Evaluating the Readability of Patient Education Materials for Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering, Distraction-Based Methods, and Posterior Spinal Fusion for the Treatment of Pediatric Spinal Deformity.

BACKGROUND: The Internet is an important source of information for patients, but its effectiveness relies on the readability of its content. Patient education materials (PEMs) should be written at or below a sixth-grade reading level as outlined by agencies such as the American Medical Association. This study assessed PEMs' readability for the novel anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT), distraction-based methods, and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in treating pediatric spinal deformity. METHODS: An online search identified PEMs using the terms "anterior vertebral body tethering," "growing rods scoliosis," and "posterior spinal fusion pediatric scoliosis." We selected the first 20 general medical websites (GMWs) and 10 academic health institution websites (AHIWs) discussing each treatment (90 websites total). Readability tests for each webpage were conducted using Readability Studio software. Reading grade levels (RGLs), which correspond to the US grade at which one is expected to comprehend the text, were calculated for sources and independent t tests compared with RGLs between treatment types. RESULTS: The mean RGL was 12.1 ± 2.0. No articles were below a sixth-grade reading level, with only 2.2% at the sixth-grade reading level. AVBT articles had a higher RGL than distraction-based methods (12.7 ± 1.6 vs 11.9 ± 1.9, P = 0.082) and PSF (12.7 ± 1.6 vs 11.6 ± 2.3, P = 0.032). Materials for distraction-based methods and PSF were comparable (11.9 ± 1.9 vs 11.6 ± 2.3, P = 0.566). Among GMWs, AVBT materials had a higher RGL than distraction-based methods (12.9 ± 1.4 vs 12.1 ± 1.8, P = 0.133) and PSF (12.9 ± 1.4 vs 11.4 ± 2.4, P = 0.016). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients' health literacy is important for shared decision-making. Assessing the readability of scoliosis treatment PEMs guides physicians when sharing resources and discussing treatment with patients. CONCLUSION: Both GMWs and AHIWs exceed recommended RGLs, which may limit patient and parent understanding. Within GMWs, AVBT materials are written at a higher RGL than other treatments, which may hinder informed decision-making and patient outcomes. Efforts should be made to create online resources at the appropriate RGL. At the very least, patients and parents may be directed toward AHIWs; RGLs are more consistent.

Use of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index to Assess Risk for Postoperative Complications Following Posterior Cervical Decompression/Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Posterior cervical decompression with or without fusion (PCD/F) is used to manage degenerative spinal conditions. Malnutrition has been implicated for poor outcomes in spine surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) as a risk calculator for postoperative complications in patients undergoing PCD/F. METHODS: The 2006 to 2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program Database was queried for patients undergoing PCD/F. Nutritional status was categorized as normal (GNRI greater than 98), moderately malnourished (GNRI 92-98), or severely malnourished (GNRI less than or equal to 92). Complications within 30 days of surgery were compared among the groups. Preoperative data that were statistically significant (P < 0.05) upon univariate χ2 analysis were included in the univariate then multivariate binary regression model to calculate adjusted ORs. All ORs were assessed at the 95% CI. RESULTS: Of the 7597 PCD/F patients identified, 15.6% were severely malnourished and 19.1% were moderately malnourished. Severe and moderate malnourishment were independent risk factors for mortality (OR = 3.790, 95% CI 2.492-5.763, P < 0.001; OR = 2.150, 95% CI 1.351-3.421, P = 0.011). Severe malnourishment was an independent risk factor for sepsis/septic shock (OR = 3.448, 95% CI 2.402-4.948, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients undergoing PCD/F, severe malnutrition, as defined by the GNRI, was an independent risk factor for mortality and sepsis/septic shock. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The GNRI may be more useful than other indices for risk stratification in elderly patients because it accounts for confounding variables such as hydration status and paradoxical malnourishment in obese patients.

Trends in usage of navigation and robotic assistance in elective spine surgeries: a study of 105,212 cases from 2007 to 2015.

