Safety and effects of calcifediol 0.266 milligrams soft capsules monthly and cholecalciferol 25000 international units monthly in osteoporotic women undergoing therapy with alendronate: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The role of vitamin D in human physiology is a topic of great interest for the scientific community in the last decades. The common target for all clinicians is to improve its status in order to prevent several pathological conditions. METHODS: The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of both calcifediol and cholecalciferol in combination with alendronate in osteoporotic women. A homogeneous population of 300 postmenopausal osteoporotic women was selected for this study. 150 women were administered with alendronate 70 mg combined with clacifediol 0.266 mg soft capsules monthly. The other half (other 150 women) were administered with alendronate 70 mg combined with cholecalciferol 25000 IU monthly. First follow up was after 4 months and second follow-up after 12 months. RESULTS: No case of toxicity was detected throughout the study in any patient. In regards to increase of vitamin D serum level, after four months supplementation calcifediol is 1.29 fold more effective than cholecalciferol while after 12 months of supplementation calcifediol is 2.32 fold more effective compared to cholecalciferol. CONCLUSIONS: In our study calcifediol showed to be as safe as cholecalciferol and more effective than cholecalciferol in order to increase vitamin D serum level after four and 12 months of supplementation when supplementation is combined with alendronate 70 mg in osteoporotic women.

A consensus-based approach on the management of patients with both psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in the dermatological and rheumatological settings in Italy: The ADOI PSO-Amore Project.

Psoriasis is a complex disease often needing a multidisciplinary approach. In particular, the collaboration between dermatologist and rheumatologist is crucial for the management of patients suffering from both psoriasis (PSO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Here we report a series of recommendations from a group of experts, as a result of a Consensus Conference, defining the circumstances in which it is preferable or even mandatory, depending on the available settings, to rely on the opinion of the two specialists, jointly or in a deferred manner. Indications are given on how to organize a 3rd level joint Dermatology- Rheumatology care unit, in connection with 1st and 2nd level clinicians of both specialties, GPs, and other specialists involved in the management of psoriasis. A potential patient journey is suggested, that can be used as a basis for future design and validation of national and/or local diagnostic therapeutic and assistance pathways.

Effects of alendronate and calcifediol compared to alendronate and cholecalciferol in osteoporotic patients.

BACKGROUND: Several formulations of vitamin D and alendronate are available for the treatment of osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to examine efficacy and safety of calcifediol (25(OH)D) compared to cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) and also the relationship between different formulations of alendronate and adverse reactions. METHODS: We observed a population of women diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis or osteopenia treated with alendronate 70 mg weekly associated to vitamin D3 or 25(OH)D at monthly total dose of 625 µg. Data collected both at baseline (T0) and at follow-up after at least 12 months of therapy (T1) were: demographic characteristics, BMI, full medical history, lumbar T-score, femur T-score, calcium, osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase, PTH and vitamin D blood level. RESULTS: A total of 362 patients were enrolled in the study. Alendronate 70 mg + calcifediol (A+25(OH)D) group consisted of 202 patients while 160 patients were treated with alendronate 70 mg + cholecalciferol (A+D3). In the A+25(OH)D group, we observed a significant increase in lumbar T-score value (0.26±0.35 vs. 0.13±0.3) and serum vitamin D (20.64±20.71 vs. 6.07±7.61 ng/mL) levels compared to the A+D3 group (P<0.05). The lowest incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions was observed among patients taking alendronate 70 mg in drinkable solution form (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Alendronate 70 mg with calcifediol gives a better outcome in the treatment of osteoporosis according to lumbar T-score and vitamin D serum level observed at one-year follow-up compared to alendronate 70 mg with cholecalciferol. Both vitamin D formulations did not show to cause hypercalcemia in this study. Alendronate 70 mg in drinkable solution form is also associated with lowest incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions.

Correction to: Drug survival and effectiveness of ustekinumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Real-life data from the biologic Apulian registry (BIOPURE).

In Fig. 1 - paned D, incorrect image was published. This is now presented correctly in this article.

Drug survival and effectiveness of ustekinumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Real-life data from the biologic Apulian registry (BIOPURE).

This study aims to evaluate the drug survival and effectiveness of ustekinumab in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients naïve to biologics or inadequate responders to tumor necrosis factor (TNF-IR) inhibitors in real life. PsA patients starting ustekinumab were enrolled from 2014 to 2016. Joint involvement, peripheral or axial, Psoriatic Area Severity Index, Disease Activity Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Lee Enthesitis Index, Health Assessment Questionnaire, body mass index, comorbidities, co-therapies, mechanism of action, and causes of discontinuation of prior TNFi were collected at baseline, and 6 and 12 months. Twelve-month drug survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves. Hazard ratios (HRs) of drug discontinuation adjusted for baseline factors were estimated by multiple Cox regression analysis. Percentages of DAPSA-based remission, as crude value and adjusted for drug retention (LUNDEX index), were compared by χ2 test. Mean differences of DAPSA from baseline to 6 and 12 months were compared between naïve and TNF-IR patients by ANOVA. Of 160 PsA patients starting ustekinumab, 54 were naïve and 106 were TNF-IR. Twelve-month drug survival was significantly higher in naïve (87%) than in TNF-IR (68%, p = 0.01). Baseline co-therapy with methotrexate did not increase the persistence on ustekinumab. Naïve patients had the lowest risk of ustekinumab discontinuation (HR 0.27, p = 0.01), and the highest DAPSA-based remission (34%, LUNDEX 26%). Mean differences from baseline of DAPSA was significantly greater in naïve than in TNF-IR patients at 12 months (- 14.4 ± 10 vs. - 4.1 ± 17, p = 0.01). Our data showed that ustekinumab has a good effectiveness in real life and the best outcomes are achieved in biologic-naïve PsA patients.

Ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of patients with inflammatory arthritides.

In primary care and internal medicine settings clinicians are often reluctant to take advantage of the resources that ultrasonography (US) offers as a diagnostic tool in the initial management of patients with inflammatory arthritis, despite the recognised importance of an accurate and timely diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and of early referral to ensure optimal patient management. Both grey-scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) imaging have been extensively used in early detection of synovitis and bone erosions in patients with inflammatory arthritides. We reviewed the main data on the clinical use of US in the initial management of patients with inflammatory arthritis, focusing on RA diagnosis in patients with undifferentiated arthritis, prediction of disease severity, differential diagnoses and assessment of synovitis in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The role of US in assessing treatment response and monitoring disease activity in clinical remission was also briefly evaluated. The reliability of US as a diagnostic tool in rheumatological diseases has greatly advanced in the last years and the use of this imaging technique, in association with conventional assessments such as physical examination and serological tests, should be considered more often also in primary care settings.