Arthroscopic treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence fractures in skeletally immature patients with bioabsorbable nails.

Fractures involving tibial eminence caused by ACL avulsion lesion most frequently occur paediatric patients. Satisfactory reduction in displaced fractures cannot be achieved through conservative treatment, while arthroscopy-assisted fixation technique represents the gold standard to reduce and to fix articular fractures and several effective implants have been used to treat this kind of fractures. In our retrospective study, we proposed a different arthroscopic technique to fix Type II and Type III tibial eminence fractures by using bioabsorbable nails. Nineteen patients, aged 6 to 13 years were treated with arthroscopic reduction and fixation of the fragment using bioabsorbable nails. At 6-month follow-up, all patients showed a decrease of less than 2mm of the anterior edge. All patients at maximum follow-up reached a full knee flexion/extension. IKDC subjective mean score at six-month was 88.14.2 points (range 80-95; p<0.01). For what concerns the Tegner Activity Scale, the mean value of 5.51 (range 3-7) prior to the surgery changed into 5.10.9 (range 3-6) at 6 months. No inflammatory reactions were reported and all fractures healed without complications. The objective IKDC grade A was reported in 18 patients and grade B in one patient, having a "nearly normal" range of motion item (92% compared to contralateral). Results can be compared to other surgical procedures described in the literature, having the same fast learning curve increase and limited complications, beside the fact that a second operation for metallic implants removal was avoided.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: Diagnostic pitfalls and therapeutic options.

One of the most prevalent hip pathologies that develops during adolescence is Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE), and over the past few decades, its incidence has been rising. To ensure an early diagnosis and prompt intervention, orthopedic surgeons should be aware of this entity. Review of recent developments in clinical examination and imaging diagnostic procedures. The presentation includes commonly used imaging methods, slippage measurement techniques, and classification schemes that are pertinent to treatment. An overview of SCFE surgery based on pertinent study findings and knowledge gained from ongoing clinical practice. The gold standard treatment for stable SCFE cases- those in which the continuity of the metaphysis and epiphysis is preserved-is pinning in situ using a single cannulated screw without reduction. However, there are disagreements over the best course of action for stable moderate/severe SCFE. On the best surgical strategy for unstable epiphysiolysis, no universal agreement has been reached. Finding the surgical procedure that will improve the long-term outcomes of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis is the question at hand.

Resilience Against COVID-19: How Italy Faced the Pandemic in Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the variation of medical and surgical activities in pediatric orthopedics in Italy, during the year of the COVID-19 pandemic, in comparison with data from the previous two years. The differences among the first wave, phase 2 and second wave were also analyzed. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study regarding the clinical and surgical activities in pediatric orthopedics during the pandemic and pre-pandemic period. The hospital databases of seven tertiary referral centers for pediatric orthopedics and traumatology were queried for events regarding pediatric orthopedic patients from 1 March 2018 to 28 February 2021. Surgical procedures were classified according to the "SITOP Priority Panel". An additional classification in "high-priority" and "low-priority" surgery was also applied. RESULTS: Overall, in 2020, we observed a significant drop in surgical volumes compared to the previous two years. The decrease was different across the different classes of priority, with "high-priority" surgery being less influenced. The decrease in emergency department visits was almost three-fold greater than the decrease in trauma surgery. During the second wave, a lower decline in surgical interventions and a noticeable resumption of "low-priority" surgery and outpatient visits were observed. CONCLUSION: Our study represents the first nationwide survey quantifying the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric orthopedics and traumatology during the first and second wave.

Recommendations from the Italian Society of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Traumatology for the management of pediatric orthopaedic patients during the COVID19 pandemic and post-pandemic period in Italy.

The rapid spread of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy has dramatically impacted the National Healthcare System, causing the sudden congestion of hospitals, especially in Northern Italy, thus imposing drastic restriction of almost all routine medical care. This exceptional adaptation of the Italian National Healthcare System has also been felt by non-frontline settings such as Pediatric Orthopaedic Units, where the limitation or temporary suspension of most routine care activities met with a need to maintain continuity of care and avoid secondary issues due to the delay or suspension of the routine clinical practice. The Italian Society of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Traumatology formulated general and specific recommendations to face the COVID-19 outbreak, aiming to provide essential care for children needing orthopaedic treatments during the pandemic and early post-peak period, ensure safety of children, caregivers and healthcare providers and limit the spread of contagion.