OBJECTIVE: Identify trends of navigation and robotic-assisted elective spine surgeries. METHODS: Elective spine surgery patients between 2007 and 2015 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) were isolated by ICD-9 codes for Navigation [Nav] or Robotic [Rob]-Assisted surgery. Basic demographics and surgical variables were identified via chi-squared and t tests. Each system was analyzed from 2007 to 2015 for trends in usage. RESULTS: Included 3,759,751 patients: 100,488 Nav; 4724 Rob. Nav were younger (56.7 vs 62.7 years), had lower comorbidity index (1.8 vs 6.2, all p < 0.05), more decompressions (79.5 vs 42.6%) and more fusions (60.3 vs 52.6%) than Rob. From 2007 to 2015, incidence of complication increased for Nav (from 5.8 to 21.7%) and Rob (from 3.3 to 18.4%) as well as 2-3 level fusions (from 50.4 to 52.5%) and (from 1.3 to 3.2%); respectively. Invasiveness increased for both (Rob: from 1.7 to 2.2; Nav: from 3.7 to 4.6). Posterior approaches (from 27.4 to 41.3%), osteotomies (from 4 to 7%), and fusions (from 40.9 to 54.2%) increased in Rob. Anterior approach for Rob decreased from 14.9 to 14.4%. Nav increased posterior (from 51.5% to 63.9%) and anterior approaches (from 16.4 to 19.2%) with an increase in osteotomies (from 2.1 to 2.7%) and decreased decompressions (from 73.6 to 63.2%). CONCLUSIONS: From 2007 to 2015, robotic and navigation systems have been performed on increasingly invasive spine procedures. Robotic systems have shifted from anterior to posterior approaches, whereas navigation computer-assisted procedures have decreased in rates of usage for decompression procedures.

External Validation of the European Spine Study Group-International Spine Study Group Calculator Utilizing a Single Institutional Experience for Adult Spinal Deformity Corrective Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The International Spine Study Group (ISSG) and the European Spine Study Group (ESSG) developed an adult spinal deformity (ASD) risk calculator based on one of the most granular, prospective ASD databases. The calculator utilizes preoperative radiographic, surgical, and patient-specific variables to predict patient-reported outcomes and complication rates at 2 years. Our aim was to assess the ISSG-ESSG risk calculator's usability in a single-institution ASD population. METHODS: Frail ([F], 0.3 > 0.5) ASD patients were isolated in a single-center ASD database. Basic demographics were assessed via χ 2 and t tests. Each F patient was inputted into the ESSG risk calculator to identify individual predictive rates for postoperative 2-year health-related quality of life questions (HRQL) outcomes and major complications. These calculated predicted outcomes were analyzed against those identified from the ASD database in order to validate the calculator's predictability via Brier scores. A score closer to 1 meant the ISSG-ESSG calculator was not predictive of that specific outcome. A score closer to 0 meant the ISSG-ESSG calculator was a predictive tool for that factor. RESULTS: A total of 631 ASD patients were isolated (55.8 ± 16.8 years, 26.68 kg/m2, 0.95 ± 1.3 Charlson Comorbidity Index). Of those patients, 7.8% were frail. Fifty percent of frail patients received an interbody fusion, 58.3% received a decompression, and 79.2% underwent osteotomy. Surgical details were as follows: mean operative time was 342.9 ± 94.3 minutes, mean estimated blood loss was 2131.82 ± 1011 mL, and average length of stay was 7.12 ± 2.5 days. The ISSG-ESSG calculator predicted the likelihood of improvement for the following HRQL's: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (86%), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 mental health (71.1%), SRS-22 total (87.6%), and major complication (53.4%). The single institution had lower percentages of improvement in ODI (24.6%), SRS-22 mental health (21.3%), SRS-22 total (25.1%), and lower presence of major complication (34.8%). The calculated Brier scores identified the calculator's predictability for each factor was as follows: ODI (0.24), SRS-22 mental health (0.21), SRS-22 total (0.25), and major complication (0.28). CONCLUSIONS: All of the variables had low Brier scores, indicating that the ISSG-ESSG calculator can be used as a predictive tool for ASD frail patients.

