further evaluated in the 150 PRCC patients recruited to the ASSURE trial. We compared the discrimination, calibration and decision-curve clinical net benefit against the Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) stage group, University of California Integrated Staging System (UISS) and the 2018 Leibovich prognostic groups. RESULTS: We developed the VENUSS score from significant variables on multivariable analysis, which were the presence of VEnous tumour thrombus, NUclear grade, Size, T and N Stage. We created three risk groups based on the VENUSS score, with a 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence equalling 2.9% in low-risk, 15.4% in intermediate-risk and 54.5% in high-risk patients. 91.7% of low-risk patients had oligometastatic recurrent disease, compared to 16.7% of intermediate-risk and 40.0% of high-risk patients. Discrimination, calibration and clinical net benefit from VENUSS appeared to be superior to UISS, TNM and Leibovich prognostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and tested a prognostic model for patients with clinically non-metastatic PRCC, which is based on routine pathological variables. This model may be superior to standard models and could be used for tailoring postoperative surveillance and defining inclusion for prospective adjuvant clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Modelos Estadísticos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Renales/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias Renales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) commonly present with tumor thrombi in the renal vein and inferior vena cava (IVC). The benefit of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in this population is unclear and the effect on overall survival (OS) has been incompletely evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2013 for patients diagnosed with mRCC and tumor thrombi, which was defined as renal vein, infradiaphragmatic IVC, or supradiaphragmatic IVC. Descriptive statistics were performed and associations between clinicopathologic variables and utilization of CN were analyzed. Patients were matched on the receipt of CN and Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate survival. RESULTS: In total, 8,629 patients were found to have mRCC during the study period. Approximately 27% (nâ¯=â¯2,376) had tumor thrombus. Tumor thrombus was associated with increased rates of CN utilization, however rates decreased as thrombus level increased. In a matched Kaplan-Meier analysis, CN was associated with improved OS in patients without thrombus, and with renal vein or infradiaphragmatic thrombus (all P < 0.01). Patients with supradiaphragmatic thrombus did not benefit from CN (Pâ¯=â¯0.46). This effect was confirmed in a Cox proportional hazards model. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor thrombus is common in patients with mRCC. OS is poor, and patient and tumor specific factors influence the use of CN. Despite discrepancies in utilization, CN is associated with improved OS, although this effect appears to be limited to those with mRCC and tumor thrombus limited to the renal vein and infradiaphragmatic IVC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Trombosis/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trombosis/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Melanoma-associated antigen-A (MAGE-A) and programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are present in urothelial carcinoma (UC). We assessed survival outcomes in patients with MAGE-A and PD-L1 expression. METHODS: MAGE-A and PD-L1 expression on neoplastic cells was analyzed using tissue microarrays from patients with UC. We compared differential expression between disease stage and grade. MAGE-A and PD-L1 co-expression was subcategorized. Fisher's exact test was done for categorical variables followed by univariable and multivariable analysis of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Co-expression of MAGE+/PD-L1+ was higher in advanced disease; however, only MAGE+/PD-L1- was associated with shorter RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.89; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-2.99; p = .006]. MAGE+/PD-L1+ was associated with the worst PFS (HR 17.1; 95% CI 5.96-49.4; p ≤ .001). MAGE-A expression was more prevalent with high-grade (p = .015), and higher-stage ≥ pT2 (p = .001) disease. The 5-year RFS was 44% for MAGE+ versus 58% for MAGE- patients. On multivariable analysis, MAGE+ was also associated with shorter RFS (HR 1.55; 95% CI 1.05-2.30; p = .03). Similarly, MAGE+ was associated with shorter PFS (HR 3.12; 95% CI 1.12-8.68; p = .03). CONCLUSION: MAGE-A and PD-L1 expression is increased in advanced disease and associated with shorter PFS. Furthermore, MAGE-A expression was significantly associated with higher-grade and -stage disease and associated with shorter RFS and PFS. The worse prognosis associated with MAGE-A+/PD-L1+ provides evidence that a combinatorial treatment strategy co-targeting MAGE/PD-L1 might be feasible. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno B7-H1/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Antígenos Específicos del Melanoma/metabolismo , Melanoma/metabolismo , Neoplasias Urológicas/metabolismo , Anciano , Femenino , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/mortalidad , Antígenos Específicos del Melanoma/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Neoplasias Urológicas/genéticaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: With prostate cancer (CaP) screening, overtreatment of low-risk CaP remains a concern. We investigated the patterns of radical prostatectomy (RP) for pathologic insignificant (iCaP) and significant CaP (sCaP) as well as variations between academic and nonacademic hospitals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing RP for clinical T1c CaP were identified in the National Cancer Database between 2006 and 2013. The primary outcome was the trend of RP for insignificant prostate cancer (iCaP) and significant prostate cancer (sCaP) over the study period. The secondary outcome was to compare the RP rate in academic vs. nonacademic institutions. Univariable and multivariable analysis were utilized to evaluate the association between overtreatment and practice type. iCaP was defined as organ confined CaP with Gleason Score ≤6. RESULTS: The total number of RP increased from 17,970 cases in 2006 to 25,324 in 2013. The RP rate decreased for iCaP from 39.9% to 19.8%, while increasing for sCaP from 18% to 27% over the study period. Patients undergoing RP in academic settings were less likely to have iCaP (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.80-0.97). Caucasian race, private insurance, younger age, and treatment in the Eastern United States were associated with higher rates of iCaP at RP. CONCLUSION: The rate of iCaP has declined over time in the United States for patients undergoing RP. Although RP in nonacademic setting was more likely to have iCaP on surgical pathology, this trend has been downward among practice types. Treatment appropriateness is an underrecognized, undermeasured, but increasingly important component of the high-value care discussion that warrants greater attention.