RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation is essential for managing acute respiratory failure, but traditional methods of assessing oxygenation, like the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, pose challenges due to invasiveness and cost. OBJECTIVE: This single-centre prospective observational study aimed to assess the potential of the non-invasive Oxygen Saturation Index (OSI), utilising SpO2 measurements, to diagnose hypoxemia in mechanically ventilated adults. The study sought to establish correlations between OSI, oxygenation index (OI), PaO2/FiO2 ratio and SpO2/FiO2 ratio. METHODS: From August 2022 to July 2023, data was collected from 1055 mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Statistical analysis included correlation tests, receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and cut-off value determination for hypoxemia diagnosis. RESULTS: We found that the P/F ratio had a statistically significant negative correlation with OI (correlation coefficient -0.832, P value: 0.000 in hypoxemic group and correlation coefficient -0.888, P value: 0.000 in the non-hypoxemic group), and OSI (correlation coefficient -0.746, P value: 0.000 in hypoxemic group and correlation coefficient -0.629, P value: 0.000 in non-hypoxemic group) and has a positive correlation with P/F ratio (correlation coefficient 0.92, P value: 0.000 in hypoxemic group and correlation coefficient -0.67, P value: 0.000 in non-hypoxemic group). OI and OSI had a statistically significant correlation (correlation coefficient 0.955, P value: 0.000 in hypoxemic group and correlation coefficient 0.815, P value: 0.000 in non-hypoxemic group). on ROC analysis P/F ratio was the most accurate in predicting hypoxia followed by OI and OSI. with a cut-off value, of OI being 7.07, and that for OSI being 3.90, at an 80% sensitivity level to diagnose hypoxemia. CONCLUSION: OSI can serve as a dependable surrogate for OI, simplifying ARDS severity assessment. The P/F ratio is the most accurate predictor of hypoxia. Further research, especially in larger multicentre studies, is needed to validate these findings and explore the long-term clinical implications of using OSI for oxygenation monitoring in mechanically ventilated patients.
RESUMEN
Purpose: End-organ damage in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is linked to "cytokine storm" and excessive release of inflammatory mediators. Various novel therapies have been used in COVID-19 including urinary trypsin inhibitor therapy. This study explores the efficacy of ulinastatin in COVID-19. Materials and methods: We retrieved the medical records of patients admitted during one month and did a propensity score analysis to create matched treatment and control groups. We analyzed these groups and the outcomes were presented with appropriate statistics. Survival curve was prepared to compare the survival effect of ulinastatin therapy at the end of hospitalization, among both the groups. Results: A total of 736 patients were admitted, and after adjusting the data with propensity score matching, 55 cases were selected by the system. On the final outcome analysis, we found that intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay [median (interquartile range) days 3 (3.5-7.8) vs 2 (0-4); p-value 0.28] in control vs intervention groups, and in hospital mortality (odds ratio: 0.491, CI 95%: 0.099-2.44, p-value 0.435) were not statistically different among the groups. In survival plot analysis also, there was no statistical difference (p-value 0.414) among both the groups.Conclusion: In this retrospective study, we conclude that the final outcome of the ICU length of stay, and overall, in hospital mortality were not different among both the groups. Hence, adequately powered randomized control trials are urgently required to confirm any benefit of ulinastatin therapy in COVID-19 treatment. How to cite this article: Jain A, Kasliwal R, Jain SS, Jain R, Gupta D, Gupta P, et al. Effect of Urinary Trypsin Inhibitor (Ulinastatin) Therapy in COVID-19. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(6):696-703.