The Inherent Value of Preoperative Optimization-Absolute and Incremental Reduction in Components of Metabolic Syndrome Can Enhance Recovery and Minimize Perioperative Burden.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is an amalgamation of medical disorders that ultimately increase patient complications. Factors such as obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes are associated with this disease complex. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incremental value of improving MetS in relation to clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective spine surgery were isolated and separated into 2 groups: MetS patients (>2 metabolic variables: hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and triglycerides) and nonmetabolic patients (<2 metabolic variables). T tests and χ 2 tests compared differences in patient demographics. Resolution of metabolic factors was incrementally analyzed for their effect on perioperative complications through utilization of logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 2,855,517 elective spine patients were included. Of them, 20.1% had MeTS (81.4% two factors, 18.4% three factors, 0.2% four factors). MetS patients were older, less female, and more comorbid (P < 0.001). About 28.8% MetS patients developed more complications such as anemia (9.8% vs 5.9%), device related (3.5% vs 2.9%), neurologic (2.3% vs 1.4%), and bowel issues (9.7% vs 6.8 %; P < 0.05). Controlling for age and procedure invasiveness, having 3 MetS factors increased a patient's likelihood (0.89×) of developing a perioperative complication (P < 0.05), whereas 2 factors had lower odds (0.82). More specifically, patients who were diabetes, obese, and had hypertension had the greatest odds at developing a complication (0.58 [0.58-0.57]) followed by those who had concomitant hypertension, high triglycerides, and were obese (0.55 [0.63-0.48]; all P < 0.001). MetS patients with 2 factors, being obese and having hypertension produced the lowest odds at developing a complication (0.5 [0.61-0.43]; P < 0.001). These MetS patients also had a lower length of stay than those with 3 and 4 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic patients improved in perioperative complications incrementally, demonstrating the utility of efforts to mitigate burden of MetS even if not completely abolished. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This review contributes to the assessment of MetS optimization in the field of adult spine surgery.

Detection of Elder Abuse Among Orthopedic Patients.

Approximately 10% of US adults experience elder abuse, which often manifests as musculoskeletal and soft tissue injuries. The goal of our study was to determine the rate of elder abuse among orthopedic surgery patients and characterize which patients may be at an increased risk. National Inpatient Sample Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data from 2001 to 2015 were parsed with the Clinical Classifications Software tool. Patients 60 years and older were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), code for elder abuse. Primary orthopedic procedures and subsequent inpatient diagnoses and comorbidities were used to develop a binary logistic regression model to predict an elder's risk of abuse. Of a total of 20,532,211 admissions for an orthopedic procedure, 0.010% (2084) were classified as elder abuse. Patients with a classification of abuse more commonly were women (74.8% vs 60.6%) and from the lowest socioeconomic quartile by income (28.5% vs 21.7%). In addition, these patients had hospital stays that were twice as long (10.2 vs 5.3 days) and had higher admission mortality rates (4.4% vs 1.2%). No primary orthopedic procedures were associated with a higher risk of elder abuse. Nonorthopedic diagnoses made during admission that were associated with increased risk of abuse included superficial injury or contusion (odds ratio [OR], 3.252), chronic skin ulcer (OR, 3.119), nutritional deficiency (OR, 3.418), fluid and electrolyte disturbances (OR, 1.729), and delirium or dementia (OR, 2.210). The incidence of elder abuse among orthopedic surgery patients is significantly lower than national estimates. This finding warrants further investigation to determine whether it is a function of underreporting or differences in patient populations, given the 4-fold increase in mortality risk. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(1):50-56.].

Trends in physician reimbursements and procedural volumes for radiosurgery versus open surgery in brain tumor care: an analysis of Medicare data from 2009 to 2018.

OBJECTIVE: Given its minimally invasive nature and effectiveness, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a mainstay for the multimodal treatment of intracranial neoplasm. However, no studies have evaluated recent trends in the use of SRS versus those of open resection for the management of brain tumor or trends in the involvement of neurosurgeons in SRS (which is primarily delivered by radiation oncologists). Here, the authors used publicly available Medicare data from 2009 to 2018 to elucidate trends in the treatment of intracranial neoplasm and to compare reimbursements between these approaches. METHODS: By using CPT Professional 2019, the authors identified 10 open resection and 9 SRS codes (4 for neurosurgery and 5 for radiation oncology) for the treatment of intracranial neoplasm. Medicare payments (inflation adjusted) and allowed services (number of reimbursed procedures) for each code were abstracted from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Part B National Summary Data File (2009-2018). Payments per procedure and procedures per 100,000 Medicare enrollees were analyzed with linear regression and compared with tests for equality of slopes (α = 0.05). The average payment per procedure over the study period was compared by using the 2-tailed Welsh unequal variances t-test, and more granular comparisons were conducted by using ANOVA with post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) tests. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2018, the number of SRS treatments per 100,000 Medicare enrollees for intracranial neoplasm increased by 3.97 cases/year (R2 = 0.99, p < 0.001), while comparable open resections decreased by 0.34 cases/year (R2 = 0.85, p < 0.001) (t16 = 7.5, p < 0.001). By 2018, 2.6 times more SRS treatments were performed per 100,000 enrollees than open resections (74.9 vs 28.7 procedures). However, neurosurgeon involvement in SRS treatment declined over the study period, from 23.4% to 11.5% of SRS treatments; simultaneously, the number of lesions treated per session increased from 1.46 to 1.84 (R2 = 0.98, p < 0.001). Overall, physician payments from 2013 to 2018 averaged $1816.08 (95% CI $1788.71-$1843.44) per SRS treatment and $1565.59 (95% CI $1535.83-$1595.34) per open resection (t10 = 15.9, p < 0.001). For neurosurgeons specifically, reimbursements averaged $1566 per open resection, but this decreased to $1031-$1198 per SRS session; comparatively, radiation oncologists were reimbursed even less (average $359-$898) per SRS session (p < 0.05 according to the Tukey HSD test for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Over a decade, the number of open resections for intracranial neoplasm in Medicare enrollees declined slightly, while the number of SRS procedures increased greatly. This latter expansion is largely attributable to radiation oncologists; meanwhile, neurosurgeons have shifted their involvement in SRS toward sessions for the management of multiple lesions.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: How Does Social Media Influence Patients and Caregivers Seeking Information?

