RESUMEN
Despite the potential for improved patient care, little is known of the true effect of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) on patient outcomes in resource-limited settings. Electronic databases were searched using medical subject heading and free text terms related to POCUS and resource-limited settings through August 2020. Two authors independently selected studies, assessed methodological quality using the Downs and Black scale and extracted data. Twenty observational studies were included in the final review. All studies had moderate to high risk of bias. No studies exhibited an effect on the pre-specified primary outcome of mortality. Varying degrees of change in differential diagnosis and management were reported, but definitions varied widely among studies. Estimates for change in diagnosis as a result of POCUS ranged from 15% to 52%, and those for change in management, from 17% to 87%. Articles on POCUS clinical utility represent a small part (4.6%) of the scholastic literature dedicated to POCUS in low-resource settings. POCUS is a valuable intervention to consider in resource-limited settings, with the potential to change diagnosis and patient management. The exact magnitude of effect remains unknown. There is a continued need for large-scale experimental studies to investigate the effect of POCUS on patient diagnosis, management and mortality.