Otitis media. A scholarly review of the evidence.

Antibiotic therapy remains the treatment of choice for otitis media in most countries despite persuasive evidence that antibiotic therapy provides limited clinical benefit and promotes bacterial resistance. Meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials demonstrated that antibiotics increased resolution at 1 week by only 13%. Amoxicillin remains as effective as any other antibiotic, despite increasing resistance to amoxicillin among the major bacterial pathogens. Immediate antibiotic treatment has been shown to reduce the duration of symptoms by 1 day but not until after the first 24 hours when symptoms were already improving. A delayed prescribing strategy is currently utilized in most children for management of acute otitis media in the Netherlands; this method is now being evaluated elsewhere. Antibiotic therapy is delayed for 48-72 hours after diagnosis; thereafter, antibiotics are initiated only if symptoms persist or worsen. In 2 studies utilizing this strategy (England and the United States), only 24-30% of the patients in the delayed treatment group initiated antibiotic therapy; a majority of parents of children in the delayed group were satisfied with their child's treatment. Treatment of bacterial otitis media ("pus drum") with high dose amoxicillin (80-100 mg/kg/kd) is recommmended; for acute otitis media without bulging, watchful waiting with a delayed prescribing strategy and treatment of pain is preferred. Yearly administration of the influenza vaccine and/or treatment of influenza with an antiviral (oseltamivir) can significantly decrease the incidence of acute otitis media during influenza season. Although pneumococcal vaccination effectively reduces the incidence of acute otitis media due to vaccine-related serotypes, there is a significant increase in the number of episodes of acute otitis media due to other serotypes of S. pneumoniae such that the overall incidence of acute otitis media is reduced only minimally by pneumoccocal vaccine. The careful use of strict diagnostic criteria coupled with judicious use of antibiotic therapy will direct antibiotic treatment to only those patients likely to benefit.

Medical exclusion of sick children from child care centers: a plea for reconciliation.

BACKGROUND: Policies for excluding ill children from child care can affect parental absenteeism from the workplace and the utilization of pediatric health care resources. METHODS: We surveyed a representative sample of 310 child care centers throughout Virginia to assess policies for excluding children with fever, common upper respiratory tract illnesses, or head lice. RESULTS: Of the 183 center directors (59%) who returned completed surveys, 119 (69%) considered a temperature of 100.0 degrees F to 100.4 degrees F to represent fever, but methods for measuring temperature varied widely. Most centers excluded children with low-grade fever, even in the absence of changes in their behavior. Other low-threshold policies could exclude afebrile children with white nasal or eye discharge and children with hair nits, even after treated with a pediculicidal shampoo. CONCLUSIONS: Exclusion policies among child care centers in Virginia vary widely and often are inconsistent with current standards of medical practice. More uniform implementation of exclusion policies established by national consensus panels of experts is needed to reduce unnecessary exclusion of children from child care centers.

Parental knowledge about common respiratory infections and antibiotic therapy in children.

BACKGROUND: Widespread antibiotic use has fostered the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Parental expectations have been cited as one reason for physicians to overprescribe antibiotics. The objective of this study was to determine parental knowledge about antibiotics and their use for common respiratory tract infections. METHODS: A survey was administered to 100 adults at a rural pediatric office. RESULTS: Many respondents had misconceptions about the etiology of common respiratory tract infections and the effects of antibiotic therapy. Only 54% knew that a virus is the usual cause of the common cold, and 33% thought that a virus causes strep throat. Almost half (46%) believed that antibiotics kill viruses, while 17% were not sure whether antibiotics kill viruses. Most respondents (60%) had never heard about antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSION: Parental knowledge about common respiratory tract infections and about antibiotic therapy is often lacking. Improved parent education may alter parents' expectations concerning antibiotic therapy for their ill children.