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a common orthopaedic condition affecting newborns. The rapid and vast adoption of social media has changed how we access medical information. The aim of this study was to deepen the understanding of the impact of social media as a tool used by caregivers. A search was performed on the Facebook (FB), Twitter (TW), and YouTube (YT) platforms. Information was quantitatively assessed by category, and number of posts and users. Comments and posts from the social medial platforms were then qualitatively assessed by using a thematic analysis. 16 Facebook pages and groups, 135 YouTube videos, and 5 Twitter accounts related to DDH were identified across 15 countries. A total of 25,471 comments/tweets were recorded. Across the social media platforms, the most common comments theme was "information sharing" (36.1%). Facebook groups had a significantly greater number of comments that were characterized as "social media as a second opinion" in comparison to YouTube videos (p < 0.001), whereas YouTube videos had significantly fewer comments characterized as "sharing information" in comparison to Facebook groups and Facebook pages (p < 0.0001). Orthopaedic surgeons may utilize caregiver presence on social media as an opportunity to help share accurate information and facilitate informed decision-making.

A Review of Orthopaedic Resident Case Logs to Identify Fluctuations in Exposure to Adult Orthopaedic Procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic surgery resident case exposure is an important component of surgical training and is monitored by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to ensure resident readiness for graduation. The purpose of this study was to investigate trends in exposure to adult orthopaedic surgical procedures and analyze the impact of the 2013 update in ACGME case logging expectations. METHODS: A retrospective review of ACGME case log data was conducted for adult orthopaedic procedures performed by graduating orthopaedic surgery residents from 2012 to 2020. Trends in the number of cases logged and the case share by anatomical location were investigated. Linear regression analysis was performed to analyze changes in case number over the 9-year period. RESULTS: For all surgical categories, there was stability in the average case number per resident from 2012 to 2013, followed by a precipitous decrease from 2013 to 2014. From 2014 to 2020, there has been a gradual increase in case number for all categories except "other musculoskeletal (MSK)," resulting in a total 46% recovery since the 2014 decline. Concomitant with the decline, there was a relative increase in pelvis/hip and femur/knee procedures and decrease in shoulder, other MSK, and spine procedures. From 2014 to 2020, shoulder, humerus/elbow, pelvis/hip, leg/ankle, foot/toes, and spine cases have gradually accounted for a larger proportion of total cases while femur/knee and "other MSK" cases have accounted for less. CONCLUSIONS: The 2013 update in ACGME case logging expectations was associated with a significant decrease in case number. This is likely a reflection of residents correctly entering 1 primary Current Procedural Terminology code for each surgical case. Programs should be aware of a general increase in case number since 2014 and acknowledge the fact that some procedure types may be given priority from a logging standpoint when multiple Current Procedural Terminology codes apply.

An ACGME-based comparison of neurosurgical and orthopedic resident training in adult spine surgery via a case volume and hours-based analysis.

