Dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa is associated with glycolytically active GATA3+ T helper 2 cells which may contribute to pruritus in lesional skin.

BACKGROUND: Dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DDEB) is characterized by trauma-induced blisters and, in some individuals, intense pruritus. Precisely what causes itch in DDEB and optimal ways to reduce it have not been fully determined. OBJECTIVES: To characterize DDEB skin transcriptomes to identify therapeutic targets to reduce pruritus in patients. METHODS: Using bulk RNA sequencing, we evaluated affected and unaffected skin biopsy samples from six patients with DDEB (all with the very itchy pruriginosa subtype) and four healthy individuals. Single-cell transcriptomes of affected (n = 2) and unaffected (n = 1) DDEB skin and healthy skin (n = 2) were obtained. Dupilumab treatment was provided for three patients. RESULTS: The skin bulk transcriptome showed significant enrichment of T helper (Th)1/2 and Th17 pathways in affected DDEB skin compared with nonlesional DDEB skin and healthy skin. Single-cell transcriptomics showed an association of glycolytically active GATA3+ Th2 cells in affected DDEB skin. Treatment with dupilumab in three people with DDEB led to significantly reduced visual analogue scale (VAS) itch scores after 12 weeks (mean VAS 3.83) compared with pretreatment (mean VAS 7.83). Bulk RNAseq and quantitative polymerase chain reaction showed that healthy skin and dupilumab-treated epidermolysis bullosa (EB) pruriginosa skin have similar transcriptomic profiles and reduced Th1/Th2 and Th17 pathway enrichment. CONCLUSIONS: Single-cell RNAseq helps define an enhanced DDEB-associated Th2 profile and rationalizes drug repurposing of anti-Th2 drugs in treating DDEB pruritus.

Dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DDEB) is a rare inherited skin disease that causes fragile skin that blisters easily, often triggered by minor injuries. These blisters are accompanied by intense itching, which can be distressing. The underlying cause of DDEB lies in genetic mutations in a gene called COL7A1. This gene encodes 'type VII collagen', a protein crucial for attaching the outer skin layer (epidermis) to the layer beneath (dermis). Although the genetic basis of DDEB is understood, the causes of itch are not known. As well as this, effective treatments for DDEB are lacking, which has driven scientists to explore innovative approaches like repurposing existing drugs. Drug repurposing involves using medications that have already been approved for other health conditions. One such drug is dupilumab, which is used for severe atopic dermatitis (eczema). Dupilumab targets immune cells called Th2 cells, which play a role in inflammation and allergies. While dupilumab has shown promise in relieving DDEB itching, the way it works in this condition is unclear. This study, carried out by a group of researchers in Taiwan, looked at gene expression in DDEB-affected and unaffected skin, and compared it to gene expression in healthy skin samples. We found heightened activity in Th2 immune cells and abnormal gene signals related to itching, similar to atopic dermatitis. These findings support using dupilumab and other anti-inflammatory drugs to alleviate itching in DDEB. Clinical trials will be crucial to evaluate the effectiveness of these drugs for managing DDEB symptoms. This research opens doors for enhanced treatment options and improving the quality of life of people living with DDEB.

Itch in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: findings of PEBLES, a prospective register study.

BACKGROUND: Itch is common and distressing in epidermolysis bullosa (EB) but has not previously been studied in depth in different recessive dystrophic EB (RDEB) subtypes. OBJECTIVES: As part of a prospective register study of the natural history of RDEB we explored features of itch, medications used, and correlation with disease severity and quality of life. METHODS: Fifty individuals with RDEB aged 8 years and above completed the Leuven Itch Scale (LIS) (total 243 reviews over a 7-year period). Data included itch frequency, severity, duration, distress, circumstances, consequences, itch surface area and medications for itch. The iscorEB disease severity score and the validated EB quality of life tool, QOLEB, were compared to LIS domains and analysed by RDEB subtype. RESULTS: Itch was frequent, present in the preceding month in 93% of reviews. Itch severity and distress were significantly greater in severe (RDEB-S) and pruriginosa (RDEB-Pru) subtypes compared to intermediate RDEB (RDEB-I). Itch medications were reported in just over half of reviews including emollients, topical corticosteroids and antihistamines; the proportion of participants not using medication despite frequent pruritus suggests limited efficacy. In inversa RDEB (RDEB-Inv) and RDEB-I, LIS domains correlated with iscorEB and QOLEB. In contrast to previous studies, correlations were lacking in RDEB-S suggesting that global disease burden relatively reduces the contribution of itch. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive study of RDEB-associated itch highlights differences between RDEB subtypes, suggests an unmet need for effective treatments and could serve as control data for future clinical trials incorporating itch as an endpoint.