Treatment of simple bone cyst with bone marrow concentrate and equine-derived demineralized bone matrix injection versus methylprednisolone acetate injections: A retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of intra-lesional autologous bone marrow concentrate (BMC) and equine derived demineralized bone matrix (EDDBM) injections with methylprednisolone acetate injections in patients with simple bone cyst. METHODS: Clinical records and radiographs of 53 consecutive patients (37 females,and 16 males; mean age: 10.6±1.53 years) treated between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Healing was assessed by an independent radiologist according to Neer scoring system. Functional outcome was assessed with the Activity Scale for Kids (ASK). Thirty-four cysts were in the humerus, 13 in the femur and 6 in other locations. Twenty-nine patients were included in Steroid Group and treated with 3 cycles of injections of methylprednisolone acetate, while 24 patients were treated with injection of autologous bone marrow concentrate and equine derived demineralized bone matrix (BMC+ EDDBM Group). The two groups were homogenous for the mean age, sex distribution, cysts location and their clinical presentation. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of 24 months, success rate (Neer/Cole score 3 and 4) was higher in EDDBM+BMC group (83.3% vs 58.6%; p=0.047). Female patients had higher healing rates in both groups (p=0.002). No association was found between healing and age (p=0.839), cyst activity (p=0.599), cyst localization (p=0.099) and clinical presentation (p=0.207). BMC+EDDBM group showed higher ASK score (p=0.0007). CONCLUSION: Treatment with BMC+EDDBM injections may provide better results with a single procedure than 3 methylprednisolone acetate injections and represent an interesting alternative for the treatment of unicameral bone cysts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Outcomes of surgical treatment of the tibial tuberosity fractures in skeletally immature patients: an update.

Tibial tubercle fractures in adolescents are uncommon injuries which typically occur in 12-16 year-old males involved in athletic activities. We hereby present our experience in the surgical treatment of such lesion. By reviewing all the tibial tuberosity fractures treated surgically at our institution between January 2012 and January 2016, we were able to identify 12 patients (14 fractures), of which 11 males and 1 female, whose average age at the time of the trauma was of 14.05. According to the Ogden classification, we identified two Type IIA fractures, one Type IIB fracture, one Type IIIB fracture, four Type IIIC fractures, four Type IVA fractures, one Type IVB fracture and one Type IVC fracture. All patients underwent surgical treatment-9 fractures ORIF (64.3%), 5 CRIF (35.7%)-and postsurgical immobilization in plaster cast for 15 days, with a non-weight bearing period of approximately 4.7 weeks. They all had a complete ROM recovery and returned to preinjury activities within 4.1 months on average. The successful union of the fracture was observed in all patients, and no cases of meniscal lesions, compartment syndrome, infections, lower limb length discrepancy or axial deviations emerged at the minimum follow-up of 24 months. After an average period of 11 months and 2 weeks (range 6.1-16.3), all patients underwent surgical implant removal. Our experience matches the outcomes described in the literature, therefore confirming the safety and effectiveness of this treatment.

Flexible Juvenile Flat Foot Surgical Correction: A Comparison Between Two Techniques After Ten Years' Experience.

The aim of our study is a retrospective analysis of the 2 most common surgical treatments of symptomatic juvenile flat foot: different arthroereisis techniques. Exosinotarsal arthroereisis with metallic screw and endosinotarsal with bioabsorbable devices were compared. In total, 402 feet were examined for a median follow-up of 130 months. Only symptomatic (plantar or calcaneus pain), flexible, and idiopathic flat feet were included in our study. Congenital (fibrous/bone tarsal coalitions), neurologic, and posttraumatic flat feet were excluded. During clinical examination, the feet were categorized according to the Viladot classification, which took into consideration the plantar impression: only grades 3 and 4 were included (complete medial longitudinal arch collapse). Evaluation was determined by taking into consideration 3 parameters: clinical evaluation, pain, and variation of the radiologic angles. No statistical differences were found between the 2 techniques; the choice can be determined mostly by the surgeon's preference.