OBJECTIVE: In a 2014 analysis of orthopedic and neurological surgical case logs published by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), it was reported that graduating neurosurgery residents performed more than twice the number of spinal procedures in their training compared with graduating orthopedic residents. There has, however, been no follow-up assessment of this trend. Moreover, whether this gap in case volume equates to a similar gap in procedural hours has remained unstudied. Given the association between surgical volume and outcomes, evaluating the status of this disparity has value. Here, the authors assess trends in case volume and procedural hours in adult spine surgery for graduating orthopedic and neurological surgery residents from 2014 to 2019. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ACGME case logs from 2014 to 2019 for graduating orthopedic and neurological surgery residents was conducted for adult spine surgeries. Case volume was converted to operative hours by using periprocedural times from the 2019 Medicare/Medicaid Physician Fee Schedule. Graduating residents' spinal cases and hours, averaged over the study period, were compared between the two specialties by using 2-tailed Welch's unequal variances t-tests (α = 0.05). Longitudinal trends in each metric were assessed by linear regression followed by cross-specialty comparisons via tests for equality of slopes. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2019, graduating neurosurgical residents logged 6.8 times as many spinal cases as their orthopedic counterparts, accruing 431.6 (95% CI 406.49-456.61) and 63.8 (95% CI 57.08-70.56) cases (p < 0.001), respectively. Accordingly, graduating neurosurgical residents logged 6.1 times as many spinal procedural hours as orthopedic surgery residents, accruing 1020.7 (95% CI 964.70-1076.64) and 166.6 (95% CI 147.76-185.35) hours (p < 0.001), respectively. Over these 5 years, both fields saw a linear increase in graduating residents' adult spinal case volumes and procedural hours, and these growth rates were higher for neurosurgery (+16.2 cases/year vs +4.4 cases/year, p < 0.001; +36.4 hours/year vs +12.4 hours/year, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Graduating neurosurgical residents accumulated substantially greater adult spinal case volumes and procedural hours than their orthopedic counterparts from 2014 to 2019. This disparity has been widened by a higher rate of growth in adult spinal cases among neurosurgery residents. Accordingly, targeted efforts to increase spinal exposure for orthopedic surgery residents-such as using cross-specialty collaboration-should be explored.

Cervical Spinal Fusion in Adult Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A National Analysis of Complications and 90-day Readmissions.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to utilize the National Readmission Database to determine the national estimates of complication and 90-day readmission rates associated with cervical spinal fusion in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: RA patients who undergo cervical spine surgery are known to be at high risk for readmissions, which are costly and may not be reimbursed by Medicare. METHODS: The National Readmission Database was queried for adults (>18 years) diagnosed with RA undergoing cervical spine fusion. Patient, operative, and hospital factors were assessed in bivariate analyses. Independent risk factors for readmissions were identified using stepwise multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2014, a total of 5597 RA patients (average age: 61.5 ±â€Š11.2 years, 70.9% female) underwent cervical spine fusion. A total of 691 (12.3%) patients were readmitted within 90 days (). Index inpatient complications included dysphagia (readmitted: 7.9% vs. non-readmitted: 5.1%; P = 0.003), urinary tract infection (UTI) (8.8% vs. 3.7%; P < 0.001), respiratory-related complications (7.6% vs. 3.4%; P < 0.001), and implant-related complications (5.4% vs. 2.7%; P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated the following as the strongest independent predictors for 90-day readmission: intraoperative bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6, P = 0.001), inpatient Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) (OR 4.1, P = 0.004), and patient discharge against medical advice (OR 33.5, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Readmission rates for RA patients undergoing cervical spine surgery are high and most often due to postoperative infection (septicemia, UTI, pneumonia, wound). Potential modifiable factors which may improve outcomes include minimizing intraoperative blood loses, postoperative DVT prophylaxis, and discharge disposition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Orthopedic Oncology.

The internet is increasingly used to access patient education materials. The average American reading level has been found to be that of a 7th- to 8th-grade student, prompting the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the American Medical Association (AMA) to advise that patient education materials be written between the 4th- to 6th-grade reading level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reading level of current patient education materials for the most common musculoskeletal oncological tumors. A Google search was performed with all location filters off to account for geographic variability for patient education materials related to 28 orthopedic primary or secondary tumors. All patient education articles from the first 10 website hits for each tumor type were analyzed. Patient education materials from these websites were evaluated using 8 validated readability scales. Patient resources were found to be written at an average grade level nearly double the NIH and AMA recommendation. Patient education materials for soft tissue chondromas were written at the highest level (14.8±1.9), whereas education materials for chordomas (10.1±1.0) most closely approached national recommendations, despite still being written at a readability level nearly 4 grade levels higher than has been recommended. The Flesch Reading Ease assessment provided a mean score of 46.5±7.7, corresponding with a "difficult to read" result. Current patient education materials regarding oncological musculoskeletal-related patient education materials are written significantly above the recommended reading level. Further modification of these resources is warranted to ensure adequate comprehension and informed decision making in the clinical setting. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(1):38-42.].

Postoperative negative pressure wound therapy is associated with decreased surgical site infections in all lower extremity amputations.

INTRODUCTION: We hypothesize that Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) is associated with a lower incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in lower extremity amputations (LEAs), a potentially devastating complication. METHODS: NSQIP database from 2011 to 2018 was queried to identify all-level LEAs. Cases using NPWT were identified. One-to-one nearest-neighbor propensity score matching was performed using a binary logistic regression on NPWT status controlling for patient comorbidities. RESULTS: NPWT was used in 133 of 5237 total LEAs (2.54%). Compared to propensity score-matched controls, they had significantly fewer SSIs (1.50% vs. 8.27%). CONCLUSIONS: NPWT was associated with lower incidence of SSI.

Complication rates following Chiari malformation surgical management for Arnold-Chiari type I based on surgical variables: A national perspective.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to identify complication trends of Chiari Malformation Type 1 patients (CM-1) for certain procedures and concomitant diagnoses on a national level. MATERIALS: The Kids' Inpatient Database was queried for diagnoses of operative CM-1 by International Classification of Disease-9 codes (348.4). Differences in preoperative demographics and perioperative complication rates between patient cohorts were assessed using Pearson's Chi-squared test and t-test when necessary. Binary logistic regression was utilized to find significant factors associated with complication rate. Certain surgical procedures were analyzed for their relationship with postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Thirteen thousand eight hundred and twelve CM-1 patients were identified with 8.2% suffering from a complication. From 2003 to 2012, the rate of complications for CM-1 pts decreased significantly (9.6%-5.1%) along with surgical rate (33.3%-28.6%), despite the increase in CM-1 diagnosis (36.3%-42.3%; all P < 0.05). CM-1 pts who had a complication were younger and had a lower invasiveness score; however, they had a larger Charlson Comorbidity Index than those who did not have a complication (all P < 0.05). CM-1 pts who experienced complications had a concurrent diagnosis of syringomyelia (7.1%), and also scoliosis (3.2%; all P < 0.05). CM-1 pts who did not have a complication had a greater rate of operation than those that had a complication (76.4% vs. 23.6% P < 0.05). The most common complications were nervous system related (2.8%), anemia (2.4%), and acute respiratory distress (2.1%). CM-1 pts that underwent an instrumented fusion (3.4% vs. 2.1%) had a greater complication rate as well as compared to those who underwent a craniotomy (23.2% vs. 19.1%; all P < 0.05). However, CM-1 pts that underwent a decompression had lower postoperative complications (21.3% vs. 28.9%; all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Chiari patients undergoing craniectomies as well as instrumented fusions are at a higher risk of postoperative complications especially when the instrumented fusions were performed on >4 levels.

Timing to surgery of Chiari malformation type 1 affects complication types: An analysis of 13,812 patients.

BACKGROUND: Chiari malformations (CM) are congenital defects due to hypoplasia of the posterior fossa with cerebellar herniation into the foramen magnum and upper spinal canal. Despite the vast research done on this neurological and structural syndrome, clinical features and management options have not yet conclusively evolved. Quantification of proper treatment planning, can lead to potential perioperative benefits based on diagnoses and days to procedure. This study aims to identify if early operation produces better perioperative outcomes or if there are benefits to delaying CM surgery. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: Assess outcomes for Chiari type I. METHODS: The KID database was queried for diagnoses of Chiari Malformation from 2003-2012 by icd9 codes (348.4, 741.0, 742.0, 742.2). Included patients: had complete time to procedure (TTP) data. Patients were stratified into 7 groups by TTP: Same-day as admission (SD), 1-day delay (1D), 2-day delay (2D), 3-day delay (3D), 4-7 days delay (4-7D), 8-14 days delay (8-14D), >14 days delay (>14D). Differences in pre-operative demographics (age/BMI) and perioperative complication rates between patient cohorts were assessed using Pearson's chi-squared tests and T-tests. Surgical details, perioperative complications, length of stay (LOS), total charges, and discharge disposition was compared. Binary logistic regressions determined independent predictors of varying complications (reference: same-day). RESULTS: 13,812 Chiari type I patients were isolated from KID (10.12 ± 6.3, 49.2F%, .063 ± 1.3CCI). CM-1 pts were older (10.12 yrs vs 3.62 yrs) and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Score (0.62 vs 0.53; all P < 0.05). Procedure rates: 27.8% laminectomy, 28.3% decompression, and 2.2% spinal fusion. CM-1 experienced more complications (61.2% vs 37.9%) with the most common being related to the nervous system (2.8%), anemia (2.4%), acute respiratory distress disorder (2.1%), and dysphagia (1.2%). SD was associated with the low length of stay (5.3 days vs 9.5-25.2 days, P < 0.001), total hospital charges ($70,265.44 vs $90, 945.33-$269, 193.26, P < 0.001) when compared to other TTP groups. Relative to SD, all delay groups had significantly increased odds of developing postoperative complications (1D-OR: 1.29 [1.1- 1.6] → 8-14D-OR: 4.77[3.4-6.6]; all P < 0.05), more specifically, nervous system (1D-OR: 1.8 [1.2-2.5] → 8-14D-OR: 3.3 [1.8-6.2]; all P < 0.05).Sepsis complications were associated with a delay of at least 3D(2.5[1.4-4.6]) while respiratory complications (6.2 [3.1-12.3]) and anemia (2 [1.1-3.5]) were associated with a delay of at least 8-14D (all P < 0.05).

An Analysis of Trends in National Residency Matching Program Match Data for Orthopedic Surgery.

Due to electronic residency applications, US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores are frequently used by orthopedic surgery program directors to screen applicants. Prospective applicants therefore often use Step 1 scores as a proxy for specialty competitiveness. The goal of this investigation was two-fold: (1) to determine whether trends in Step 1 scores are indicative of trends in competitiveness of orthopedic surgery and (2) to report the characteristics that optimize a US medical student's match success. A retrospective review of published National Resident Matching Program data from 2009 to 2018 was performed for orthopedic surgery residency applicants. Additional data from the Charting Outcomes reports were used for specific analyses of applicant characteristics. From 2009 to 2018, the number of orthopedic surgery residency positions grew at an annual rate of 1.51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37% to 1.64%; P<.001), accommodating the 1.26% (95% CI, 0.63% to 1.90%; P=.006) annual increase in the number of applicants who ranked orthopedic surgery as their preferred specialty choice (only choice or first choice). There were no significant changes in the applicant-to-position ratio (95% CI, -0.85% to 0.37%; P=.483) or the match rate for US seniors who ranked orthopedic surgery as their preferred choice (95% CI, -0.23% to 0.87%; P=.313). Increases in mean Step 1 scores of matched orthopedic surgery applicants parallel national Step 1 growth trends (0.49% vs 0.44%, respectively). Although orthopedic surgery is currently a competitive specialty to match into, this has been the case since 2009. Increasing Step 1 scores of matched applicants is not unique to orthopedic surgery and should not be misinterpreted as a proxy for increasing competitiveness of the specialty. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):e616-e622.].

Risk assessment of hypertension in carotid body surgeries: A NSQIP analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Carotid body tumors (CBT) are rare paragangliomas of the carotid body at the carotid bifurcation. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of hypertension on outcomes in carotid body tumor surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective database review. METHODS: Data on carotid body resections performed from 2005 to 2014 were drawn from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement database. Two groups were created based on the presence of preoperative hypertension. These groups were analyzed for demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications using bivariate and multivariate methods. RESULTS: Of the 452 patients included in the analysis, 49.3% had hypertension. Those with hypertension were significantly more likely to have additional comorbidities, which were controlled for by multivariate analysis to focus on hypertension. These hypertensive patients also had significantly longer hospital stays. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with hypertension undergoing carotid body resections had increased risk for overall medical complications but did not have increased risk for postoperative surgical complications or specific medical complications CONCLUSION: This statistically robust study revealed that hypertension does not independently increase a patient's risk for specific postoperative surgical complications following a carotid body tumor resection. However, hypertension increases the risk for postoperative medical complications and longer hospital stays. It is notable that almost half of all CBT patients have hypertension, and these hypertensives patients are significantly more likely to carry additional comorbid conditions that may have an adverse effect on outcomes including overall medical complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130: 2008-2012, 2020.